92-35 PROTECTING CITY ROADS ABUTTING BODIES OF SALT WATERAmended 8-7-92 RESOLUTION N0.92- 35
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WASHINGTON,
RECOGNIZING, PROTECTING, AND MAINTAINING THE USE OF CITY ROADS
AND ROADENDS ABUTTING BODIES OF SALT WATER ON BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
WHEREAS, Access to public shorelines is limited in the City of
Bainbridge Island (the City); and
WHEREAS, City roads and roadends may provide suitable public access
to the shoreline; and
WHEREAS, Roadends are a valuable and protected resource for access
to the shoreline and should be considered to have value as well for marine
education, history, water rescue, fire safety, environmental issues,
viewpoints, and a variety of recreational purposes; and
WHEREAS, Public access to the water via verified City roadends is
encouraged and supported by the City; and
WHEREAS, RCW 35.79.035 prohibits a city or town from vacating any
road which abuts a body of salt or fresh water unless the street or road is
not currently used or is not suitable for use as a port facility, beach or
water access purposes, boat moorage or launching sites, or for park,
viewpoint, recreational, educational or other purposes; and
WHEREAS, Public use of and access to shorelines is a high priority,
warranting shoreline preservation and enhancement; and
WHEREAS, A goal of the City is to protect and enhance public access
to shorelines as well as to safeguard the rights ,of private property owners
adjacent to public shoreline access points; and
WHEREAS, Activities on the shoreline must be consistent with the
goals, policies and regulations in the City's Shoreline Master Program and
RCW 58.17 the State Shoreline Management Act; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE
AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. Road End Committee.
The City Council of the City of Bainbridge Island, Washington,
shall appoint a Roadend Committee (Committee) to evaluate all public
roadends to determine the best use of each.
Section 2. Committee Purpose.
The committee shall consist of 7 members and shall accomplish
its purpose in 3 years.
Section 3. Committee Schedule.
The committee shall first adopt a procedure and schedule for
completing its task including establishing priorities for examining the
roadends.
Section 4. Committee Procedures.
The committee will use the following procedure for
evaluating each roadend:
A. Identify the exact boundaries of the road end
and any encroachment that may have occurred;
B. Investigate the topography, history, and use;
Conduct a public hearing regarding the past history and
potential future use. Public hearings for more than one road
end may be combined at the discretion of the Committee.
Publish notice of each public hearing at least 10 days prior to
the hearing and mail notice to adjoining property owners within
300 feet of the roadend(s);
E. The committee shall issue a written decision to the City
Administrator and those persons who request a copy;
Section 5. Decision Criteria.
The Committee shall decide the type of public access which will
be allowed, the type of signage that will be erected, and recommend
improvements to be made to the roadend based on the following criteria:
A. The location, size, and nature of ownership of
the roadend.
B. The ownership of the adjacent tidelands.
C. The location of existing homes and potential for adequately
identifying the boundaries of the public right-of-way.
D. The ease of access and the availability of parking.
E. The concerns and recommendations of the nearby property
owners and the general public.
Whether the public access areas will be a comfortable place to
visit, that is, will visitors feel they "belong". This feeling
can be reinforced by signing, but signs cannot overcome the
negative effects of inadequate space and design deficiencies.
Whether there should be a physical separation of the public and
private space so the public clearly will know the extent of its
domain and know it is not infringing on private rights. This
separation can be achieved by adequate space and screening, such
as plantings or fences.
Whether the public space is of sufficient size to allow passage
and allow the visitors to stop, linger, and contemplate the
setting.
-2-
Whether there is an attraction, like a scenic view, which will
draw people to the site, although the mere presence of water may
be sufficient.
J. Whether the road end presents a potential danger to public
safety.
If the committee determines that public access to the roadend should
be discouraged or restricted, the Committee shall forward its
recommendation to the Council for a decision.
Section 6. Signs..
All roadends shall be identified by signs appropriate to each
location. Signing should be consistent in size and scale with
the location and nature of the road end and supporting
facilities including parking. All signs must comply with the
provisions of the City Sign Code BIMC 15.08. Signs may include
information about permitted and/or prohibited uses including
ownership of tidelands; hours of use; and other limits on access
(for example, "pedestrian use only", "tidelands are/are not
public property" or "no vehicle turnaround").
B·, Where encroachment has occurred or the boundaries of public
access have been obscured in any way, the boundaries shall be
clearly identified in order to protect adjacent landowners from
trespass and to preserve the rights of the public to access.
Section 7· Improvements.
Any modification (beyond signing and/or the cutting or removal
of vegetation) of a roadend to facilitate public use or access
to water is considered an improvement.
Recommendations for improvements shall be made to the City
Administrator or City Council for review, approval and funding
as appropriate.
Section 8. Other Considerations.
Although the public may occasionally abuse the right of public
access in ways that annoy adjoining property owners this shall
not by itself be a sufficient basis to deny to other members of
the public their right to enjoy access to the water from Ci~y
road or roadends.
The same decision criteria shall be applied in reviewing each
roadend even though some persons may perceive other nearby
facilities to be more suitable.
-3-
No private person shall be allowed to erect or maintain
artificial or natural barriers which restrict the public right
to reach the water from City roads abutting the water; and
No private person shall be allowed to maintain signs or other
designations which incorrectly imply to members of the public
that its right of access to the water from a verified City
roadend is denied.
If a City roadend is designated by the Committee to provide
access to public tidelands of sufficient size for recreational
purpose, the Committee shall recommend to the City Council
appropriate improvements to enhance public access to the
tidelands.
Section 9. Appeals.
The Committee's decision may be appealed to the City Council.
The City Council may, at its discretion, refer the appeal to a Committee of
the Council for a recommendation. All appeals shall be in writing and state
specific reasons for appealing the Roadend Committee's decision. All
appeals shall be accompanied by the appeal fee specified in City Resolution
and must be submitted within 15 days of the Committee's decision. Notice of
appeal hearings will be published at least 10 days in advance. All appeals
will be on the record.
Section 10. Reporting.
The Committee will report to the City Council at least semi-
annually on its activities.
PASSED by the City Council this 6th day of ~lst
, 1992·
APPROVED by the Mayor this 10th day of
ATTEST~~5~~TE:
RALPH W. EELLS, Finance Director
1992.
SAM
-4-