RES 88-13 GREENHOUSE HILL APPEALRESOLUTION NO. 88-13
A RESOLUTION ADOPTING THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY
OF WINSLOW, WASHINGTON, FINDING OF FACTS, CONCLUSIONS
OF LAW AND DENIAL OF APPLICATION IN THE MATTER OF THE
GREENHOUSE HILL APPEAL.
WHEREAS, this matter came before the City Council of
the City of Winslow, Washington, on April 21, 1988, at 7:00
P.M. for consideration of an appeal. At issue was whether
a conditional use permit should be granted to allow commercial
parking north of Winslow Way East and Ferncliff Avenue, and
whether the development proposal meets the applicable planned
unit development criteria; and
WHEREAS the appeal hearing was concluded,
NOW THEREFORE, the City Council of the City of Winslow,
Washington hereby resolves as follows:
Section 1. The Findings of Fact and Conclusions of Law
and denial of application is adopted and attached as Exhibit A.
RESOLVED THIS 5th day of May , 1988.
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
ALICE B. TAWRESEY, Mayor
Before the
City Council
CITY OF WINSLOW
In the Matter of the )
Greenhouse Hill PUD )
Application for a Planned Unit )
Development/Conditional Use Permit, )
New Bainbridge )
Development Partnership, Applicant )
File No. 10-01-87-1
FINDINGS OF FACT,
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW,
AND DENIAL OF
APPLICATION
This matter came before the city council for the City of
Winslow, on April 21, 1988 at 7:00 P.M. for consideration of an
appeal. At issue was whether a conditional use permit should be
granted to allow commercial parking north of Winslow Way East and
Ferncliff Avenue, and whether the development proposal meets the
applicable planned unit development criteria. Applicant was
represented by Wilbur and Dorothy Nystrom, attorney David Bendell
of Sequim, Wa., and representatives of New Bainbridge Development
Partnership, including architect Miles Yanick.
The appeal hearing was concluded.
The council having voted in open session 3 - 2 to deny the
application, pursuant to Winslow City Code Section 2.16.070 and
2.16.080, it now, in order to demonstrate its reasons for denial,
From the testimony, the exhibits admitted
and the exhibits within the public file, makes
following:
at the hearing,
and enters the
FINDINGS OF FACT
1. Those findings of fact
Hearing Examiner filed March 3,
city council's findings of fact.
made by the City of Winslow
1988 shall be adopted as
2. The decision of the Hearing Examiner to deny the
Conditional Use Permit shall be affirmed, for the reasons
set forth in her opinion of March 3, 1988.
3. The recommendation of the Hearing Examiner to deny the
Planned Unit Development is accepted and affirmed, for the
reasons set forth in her opinion of March 3, 1988.
From the Foregoing, the Council
makes the following:
CONCLUSIONS OF LAW
Based on the conclusions set forth by the Hearing Examiner
in her opinion of March 3, 1988, which shall be adopted as city
council's conclusions, the application should be denied.
Dated this 5th day of May, 1988
Attest:
v~o Form
City Attorney