RES 89-24 WASTE REDUCTION AND RECYCLINGRESOLUTION NO. 89-24
A RESOLUTION OF THE CITY OF WINSLOW, NASHINGTON, SUPPORTING
THE SUBMII~fAL OF A GRANT APPLICATION TO THE DEPARIMMqT OF
ECOLOGY FOR A COUNTY-WIDE PLAN FOR WASTE REDUCTION/OR RECYCLING.
WHEREAS, the Deparhlent of Ecology has a total of $1,037,500,
available for program design projects.
WHEREAS, grants will be made for up to 85% of the total eligible
project costs, pursuant to RCW 43.83-A, or for a maximum of $100,000,
per project,
WHEREAS, projects eligible for funding are those that will result
in inplementable program designs that neet the waste reduction and/or
recycling needs of geographical areas,
WHEREAS, Kitsap County receives a user fee frcm the operators of
the ladfills in the County for each cubic yard placed in the sites and
the fee is used for County-wide solid waste needs,
WHEREAS, there is a need for a County-wide plan for recycling
and/or waste reduction,
WHEREAS, grant applications for preimplementation program designs
must be received by June 9, 1989, to receive consideration in the first
round of awards,
NON, THEREFORE, THE MAYOR AND CITY CCITNCIL OF THE CITY OF WINSIDW,
WASHINGTON, DO RESOLVE AS FOLLCIWS:
Section 1. ~he County should act as lead agency for a regional
plan using monies collected through the County-wide user fee to pay for the
grant matching requirement.
Section 2. Tne County is authorized to prepare a plan with the
City of Winslow as part of the County-wide plan for Waste Reduction and/or
Recycling Project.
ATi'EST/AUTHENTICATE:
AT,TCE B. TAWRESEY, Mayor/7~a<z~'~/
ROBERT O. CONOLEY, C~i~y
KITSAP COUNTY
SOLID WASTE REDUCTION/RECYCLING PLAN
DRAFT
SCOPE OF WORK
1. INTRODUCTION/PURPOSE
PLANNING AREA BACKGROUND
a)
Waste composition/recyclables characterization
1) Transfer station
2) Curbside residential
b)
Service area determination
1) Urban
2) Suburban
3) Rural
c) Existing waste
facilities
reduction/recycling
programs
and
RECYCLING SERVICES ALTERNATIVES
a)
Urban/Suburban
l)
2)
4)
5)
6)
Curbside collection
Apartment collection
Drop-off centers
Buy-back centers
Yard waste collection
Commercial waste collection
b)
Rural
1) Multi-material drop-off centers
2) Yard waste drop-off boxes
3) Modified/limited curbside collection
WASTE REDUCTION ALTERNATIVES
~)
b)
c)
Conservation education
Educational tools
Government in-house reduction/recycling programs
TECHNICAL ANALYSIS
~)
b)
Methods of handling, processing
recyclables
Suitability for each area
1) Character of each area
2) Preferences of area residents
and collecting
ECONOMIC ANALYSIS
a)
b)
C)
Revenues from recyclables
Avoided disposal costs
Comparison of recycling
collection and disposal costs
costs to present waste
EVALUATION OF SYSTEM ALTERNATIVES
a)
b)
Flexibility in design and operation for each area
Costs comparison
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
a)
b)
c)
d)
Financing
Flow control
Administration/coordination
Public involvement
Enforcement
RECOMMENDATIONS
a)
Waste reduction/recycling
each area
Program costs by area
Implementation schedule
program
recommendations for