WALLACE COTTAGES PLN50589 HEX OFFICIAL RECORD
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 1 of 24
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER
FOR THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
In the Matter of the Application of ) No. PLN 50589 SUB
)
David Smith, Central Highlands, Inc. ) Wallace Cottages Housing Design
) Demonstration Project Subdivision
)
) FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS,
For Approval of a Preliminary Plat ) AND DECISION
SUMMARY OF DECISION
The request for a preliminary plat to subdivide four lots, totaling approximately 2.5 acres, into 19
lots, as a Tier 2 Housing Design Demonstration Project, at Wallace Way, between Madison
Avenue and Nakata Avenue, is APPROVED. Conditions are necessary to mitigate specific
impacts of the proposed development.
SUMMARY OF RECORD
Hearing:
The Hearing Examiner held an open record hearing on the request on April 20, 2018. At the
outset of the hearing, Stephen Crampton entered into the record a claim of ownership of a
portion of the property submitted by the Applicant for subdivision. Following a recital of
applicable law by the Hearing Examiner, including an expression of concern about the
advisability of processing the application if property ownership is disputed, the Applicant
conceded that the property claimed by Mr. Crampton would be transferred to him so that the
hearing could continue without a disputed ownership claim. The Hearing Examiner issued a
Memorandum on Adverse Possession Claim to the Applicant, Mr. Crampton, and to the City of
Bainbridge Island (City), dated April 23, 2018, requesting that these parties resolve the claim of
ownership. The parties notified the Hearing Examiner that a settlement agreement has been
reached, and the City determined that the application should be approved without further
modification of conditions.
As a separate action, the City subsequently determined that some properties were inadvertently
omitted from the original notice of application, SEPA comment period, and notice of public
hearing. The City provided additional public notice, and the hearing was continued to July 11,
2018, to take testimony from those who had not been notified of the initial hearing.
Testimony:
The following individuals testified under oath at the initial April 20, 2018, open record hearing:
Kelly Tayara, Associate City Planner
David Smith, Applicant
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 2 of 24
Stephen Crampton
Doug Hotchkiss
Steve Matthews
Venera Di Bella Bar les
Debbie Hollyer
Attorney Hayes Gori represented the Applicant
The following individuals testified under oath at the July 11, 2018, open record hearing:
Kelly Tayara, Associate City Planner
Peter Corelis, P.E., City Development Engineer
Sanjay Bhatt
Stephanie Farwell
Steve Matthews
Stephen Crampton
Barbara Hotchkin
Kevin Curran
Loanne Harmeling
Attorney Hayes Gori represented the Applicant
Exhibits:
The following exhibits were admitted into the record:1
1. Staff Recommendation, dated July 3, 2018
2. Preliminary plat maps
a. Draft homeowners’ association agreement (Sheet 1 of 7), dated April 18,
2017
b. Legal descriptions (Sheet 2 of 7), dated April 18, 2017
c. Minimum Building Separation and Setbacks (Shee t 3 of 7), dated April
18, 2017
d. Revised preliminary plat (Sheet 4 of 7), dated April 10, 2018
e. Revised preliminary plat (Sheet 5 of 7), dated April 10, 2018
f. Revised preliminary plat (Sheet 6 of 7), dated April 10, 2018
1 As part of the continued July 11, 2018, hearing, City staff made changes to the exhibit list
presented at the April 20th hearing: The revised Staff Recommendation is now listed as Exhibit 1,
rather than Exhibit 27. The land use application is now listed as Exhibit 11, rather than Exhibit 1.
The Notice of Application and SEPA Comment Period is now added to Exhibit 23, rather than
Exhibit 11. The Notice of Public Hearing is now part of Exhibit 23, rather than Exhibit 26.
Additional public notice material has been added to Exhibit 23. The Hearing Examiner
Memorandum regarding an Adverse Possession Claim is now Exhibit 26. The Crampton
Settlement Agreement is now Exhibit 27. An email from Stephen Crampton to PCD, dated April
19, 2018, is Exhibit 28. The April 12, 2018, Staff Recommendation is now Exhibit 29.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 3 of 24
g. Revised preliminary plat (Sheet 7 of 7), dated April 10, 2018
3. Utility plans
a. Utility Plan (C1 - 1 of 5)
b. Utility Plan – South (C2 - 2 of 5)
c. Wallace East Plan, Profile & Sections (C3 - 3 of 5)
d. Loganberry Rd Plan, Profiles & Sections (C4 - 4 of 5)
e. L.I.D. Site Assessment Plan (C5 – 5 of 5)
4. Preliminary Utility Report, Seabold Engineering, LLC, dated April 26, 2017
5. Landscape Plan, revised April 12, 2018
6. Traffic Impact Analysis, Heath & Associates, Inc., dated July 2017
7. Lot Closures, Job No. 17-6173, dated January 17, 2018
8. Subdivision Guarantee, First American Title, received April 9, 2018
9. Open Space Management Plan, Central Highlands, Inc., dated April 10, 2018
10. Environmental SEPA Checklist , with staff response, dated April 20, 2017
11. Master Land Use Application, received April 27, 20017; with Owner/Agent Agreement,
dated December 5, 2016
12. Ordinance 2018-04, Duane Lane Right -of-Way Vacation, effective March 6, 2018
13. Public Benefit, Development and Permit Processing Agreement (Ohrt, CCHD, Mattis,
and City), dated March 15, 2018
14. Public Benefit, Development and Permit Processing Agreement (Central Highlands,
Wallace, Madison, and City), dated March 16, 2018
15. Madison Avenue Access Agreement (Ohrt, Madison Landings Company, CCHD, Central
Highlands, and Wallace Cottages), dated March 16, 2018
16. Developer Agreement Map, undated
17. BIMC 2.16.020.Q; Tables 2.16.020.Q-1, Q-2 and Q-3 (Source: Ord. 2016-27)
18. Letter from Kelly Ta yara to Central Highlands, Inc., dated April 6, 2017; with City
Preliminary Notification of Qualification, undated, with attachments
19. Wallace Cottages – Vision Statement , with attachments; Built Green Single-
Family/Townhome New Construction Checklist, received April 27, 2017
20. Table 2.16.020.Q-3 Innovative Site Development Scoring Method, with staff scoring,
undated
21. Memo from Assistant Chief Luke Carpenter, Fire Marshal, to Kelly Tayara, dated May
17, 2017
22. Memorandum from Peter Corelis, P.E., to Kelly Tayara, dated March 7, 2018
23. Public Notices
Notice of Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS), issued March 22, 2018
Notice of Application and SEPA Comment Period; with Certificate of Posting, dated
June 6, 2017
Notice of Public Hearing, dated March 30, 2018; with Memorandum from Kelly Tayar a
to Jane Rasely regarding hearing notice, dated March 19, 2018; with Affidavit of Notice
24. Public comments
a. Submitted May 11, 2017 – April 10, 2018
b. Submitted after April 10, 2018
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 4 of 24
25. Planning Commission Regularly Scheduled Meeting Minutes, Thursday, February 8,
2018; Planning Commission Regularly Scheduled Meeting Minutes, Thursday, February
22, 2018
26. Hearing Examiner Memorandum re: Adverse Possession Claim, dated April 23, 2018
27. Settlement Agreement, signed by Stephen Crampton and David Smith, dated May 11,
2018
28. Email from Stephen Crampton to PDC, dated April 18, 2018
29. Staff Recommendation, dated April 12, 2018
30. Memorandum from Kelly Tayara to the City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner,
dated May 25, 2018
31. Written comments of Sanjay Bhatt, presented at hearing on July 11, 2018
32. Planning Commission Regularly Scheduled Meeting Minutes, Thursday, February 8,
2018; Planning Commission Regularly Scheduled Meeting Minutes, Thursday, February
22, 2018, with attachments
33. Written comments of Steve Matthews, with attached news article, presented at hearing on
July 11, 2018
The Hearing Examiner enters the following findings and conclusions based upon the testimony
at the open record hearing and admitted exhibits:
FINDINGS
Application and Notice
1. David Smith, Central Highlands, Inc. (Applicant), requests approval of a preliminary plat
application to subdivide four lots, totaling approximately 2.5 acres, into 19 lots, as a Tier
2 Housing Design Demonstration Project.2 The development is located at Wallace Way,
between Madison Avenue and Nakata Avenue.3 Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page
1; Exhibit 2; Exhibit 3; Exhibit 5.
2. The City of Bainbridge Island (City) determined the application was complete on May
30, 2017.4 Since this date, the City has adopted a Landmark Tree Ordinance, as well as a
2 The proposed project is one of a group of developments that are the subject of four agreements
between the City and two developers. In addition to Wallace Cottages, the agreements involve
Madison Gr ove, Madison Place, The Reserve at Winslow, the Winslow Grove (all subdivisions), and
Madison Landing (a multifamily project). Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 2.
3 The preliminary plat identifies the property by Tax Assessor Parcel Nos. 272502-1-023-2005;
272502-1-153-2007; 272502-1-154-2006; and 272502-1-155-2005. A legal description of the
property is provided on the preliminary plat map. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 2;
Exhibit 2.b.
4 The City gave the Applicant preliminary notification that the project qualified for the Housing
Design Demonstration Project Program on April 6, 2017. Exhibit 27, Staff Recommendation, page
5.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 5 of 24
building moratorium, which the City determined do not apply to this application. The
City issued a combined Notice of Application/SEPA Comment Period, with a publication
date of June 2, 2017, and a comment deadline of June 16, 2017. The Planning
Commission held a public meeting on February 22, 2018. The City issued a Notice of
Public Hearing with a publication date of March 30, 2018. Because some properties were
inadvertently omitted from the original notice and comment period, the City issued a
combined Notice of Application/SEPA Comment Period and Public Hearing on June 1,
2018, with a comment deadline of June 15, 2018. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation,
pages 5 and 9; Exhibit 23.
Prior to the meeting of the Planning Commission on February 22, 2018, the City received
numerous comment s. These included expressions of opposition to making Wallace Way
a two-way street between Grow Avenue and Madison Avenue North, opposition to
vacating Duane Lane, and opposition to extending Wallace Way NW east of Nakata. The
Planning Commission passed a motion that recommended denial of the Wallace Cottages
proposal status as a HDDP project, stating that the proposal is not consistent with the
Co mprehensive Plan or the goals and purposes of the HDDP. The Planning Commission
noted concerns with the proposal, including traffic impacts, public safety impacts on
surrounding neighborhoods resulting from the proposed traffic access from Wallace Way
NW to Grow Avenue, tree retention issues, and lack of suitable open space. In response
to the concerns expressed by the Planning Commission, the City planning staff
determined that open space regulations would not apply to a HDDP project and that tree
retention in open space is not required. The Applicant addressed the concern of the
Planning Commission about traffic impacts by entering into agreements t hat provide
access solely from Madison Avenue North. This action occurred before the open record
hearing on the application and before additional notice of that hearing was given by the
City. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 6 through 10; Exhibit 12 through 15;
Exhibit 24; Exhibit 25.
State Environmental Policy Act
3. The City acted as lead agency and analyzed the environmental impacts of the proposal, as
required by the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), Chapter 43.21C Revised Code
of Washington (RCW). The City reviewed the Applicant’s environmental checklist and
other information on file and determined that the proposal would not have a probable
significant adverse impact on the environment. The Applicant’s Environmental Checklist
did not identify any birds, mammals, or fish as observed or known to be on or near the
site. The City identified birds on or near the site, but noted that no threatened or
endangered species are known to be on or near the site. No critical areas, such as
wetlands or steep slopes, were identified.
The City issued a Notice of Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) on
March 22, 2018, with a comment and appeal deadline of April 5, 2018. On June 26,
2018, the City issued a Notice of Withdrawal of Mitigated Determination of
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 6 of 24
Nonsignificance and New SEPA MDNS, with a comment and appeal deadline of July 10,
2018. To mitigate recreation and transportation impacts, the MDNS contains a condition
requiring construction of a four-foot-high fence, with a gate, along the perimeter of the
northern open space. No appeals of the SEPA threshold determination were filed.
Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 5; Exhibit 10; Exhibit 20.
Comprehensive Plan and Zoning
4. The proposed residential lots are located in the Urban Comprehensive Plan designation.
The property is within the Winslow Master Plan Secondary Study Area. City staff
identified Comprehensive Plan goals and policies that are relevant to the proposal,
including Land Use Element Goal LU-5, to focus urban development in designated
centers, and Goal LU-6, to ensure a development pattern that reduces the conversion of
undeveloped land into sprawling development . Additional goals and policies identified
by the City include: Housing Element Goal HO-6 (to facilitate diverse affordable housing
stock); Transportation Element Goal TR-8 (to consider the special needs of neig hborhood
safety, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit use and facilities, and traffic flow in the
development of transportation improvements that affect neighborhoods); and Cultural
Element Goal CUL-3 (to preserve places where the Island’s history can be experienced,
interpreted, and shared with the general public). Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages
4 and 5.
5. The property is split-zoned, with the proposed residential lots located in the residential
portion R-4.3 zone. A flagpole portion of existing tax Lot 272502-1-023-2005 extends as
access east to Madison Avenue North within the City’s Mixed Use Town Center-
Madison Avenue Overlay District (MUTC-MAD). The municipal code includes Table
18.12.020-1, identified as the Flexlot Subdivision Dimensional Standards for Residential
Zone Districts, with a minimum lot size of 5,000 square feet . It requires a minimum lot
width of 50 feet; a base density of one lot per 10,200 square feet; a maximum lot
coverage of 25 percent; building to building (on-site) setbacks at a minimum of 10 feet;
building to exterior subdivision boundary line setbacks of five feet; a building to right-of-
way setback of 10 feet; and a building to Open Space setback of 10 feet. Exhibit 1, Staff
Recommendation, pages 2, 3, 7, 13, 14, and 21.
6. The purpose of the Mixed Use Town Center zone is to implement the Mixed Use Town
Center sections of the comprehensive plan. The Mixed Use Town Center is intended to
strengthen the vitality of downtown Winslow as a place for people to live, shop, and
work; to provide a strong residential component in the area; and to encourage a lively
community during both the day and night. Bainbridge Island Municipal Code (BIMC)
18.06.030.A. The purpose of the Madison Avenue overlay district is to provide for a mix
of residential and small-scale nonresidential development. Within the Madison Avenue
overlay district, all retail and office development must include a residential component.
Retail development is permitted only on the ground floor . Resident ial development is
only required for buildings greater than one story in height. BIMC 18.06.030.A.3. All
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 7 of 24
single-family residential subdivisions are subject to design under the City’s Flexible Lot
design requirements in Titles 17 and 18 BIMC. The City determined that the proposal is
subject to the City’s Open Space Standards (BIMC 17.12.030), General Residential
Subdivision Standard (BMC 17.12.040), and Flexible Lot Dimensional Standards (BIMC
Table 18.12.020-1). BIMC 2.16.020.Q provides that development standards in BIMC
Titles 17 and 18 may be modified as part of a Housing Design Demonstration Project
(HDDP). Single-family use is permitted in the R-4.3 zone. Adjacent properties are
within the Urban Comprehensive Plan designation with properties to the north, east, and
zone within the R-4.3 zone, and properties to the east zoned MUTC-MAD. Exhibit 1,
Staff Recommendation pages 2, 11, and 12.
7. The purpose of the HDDP is to allow the development of housing design demonstration
projects that increase the variety of housing choices available to residents across
underserved portions of the socio -economic spectrum, and to promote compact, low-
impact development where it is most appropriate. The HDDP program is intended to
encourage innovation in building design, site development, and “green” building
practices. The goals of this program are to increase the housing supply and the choice of
housing styles available in the community; to promote socio -economic diversity by
adding to the stock of income-qualified housing; to encourage development of smaller
homes in neighborhoods attractive to a mix of income and age levels; and to demonstrate
that innovative design and building techniques (conserving water and energy, using
sustainably sourced materials, limiting environmental impacts) are compatible with
market considerations. BIMC 2.16.020.Q; Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 2.
8. Utilizing the HDDP, the Applicant seeks relief from density, setback, lot size, lot
coverage, open space, and road standard requirements that would otherwise apply to a
subdivision of land. City staff determined that the open space requirements in BIMC
17.12.030 would be modified by HDDP incentives, which require that the project
integrate at least 400 square feet of open space per unit in the R-4.3 zone. BIMC
2.16.l020.Q.7.c. The City determined that the effective amount of open space is
approximately 15,000 square feet or 790 square feet per lot. This meets the City’s open
space requirements, as modified by the HDDP program. Exhibit 1, Staff
Recommendation, page 11.
9. A Tier 2 HDDP project in the R-4.3 zone is eligible for a density bonus up to two times
the base density. The project must provide 10 percent of the units as affordable housing,
as defined in BIMC 18.36.030, and density may not exceed base density for the R-8
district . The project must achieve LEED Silver, BuiltGreen 4 or Evergreen Sustainable
Development certification; it must achieve at least 25 points in the Innovative Site
Development category and at least 12 points in the Housing Diversity category; and it
must limit home size to 1,600 square feet. The City determined that the project would
exceed the minimum points in the Innovative Site Development category and that the
open space exceeds the HDDP program requirements. City staff also determined that the
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 8 of 24
proposed project meets the Housing Diversity requirements, with no residences more
than 1,600 square feet and with a variety of unit types, including duplexes, age-in-place
homes, and two -story residences. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 15, 16, and
17; Exhibit 19; Exhibit 20.
Existing Site
10. The subject property is undeveloped and vegetated with overgrown blackberry bushes
and English ivy, interspersed with native conifer and deciduous trees. The land slopes
evenly at about a 5 percent grade from northwest to southeast. The USDA Natural
Resources Conservation Service maps the site as containing Kapowsin gravely ashy loam
and Kitsap silt loan on the eastern flag lot near Madison Avenue North. Exhibit 1, Staff
Recommendation, page 3; Exhibit 4.
Access, Parking, and Traffic
11. Madison Avenue North would provide access to the proposed subdivision with a road
going west to access Lots 18 and 19, that would then turn south, as Loganberry Road, to
access Lots 1 to 17, ending in the south end as a cul-de-sac. The Applicant would
provide two vehicle parking spaces per dwelling unit.5 Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation,
page 4; Exhibit 3.a.
12. City Development Engineer Peter Corelis reviewed the proposal and determined that the
streets and pedestrian ways are adequate to accommodate the anticipated increase in
traffic caused by the proposed project . He determined that the east/west plat access road
extension of Wallace Way NW would meet the standards of an urba n local access street.
The plat access road would provide two, nine-foot travel lanes for two -way traffic, with
one-foot gutter pans and vertical curbs to provide a curb-to-curb distance of 20 feet.
Sidewalks would be provided on one side. A minimum 30 feet of right-of-way for the
road section and sidewalk would be dedicated to the City. The City determined that site
distance for the access road exceeds 300 feet in both directions, which is above the
required site distance needed for outbound turns to Madison Avenue North. Exhibit 1,
Staff Recommendation, pages 24; Exhibit 3; Exhibit 22.
13. Heath & Associates, Inc., prepared a Traffic Impact Analysis (TIA) for the Applicant,
dated July 2017. The TIA analyzed three access alternatives: full-access to the west via
Wallace Way NW, full-access to the west and one-way outbound to Madison Avenue
North, and full access to the east to Madison Avenue North. The TIA identified the
5 Duane Lane is adjacent to the north boundary of Madison Landing. The City asserted that Duane
Lane was public right-of-way, and the developer disagreed. The disagreement was resolved by
vacating the Duane Lane right-of-way in exchange for a trail connecting The Reserve at Winslow and
Winslow Grove, in addition to right-of-way dedication along the south boundary of the Madison
Landing project: The right-of-way dedication affords both Wallace Cottages and Madison Landing
access from Madison Avenue. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 2.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 9 of 24
existing level of service (LOS)6 at seven surrounding intersections, all operating at LOS
C or better. Based on the proposed increase of 19 dwelling units, the TIA determined
that there would be a 181 average weekday daily traffic count, 14 AM peak-hour trips,
and 19 PM peak-hour trips. The TIA noted that, for access to Madison Avenue North,
the 2020 LOS at surrounding intersections would remain at LOS C or better. By 2035,
the PM LOS would drop to LOS D for Madison Avenue North/Wyatt Way NW/NE and
to LOS E for Madison Avenue North and Entrance/Wallace Way NE. The 2015 to 2020
City Capital Improvement Program includes intersection improvements at Madison
Avenue North/Wyatt Way NW, with plans to reconstruct and improve the existing Wyatt
Way segment from Madison Avenue North to Lovell Avenue using either signalization or
a roundabout at the Wyatt Way/Madison Avenue North intersection. The TIA estimated
traffic impact fees for 19 PM trips as $31,016.93. Exhibit 6.
14. Kitsap Transit Routes 90 and 99 offer stops at the intersection of Madison Avenue
North/Wallace Way NW. Routes 93, 95, 97, 98, and 106 also provide stops within one
mile of the proposed site. Exhibit 6.
Trees, Landscaping, and Open Space
15. The Environmental Checklist listed significant trees on site. It identified 12 of 22
Douglas firs to be removed, 1 of 2 Madronas, and 19 of 22 cottonwoods. The Applicant
provided a landscape plan depicting street trees and a planting plan. City staff noted that,
although the Applicant intends to retain trees in designated open spaces, tree retention in
open spaces is not required. The Applicant submitted an Open Space Management Plan
(OSMP) with the application. The Applicant would record a final OSPM with the final
plat and the OSMP would be referenced on the face of the plat. The Applicant would
provide fencing along the perimeter o f the northern open space area and along the open
space boundary common to Lots 7 and 8. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 11, 14,
15, and 21; Exhibit 5; Exhibit 10.
Stormwater
16. The Applicant submitted a Preliminary Utility Report, prepared by Seabold Engineering
LLC, dated April 26, 2017. A small amount of stormwater from adjacent single-family
residential parcels drains toward the project site, which is located within the Kitsap Water
Resource Inventory Area 15. The project parcels do not have any existing storm drainage
conveyance systems. Downhill parcels connect to a drainage system in Madison Avenue
North, which eventually discharges to the south near the shoreline of Eagle Harbor. The
Applicant proposes a storm drainage collection and water quality system for the new
impervious area runoff. Water quality treatment would be provided through a
combination of bioretention swales and cells, roof downspout and footing drain collection
6 Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS), which is an established measure of
congestion for transportation facilities. The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F,
with the former indicating the best operating conditions, with low control delays, and the latter
indicating the worst conditions, with heavy control delays. Exhibit 6.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 10 of 24
systems, and surface water collection. The proposed stormwater collection system would
connect to the existing storm drain system in Madison Avenue North, including
replacement of approximately 110 feet of storm drain in Madison Avenue North.
Mr. Corelis reviewed the proposal on behalf of the City and determined the proposal
would meet the City’s drainage regulations found in Chapters 15.20 and 15.21 BIMC.
Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, page 23; Exhibit 4; Exhibit 22.
17. The Applicant would submit a Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan prepared by a civil
engineer, licensed in the State of Washington, prior to construction activities, including
clearing, grading, and civil improvements for all phases of the project. Prior to final plat
submittal, the Applicant would submit an operation and maintenance plan for the on-
going maintenance of the storm drainage system. The on-site stormwater facilities would
be privately owned and maintained. The Applicant would provide a sediment pond to
handle the peak 10-year flow until storm drain capacity upgrades in Madison Ave nue
North are performed. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 24 and 25.
Utilities
18. The City has sufficient capacity to serve the plat with water and sewage service. A
proposed eight -inch water main extension from Madison Avenue North to the Wallace
Wa y NW right -of-way would allow a minimum 10 feet of separation of the water main
from an existing sewer main. Alternatively, a looped water main system may be
constructed. The Applicant would dedicate a 30-foot right-of-way for the existing sewer
facilities, water, and stormwater facilities from Madison Avenue North to the extension
of the Wallace Way NW right -of-way. The Applicant would obtain binding water and
sewer availability letters from the City prior to application for a final plat. Exhibit 1, Staff
Recommendation, pages 2, 18, 23, and 25; Exhibit 22.
19. Fire Marshal and Assistant Bainbridge Fire Department Chief Luke Carpenter provided
comments on the proposal, dated May 17, 2017. He no ted that the proposed project must
comply with all provisions of the adopted Fire Code, including: the turning radius of the
proposed cul-de-sac must be not less than 39 feet and there must be a 10-foot private road
width with a five-foot flush sidewalk, but , if the sidewalk is raised, then the road width
must be not less than 12 feet. He stated that the proposed fire hydrant locations are
acceptable at this time. A Fire Marshal’s Office fire flow test would be required prior to
occupancy. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 2, 5, 17, and 21; Exhibit 22.
Schools and Parks
20. The Bainbridge Island School District would serve the proposed subdivision, but it did
not provide any comments. The Applicant would construct an internal sidewalk system
to the existing sidewalk located on Madison Avenue North. Exhibit 1, Staff
Recommendation, page 23; Exhibit 3.c.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 11 of 24
Archaeological Resources
21. The Applicant would stop excavation or construction should any historical or
archaeological artifacts be uncovered and immediately contact the City Department of
Planning and Community Development and the Washington State Office of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 20 and 21.
Testimony - April 20, 2018
22. Associate City Planner Kelly Tayara testified that the Comprehensive Plan has been
amended since the date of complete application on May 30, 2017. She testified that
access has been addressed by the City as part of Public Benefit, Development and Permit
Processing Agreements, referencing Exhibits 13, 14, and 15. Ms. Tayara, as the City
Planner, testified to her opinion that Madison Avenue would be the best place for access
to the plat. Testimony of Ms. Tayara.
23. Public testimony was also given at the open record hearing. Doug Hotchkiss asked that
access be provided to Madison Avenue North, not through Nakata Avenue. Steve
Matthews also testified in favor of access from Madison Avenue. Venera Di Bella Barles
asked that Madison Avenue, rather than Nakata Avenue or Wallace Way, be used for
access. Debbie Hollyer testified in favor of a Madison Avenue access. Stephen
Crampton and David Smith, Applicant, testified about Mr. Crampton’s adverse
possession claim. Testimony of Mr. Hotchkiss, Mr. Matthews, Ms. Bartes, Ms. Hollyer,
Mr. Crampton, and Mr. Smith.
July 11, 2018 - Testimony
24. Ms. Tayara testified that she made minor revisions to her previous staff recommendation
for lot area and open space but that no significant changes to her recommendation were
necessary following resolution of an adverse-possession claim. Testimony of Ms. Tayara.
25. Additional public comment was given at the continued open record hearing. Sanjay
Bhatt testified to his concerns about notice of a public meeting. He stated that a
November 2016 pre-applicant meeting7 was held without notice to the Courtyards at
Madison. He also objected to the lack of opportunity to comment on the SEPA MDNS
threshold decision until June 1, 2018. He opined that the City and Applicant responded
7 BIMC 2.16.020.G provides:
1. Subject to certain exemptions, all projects are subject to and must complete the site
assessment review process set forth and in accordance with Chapter 15.19 BIMC, and
projects requiring a preapplication conference have the option of proceeding with the two
processes concurrently. Chapter 15.19 BIMC is designed to ensure that future development
integrates low impact development practices to the maximum extent practicable, as
required by Chapters 15.19and 15.20 BIMC.
2. The preapplication conference is an informal discussion between a potential applicant,
interested citizen s, city staff, and the design review board (if applicable) regarding a
proposed project.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 12 of 24
to concerns solely from the Nakata neighborhood and that, as a result, the project was
redesigned with access solely from Madison Avenue North. In his opinion, Nakata area
residents were treated differently than Madison Avenue North residents because they had
an opportunity to express their concerns early in the process. He requested a remand of
the application to the City to reconsider the access point to the proposed plat, including
the use of Wallace Way NW. Testimony of Mr. Bhatt.
26. Stephanie Farwell testified about her concerns with the Planning Commission review
process. She provided the meeting minutes of the February 8 and 22, 2018, Planning
Commission meeting (Exhibit 32), and referenced its motion to deny approval of the
proposed plat .8 Steve Matthews submitted written testimony and testified in support of
access to the Wallace Cottages proposed plat via Madison Avenue North. Barbara
Hotchkin testified to her opinion that the City’s transportation goals and policies in the
Winslow Master Plan do not support a single access point to proposed subdivisions.
Kevin Curran testified that he grew up in the neighborhood when it was a quiet place that
was safe and sound. He stated that he does not want Wallace Way NW extended because
of the increased traffic that it would introduce to the neighborhood. Loanne Harmeling
testified to her opinion that Wallace Way should become a through street in order to help
disperse traffic. Exhibit 32; Exhibit 33; Testimony of Ms. Farwell, Mr. Matthews, Ms.
Hotchkin; Mr. Curran, and Ms. Harmeling.
27. Ms. Tayara responded for the City at the open record hearing. She testified to the City’s
determination that access should not go through the Nakata neighborhood but rather
should be accessed from Madison Avenue North. She testified that the Planning
Commission initially recommended denial because it didn’t want to see access through
the Nakata neighborhood but that, once that issue was resolved, the Planning
Commission supported the proposal. Mr. Corelis testified that he was in favor of
connecting the plat west to Grow Avenue at a preliminary meeting to provide
connectivity but that he changed his mind when considering other factors, including the
impacts of a Wallace Way NW extension. He testified that Madison Avenue North
would be widened in the future and would include a round-a-bout at Wyatt Way. Finally,
he noted that it is City policy to concentrate traffic in arterials, and not to disperse it.
Testimony of Ms. Tayara and Mr. Corelis.
28. Applicant Attorney Hayes Gori stated that , except for a mailing error, it is his legal
opinion that the notice given was reasonable. He also noted that he attended the Planning
Commission meetings and that he corroborated the City staff testimony that, once the
8 Although minutes of Planning Commission meetings were provided for the hearing record for
consideration by the Hearing Examiner, motions passed by the Planning Commission are not final land use
decisions. The City Council has assigned the task of making most final land use to the Hearing Examiner.
BIMC 2.16.020.C.2 provides that quasi-judicial decisions are to be made by the Hearing Examiner. To
render a legally defensible decision, the Hearing Examiner must issue a decision consistent with the
municipal code, state statutes and case law.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 13 of 24
decision was made to provide access to Madison Avenue North, the Planning
Commission was supportive. He stated for the record that the adverse possession claim
was settled and that such settlement should be noted in the Hearing Examiner’s decision.
Statement of Mr. Gori.
Staff Recommendation
29. City staff reviewed the proposal and determined that the pro posed plat, with 12
conditions, would be consistent with the City’s Comprehensive Plan, municipal code, and
development standards. City staff recommended approval of the application, with
conditions. Exhibit 1, Staff Recommendation, pages 20 through 25; Exhibit 22.
CONCLUSIONS
Jurisdiction
The Hearing Examiner is granted jurisdiction to hear and decide applications for preliminary
plats under BIMC 2.14.030, and under BIMC 2.16.020.A and .125.G.5. The decision to approve
or deny a housing design demonstration project shall be made as part of the underlying land use
permit review. BIMC 2.16.020.Q.3.e.
Criteria for Review
BIMC criteria for subdivision approval are as follows:
The Hearing Examiner’s decision must include findings of fact that the applic ation meets all the
requirements of the following subsections:
1. The preliminary long subdivision may be approved or approved with modification
if:
a. The applicable subdivision development standards of BIMC Titles 17 and
18 are satisfied; and
b. The preliminary long subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the
public health, safety and general and public use and interest, including
those items listed in RCW 58.17.110; and
c. The preliminary long subdivision has been prepared consistent with the
requirements of the flexible lot design process, unless a flexible lot
standard has been modified as part of a housing design demonstration
project pursuant to BIMC 2.16.020.Q; and
d. Any portion of a long subdivision that contains a critical area, as define d
in Chapter 16.20 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter; and
e. Any portion of a long subdivision within shoreline jurisdiction, as defined
in Chapter 16.12 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter; and
f. The city engineer’s reco mmendation contains determinations that the
following decision criteria are met and such determinations are supported
by substantial evidence within the record:
i. The long subdivision conforms to regulations concerning drainage
in Chapters 15.20 and 15.21 BIMC; and
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 14 of 24
ii. The long subdivision will not cause an undue burden on the
drainage basin or water quality and will not unreasonably interfere
with the use and enjoyment of properties downstream; and
iii. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed align with and are
otherwise coordinated with streets serving adjacent properties; and
iv. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed are adequate to
accommodate anticipated traffic; and
v. If the long subdivision will rely on public water or sewer services,
there is capacity in the water or sewer system (as applicable) to
serve the long subdivision, and the applicable service(s) can be
made available at the site; and
vi. The long subdivision conforms to the “City of Bainbridge Island
Engineering Design and Development Standards Manual,” unless
the city engineer has approved a variation to the road standards in
that document based on his or her determination that the variation
meets the purposes of BIMC Title 17; and
g. The subdivision conforms to the requirements of this chapter and the
standards in the “City of Bainbridge Island Design and Construction
Standards and Specifications,” unless the city engineer has approved a
variation to the road standards in that document based on his or her
determination that the variation meets the purposes of BIMC Title 17; and
h. The proposal complies with all applicable provisions of this code, unless
the provisions have been modified as part of a housing design
demonstration project pursuant to BIMC 2.16.020.Q; Chapters 36.70A and
58.17 RCW; and all other applicable provisions of state and federal laws
and regulations; and
i. The proposal is in accord with the city’s comprehensive plan.
2. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless written findings are made
that the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision.
BIMC 2.16.125.H.
In addition to decision criteria required by the underlying planning permit or approval, an
application for a housing design demonstration project may be a pproved if the following criteria
are met:
a. The applicant clearly demonstrates evaluation factors listed in subsection
Q.4 of this section as shown in the housing design demonstration project scoring
system as evaluated by the planning department;
b. The applicant has demonstrated how relief from specific development standards,
including setback reductions, lot coverage and/or design guidelines, is needed to
achieve the desired innovative design and the goals of this chapter;
c. The project does not adversely impact existing public service levels for
surrounding properties;
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 15 of 24
d. The project complies with all other portions of the BIMC, except as modified
through this housing design demonstration project process;
e. If a project will be phased, each phase of a proposed project must contain
adequate infrastructure, open space, recreational facilities, landscaping and all
other conditions of the project to stand alone if no other subsequent phases are
developed; and
f. The applicant is meeting required housing diversity standards.
BIMC 2.16.020.Q.5.
In addition, housing design demonstration project approval conditions must be included in the
final permit approval and must address any ongoing compliance requirements, including
compliance with approved desig n plans. The City may require that the applicant record
covenants to ensure ongoing compliance or maintenance for required project components. BIMC
2.16.020.Q.3.e
The state subdivision criteria, codified at Chapter 58.17 RCW, are as follows:
A proposed subdivision and dedication shall not be approved unless the city, town, or
county legislature body makes written findings that: (a) appropriate provisions are made
for the public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage
ways, streets or roads, alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies,
sanitary wastes, parks and recreation, playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all
other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other planning features that assure sa fe
walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school; and (b) the public use
and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication.
RCW 58.17.110(2).
The criteria for review adopted by the City Council are designed to implement the requirement
of Chapter 36.70B RCW to enact the Growth Management Act. In particular, RCW 36.70B.040
mandates that local jurisdictions review proposed development to ensure consistency with City
development regulations, considering the type of land use, the level of development,
infrastructure, and the characteristics of development. RCW 36.70B.040.
Conclusions Based on Findings
1. With conditions, the proposed subdivision would be consistent with Housing Design
Demonstration Projects decision criteria of BIMC 2.16.020.Q. City staff determined
that the Applicant’s proposal exceeds the minimum required scoping for a Type 2 HDDP
project. The project would be BuiltGreen 4, with a variety of home sizes, limited to no
more than 1,600 square feet, thereby meeting the HDDP housing diversity standards. By
using the HDDP approach, smaller residences can be constructed with relief from open
space and setback standards. Adequate access to water, sewage, and other services is
available and would not adversely impact existing public service levels for surrounding
properties. Except for the HDDP project modifications, the proposed project would
comply with all other portions of the BIMC.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 16 of 24
Conditions are necessary including those to ensure compliance with the criteria for
approval in the municipal code, including those to ensure that the Applicant constructs a
four-foot high fence along the perimeter of the northern open space; to ensure that the
project conforms to the HDDP program Tier 2 requirements; to ensure that work will stop
if any historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered ; to ensure that a final Open
Space Management Plan is recorded with the final plat; to ensure that the final plat will
comply with Fire Marshal conditions; and to ensure that the Applicant will comply with
the recommended conditions of the City Engineer . Findings 1-29.
2. With conditions, the applicable subdivision development standards of Titles
17 and 18 BIMC would be satisfied, as modified by the Housing Design
Demonstration Projects decision criteria as described in Conclusion 1 . The proposed
subdivision would provide common open space through the HDDP modification.
Sidewalks would be provided to connect to Madison Avenue North. Two parking spaces
per unit would be provided to meet the City’s parking standard. As detailed above in
Conclusion 1, conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria
required for plat approval. Findings 1, 6-21, and 29.
3. With conditions, the preliminary long subdivision makes appropriate provisions for
the public health, safety, and general welfare and serves the public use and interest,
including those items listed in RCW 58.17.110. The City reviewed the proposed
project, including environmental review under SEPA and issued an MDNS, requiring that
the Applicant construct a four-foot-high fence along the perimeter of the northern open
space. The MDNS did not address traffic impacts, a primary concern expressed in public
testimony. Notice of the MDNS was properly given, and a second opportunity to appeal
it was given, yet the MDNS was not appealed. The MDNS was issued on a proposal that,
at the time the second notice was given, included access off of Madison Avenue North.
Members of the public concerned about traffic impacts must be vigilant and diligent in
review of development proposals that may impact them. Traffic impacts are addressed
during environmental review, as well as during permit application review. Yet, if there is
no appeal of the City determination that there will be no significant adverse impacts due
to increased traffic, the review of that issue at the permit application review stage is
constrained. If not appealed, the Hearing Examiner must accept the City determination
that there will be no significant adverse impacts due to increased traffic. There are many
criteria for approval that must be reviewed by the Hearing Examiner when deciding
whether to approve a proposed plat. One is that there must be appropriate provisions for
streets and roads, as required by RCW 58.17.110 (2). The evidence provided by the City
during the open record hearing is that the existing street system can accommodate
increased traffic associated with the proposed plat. Although there was passionate
disagreement with that evidence expressed during the open record hearing, the evidence
does not support a denial of the plat application.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 17 of 24
The Applicant proposes a storm drainage collection and water quality system for the new
impervious area runoff. Water quality treatment would be provided through a
combination of bioretention swales and cells, roof downspout and footing drain collection
systems, and surface water collection. The proposed stormwater collection system would
connect to the existing storm drain syst em in Madison Avenue North. The City has
adequate water and sewer capacity. The Bainbridge Island Fire Marshal reviewed the
project and stated that the Applicant must comply with all provisions of the adopted Fire
Code. Although the Bainbridge Island School District did not provide comments, the
Applicant would provide internal sidewalks that would connect to Madison Avenue
North. As detailed above in Conclusion 1, conditions are necessary to ensure that the
proposal meets all criteria required for plat approval. Findings 1-29.
4. The City engineer’s recommendation contains determinations that the decision
criteria would be met, with conditions, and such determinations are supported by
substantial evidence within the record. The City’s Development Engineer reviewed
the proposed subdivision and determined that the proposed subdivision conforms to
regulations concerning drainage in Chapters 15.20 and 15.21 BIMC; that the proposed
subdivision will not cause an undue burden on the drainage basin or water quality and
will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of properties downstream;
that the streets and pedestrian ways as proposed align with, and are otherwise coordinated
with, streets serving adjacent properties; that the streets and pedestrian ways, as
proposed, are adequate to accommodate anticipated traffic; that there is capacity in the
water and sewer system to serve the proposed subdivision; and that the proposed
subdivision conforms to the “City of Bainbridge Island Engineering Design a nd
Development Standards Manual,” except as noted. As detailed above in Conclusion 1,
conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria required for plat
approval. The City Development Engineer recommended conditions that have been
included in this decision. Finding 12.
5. With conditions, the proposal would be in accord with the Comprehensive Plan .
The proposed development would focus development in designated centers and would
also facilitate the provision of a diverse affordable housing stock by allowing
development compliant with HDDP criteria, including common open space, green-
building certification, and landscaping along Madison Avenue North. As detailed above
in Conclusion 1, conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria
required for plat approval. Finding 4.
6. With conditions, the public use and interest would be served by the platting of the
subdivision. The City provided reasonable notice and opportunity to comment on the
proposed preliminary plat. Single-family uses are permitted in the R-4.3 zone. The
proposed subdivision to allow additional housing would be compatible with neighboring
land uses, which are all developed with houses. The Applicant proposes a storm drainage
collection system fo r the new hard surface areas, consisting of driveway, roof downspout
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 18 of 24
and footing drain collection systems, and surface water collection. Water quality
treatment would be provided through a combination of bioretention swales and cells, roof
downspout and footing drain collection systems, and surface water collection. City staff
determined that, with conditions, the proposal would be consistent with all applicable
City, county, and state requirements, including the applicable Comprehensive Plan,
municipal code, and development standards. As detailed above in Conclusion 1,
conditions are necessary to ensure that the proposal meets all criteria required for plat
approval. Findings 1-29.
DECISION
Based on the preceding findings and conclusions, the request to subdivide four lots, totaling
approximately 2.5 acres, into 19 lots, as a Tier 2 Housing Design Demonstration Project , at
Wallace Way, between Madison Avenue and Nakata Avenue, is APPROVED, with the
following conditions:9
SEPA Condition
1. To mitigate recreation and transportation impacts, the perimeter of the northern open space
shall be fenced and provide a gate which is located proximate to Wallace Way. To avoid
adverse aesthetic impact, appropriate materials which afford visual access to the open spac e
(e.g., picket fence rather than chain link) shall be used, and the fence shall be four feet in
height.
Project Conditions
2. The project must conform to the Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP)
program Tier II requirements (BIMC 2.16.020.Q).
A. The project must provide at least two affordable housing units, as defined in the
Municipal Code (BIMC 18.36).
B. The project must achieve LEED, BuiltGreen 4 or Evergreen Sustainable
certification.
C. The project must provide homes no greater than 1,600 square feet in size.
D. The project shall substantially conform to the Innovative Site Development
category scoring, as determined by staff, and shall provide and maintain the
following:
1) At least 16 percent of the lot area as open space which is well designed
and integrated part of the project
2) A neighborhood garden which is 1,140 square feet in size, at a minimum
3) 20 percent or less turf in private yard areas
4) At least 60 percent native or drought -tolerant plants
5) A number of vehicle charging stations serving a minimu m of three percent
of the vehicle parking capacity of the subdivision: The stations shall be
9 Conditions include both legal requirements applicable to all developments and conditions to
mitigate the specific impacts of this development.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 19 of 24
shall be accessible to all homeowners in the subdivision and shall be
shown on the civil plan.
6) Covered bicycle parking for 10 bicycles, at a minimum. The bicycle
parking shall be held in common and shall be shown on the civil plan.
Additionally, a bike rack serving four bicycles, at a minimum, must be
located in the northern open space.
3. Prior to any construction activities, the Applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits
from the City of Bainbridge Island, including but not limited to clearing, grading, and/or
building permits.
4. If any historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during excavation or
construction, work shall immediately stop and the Department of Planning and
Community Development and the Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic
Preservation shall be immediately notified. Construction shall only continue thereafter in
compliance with the applicable provisions of law.
5. A final Open Space Management Plan (OSMP) shall be recorded with final plat and the
OSMP shall be referenced on the face of the plat. The final OSMP shall meet the
requirements of BIMC 17.12.
6. In addition to the open space fencing required in Condition 1 above, the open space
boundaries common to lots 7 and 8 shall be fenced.
7. Open Space fencing shall be installed on or installation financially assured prior to final
plat approval. The fencing must be maintained in perpetuity and required locations of
fencing shall be noted on the face of the plat.
8. Lot coverage of 35 percent shall be allocated between the lots as proposed and noted on
the face of the plat, except: The final plat shall reflect a modest reduction in the per -lot
allocation to provide lot coverage for open space buildings (e.g., garden shed, picnic
shelter, covered climbing structure).
9. The following setbacks shall be noted and depicted on the final plat:
Building to building (on-site) Minimum 10 feet
Building to exterior subdivision boundary line Minimum 5 feet
Building to right -of-way or vehicular access easement Minimum 10 feet
Building to Open Space Minimum 10 feet
10. The final plat shall comply with the following conditions of the Fire Marshal:
A. The proposed project shall comply with all provisions of the adopted Fire Code.
B. A fire flow test is required prior to occupancy.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 20 of 24
11. The final plat shall comply with the following conditions of the City Survey Manager:
A. A boundary line adjustment between Parcel 272502-1-023-2005 and Parcel
272502-1-022-2006 will be completed before final plat.
B. Right-of-way and roadway plans connecting to Madison Avenue are dependent on
approval of the boundary line adjustment and subsequent right -of-way dedication
by others.
C. City utilities and related facilities located outside of dedicated right -of-way will
require a separately recorded easement agreement with the recording information
noted on the face of the fina l plat.
D. Easement agreements with the City will be prepared using the City’s template
with the legal description and map prepared by a licensed land surveyor.
12. The Applicant shall comply with the following conditions, to the satisfaction of the City
Engineer:
A. Unless specifically exempted in these conditions or otherwise by the City
Engineer, the project shall conform to the City of Bainbridge Island Design and
Construction Standards, Surface and Stormwater Management regulations (BIMC
15.20 and 15.21), and the Stormwater Facilities Maintenance Program in
accordance with the provisions of BIMC 2.16.070.G(5).
B. Public and private improvements, facilities, and infrastructure, on and off the site,
that are required for the subdivision, shall be completed and ha ve final inspection
and approval prior to final plat approval unless the City Engineer accepts an
assurance device in lieu of completion.
C. In accordance with the provisions of BIMC 2.16.070.N, the City Engineer may
accept financial assurity10 in lieu of co mpletion of improvements, in an amount
and in a form determined by the City Engineer, but not exceeding 125 percent of
the cost of completing the improvements.
1) Any such assurance device shall be in place prior to final plat approval,
shall enumerat e in detail the items being assured, and shall require that all
such items will be completed and approved by the City within one year of
the date of final plat approval. The assurity shall include preparation of all
final plans and documents.
2) Upon completion and the City’s acceptance of facilities, the Applicant
shall provide an assurance device securing the successful performance of
improvements.
3) While lots created by the subdivision may be sold, occupancy may not be
allowed until the required improvements are formally accepted by the
City. A prominent note on the face of the final plat shall state: “The lots
created by this plat are subject to conditions of an assurance device held
10 The word “assurity” is not found in any dictionary that could be accessed by the Hearing Examiner. It is
assumed the City means “surety” or “bonding”. Conditions recommended by the City, however, are not
altered by the Hearing Examiner unless reason to do so is given at the open record hearing.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 21 of 24
by the City for the completion of certain necessary facilities. Building
permits may not be issued and/or occupancy may not be allowed until
such necessary facilities are completed and approved by the City of
Bainbridge Island. All purchasers shall satisfy themselves as to the status
of completion of the necessary facilities.”
D. General
1) Survey monumentation shall be provided consistent with the Standards,
Section 8-03.
2) Civil improvement plans ready for construction shall be submitted with an
application for a plat utility permit to COBI for review and approval to
construct all necessary infrastructure serving the divided lots and the offsite
improvements proposed in the Developer Extension Agreement (DEA)
application.
3) Separate clearing and grading permits shall be required concurrently with the
plat utility permit issua nce to clear and grade the site.
4) No building permits for the newly created lots will be issued until the
completion of the civil improvements or performance bonding is established
to cover unfinished work to apply for final plat.
5) Performance bonding for plat civil improvements shall be released and re-
bonded only as determined by a pre-approved work completion phasing plan
to be developed with the plat utility permit application.
6) As-built civil construction plans stamped by a civil engineer shall be prov ided
by the Applicant prior to final plat.
E. Facilities Extension
1) The Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) shall be executed at the plat
utilities permitting application phase for the construction of roads and utilities
to be inspected and accepted by the City. All property to be deeded to the
City for the extension shall be provided with a Right of Way Warranty Deed,
or, the DEA shall include all underlying property owners as applicants and the
ROW may be dedicated on the face of the plat.
F. Utilities
1) The proposed 8-inch water main extension from Madison Avenue to the
Wallace Way NW right -of-way extension shall be located to allow both a
minimum 10 feet of separation of the water main from the existing sewer
main and provide adequate setback from the northern property line to allow
for construction, maintenance, and servicing of the new main . If additional
ROW or easement is required it shall be provided. Alternatively, a looped
water main system may be accomplished by routing the water line in from
Wallace Way NW from Nakata Avenue NW.
2) The water main extension from the Fir Acres Drive ROW at the south end of
the project shall be located within existing or proposed easements and provide
a minimum 10 feet clearance to the edge of the easement.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 22 of 24
3) A 30-foot ROW shall be dedicated to the City of Bainbridge Island to include
the existing sewer facilities, water, and surface and stormwater facilities from
Madison Avenue to the extension of the Wallace Way NW right -of-way.
4) Easement areas flanking the plat roads will require separate easement
documents to be recorded as they are not within the ROW to be dedicated on
the face of the plat.
5) Any and all permanent or temporary construction easements required to install
the road and utility extension, or remove vegetation and disturb ground
outside the future ROW areas shall be secured prior to the execution of the
Developer Extension Agreement.
6) Sewer and storm drain improvements along with easements to be dedicated to
the City through and over portions of existing Lot B of short plat SPT 06-07-
91-1, also known as the Extendicare Parcel, are subject to restrictions of an
easement with Lot A, also known as the Hanavan Parcel, of the same plat .
The underlying easement agreement shall be amended to allow for the
installation and maintenance of City facilities.
7) The routing of sewer and storm drain improvements through Lots A and B of
the Hanavan Short Plat and the Courtyards at Madison Condominium sites
requires a dedicated easement to the City totaling 20 feet in width to
accommodate both the storm and sewer utilities. Additionally, the easement
shall be extended to provide vehicular access for City maintenance vehicles
and equipment from Fir Acres Drive NW through Lot A.
8) Extending the sewer beyond the Hanavan Short Plat lots at the southeast
corner to tie into an existing 8-inch sewer line requires amendment of the
existing sewer easement with the Courtyards on Madison Condominium
Association to allow more than 2 residential lots to connect.
9) The north/south plat access road identified as Loganberry Road NE on the
preliminary civil plans, shall meet the standards of an urban local access street
per standard drawing DWG. 7-050 of the Standards, except as noted: The plat
access road shall provide two (2) 9-foot travel lanes for two-way traffic
circulation, with 1-foot gutter pans and vertical curbs to provide a clear curb-
curb distance of 20 feet . Sidewalks shall be provided on one side with a
minimum 3-foot wide planter strip. A minimum of 20 feet of right -of-way for
the road section and 10-foot easements on either side shall be dedicated to the
City to provide a combined 40 feet of ROW and easement dedication for
access and utilities.
10) The east/west plat access road extension of Wallace Way NW shall meet the
standards of an urban local access street per standard drawing DWG. 7-050 of
the Standards, except as noted. The plat access road shall provide two (2) 9-
foot travel lanes for two -way traffic circulation, with 1-foot gutter pans and
vertical curbs to provide a clear curb-curb distance of 20 feet. Sidewalks shall
be provided on one side. A minimum of 30 feet of right -of-way for the road
section and sidewalk shall be dedicated to the City.
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 23 of 24
G. Stormwater
1) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a civil
engineer licensed in the State of Washington is required prior to construction
activities including clearing or grading or civil improvements for all phases of
the project that complies with BIMC 15.20.
2) A final stormwater report shall be submitted detailing compliance with all
applicable minimum requirements as required by BIMC 15.20, prepared by a
civil engineer licensed in the State of Washington.
3) On-site Best Management Practices for soil management and Low Impact
Development shall be employed consistent with the Stormwater Management
Manual for Western Washington (SWMMWW) BMP T5.13 for surfaces not
converted to hard surfaces after construction.
4) Prior to final plat submittal, the Applicant shall submit an operation and
maintenance plan for the on-going maintenance of the storm drainage system.
5) All on-site stormwater facilities shall remain privately owned and maintained .
The owner(s) shall be responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage
facilities for this development following construction. Annual inspection and
maintenance reports shall be provided to the City. A Declaration of Covenant
for stormwater system operation and maintenance will be required to be
recorded before final plat submittal. The approved language for the
Declaration of Covenant is found in BIMC Chapter 15.21, Exhibit A.
6) A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis must be performed to demonstrate that
the future build-out conditions from the site combined with the existing offsite
drainage tributary to the storm drain system will not exceed the capacity of the
existing or proposed storm drain system in Madison Avenue North. Where
the existing capacity of the system is insufficient, the project shall mitigate
on-site to match the existing 100-year storm flows leaving the project site, or,
upgrade the storm system to provide the needed capacity as defined below.
7) The capacity analysis shall include an assessment of all backwater effects on
the existing system up Madison Avenue North. The design storm for capacity
analysis is a 25-year storm event. The 25-year hydraulic grade line (HGL)
shall be below the rim elevations of all drainage structures. The 100-year
storm event shall be shown to not overtop the crest of any roadways.
8) Clearing and grading of the site may not begin until the storm drain extension
to Madison Avenue is completed. A sediment pond shall be provided sized
handle the peak 10-year flow until the time the storm drain capacity upgrades
in Madison Avenue are performed. Once upgrades are performed the on-site
sediment pond storage requirement may be reduced to the standard 2-year
peak flow per the Department of Ecology SWMMWW BMP C241:
Temporary Sediment Pond.
H. Permitting
Findings, Conclusions, and Decision
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 24 of 24
1) In addition to a clearing and/or grade and fill permit, a right -of-way (ROW)
construction permit will be required prior to any construction activities within
the existing right -of-way. The ROW permit will be subject to separate
conditions and bonding requirements.
2) Application for a final plat shall require binding water and sewer availability
letters from the City.
3) The proposed action(s), phased or concurrent, in their totality would result in
more than one (1) acre of earth disturbance on the site and drain to waters of
the State. A Construction Stormwater General Permit shall be obtained from
the Washington State Department of Ecology and the site shall be monitored
for discharge of pollutants and sediment to the wetlands and stream for the
duration of the project . No land clearing or construction permits shall be
issued prior to obtaining the State permit.
13. The following conditions shall be noted on the face of the final plat: Conditions 2; 3; 4;
reference to open space plan and requirements in Conditions 1; 5; 6 and 7; 8; 9;
applicable portions of 13.
DECIDED this 25th day of July 2018.
THEODORE PAUL HUNTER
Hearing Examiner
Sound Law Center
Project: Wallace Cottages Housing Design Demonstration Project Preliminary Subdivision
File No: PLN 50589 SUB
Date: July 3, 2018
To: The City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Project Manager: Kelly Tayara, Senior Planner
Applicant: Central Highlands Inc. Owner: Wallace Way Cottages LLC
PO Box 2879 PO Box 2879
Poulsbo, WA 98370 Poulsbo, WA 98370
Request: Preliminary plat approval of four lots totaling 2.5 acres into 19 lots, with approval as a Tier II
Housing Design Demonstration Project through the underlying preliminary plat approval.
Location: Wallace Way between Madison Avenue and Nakata Avenue
Summary of Recommendation: Approval subject to conditions
Part 1 - Background
1. Prior Hearing
The Hearing Examiner held an open-record hearing on the application on April 20, 2018. During the
hearing, Stephen Crampton entered into the record a claim of ownership over a portion of the site. Mr.
Crampton and the applicant entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the adverse possession
claim, and this includes a boundary agreement to quitclaim a portion of the subject property (Exhibit
27).
Subsequent to the hearing, the City discovered that some properties were inadvertently omitted from
the original public notice and republished Notice of Application / SEPA comment period / Notice of
Hearing (see details under Part IV.1 of this report).
The facts and findings presented by the City during the April 20th hearing are substantially the same,
with the exception of adjustments to reflect the Crampton settlement agreement (e.g. lot area, lot
coverage and open space area calculations), and the addition of public comment which is discussed in
Part IV.3 of this report.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 2 of 25
2. Developer Agreements (Exhibits 12 - 15)
This project is part of a group of developments which are the subject of four agreements between the
City and two developers. Aside from Wallace Cottages, the agreements involve Madison Grove,
Madison Place, The Reserve at Winslow, and Winslow Grove (all subdivisions), and Madison Landing (a
multi-family project). A map and developer information are provided in Exhibit 16.
Duane Lane is adjacent to the north boundary of Madison Landing. The City asserted that Duane Lane
was public right-of-way, and the developer disagreed. The disagreement was resolved by vacating the
Duane Lane right-of-way in exchange for a trail connecting The Reserve at Winslow and Winslow Grove,
in addition to right-of-way dedication along the south boundary of the Madison Landing project: The
right-of-way dedication affords both Wallace Cottages and Madison Landing access from Madison
Avenue.
3. The Housing Design Demonstration Project Program (Exhibit 17)
The Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP) program was established to increase the variety of
housing choices available to residents of all economic segments and to encourage sustainable
development by providing development standard incentives. HDDP approval is authorized through
the underlying land use permit approval. Program specifics are discussed in Part V of this report.
Part II: General Information and Site Characteristics
1. Tax Assessor Information:
a. Tax Lots: 272502-1-023-2005; 272502-1-153-2007; 272502-1-154-2005; 272502-1-155-2005
b. Owner of Record: Wallace Way Cottages LLC
c. Lot size: 2.46 acres
2. Subject Property Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation:
The subject properties are split zoned: The lots are within the R-4.3 district and the Urban
Comprehensive Plan designation, with the exception of the flagpole portion of Lot 023 which is
within the Mixed Use Town Center – Madison Overlay District (MUTC-MAD). The properties are also
within the Secondary Study Area of the Winslow Master Plan Area.
3. Surrounding Property Zoning and Comprehensive Plan Designation:
Adjacent properties to the north, east and south are zoned R-4.3 and are within the Urban
Comprehensive Plan designation, and those to the east are zoned MUTC-MAD.
4. Public Services and Utilities:
a. Police: City of Bainbridge Island Police Department
b. Fire: Bainbridge Island Fire District
c. Schools: Bainbridge Island School District
d. Water: City of Bainbridge Island
e. Sewer: City of Bainbridge Island
f. Storm drainage: Bio-retention and detention or public facility with upsized capacity
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 3 of 25
5. Existing Development: The subject properties are undeveloped.
6. Access: Access from Madison Avenue via new right-of-way dedication (extension of Wallace Way) is
proposed.
7. Soils and Terrain: Site topography is relatively flat and soils are composed of Vashon till.
Zoning
Project Site
Vicinity Map
Taurnic Place
Na
k
a
t
a
A
v
e
Wyatt Way
Ihland Way
R-4.3 R-3.5
MUTC
-MAD
Ma
d
i
s
o
n
Av
e
Gr
o
w
A
v
e
Fir Acres Drive
Duane Lane
Lo
v
e
l
l
A
v
e
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 4 of 25
Part III: Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies
Comprehensive Plan text is presented in normal font, and staff discussion in bold font.
1. Land Use Element
The properties are within the Secondary Study Area of the Winslow Master Plan Area; the
Comprehensive Plan focuses growth within Winslow, the urban core of the Island, and other designated
centers.
a. Goal LU-5: Focus urban development in designated centers. Encourage development in areas
where public facilities and services can be provided and provide choice of housing location and
lifestyle. Encourage residential uses in a variety of forms and densities as part of the use mix in
Winslow. Residential density within designated centers may be increased through the use of
affordable housing.
The project is served by public water and sewer and is proximate to public services, including
bus lines and the ferry terminal. The project provides affordable housing and qualifies for
increased density through the Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP) program.
b. Goal LU-6: Ensure a development pattern that reduces the conversion of undeveloped land into
sprawling development. Promote dense residential development and encourage human activity
within Winslow in order to create a vibrant City center, direct growth where infrastructure
exists, reduce reliance on the automobile, provide opportunities for affordable housing and
absorb growth that would otherwise be scattered in outlying areas. Plan for adequate parking
in Winslow to accommodate residents and visitors.
The density bonus provided by the HDDP program provides for increased growth where
infrastructure exists and enables reduced reliance on automobiles because of the proximity to
the Winslow commercial districts. The project provides two vehicle parking spaces per lot.
2. Housing Element
a. Goal HO-6: Facilitate the provision of a diverse affordable housing stock in all geographic areas
of the community. Pursue effective strategies to reduce the land cost component of affordable
housing, which may include alternative land use zoning, density bonuses and other incentives.
The project provides two affordable housing units and utilizes development standard incentives,
including reduced setbacks and increased lot coverage, through the HDDP program.
3. Transportation Element
a. Goal TR-8: Consider the special needs of neighborhood safety, pedestrian and bicycle facilities,
transit use and facilities and traffic flow in the development of transportation improvements
that affect neighborhoods. Protect residential neighborhoods from the impacts of cut-through
motor vehicle traffic by providing appropriate connecting routes and applying appropriate
traffic-calming measures to control vehicle volumes while maintaining emergency vehicle
response times. Consider closing or restricting streets to motorized traffic and devote those
streets to non-motorized and other neighborhood uses.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 5 of 25
Through development agreements between the applicant, a neighboring property owner and
the City, the project avoids vehicular access from the west, through the Nakata neighborhood,
and accesses from Madison Avenue. A new sidewalk provides non-motorized connection
between the Nakata neighborhood and Madison Avenue.
4. Cultural Element
a. Goal CUL-3: Preserve places where the Island’s history can be experienced, interpreted and
shared with the general public in order to deepen an understanding of our heritage and the
relationship of the past to our present and future. Recognize the probability of discovering new
Native American cultural resources throughout the Island.
Recommended conditions include a requirement stop work and notify the City and
Washington State Office of Archeology and Historic Preservation should any cultural resources
be discovered.
Part IV: Agency Review and Public Comment
1. Environmental Review / Public Notice
Conceptual review of the Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP) was held on October 11, 2016.
A public participation meeting was held on November 1, 2016 and the Design Review Board reviewed
the HDDP aspects of the proposal on November 21, 2016. A pre-application conference was held on
January 3, 2017. The applicant received preliminary notification that the project qualified for the HDDP
Program on April 6, 2017.
Preliminary subdivision application was submitted on April 27, 2017 and deemed complete on May 30,
2017. A public meeting before the Planning Commission was held on February 22, 2018 and the
Commission’s recommendation for Housing Design Demonstration Project approval is discussed in
Part V.5 of this report.
The project is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as provided in Washington
Administrative Code (WAC 197-11-800). The City issued a combined Notice of Application/SEPA
comment period on June 2, 2017, and SEPA determination on March 22, 2018. The City published
Notice of Hearing on March 30, 2018 and a public hearing was held on April 20, 2018.
Because some properties were inadvertently omitted from the original comment period, the City
issued a combined Notice of Application / Hearing / SEPA comment period on June 1, 2018; the 14-
day comment period ended on June 15, 2018. On June 26, 2018, the City issued a combined notice
withdrawing the March 22 SEPA determination and issuing a mitigated SEPA determination; the
appeal period ends on July 10. Public and agency comment is discussed below.
2. Agency Comment
The Kitsap Public Health District approved the preliminary plat. The Bainbridge Island Fire District
approved the project subject to several conditions which are incorporated into the recommended
conditions. Final subdivision is subject to the approval of both agencies.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 6 of 25
3. Public Comment Summary
A total of 42 public comments were received, 16 of those subsequent to the April 11 hearing. In the 26
comments received prior to the hearing, commenters primarily objected to vehicular access via Grow
Avenue and Nakata Avenue.
Many of the comments submitted after the hearing referenced this application in conjunction with four
other developments, a total of 111 units within a one-third mile area. One of the developments
accesses Madison Avenue via Duane Lane, one accesses from Wyatt Way with additional emergency
services access from Madison Avenue via access easement, and Madison Landing and this project share
access to Madison Avenue via a new dedication of right-of-way which extends Wallace Way.
The comments received after the hearing often refer to the group of developments rather than a
specific project, and commenters are generally opposed to the projects. Commenters primarily are
concerned about adverse impacts due to traffic and tree / vegetation removal, adverse impacts to
wildlife, adverse impacts to existing utilities, including water, sewer, stormwater and power, and
adverse quality-of-life impacts due to loss of green spaces and increased density and noise.
Commenters were also concerned that, due to an error in the original Notice of Application and SEPA
comment period publication, commenters did not have the opportunity to participate in shaping the
project. A summary of public comment along with staff discussion follows:
Madison Grove PRJ # 50667 SUB
8 Lot Subdivision
Madison Landing PRJ #50879 SPR
24 Multi-family
Wallace Cottages HDDP PRJ # 50589 SUB
19 Lot Subdivision
Madison Place HDDP PRJ # 50892 SUB
18 Lot Subdivision
Wyatt Apartments PRJ # 50165B SPR
42 unit Multi-family
Duane Lane
Na
k
a
t
a
A
v
e
Ma
d
i
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Knechtel Way
Wyatt Way
Wallace Way
High School Road
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 7 of 25
Transportation:
• Commenters object to vehicular access via Grow Avenue and Nakata Avenue, especially if the
vehicular access connects Nakata Avenue to Madison Avenue (i.e. extending Wallace Way from
Madison Avenue to Nakata Avenue); commenters expressed a strong preference that vehicular
access to the subdivision be limited to extending Wallace Way from Madison Avenue only to the
extent that it serves the subdivision (i.e. is not a through-way).
One commenter stated that the Nakata Avenue neighborhood is “…reminiscent of the 1950s with
children playing in the street, be it catch, hopscotch, Frisbee, 4-square and other games, moving
out of the way when cars need to go by, often waving to friends’ parents as they drive by. The
neighborhood design functions perfectly. There are no speed bumps or other traffic-slowing
retrofits, or signs asking drivers to slow down because they are not needed. The design of the
neighborhood lends itself to driving slowly.” This comment captures the sentiment of the many
comments received from the neighborhood.
Many commenters also expressed concern about increase traffic on Grow Avenue, noting that it
does not currently provide for the traffic it has, especially with regard to children walking or riding
bikes to school: It does not have sidewalks or fog lanes / bike lanes, and is currently not designed or
developed in a manner which is conducive to accepting increased traffic.
Staff response: Multiple access options were originally proposed with variations on two basic
access themes: 1) From the west: Grow Avenue through the Nakata neighborhood or 2) From
the east: Madison Avenue via new right-of-way. The subject property has a 15-foot width
panhandle strip leading to Madison Avenue, and until recently, the applicant was unable to
secure sufficient additional width which would allow the City Engineer to determine that the
development provided adequate right-of-way width from Madison Avenue. The applicant
entered into a group of agreements, including an agreement entitled, “Madison Avenue Access
Agreement”, which provides for adequate vehicular access width from Madison Avenue.
• This project, along with four others in the vicinity, will add 180 cars to the area and over 700 daily
trips. Traffic on Madison Avenue backs up on school-day afternoons currently. The roundabout at
High School Road and the planned roundabout at Wyatt Way will result in greater difficulty making
left turns onto Madison Avenue. Emergency services (police and fire) may not be able to respond
as quickly. Wyatt Way is the most common route for those heading south and there is currently
heavy rush-hour traffic. The transportation routes in Winslow are limited, there are few cross
streets between Ericksen, Madison and Grow Avenues and few alternatives are available during
construction or repair times. More traffic poses increased hazards to pedestrians trying to cross
Madison Avenue and its intersections. Madison Avenue residents may peel out of their drives
trying to find a break in the significantly-increased peak hour traffic, putting pedestrians at risk,
especially parents and toddlers using the Tot Lot adjacent to the project. Despite the roundabout
at High School Road, pedestrians and bicyclists are being hit by cars. We need to ensure that
Winslow is a people-friendly place by providing safe spaces for pedestrians and bicyclists and the
cars and trucks that need to get through.
Staff response: The City is constructing a roundabout at the intersection of Madison Avenue
and Wyatt Way, and construction is planned for summer of 2019. Increased traffic will result in
near-indiscernible delays at some intersections (e.g. 1/10 of a second to turn left off Knechtel
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 8 of 25
after Wallace Cottages, Madison Grove and Madison Place are constructed). The traffic analysis
evaluates the planned roundabout at Wyatt Way. The City’s minimum acceptable Level of
Service (LOS) standard for Madison Avenue is LOS-D, where operating conditions result in lower
travel speeds and higher delays at intersections.
• It is unclear if the traffic study has sufficiently addressed the cumulative impacts associated with the
five area developments. There will be additional air pollution and noise pollution and the five
developments result in significant vehicle exhaust emissions.
Staff response: The City Engineer finds that the traffic analyses for the five developments
adequately assess cumulative impacts.
• Parking reductions should be required, and developers should install bus shelters to incentivize
public transit use. There is no public transportation onto many on-or-off island areas except during
commute hours.
Staff response: The parking standard is two spaces per primary dwelling unit. Each lot provides
parking for two vehicles. Kitsap Transit reviewed all of the projects and evaluates service
routes and times: An improved bus stop on Madison Avenue is required in association with
Wyatt Apartments.
Infrastructure and Aquifer Resources
• The cumulative impacts of the five developments results in significant reduction in rainwater
infiltration. The storm sewer at Wallace Way and Madison Avenue needs immediate repair. There
is an increase in the number of stormwater ponds with stagnant water that provide a breeding
ground for mosquitos. Stormwater runoff will send more pollution to the Sound. There is a high
proportion of impervious surface compared to the existing development. Climate change science
projects that heavy rainfall events will become more severe and stormwater runoff will increase as
climate change continues, and the unpredictability of such events will increase. Is there a
requirement for projects to maintain pervious pavement?
Staff response: In general, the rate of infiltration is poor due to soils in this area and, for most of
the developments, a high water table. Where feasible, projects must infiltrate stormwater.
Required stormwater pollution prevention plans must be submitted to the City for review and
approval to ensure that the development results in no adverse impact to water quality. If
stormwater facility upgrades are required for adequate stormwater facilities, the developer is
responsible for the cost. Maintenance of pervious pavement is required: The stormwater
facilities remain privately owned and maintained; annual inspection and maintenance reports
are provided to the City, and the project must record a Declaration of Covenant for
stormwater system operation and maintenance.
• The developments may strain the sewer system and the aquifer and result in water shortages. How
does the City determine whether a proposal has a significant aquifer impact?
Staff response: Projects demonstrate adequate water service by obtaining a binding water
availability letter from the City. The City relies on resources including the Conceptual Model and
Numerical Simulation of the Groundwater-Flow System of Bainbridge Island, Washington 2011 –
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 9 of 25
5021 prepared by the U.S. Geological Survey and the Bainbridge Island Groundwater Model:
Aquifer System Carrying Capacity Assessment prepared by Aspect Consulting in 2016, to
determine capacity: Both documents are available on the City website at
https://www.bainbridgewa.gov/177/Water-Resources-Libraries
The Environmental Technical Advisory Committee is also working on water resource
sustainability recommendations for City Council.
• The Island’s power grids are overtaxed and building permits continue to be issued while City Council
voted against additional power stations. Developments and other uses (e.g. charging hybrid ferries)
will drain the Island’s power supply. The Island has historically experienced frequent black-outs.
Staff response: The existing power infrastructure is adequate to serve the projects. Puget Sound
Energy (PSE) is charged with maintaining capacity and infrastructure by the Washington State
Utility and Transportation Commission. An applicant for development provides information and,
generally with the exception of large industrial developments, PSE makes any necessary
upgrades.
Miscellany:
• One commenter stated that his ownership extends onto the site.
Staff response: The applicant has entered into a settlement agreement to resolve the
ownership claim. (Ex 27).
• One individual wrote to advise the City that the project relies upon private easements over his
property for proposed public facilities. The commenter stated that he is working with the applicant
to negotiate the appropriate easements. Subsequent to the April 20 hearing, the commenter
expressed concern that a fencing condition recommended to the Hearing Examiner may conflict
with an easement.
Staff response: Recommended project conditions provide that existing easements and
restrictions of record must be amended or extinguished to allow for improvements. Fencing
the south common boundaries of Lots 7 and 8 is recommended to preclude private use of the
open space area by the residents of Lots 7 and 8, not to restrict the easement rights.
• The City has enacted a development moratorium.
Staff response: A proposed subdivision is considered under the land use regulations in effect at
the time of complete land use application (RCW 58.17.020). The project is not subject to the
moratorium (Ord. 2018-02), nor the recent Landmark Tree ordinance (Ord. 2018-25).
• The five developments, when considered together, constitute a significant environmental impact in
the subject area.
Staff response: State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) rules define “significant” as “a reasonable
likelihood of more than a moderate adverse impact on environmental quality.” For example,
using a broadcast pesticide to control an invasive species in Eagle Harbor would be a significant
environmental impact. Environmental impacts of project proposals are reviewed and, where
City regulations are insufficient, SEPA conditions ensure impacts are reduced to a
nonsignificant level.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 10 of 25
• The cumulative impacts of the developments should be considered.
Staff response: Cumulative impacts are considered in the evaluation of a proposed development,
including those related to traffic, stormwater facilities, water and sewer service, and utilities. As
a rule, cumulative impacts of development are considered in establishing the Comprehensive
Plan and the Island Wide Transportation Plan and in the standards and guidelines which reflect
those policies, principles and goals such as the Municipal Code and Design and Construction
Standards. Additionally, the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) is a tool for evaluating
cumulative impacts.
• The five developments will reduce the open space in this area that currently benefits Bainbridge
Island and the birds using the Pacific Flyway and reduces the number of mature trees. Existing
vegetation provides shelter and food for birds and other animals. We need parks and trees for our
sanity and health, and at least some of this area needs to be a City park with access from Madison
and Grow Avenues. The lots should be converted into public natural area / greenspace rather
than a residential subdivision to help preserve the natural environment in downtown Winslow,
and to provide area residents with similar access to park facilities that Islanders in the less dense
residential districts are afforded.
Staff response: The site is within the Pacific Flyway, which is a major north-south flyway for
migratory birds and extends from Alaska to Patagonia. No endangered or protected bird
species have been identified, and no significant adverse environmental impacts from this
proposal have been identified. There is no proposal before the City to convert the area to public
space. The properties are privately owned and are not currently held as public open space or
green space. This development provides a large private open space area and community
garden. Additionally, Gideon Park on Grow Avenue is in the immediate vicinity.
• The additional density is not balanced with a benefit to current residents of Madison Avenue. A
community discussion should be held to discuss whether infill development near Winslow Center
should occur, whether additional development benefits the community, and what should be done
to mitigate impacts.
Staff response: The Comprehensive Plan promotes dense development within Winslow in part
to absorb growth that would otherwise be scattered in outlying areas.
• The proposed Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP) is not “green” nor “sustainable” (e.g.
because of the number of parking spaces, the removal of mature trees, hard surfaces).
Staff response: The HDDP program uses a quantitative evaluation method to score projects,
and an HDDP project must achieve LEED, BuiltGreen 4 or Evergreen Sustainable certification.
• The public notice error resulted in insufficient public process.
Staff response: The City issued a second combined Notice of Application/SEPA comment
period because some properties were inadvertently omitted from the original comment
period. While the Planning Commission reviewed the proposed development prior to the second
notice, the facts presented to the Commission remain consistent and no change to the
recommended conditions result.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 11 of 25
Part V: Land Use Code Analysis
1. BIMC 17.12 Subdivision Design Standards
a. All single family residential subdivisions shall be designed in accordance with the City’s adopted
Flexible Lot design requirements, outlined in BIMC Titles 17 and 18.
This application is subject to Open Space Standards (BIMC 17.12.030), General Residential
Subdivision Standards (BIMC 17.12.040) and Flexible Lot Dimensional Standards (BIMC Table
18.12.020-1). As provided in BIMC 2.16.020.Q, development standards in BIMC Titles 17 and 18
may be modified as part of a Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP).
2. BIMC 17.12.030 Open Space Standards
a. The open space requirements contained in BIMC 17.12.030.A are modified by HDDP incentives
which require that the project integrate at least 400 square feet of open space per unit. The
open space shall be located along a public or private street or driveway, or public walkway.
As proposed, the plat depicts 20,508 square feet of open space. The settlement agreement to
resolve the Crampton adverse possession claim includes a boundary agreement to quitclaim a
strip of land located along the west side of the north open space area. This results in a
reduction of total open space area from 20,508 square feet to 19,058 square feet.
The northerly open space abuts Wallace Way and incorporates a neighborhood garden. The
southerly open space is fragmented by easements which render use of the southerly-most
section of the south open space largely impracticable; for example, one easement provides for
utilities, and another for use by an adjacent property owner. While these encumbered areas
may be included in the open space for the purpose of, for example, the convenience of the
future homeowners’ association maintenance, the easement encumbrances conflict with the
goals of the HDDP program to provide well-designed, integrated open space. Therefore, the
project effectively provides approximately 15,000 square feet of open space or 790 square
feet per lot. The open space provided meets open space requirements, as modified by the
provisions of the HDDP program.
b. Common open space may be held by a homeowners’ association or similar organization.
Common ownership by a homeowners’ association is proposed.
c. Fences and/or signs delineating open space areas are required; the Director shall determine
which is required based on the likelihood of encroachment into designated open space areas.
Recommended project conditions include requirements to maintain open space fencing along
the perimeter of the northern open space area (the pea patch and playground) in order to
provide for safety and to delineate boundaries, and along the open space boundary common
to Lots 7 and 8 in order to preclude encroachment.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 12 of 25
d. A draft open space management plan (OSMP) is reviewed as part of the preliminary plat
application. Final approval of the OSMP occurs with final plat approval. The OSMP shall include
a list of all approved uses and a maintenance plan for open space areas. Allowed uses within
designated open space areas are limited to those listed in BIMC 17.12.030. The approved OSMP
must be filed with the Kitsap County Auditor.
The draft open space plan provides for appropriate open space uses. The recommended
project conditions include a requirement to provide a final open space plan and to record the
plan with the Kitsap County Auditor.
3. BIMC 17.12.040 General Residential Subdivision Standards
a. Compliance with BIMC Title 16, BIMC Title 18 and RCW Title 58
Lot areas, dimensions and other characteristics shall comply with the requirements of Title 18
and all applicable provisions of RCW Title 58 or its successors.
As conditioned, the project complies with Title 18 as modified by the Housing Design
Demonstration Project development standards incentives of BIMC 2.16.020: The plat meets
density and lot area requirements, and recommended conditions include requirements to
note setback and lot coverage standards on the face of the plat and to comply with fencing
requirements of BIMC 17.12.030. Subject to conditions, the subdivision provides adequately
for the public health, safety and welfare, and for the public use and interest.
b. Roads and Pedestrian Access
i. Roads and access complying with the “City of Bainbridge Island Design and Construction
Standards and Specifications” and all applicable requirements of the municipal code, shall
be provided to all proposed lots consistent with the standards contained within this
subsection.
The City Engineer recommends approval of the project as conditioned, and finds that the
project, as conditioned, provides roads and access in compliance with City standards.
ii. Existing roadway character shall be maintained where practical. To minimize impervious
surfaces, public right-of-ways, access easements and roadways shall not be greater than the
minimum required to meet standards unless the City Engineer agrees that the additional
size is justified.
The City Engineer recommends approval as conditioned. Standard right-of-way width is
modified to reduce impervious surface and to provide flexibility with regard the Housing
Design Demonstration Project goals.
iii. Pedestrian and bicycle circulation and access within a subdivision and onto the site shall be
provided through walkways, paths, sidewalks, or trails and shall be consistent with the Non-
motorized Transportation Plan (NMTP).
The project provides non-motorized facilities within the subdivision that connect Madison
Avenue, Nakata Avenue and Fir Acres Drive. The plat is consistent with the NMTP.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 13 of 25
4. BIMC Table 18.12.020-1 Flexible Lot Dimensional Standards
The applicant may request that the following development standards from BIMC Title 18 be
modified as part of an HDDP project: Minimum lot dimensions and size, density, lot coverage,
setbacks and parking.
a. Minimum Lot Size and Dimension Requirements
The minimum lot size is 5,000 square feet for lots served by public sewer and the minimum lot
width is 50 feet.
The lots are served by public sewer. The lots range in size from 2,650 – 4,120 square feet and
the minimum lot width is 40 feet. The Health District approved the preliminary subdivision;
final plat approval is subject to the Health District’s final approval in accordance with BIMC
2.16.070.I.4.
b. Density
The base density in the R-4.3 district is one lot per 10,200 square feet. The number of lots
permitted shall be calculated by dividing the total lot area of the property (without deducting
areas to be dedicated as public right-of-ways or areas to be encumbered by private road
easements) by the minimum lot area for standard lots in the district.
As proposed, the total lot area is 103,685 square feet. The settlement agreement to resolve
the Crampton adverse possession claim includes a boundary agreement to quitclaim a strip of
land located along the west side of the north open space area. This results in a reduction of
total lot area from 103,685 square feet to 102,172 square feet.
Base density in the R-4.3 district is 10,200 square feet per lot, or 10.02 lots based on a total lot
area of 102,172 square feet. Bonus density through the HDDP program provides a maximum
of two times the base density, not to exceed R-8 maximum density which is 5,400 square feet
per lot or 19 lots. The proposed plat creates 19 lots, and therefore does not exceed bonus
density allowable through the HDDP program.
c. Maximum Lot Coverage
Lot coverage is the portion of the lot area that may be covered by buildings (BIMC 18.12.050.K).
Maximum lot coverage in the R-4.3 district is 25 percent of the lot area.
As proposed, the total lot area is 103,685 square feet. The settlement agreement to resolve
the Crampton adverse possession claim includes a boundary agreement to quitclaim a strip of
land located along the west side of the north open space area. This results in a reduction of
total lot area from 103,685 square feet to 102,172 square feet.
Maximum lot coverage may be increased by 10 percent through the HDDP program, to 35
percent. Based on a total lot area of 102,172 square feet, the maximum aggregate lot
coverage is 35,760. The recommended conditions of approval include modification to a per-
lot equal allocation of lot coverage in order to provide for buildings, such as picnic shelters
and garden sheds, within the open space.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 14 of 25
d. Minimum Setbacks
Subdivision setbacks required by BIMC Title 18 may be modified through the HDDP program as
follows: Building-to-exterior plat boundary may be reduced from 15 feet and building to right-
of-way or other streets from 15 feet). The following setbacks apply:
Building to building (on-site) Minimum 10 feet
Building to exterior subdivision boundary line Minimum 5 feet
Building to right-of-way or vehicular access easement Minimum 10 feet
Building to Open Space Minimum 10 feet
The recommended conditions include a requirement to depict setbacks on the final plat.
5. BIMC 2.16.020.Q. Housing Design Demonstration Projects (HDDP)
a. Review and Approval Process
The HDDP review and approval process requires that the preapplication proposal be evaluated
by City staff with the Design Review Board serving in an advisory role, and that the project
receive preliminary notification whether the proposal will qualify as an HDDP project. The
Planning Commission must make recommendation on all HDDP projects.
The Design Review Board suggested that the project provide well-designed open space,
appropriate community amenities, enhanced sensitivity to pedestrians and pedestrian
connection to Madison Avenue. The applicant received preliminary notification that the project
qualified for the Housing Design Demonstration Project Program as part of the preapplication
summary letter (Exhibit 18).
The Planning Commission met twice to discuss the project. There was dissention between the
applicant and the Commission, and ultimately the Commission recommended that the project
be denied as an HDDP project, stating that the proposal “is not consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the goals and purposes of the HDDP, including traffic
impacts, public safety impacts on surrounding neighborhoods resulting from the proposed
traffic access via Wallace Way to Grow Avenue, tree retention issues and feasibility of open
space.”
City staff encouraged the Commission to consider Municipal Code regulations. For example:
Open space regulations which normally govern subdivisions do not apply to HDDP projects;
tree retention in open space is not required, and projects earn incentive points for elements
such as neighborhood gardens within open space.
The Commission’s overriding objection was vehicular access through the Nakata
neighborhood rather than from Madison Avenue. Commission concerns were identified in
correspondence and read into the record at the February 22 meeting (Exhibit 25).
Commissioner Quitslund commented that the Commission was especially concerned that the
project avoid adverse impact to public service levels, and included in recommendations that
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 15 of 25
either the project be denied based on inconsistency with the Comprehensive Plan and that the
project does not meet the goals and purposes of the HDDP program due to traffic and public
safety impacts resulting from access through the Nakata neighborhood, or that the project be
approved provided vehicular access avoids the Nakata neighborhood.
The Commission’s concerns with regard to traffic and public safety impacts as a result of
access through the Nakata neighborhood were addressed once the applicant entered into the
agreement which provide for access from Madison Avenue rather than from Grow Avenue
(Exhibit 15).
Though the intent of the applicant is to retain trees in the designated open space area, there
are no Municipal Code requirements to do so. The open space is separated into two areas
and, as discussed under the Open Space Standards in V.2 above, the required open space is
provided. Prescriptive open space requirements in BIMC Title 17 Subdivisions do not apply to
HDDP projects; instead, the HDDP program relies on a point system to evaluate the open
space, as discussed in the following paragraph. Ideally, the applicant would return to the
Commission, but the development agreement (Exhibit 14) specifically provides that the
project does not have to return to Planning Commission. Because the project meets the
Municipal Code requirements, the Planning Department recommends approval.
b. Evaluation Method
The Housing Design Demonstration Project program (HDDP) utilizes a tiered quantitative
evaluation method to link sustainable building goals.
A Tier II project in the R-4.3 district is eligible for a density bonus up to two times the base
density: The project must provide ten percent of the units as Affordable Housing, as defined in
BIMC 18.36.030, and density may not exceed base density for the R-8 district.
A Tier II HDDP project must achieve LEED Silver, BuiltGreen 4 or Evergreen Sustainable
Development certification, and must achieve at least 25 points in the Innovative Site
Development category and at least 12 points in the Housing Diversity category. Tier II limits
home sizes to 1,600 square feet.
The project exceeds the required minimum points in the Innovative Site Development
category, as scored by City staff (Exhibit 20). The application materials include a BuiltGreen 4
checklist (Exhibit 19). Garages are provided for covered parking. The open space for which
points are awarded is well-designed and usable and the area provided well-exceeds program
requirements, as discussed above. A neighborhood garden is proposed, and new sidewalks
provide non-motorized facilities and garages and bike racks provide for bicycles.
The project meets Housing Diversity requirements with homes no more than 1,600 square
feet in size, two affordable housing units, and a variety of unit types including duplexes, age-
in-place homes and two-story homes (Exhibit 19). Conditions to ensure compliance are
recommended, and compliance is reviewed during the building permit process. As determined
by City staff, project scoring follows:
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 16 of 25
Category Points
Awarded
Points
Required
Green Building and Innovative Site Development
✓ BuiltGreen 4 - -
✓ Water Quality & Conservation - -
✓ Covered parking (21% - 40% of total parking spaces) 2 -
✓ Landscaping & Open Space -
✓ Open space minimum 5% and 400 sf/unit (16% – 20%) 6 -
✓ Neighborhood garden (60 sf per dwelling) 2 -
✓ Private yard turf (20% or less) 4 -
✓ Plants (60% native or drought-tolerant) 4 -
✓ Transportation
✓ Preserves, creates or integrates internal and external non -
motorized connections
2 -
✓ Provides public walkways, paths, or bike lanes 3 -
✓ Vehicle charging station (3% of vehicle parking capacity) 3 -
✓ Covered consolidated bike parking 3 -
Innovative Site Development Total 29 25
Housing Diversity
✓ Maximum Home Size 1,600 sf - -
✓ Percent of Affordable Housing (10% of units = 2) 10 or 12+ 10
✓ Unit Type 2 - 5 2
Housing Diversity Total 12 - 17 12
+ Ownership value 10 points, rental value 12 points: The submitted materials do not provide sufficient
information to determine the intent of the applicant in this regard.
6. BIMC 2.16.020.Q Housing Design Demonstration Projects – Decision criteria
In addition to decision criteria required by the underlying planning permit or approval, an
application for a Housing Design Demonstration Project may be approved if the following criteria are
met:
a. The applicant clearly demonstrates evaluation factors listed in subsection Q.4 of this section as
shown in the Housing Design Demonstration Project scoring system as evaluated by the
planning department.
The project demonstrates the evaluation factors and exceeds the minimum required scoring
for a Tier II project. The project is BuiltGreen 4, achieves greater than 25 points in the
Innovative Site Development category, greater than 12 points in the Housing Diversity
category, and limits home sizes to 1,600 square feet. Compliance with recommended project
conditions is ensured at the building permit stage.
b. The applicant has demonstrated how relief from specific development standards, including
setback reductions, lot coverage and/or design guidelines, is needed to achieve the desired
innovative design and the goals of this chapter.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 17 of 25
Relief from setback, lot size and lot coverage standards allows the project to achieve a larger
common open space area with a neighborhood garden and reduces road surface; these are
both innovative design goals.
Additionally, the project provides two affordable housing units: The goal of the HDDP
program is to increase the variety of housing choices available to residents across underserved
portions of the socio-economic spectrum. This HDDP goal is based on a larger jurisdictional
goal to address Department of Housing and Urban Development statistical area deficiencies
by increasing the stock of middle- and moderate-income households on Bainbridge Island.
c. The project does not adversely impact existing public service levels for surrounding properties.
As conditioned, agencies including the City, Bainbridge Island Fire District, and Kitsap Public
Health District find that the project does not adversely impact public service levels.
Recommended project conditions are provided to ensure adequate access, including
emergency services access, water, septic and stormwater facilities.
d. The project complies with all other portions of the BIMC, except as modified through this
housing design demonstration project process.
The project relies on relief from zoning and subdivision standards, including density, setback,
lot size, lot coverage and road standard requirements, as provided in the HDDP program.
e. The applicant is meeting required housing diversity standards.
The project meets housing diversity standards, providing diverse unit types, limiting unit size
and incorporating affordable housing.
7. BIMC 2.16.125.H Preliminary Long Subdivision – Decision criteria
The Hearing Examiner’s decision shall include findings of fact that the application meets all the
following requirements. The preliminary long subdivision may be approved or approved with
modification if:
a. The applicable subdivision development standards of BIMC Titles 17 and 18 are satisfied.
As conditioned, the subdivision complies with applicable subdivision and zoning standards, as
modified by the Housing Design Demonstration Project standard incentives of 2.16.020.Q.
b. The preliminary plat makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and general and
public use and interest, including those items listed in RCW 58.17.110.
Adequate provision is made for the public health, safety and welfare, and public use and
interest, including required items in 58.17.110 RCW such as streets and public ways. The
project is conditioned to ensure adequate access, including emergency services access, water,
septic and stormwater facilities prior to final plat approval.
c. The preliminary plat has been prepared consistent with the requirements of the flexible lot
design process.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 18 of 25
The proposed plat reflects required setbacks and meets open space requirements consistent
with the flexible lot design process and standards, as modified by the Housing Design
Demonstration Project standard incentives.
d. Any portion of a plat which contains a critical area, as defined in BIMC 16.20, conforms to all
requirements of that chapter.
The property contains no critical areas.
e. Any portion of a plat within shoreline jurisdiction, as defined in BIMC 16.12, conforms to all
requirements of that chapter.
The property is not within shoreline jurisdiction.
f. The City Engineer’s recommendation contains determinations that all of the following decision
criteria for long subdivision are met and such determinations are supported by substantial
evidence within the record: The plat conforms to drainage regulations in BIMC 15.20 and 15.21;
the plat will not cause an undue burden on the drainage basin or water quality and will not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of properties downstream; the streets and
pedestrian ways as proposed align with and are otherwise coordinated with streets serving
adjacent properties; the streets and pedestrian ways as proposed are adequate to
accommodate anticipated traffic; there is capacity in the public water system to serve the plat,
and the applicable service can be made available at the site; the plat conforms to the “City of
Bainbridge Island Engineering Design and Development Standards Manual,” unless the City
Engineer has approved a variation to the road standards in that document based on his or her
determination that the variation meets the purposes of BIMC Title 17. The subdivision conforms
to the requirements of this chapter and the standards in the “City of Bainbridge Island Design
and Construction Standards and Specifications,” unless the City Engineer has approved a
variation to the road standards in that document based on his or her determination that the
variation meets the purposes of BIMC Title 17.
As conditioned, the City Engineer recommends approval of the preliminary plat. The City
Engineer finds that, as conditioned, the preliminary subdivision: Conforms to surface and
stormwater requirements; will not cause undue burden on the drainage basin, and will not
unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of properties downstream; the streets
and pedestrian ways are coordinated with streets serving adjacent properties and are
adequate to accommodate anticipated traffic; the water system has sufficient capacity to
serve the plat and water service can be made available at the site; the preliminary plat
conforms to the road standards contained in the “City of Bainbridge Island Design and
Construction Standards and Specifications” manual.
g. The proposal complies with all applicable provisions of this code, Chapters 36.70A and 58.17
RCW, and all other applicable provisions of state and federal laws and regulations.
The Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code reflect the Growth Management Act mandates
(Chapter 36.70A RCW) and State subdivision regulations (Chapter 58.17 RCW). Recommended
conditions ensure that the plat complies with all local, state and federal regulations.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 19 of 25
h. The proposal is in accord with the Comprehensive Plan.
The proposal is in accord with the Comprehensive Plan. The proposal provides for a
residential subdivision within a residential zone. The project provides affordable housing and
provides for growth proximate to public facilities and services. The access from Madison
Avenue protects a residential neighborhood from the vehicular traffic impacts while providing
non-motorized connection. Recommended project conditions require appropriate notification
in the event cultural resources are uncovered.
i. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless written findings are made that the public
use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision.
The project is consistent with the goals Comprehensive Plan as codified in City regulations and
as such, demonstrates that the public interest is served.
Part VI: Conclusions
As conditioned, the proposed development is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and applicable
subdivision standards, as modified by the Housing Demonstration Project Program.
Approval of the preliminary subdivision shall constitute authorization for the applicant to develop the
facilities and improvements in strict accordance with standards established within the municipal code
and recommended conditions. As provided in RCW 58.17.140, complete application for final subdivision
shall be filed within five years of the date of preliminary subdivision approval. If the application is not
filed within the five year period, the approval shall expire and shall be void.
Appropriate notice of application was made and comments were considered. The application is
properly before the Hearing Examiner for decision. Recommended conditions of approval follow:
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 20 of 25
Recommended Conditions of Approval
SEPA CONDITION
1. To mitigate recreation and transportation impacts, the perimeter of the northern open space shall
be fenced and provide a gate which is located proximate to Wallace Way. To avoid adverse
aesthetic impact, appropriate materials which afford visual access to the open space (e.g. picket
fence rather than chain link) shall be used, and the fence shall be four feet in height.
PROJECT CONDITIONS
2. The project must conform to the Housing Design Demonstration Project (HDDP) program Tier II
requirements (BIMC 2.16.020.Q).
A. The project must provide at least two affordable housing units, as defined in the Municipal Code
(BIMC 18.36).
B. The project must achieve LEED, BuiltGreen 4 or Evergreen Sustainable certification.
C. The project must provide homes no greater than 1,600 square feet in size.
D. The project shall substantially conform to the Innovative Site Development category scoring, as
determined by staff, and shall provide and maintain the following:
1) At least 16 percent of the lot area as open space which is well designed and integrated part
of the project
2) A neighborhood garden which is 1,140 square feet in size, at a minimum
3) 20 percent or less turf in private yard areas
4) At least 60 percent native or drought-tolerant plants
5) A number of vehicle charging stations serving a minimum of three percent of the vehicle
parking capacity of the subdivision: The stations shall be shall be accessible to all
homeowners in the subdivision and shall be shown on the civil plan.
6) Covered bicycle parking for 10 bicycles, at a minimum. The bicycle parking shall be held in
common and shall be shown on the civil plan. Additionally, a bike rack serving four bicycles,
at a minimum, must be located in the northern open space.
3. Prior to any construction activities, the applicant shall obtain the appropriate permits from the City
of Bainbridge Island, including but not limited to clearing, grading, and/or building permits.
4. If any historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during excavation or construction, work
shall immediately stop and the Department of Planning and Community Development and the
Washington State Office of Archaeology and Historic Preservation shall be immediately notified.
Construction shall only continue thereafter in compliance with the applicable provisions of law.
5. A final Open Space Management Plan (OSMP) shall be recorded with final plat and the OSMP shall
be referenced on the face of the plat. The final OSMP shall meet the requirements of BIMC 17.12.
6. In addition to the open space fencing required in Condition 1 above, the common property line
between Lot 7 and the open space and Lot 8 and the open space shall be fenced.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 21 of 25
7. Open Space fencing shall be installed on or installation financially assured prior to final plat
approval. The fencing must be maintained in perpetuity and required locations of fencing shall be
noted on the face of the plat.
8. Lot coverage of 35 percent shall be allocated equally between the lots and noted on the face of the
plat, except: The final plat shall reflect a modest reduction in the per-lot allocation to provide lot
coverage for open space buildings (e.g. garden shed, picnic shelter, covered climbing structure).
9. The following setbacks shall be noted and depicted on the final plat:
Building to building (on-site) Minimum 10 feet
Building to exterior subdivision boundary line Minimum 5 feet
Building to right-of-way or vehicular access easement Minimum 10 feet
Building to Open Space Minimum 10 feet
10. The final plat shall comply with the following conditions of the Fire Marshal:
A. The proposed project shall comply with all provisions of the adopted Fire Code.
B. A fire flow test is required prior to occupancy.
11. The final plat shall comply with the following conditions of the City Survey Manager:
A. A boundary line adjustment between Parcel 272502-1-023-2005 and Parcel 272502-1-022-2006
will be completed before final plat.
B. Right-of-way and roadway plans connecting to Madison Avenue are dependent on approval of
the boundary line adjustment and subsequent right-of-way dedication by others.
C. City utilities and related facilities located outside of dedicated right-of-way will require a
separately recorded easement agreement with the recording information noted on the face of
the final plat.
D. Easement agreements with the City will be prepared using the City’s template with the legal
description and map prepared by a licensed land surveyor.
12. The applicant shall comply with the following conditions, to the satisfaction of the City Engineer:
A. Unless specifically exempted in these conditions or otherwise by the City Engineer, the project
shall conform to the City of Bainbridge Island Design and Construction Standards, Surface and
Stormwater Management regulations (BIMC 15.20 and 15.21), and the Stormwater Facilities
Maintenance Program in accordance with the provisions of BIMC 2.16.070.G(5).
B. Public and private improvements, facilities, and infrastructure, on and off the site, that are
required for the subdivision, shall be completed and have final inspection and approval prior to
final plat approval unless the City Engineer accepts an assurance device in lieu of completion.
C. In accordance with the provisions of BIMC 2.16.070.N, the City Engineer may accept financial
assurity in lieu of completion of improvements, in an amount and in a form determined by the
City Engineer, but not exceeding 125 percent of the cost of completing the improvements.
1) Any such assurance device shall be in place prior to final plat approval, shall enumerate in
detail the items being assured, and shall require that all such items will be completed and
approved by the City within one year of the date of final plat approval. The assurity shall
include preparation of all final plans and documents.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 22 of 25
2) Upon completion and the City’s acceptance of facilities, the applicant shall provide an
assurance device securing the successful performance of improvements.
3) While lots created by the subdivision may be sold, occupancy may not be allowed until the
required improvements are formally accepted by the City. A prominent note on the face of
the final plat shall state: “The lots created by this plat are subject to conditions of an
assurance device held by the City for the completion of certain necessary facilities. Building
permits may not be issued and/or occupancy may not be allowed until such necessary
facilities are completed and approved by the City of Bainbridge Island. All purchasers shall
satisfy themselves as to the status of completion of the necessary facilities.”
D. General
1) Survey monumentation shall be provided consistent with the Standards, Section 8-03.
2) Civil improvement plans ready for construction shall be submitted with an application for a
plat utility permit to COBI for review and approval to construct all necessary infrastructure
serving the divided lots and the offsite improvements proposed in the Developer Extension
Agreement (DEA) application.
3) Separate clearing and grading permits shall be required concurrently with the plat utility
permit issuance to clear and grade the site.
4) No building permits for the newly created lots will be issued until the completion of the civil
improvements or performance bonding is established to cover unfinished work to apply for
final plat.
5) Performance bonding for plat civil improvements shall be released and re-bonded only as
determined by a pre-approved work completion phasing plan to be developed with the plat
utility permit application.
6) As-built civil construction plans stamped by a civil engineer shall be provided by the
applicant prior to final plat.
E. Facilities Extension
1) The Developer Extension Agreement (DEA) shall be executed at the plat utilities permitting
application phase for the construction of roads and utilities to be inspected and accepted by
the City. All property to be deeded to the City for the extension shall be provided with a
Right of Way Warranty Deed, or, the DEA shall include all underlying property owners as
applicants and the ROW may be dedicated on the face of the plat.
F. Utilities
1) The proposed 8-inch water main extension from Madison Avenue to the Wallace Way NW
right-of-way extension shall be located to allow both a minimum 10 feet of separation of the
water main from the existing sewer main and provide adequate setback from the northern
property line to allow for construction, maintenance, and servicing of the new main. If
additional ROW or easement is required it shall be provided. Alternatively, a looped water
main system may be accomplished by routing the water line in from Wallace Way NW from
Nakata Avenue NW.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 23 of 25
2) The water main extension from the Fir Acres Drive ROW at the south end of the project shall
be located within existing or proposed easements and provide a minimum 10 feet clearance
to the edge of the easement.
3) A 30-foot ROW shall be dedicated to the City of Bainbridge Island to include the existing
sewer facilities, water, and surface and stormwater facilities from Madison Avenue to the
extension of the Wallace Way NW right-of-way.
4) Easement areas flanking the plat roads will require separate easement documents to be
recorded as they are not within the ROW to be dedicated on the face of the plat.
5) Any and all permanent or temporary construction easements required to install the road
and utility extension, or remove vegetation and disturb ground outside the future ROW
areas shall be secured prior to the execution of the Developer Extension Agreement.
6) Sewer and storm drain improvements along with easements to be dedicated to the City
through and over portions of existing Lot B of short plat SPT 06-07-91-1, also known as the
Extendicare Parcel, are subject to restrictions of an easement with Lot A, also known as the
Hanavan Parcel, of the same plat. The underlying easement agreement shall be amended to
allow for the installation and maintenance of City facilities.
7) The routing of sewer and storm drain improvements through Lots A and B of the Hanavan
Short Plat and the Courtyards at Madison Condominium sites requires a dedicated
easement to the City totaling 20 feet in width to accommodate both the storm and sewer
utilities. Additionally, the easement shall be extended to provide vehicular access for City
maintenance vehicles and equipment from Fir Acres Drive NW through Lot A.
8) Extending the sewer beyond the Hanavan Short Plat lots at the southeast corner to tie into
an existing 8-inch sewer line requires amendment of the existing sewer easement with the
Courtyards on Madison Condominium Association to allow more than 2 residential lots to
connect.
9) The north/south plat access road identified as Loganberry Road NE on the preliminary civil
plans, shall meet the standards of an urban local access street per standard drawing DWG.
7-050 of the Standards, except as noted: The plat access road shall provide two (2) 9-foot
travel lanes for two-way traffic circulation, with 1-foot gutter pans and vertical curbs to
provide a clear curb-curb distance of 20 feet. Sidewalks shall be provided on one side with a
minimum 3-foot wide planter strip. A minimum of 20 feet of right-of-way for the road
section and 10-foot easements on either side shall be dedicated to the City to provide a
combined 40-feet of ROW and easement dedication for access and utilities.
10) The east/west plat access road extension of Wallace Way NW shall meet the standards of an
urban local access street per standard drawing DWG. 7-050 of the Standards, except as
noted. The plat access road shall provide two (2) 9-foot travel lanes for two-way traffic
circulation, with 1-foot gutter pans and vertical curbs to provide a clear curb-curb distance
of 20 feet. Sidewalks shall be provided on one side. A minimum of 30 feet of right-of-way for
the road section and sidewalk shall be dedicated to the City.
G. Stormwater
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 24 of 25
1) A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a civil engineer licensed in the
State of Washington is required prior to construction activities including clearing or grading
or civil improvements for all phases of the project that complies with BIMC 15.20.
2) A final stormwater report shall be submitted detailing compliance with all applicable
minimum requirements as required by BIMC 15.20, prepared by a civil engineer licensed in
the State of Washington.
3) On-site Best Management Practices for soil management and Low Impact Development shall
be employed consistent with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW) BMP T5.13 for surfaces not converted to hard surfaces after
construction.
4) Prior to final plat submittal, the applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance plan
for the on-going maintenance of the storm drainage system.
5) All on-site stormwater facilities shall remain privately owned and maintained. The owner(s)
shall be responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage facilities for this development
following construction. Annual inspection and maintenance reports shall be provided to the
City. A Declaration of Covenant for stormwater system operation and maintenance will be
required to be recorded before final plat submittal. The approved language for the
Declaration of Covenant is found in BIMC Chapter 15.21, Exhibit A.
6) A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis must be performed to demonstrate that the future
build-out conditions from the site combined with the existing offsite drainage tributary to
the storm drain system will not exceed the capacity of the existing or proposed storm drain
system in Madison Avenue North. Where the existing capacity of the system is insufficient,
the project shall mitigate on-site to match the existing 100-year storm flows leaving the
project site, or, upgrade the storm system to provide the needed capacity as defined below.
7) The capacity analysis shall include an assessment of all backwater effects on the existing
system up Madison Avenue North. The design storm for capacity analysis is a 25-year storm
event. The 25-year hydraulic grade line (HGL) shall be below the rim elevations of all
drainage structures. The 100-year storm event shall be shown to not overtop the crest of
any roadways.
8) Clearing and grading of the site may not begin until the storm drain extension to Madison
Avenue is completed. A sediment pond shall be provided sized handle the peak 10-year flow
until the time the storm drain capacity upgrades in Madison Avenue are performed. Once
upgrades are performed the on-site sediment pond storage requirement may be reduced to
the standard 2-year peak flow per the Department of Ecology SWMMWW BMP C241:
Temporary Sediment Pond.
H. Permitting
1) In addition to a clearing and/or grade and fill permit, a right-of-way (ROW) construction
permit will be required prior to any construction activities within the existing right-of-way.
The ROW permit will be subject to separate conditions and bonding requirements.A.
2) Application for a final plat shall require binding water and sewer availability letters from the
City.
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN 50589 SUB Page 25 of 25
3) The proposed action(s), phased or concurrent, in their totality would result in more than
one (1) acre of earth disturbance on the site and drain to waters of the State. A Construction
Stormwater General Permit shall be obtained from the Washington State Department of
Ecology and the site shall be monitored for discharge of pollutants and sediment to the
wetlands and stream for the duration of the project. No land clearing or construction
permits shall be issued prior to obtaining the State permit.
13. The following conditions shall be noted on the face of the final plat: Conditions 2;3; 4; reference
to open space plan and requirements in conditions 1,5, 6 and 7; 8; 9; applicable portions of 13.
FE
R
N
C
L
I
F
F
A
V
E
WINSLOW WAY
SR
3
0
5
SP
O
R
T
S
M
A
N
C
L
U
B
R
D
WE
A
V
E
R
A
V
E
N
U
E
MA
D
I
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
HIGH SCHOOL ROAD
WINSLOW WAY
ER
I
C
K
S
E
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
WYATT WAY
WALLACE WAY
KNECHTEL WY
LO
V
E
L
L
A
V
E
N
U
E
GR
O
W
A
V
E
N
U
E
CA
V
E
A
V
E
MADRONA WY
SMH
SMH
UP
LP
CB
LP
TP(2)
bumps
E
a
v
e
E
a
v
e
5.5' Chainlink fence
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
N
o
r
t
h
5' Wo
o
d
boar
d
f
e
n
c
e
Stones (2)Stones (2)
6' T-post & wire fence
6
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
Continues
East
Ro
c
k
w
a
l
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
c
u
r
b
s
Ro
c
k
w
a
l
l
Rehab Clinic
Building
Shed
26"P
12"B
26"
16"18"
14"
14"
16"
12"A
16"A
16"A
16"A*
2-trunk
12"
14"
14"
14"16"
12"
12"
22"F
20"F
28"M
12"A
12"A
12"A
14"A
22"M
22"F
24"F 26"F
14"A
12"A
12"A
12"A*
4-trunk
26"F
10"F
12"Mad.
26"*
2-trunk
18"*
2-trunk
12"F
14"F
14"F
16"F
18"F
18"F
14"A
22"F
16"F
12"F
12"F
14"F
22"F
14"F
10"F
14"A
14"A
12"A
12"A
18"A
R
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
C&
P
C
&
P
C
&
P
C
&
P
Fenced
4
"
P
V
C
6"Conc.dumpster area
6"PVC 4"CPP
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
8"Conc
.
6"Conc.
Speed
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
8"Conc.
4
"
C
P
P
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
12"CI
Power
box
Right-of-way
Right-of-way
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
W
W
WALLACE WAY NW
N
E
T
A
U
R
N
I
C
P
L
NA
K
A
T
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
W
WALLACE WAY NE
CLAYTON PL
M
A
D
I
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
11
LO
G
A
N
B
E
R
R
Y
R
O
A
D
18 19
PEA
PATCH
4,055-sf
PLAY
GROUND
9,210-sf
50'
BIKE
SHELTER
SSMH-1
TYPE 2, 48"
CONNECT TO
EX. 8"SS
PROPOSED FIRE
HYDRANT
PROPOSED FIRE
HYDRANT
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W W W W W W W W W W W
SD
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
SD SD SD SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
CONNECT CB
TO EX. 12"SD
SD
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN BASED ON CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAN DATED
2.25.2017, AGO LAND SURVEYING SURVEY DATED 2.26.2017,
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA & SITE OBSERVATIONS.
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN 2-FT CONTOURS.
DATUM: NAVD88
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 80200
WALLACE COTTAGES
HDDP PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
SEABOLD
ENGINEERING LLC
PO Box 445 Indianola, WA 98342
360.930.4668 Engineer@SeaboldEng.com
date:4/26/2017
designed:k. laughlin
drawn:k. laughlin
checked:a. loving
job no.:CE10.10
12.8.2017 K.E.L. ADDRESSED COBI COMMENTS DATED 8.14.2017.
4/10/2018
1
4.10.2018 K.E.L. REVISED WALLACE WAY EAST AS REQUESTED.2
UTILITY PLAN
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS
PO BOX 2879
POULSBO, WA 98370
DAVID SMITH - 360.779.7157
smithhouse4@comcast.net
C1
1 OF 5
1,0000500 2,000
SCALE: 1" = 1,000'
PROJECT
LOCATION
VICINITY MAP
TAX ID: 272502-1-023-2005, 272502-1-155-2005,
272502-1-154-2006, 272500-1-153-2007
SE & NE 1
4 OF NE 1
4 SECTION 27 TOWNSHIP 25 NORTH RANGE 2 EAST
SEE SHEET C2 FOR CONTINUATION
CONNECT TO
EXISTING WATER
WATER METER,
TYPICAL
SEWER SERVICE
STUB, TYPICAL
BIORETENTION
SWALE, TYPICAL
EX. SSMH
EX.
SSMH
PARCEL INFORMATION
NORTH PARCEL
TAX ID: 272502-1-023-2005,
ADDRESS: NONE,
AREA: 0.58-ACRES
NORTH-CENTRAL PARCEL
TAX ID: 272502-1-155-2005,
ADDRESS: 351 WALLACE WAY NW,
AREA: 0.63-ACRES
SOUTH-CENTRAL PARCEL
TAX ID: 272502-1-154-2006,
ADDRESS: 349 WALLACE WAY NW,
AREA: 0.63-ACRES
SOUTH PARCEL
TAX ID: 272502-1-153-2007,
ADDRESS: 347 FIR ACRES DR NW,
AREA: 0.63-ACRES
TOTAL AREA: 2.47-ACRES
ZONING: R4.3 - 10,000-sf LOTS, 4.3-DU/AC
EXISTING IMPERVIOUS: N/A
PROPOSED AREAS:
WALLACE EAST ROAD 9,170-SF; 8.5%
WALLACE SIDEWALK & MULTI-USE TRAIL : 3,680-SF; 3.4%
LOGANBERRY ROAD: 13,305-SF; 12.4%
LOGANBERRY SIDEWALK: 2,545-SF; 2.4%
DRIVEWAY: 6,100-SF; 5.7%
ROOFTOPS: 21,340-SF; 19.8%
TOTAL IMPERVIOUS AREA: 56,140-SF; 52.2%
ON-SITE STORMWATER BMP'S:
ROADWAY: BIORETENTION SWALE, BMP T7.30,
ROOFTOP: BIORETENTION SWALE & CELL, BMP T7.30,
LANDSCAPING: SOIL AMENDMENT, BMP T5.13.
TOTAL DISTURBED AREA: ±2.3-ACRES
CRITICAL AREAS: NONE LISTED.
LEGEND
EXISTING PROPERTY LINES
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING EASEMENT
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
PROPOSED SIDEWALK
PROPOSED CATCH BASIN
PROPOSED SANITARY SEWER
EXISTING CENTERLINE
SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
W EXISTING WATER
PROPOSED FIRE HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE HYDRANT
PROPOSED PAVEMENT
SHEET LIST
C1 - UTILITY PLAN
C2 - UTILITY PLAN - SOUTH
C3 - WALLACE EAST ROAD PLAN, PROFILE & SECTIONS
C4 - LOGANBERRY ROAD PLAN, PROFILE & SECTIONS
C5 - L.I.D. SITE ASSESSMENT
ABBREVIATIONS
EX. = EXISTING
PRO. = PROPOSED
ROW = RIGHT OF WAY
DIP = DUCTILE IRON PIPE
PVC = POLYVINYL CHLORIDE PIPE
SSMH = SANITARY SEWER MANHOLE
SDMH = STORM DRAIN MANHOLE
CB = CATCH BASIN
CPP= CORRUGATED POLYETHYLENE PIPE
LF = LINEAR FEET
MIN. = MINIMUM
TYP. = TYPICAL
PROPOSED PROPERTY LINES
NOTES:
1.STORM DRAINAGE:
·WATER QUALITY TREATMENT WILL BE PROVIDED THROUGH
BIORETENTION SWALES AND STORMFILTERS.
·DRAINAGE FROM INDIVIDUAL LOTS 8-17 WILL DISCHARGE TO
THE BIORETENTION SWALE ALONG LOGANBERRY. LOTS 1-7 WILL
DISCHARGE TO THE LOGANBERRY DRAINAGE SYSTEM.
2.A FIRE HYDRANT WILL BE LOCATED NEAR THE INTERSECTION OF
WALLACE WAY WITH LOGANBERRY ROAD AND A SECOND ONE
WILL BE LOCATED NEAR THE CUL-DE-SAC TO MEET FIRE
PROTECTION REQUIREMENTS.
3.SEE SURVEY DRAWINGS FOR EXISTING & PROPOSED EASEMENTS.
4.DETAILED EROSION & SEDIMENT CONTROL PLAN WILL BE
DEVELOPED DURING PLAT UTILITY DESIGN.
EXISTING TREES BASED
ON AGO SURVEY
VEGETATED
SWALE
BIORETENTION
CELL
W PROPOSED WATER
SD PROPOSED STORM DRAIN
STORMFILTER
2
2
2
FH
WV
WV
WV
(3)WV's
MH
MH
MH
CB
CBCB
WV
UP
SMH
UP
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
SN
WM
TP
8
"
P
V
C
8
"
P
V
C
18
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
8
"
C
o
n
c
8
"
P
V
C
8"PVC
8
"
P
V
C
8"PVC
CB
MHMH
CB
CB
TP(2)
CB
6"PVC 8"CPP
12"C
P
P
8"CPP
1
2
"
C
P
P
5.5' Wood boar fence
F
e
n
c
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
Utility
(type unknown)
6
.
5
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
(
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
N
o
r
t
h
)
6.5' Wood board fence
Gate
Power
box
1.25"Ø
PVC
G
a
t
e
6
.
5
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
Area
drain
6"Ø PVC
clean-out5' Wood
board fence
Area
drain
Trail
House
14"
22"F
12"F
18"F
26"F
12"F
18"F
30"M
18"F
14"F
4"Holly
20"F
10"M
18"F
18"F10"
3"Holly
3"Holly
8"M
5"
7"
12"F
12"F
10"F
12"F
12"F
Mad.Multi-
trunk
12"F
10"F
4"Mad.
18"F
14"F
6"Mad.
16"F
3"Mad.
12"F 12"F
5"Mad.12"F
14"F
4"Mad.
14"F
5"Mad.
10"F
8"Mad.
3"Mad.
16"F
5"Mad.
12"F
5"Mad.
5"Mad.
4"Mad.12"F
18"F
12"F
12"F
16"F
12"F
4"Mad.
Mad.Multi-
trunk
5"Mad.
6"Mad.3"Mad.
12"F
16"F 5"Mad.
12"F
8"F
3"Mad.
F Split-
trunk
22"F
12"F
6"Mad.12"F
3"Mad.
24"F
10"F
4"Mad.
8"F
5"F8"Mad.
18"F
16"F
14"F
F Multi-
trunk
6"F
16"F
16"Mad.
20"F 12"F
18"F
18"F
16"F
C&P
P
C&
P
C&
P
Trail c
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
12"CPP
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
W
W
W
W
UTILITY ACCESS LID
COMM. ACCESS LID
RIM=165.1
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
F
o
g
l
i
n
e
B
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
B
i
k
e
l
a
n
e
Benchmark
Set a Mag-nail in pavement0.2' West of West face concretecurb and 0.7' West of Northwest
Elevation=164.85'corner of traction pad for ramp
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
KNECHTEL WAY
8
M
A
D
I
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
14+
7
1
6+
0
0
7+
0
0
8+
0
0
9+
0
0
9+
4
4
CONNECT EX. 12"SD
TO NEW SD CB
CONNECT 8"SS
TO EX. SSMH
180
1
7
8
18
2
184
186
18
8
17
0
164
16
6
168
1
7
2
17
4
17
6
W
W
W
W
W
S
D
S
D
S
D
SD
S
D
S
D
S
D
SD SD SD SD SD SD
30' PRO.
EASEMENT
20' EX.
EASEMENT 20' PRO.
EASEMENT
10' PRO.
EASEMENT
20' PRO.
EASEMENT
CONNECT 18"SD
TO EX SDMH
CONNECT EX.
SS SERVICES
S
D
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN BASED ON CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAN DATED
2.25.2017, AGO LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY DATED 2.26.2017,
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA & SITE OBSERVATIONS.
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN 2-FT CONTOURS.
DATUM: NAVD88
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 80200
WALLACE COTTAGES
HDDP PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
SEABOLD
ENGINEERING LLC
PO Box 445 Indianola, WA 98342
360.930.4668 Engineer@SeaboldEng.com
date:4/26/2017
designed:k. laughlin
drawn:k. laughlin
checked:a. loving
job no.:CE10.10
12.8.2017 K.E.L. ADDRESSED COBI COMMENTS DATED 8.14.2017.
4/10/2018
1
4.10.2018 K.E.L. REVISED WALLACE WAY EAST AS REQUESTED.2
UTILITY PLAN - SOUTH
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS
PO BOX 2879
POULSBO, WA 98370
DAVID SMITH - 360.779.7157
smithhouse4@comcast.net
C2
2 OF 5
CONNECT TO
EXISTING WATER
ABANDON
EX. 12"SD
2
18"SD TO REPLACE
ABANDONED 12"SD
P-CL-WALLACE-EAST-REV-2
180
190
200
210
220
230
180
190
200
210
220
230
20+0021+0022+0023+0024+0024+54
20+0021+0022+0023+0024+0024+54
2.92%
7.79%
2.40%GRADE BREAK STA = 20+17.57
ELEV = 190.98
GRADE BREAK STA = 24+53.54
ELEV = 208.95
L = 50.00 VC
L = 50.00 VC
UP
LP
LP
bumps
E
a
v
e
E
a
v
e
5.5' Chainlink fence
C
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
N
o
r
t
h
5' Wo
o
d
boar
d
f
e
n
c
e
Stones (2)Stones (2)
6' T-post & wire fence
6
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
Continues
East
Ro
c
k
w
a
l
l
Pa
r
k
i
n
g
c
u
r
b
s
Ro
c
k
w
a
l
l
Rehab Clinic
Building
Shed
26"P
12"B
26"
16"18"
14"
14"
16"
12"A
16"A
16"A
16"A*
2-trunk
12"
14"
14"
14"16"
12"
12"
22"F
20"F
12"A
12"A
24"F 26"F
14"A
12"A
R
i
g
h
t
-
o
f
-
w
a
y
Fenced
4
"
P
V
C
6"Conc.dumpster area
6"PVC 4"CPP
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
1
2
"
C
o
n
c
.
8"Conc
.
6"Conc.
Speed
Right-of-way
Right-of-way
W
W
WALLACE WAY NW
N
E
T
A
U
R
N
I
C
P
L
NA
K
A
T
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
W
WALLACE WAY NE
CLAYTON PL
M
A
D
I
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
1 17
18 19
9,210-sf
60'
50'
BIKE
SHELTER
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
206
208
210
208
200
19
4196198202204
20
6
SD
S
D
S
D
SD SD SD SD
20+00
21+00
22+00
23+00
24+0024+54
SD
2%
DRIVING LANE
CL
DRIVING LANE
EXISTING 8"
SEWER MAIN
10'10'
12" STORM
DRAIN
30' ROW
8" WATER
MAIN
PLANTER
3'5'
SIDEWALK
1.5%
2%
DRIVING LANE
CL
DRIVING LANE
EXISTING 8"
SEWER MAIN
10'10'
12" STORM
DRAIN
30' ROW
8" WATER
MAIN
5'
SIDEWALK
1.5%
WALLACE COTTAGES
HDDP PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
SEABOLD
ENGINEERING LLC
PO Box 445 Indianola, WA 98342
360.930.4668 Engineer@SeaboldEng.com
date:4/26/2017
designed:k. laughlin
drawn:k. laughlin
checked:a. loving
job no.:CE10.10
12.8.2017 K.E.L. ADDRESSED COBI COMMENTS DATED 8.14.2017.
4/10/2018
1
4.10.2018 K.E.L. REVISED WALLACE WAY EAST AS REQUESTED.2
WALLACE EAST PLAN, PROFILE & SECTIONS
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS
PO BOX 2879
POULSBO, WA 98370
DAVID SMITH - 360.779.7157
smithhouse4@comcast.net
C3
3 OF 5
Road Section
SCALE: 1" = 5'
B
C3
Road Section
SCALE: 1" = 5'
A
C3
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN BASED ON CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAN DATED
2.25.2017, AGO LAND SURVEYORS SURVEY DATED 2.26.2017,
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA & SITE OBSERVATIONS.
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN 2-FT CONTOURS.
DATUM: NAVD88
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 80200
ROAD PROFILE STA 20+00 - 24+54
SCALE: 1" = 40' H
1" = 20' V
ELEVATIONS SHOWN AT ROAD CENTERLINE
A C3
2
2 2
2
B C3
180
190
200
210
220
230
180
190
200
210
220
230
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 14+71
10+00 11+00 12+00 13+00 14+00 14+71
-1.50%
-4.50%
-4.25%
GRADE BREAK STA = 10+30.00
ELEV = 207.91
GRADE BREAK STA = 14+70.65
ELEV = 192.64L = 50.00 VC
L = 50.00 VC
30'
WALLACE
ROW
PROPOSED
GRADE
EXISTING GRADE
TP(2)
TP(2)
6' T-post & wire fence
6
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
6.5' Wood board fence
Gate
Power
box
1.25"Ø
PVC
G
a
t
e
6
.
5
'
W
o
o
d
b
o
a
r
d
f
e
n
c
e
c
o
n
t
i
n
u
e
s
S
o
u
t
h
Area
drain
12"A
16"A
16"A
16"A*
2-trunk
12"12"A
12"A
12"A
14"A
22"M
22"F
24"F 26"F
14"A
12"A
12"A
12"A*
4-trunk
26"F
10"F
12"Mad.
26"*
2-trunk
18"*
2-trunk
12"F
14"F
14"F
16"F
18"F
18"F
14"
14"A
22"F
16"F
12"F
12"F
14"F
22"F
14"F
10"F
14"A
14"A
12"A
12"A
18"A
C&P
P
C&
P
C&
P
C&
P
C
&
P
C
&
P
C
&
P
Power
box
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
12
13
14
15
16
17
10
11LO
G
A
N
B
E
R
R
Y
R
O
A
D
10
+
0
0
11
+
0
0
12
+
0
0
13
+
0
0
14+
0
0
14+
7
1
20
0
210
19
6
198
20
2
20
4
206
208
190
186
18
8
192
194
20
6
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
S
D
SD
S
D
SD
24+0024+54
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
SD
20' ROW
2%
DRIVING LANE
BIORETENTION SWALE
7'
CL
5'
SIDEWALKDRIVING LANE
11'
8" WATER
MAIN
8" SEWER
MAIN
10'10'
6" DESIGN
WATER DEPTH
4'
12" STORM
DRAIN
10' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
40' TOTAL
10' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
6" UNDER
DRAIN
CURB W/ 1'
CUTS @ 8'O.C.
DRIVING LANE DRIVING LANEDRIVEWAY APRON
20' ROW
2%
10'
CL
5'
SIDEWALK
10'10'4'
10' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
40' TOTAL
10' ACCESS &
UTILITY EASEMENT
2%
11'
8" WATER
MAIN
8" SEWER
MAIN
12" STORM
DRAIN
WALLACE COTTAGES
HDDP PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
SEABOLD
ENGINEERING LLC
PO Box 445 Indianola, WA 98342
360.930.4668 Engineer@SeaboldEng.com
date:4/26/2017
designed:k. laughlin
drawn:k. laughlin
checked:a. loving
job no.:CE10.10
12.8.2017 K.E.L. ADDRESSED COBI COMMENTS DATED 8.14.2017.
4/10/2018
1
4.10.2018 K.E.L. REVISED WALLACE WAY EAST AS REQUESTED.2
LOGANBERRY RD PLAN, PROFILE & SECTIONS
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS
PO BOX 2879
POULSBO, WA 98370
DAVID SMITH - 360.779.7157
smithhouse4@comcast.net
C4
4 OF 5
Section STA 10+35 - 13+75
SCALE: 1" = 5'
A
C4
Section @ Driveway aprons
SCALE: 1" = 5'
B
C4
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN BASED ON CENTRAL HIGHLANDS PLAN DATED
2.25.2017, AGO LAND SURVEYING SURVEY DATED 2.26.2017,
PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA & SITE OBSERVATIONS.
TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION SHOWN 2-FT CONTOURS.
DATUM: NAVD88
SCALE: 1" = 40'
40 80200
ROAD PROFILE STA 10+00 - 14+71
SCALE: 1" = 40' H
1" = 20' V
BIORETENTION
SWALE, TYPICAL
A
C4
B
C4
BIORETENTION
CELL
2
20
0
21022
0
19
219
419619820220420
620
8
21221
4
2
1
6
21
8
20' ESMT
WALLACE WAY NW
NE TAURNIC PL
F
I
R
A
C
R
E
S
D
R
I
V
E
N
W
N
A
K
A
T
A
A
V
E
N
U
E
S
W
CLAYTON PL
4"AC
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
170
180
190
172
174
176
178
182
18
4
18
6
18
8
192
194
196
19
8
19
0
190
200
19
2
192
194
194
196
19
8
202
204
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W W W W
W
W
W
W
W
W
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
20
'
E
S
M
T
15' ESMT
19
0
20
0
210
188
19
2
19
4
196
198
202
204
2
0
6
208
21
2
214
216
S
D
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
W
EX. SLOPES ON ADJACENT
SITE >10% BASED ON
AERIAL LIDAR.
30'
R.O.W.
45'
VEGETATED
BUFFER
KITSAP SILT
LOAM
KAPOWSIN
GRAVELLY
ASHY LOAM
APPROX. CHANGE IN
SOIL TYPE PER USDA
NRCS SOIL SURVEY
M
A
D
I
S
O
N
A
V
E
N
U
E
EXISTING FIRE
HYDRANT
KAPOWSIN
GRAVELLY
ASHY LOAM
SITE PLAN
SITE PLAN BASED ON PUBLICLY AVAILABLE DATA & SITE
OBSERVATIONS. TOPOGRAPHIC INFORMATION BASED
ON KITSAP COUNTY PUD AERIAL LIDAR 2-FT CONTOURS,
NOT A SURVEY.
DATUM: NAVD88
SCALE: 1" = 50'
50 100250
LEGEND
WALLACE COTTAGES
HDDP PRELIMINARY PLAT SUBMITTAL
SEABOLD
ENGINEERING LLC
PO Box 445 Indianola, WA 98342
360.930.4668 Engineer@SeaboldEng.com
date:4/26/2017
designed:k. laughlin
drawn:k. laughlin
checked:a. loving
job no.:CE10.10
12.8.2017 K.E.L. ADDRESSED COBI COMMENTS DATED 8.14.2017.
12/8/2017
1
L.I.D. SITE ASSESSMENT PLAN
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS
PO BOX 2879
POULSBO, WA 98370
DAVID SMITH - 360.779.7157
smithhouse4@comcast.net
C5
5 OF 5
POTENTIAL
SITE ACCESS
POTENTIAL
SITE ACCESS
POTENTIAL
SITE ACCESS
EXISTING PROPERTY LINES
EXISTING ROAD
EXISTING CENTERLINE
SD EXISTING STORM DRAIN
EXISTING SANITARY SEWER
W EXISTING WATER MAIN
EXISTING MAJOR CONTOUR
EXISTING MINOR CONTOUR
EXISTING BUILDINGS
EXISTING PAVEMENT
APPROX.
EXISTING TRAILS
EXISTING TREES BASED
ON AGO SURVEY
OVERGROWN
BLACKBERRY
BUSHES
OVERGROWN
BLACKBERRY
BUSHES
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TABLE OF CONTENTS
1. Introduction ...............................................................................................................4
2. Project Description ...................................................................................................4
3. Existing Conditions ...................................................................................................7
4. Future Traffic Demand ............................................................................................14
5. Conclusions and Mitigation .....................................................................................20
Appendix .............................................................................................................................22
LIST OF TABLES
1.Study Area ................................................................................................................8
2.Existing Level of Service ........................................................................................12
3.Project Trip Generation ..........................................................................................14
4. 2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1 .................................................16
5. 2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1-2 ..............................................16
6. 2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 2 .................................................17
7. 2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1 .................................................18
8. 2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1-2 ..............................................18
9. 2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 2 .................................................19
LIST OF FIGURES
1.Vicinity Map & Roadway System ..............................................................................5
2.Site Area ...................................................................................................................6
3.Existing AM Peak Hour Volumes ..............................................................................9
4.Existing PM Peak Hour Volumes ............................................................................10
5.Trip Distribution & Assignment Alternative 1 ..........................................................23
6. Trip Distribution & Assignment Alternative 1-2 .......................................................24
2
7. Trip Distribution & Assignment Alternative 2 ..........................................................25
8. Forecast 2020 Background AM Peak Hour Volumes .............................................26
9. Forecast 2020 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1 .........................27
10. Forecast 2020 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1-2 ......................28
11. Forecast 2020 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 2 .........................29
12. Forecast 2020 Background PM Peak Hour Volumes .............................................30
13. Forecast 2020 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1 .........................31
14. Forecast 2020 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1-2 ......................32
15. Forecast 2020 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 2 .........................33
16. Forecast 2035 Background AM Peak Hour Volumes .............................................34
17. Forecast 2035 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1 .........................35
18. Forecast 2035 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1-2 ......................36
19. Forecast 2035 with Project AM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 2 .........................37
20. Forecast 2035 Background PM Peak Hour Volumes .............................................38
21. Forecast 2035 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1 .........................39
22. Forecast 2035 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 1-2 ......................40
23. Forecast 2035 with Project PM Peak Hour Volumes Alternative 2 .........................41
3
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
1. INTRODUCTION
This report summarizes traffic impacts related to the Wallace Cottages development. The
general goals of this impact study concentrate on 1) the assessment of existing roadway
conditions and intersection congestion, 2) forecasts of newly generated project traffic, 3)
estimations of future delay, and 4) recommendations for mitigation. Preliminary tasks
include the detailed collection of roadway information, road improvement information, and
peak hour traffic counts. A level of service analysis for existing traffic conditions is then
made to determine the present degree of intersection congestion. Based on this analysis,
forecasts of future traffic levels on the surrounding street system are found. Following this
forecast, the future service levels for the key intersections are investigated. As a final
step, applicable conclusions and possible on-site or off-site mitigation measures are
defined. The findings of this study are intended to ensure safe and efficient progression of
vehicular/non-motorist traffic near the site.
2.PROJECT DESCRIPTION
The Wallace Cottages project proposes to construct nineteen (19) new single family lots in
the City of Bainbridge Island. Development will take place on four (4) undeveloped
parcels (272502-1-023-2005; -155-2005; -154-2006; -153-2007) located opposite of the
Wallace Way NE & Madison Avenue North intersection. The parcels are located in the R-
4.3 urban zoning district within the Mixed Use Town Center. This analysis analyzes three
(3)varying access scenarios:
Alternative 1: One (1) Full-access to the west via Wallace Way NW easement
extension only.
Alternative 1-2: One (1) Full-access to the west via Wallace Way NW easement
extension AND one (1) one-way egress at Madison Avenue North.
Alternative 2: One (1) Full-access to the east at Madison Avenue North only.
Level of service calculations and forecast trip distributions reflect each alternative for the
2020 buildout and 2035 horizon analyses.
Surrounding land uses are primarily residential. Figure 1 on the following page shows the
vicinity of the area along with the street network serving the site. The general
configuration of the project is shown on the site plan on Figure 2.
4
5
6
3. EXISTING CONDITIONS
3.1. Surrounding Roadway System
Roadways serving the proposed site consist of arterials and residential roadways which
vary in width, terrain, and posted speeds as well as SR-305 to the east. As indicated by
their specific arterial designations, these roadways also vary in their overall function as
part of the general network. The key streets near the site are described below.
Madison Avenue North: is a two-lane, north-south secondary arterial that borders the east
side of the project. The roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 mph with a 20 mph posted
school speed limit to the north of the site from the hours of 7 AM to 5 PM Monday through
Friday. Paving is asphalt concrete with lane widths of approximately 12 feet. Designated
bicycle lanes are found on either side of the roadway and are roughly 5 feet wide that
transitions to curb/gutter/sidewalk. Grades are mild in the area.
Grow Avenue NW: is a two-lane, north south local access roadway that is located to the
west of the project site. The roadway has a posted speed limit of 25 mph and lane widths
are approximately 10 feet. Shoulders are paved in areas and transitions into grass/gravel.
Grades are moderate in the area.
High School Road NE: is a two-lane, east-west secondary arterial that is located north of
the project. The posted speed limit is 40 mph west of Sportsman Club Rd and reduces to
25 mph east of Sportsman Club Rd. Paving is asphalt concrete and lane widths are
approximately 10-11 feet. Shoulders are paved at roughly 5 feet west of Sportsman Club
Rd and consist of curb/gutter/sidewalk to the east. Grades are moderate in the area.
Wyatt Way NW: is a two-lane, east-west secondary arterial that is located to the south of
the site. The posted speed limit is 25 mph. Paving is asphalt concrete and lane widths
are approximately 11 feet. Shoulders are paved and consist of curb/gutter/sidewalk in
some areas. Grades are moderate in the area.
7
3.2. Existing Peak Hour Volumes and Patterns
Table 1 below portrays the field data that was obtained for this impact study. The traffic
counts were taken during the morning peak period between 7 AM to 9 AM and the evening
peak period between the hours of 4 PM to 6 PM. These specific peak periods were
targeted for analysis purposes since they generally represent a worst case scenario for
roadways with respect to traffic conditions. This is primarily due to the common 8 AM to 5
PM work schedule and the greater number of personal trips occurring after work hours.
Most commuters leave and return to their dwellings at the same time of day which
translates to a natural peak in intersection traffic loads. Figure 3 on the following page
shows the existing weekday AM peak hour volumes; Figure 4 on page 10 shows the
existing weekday PM peak hour volumes.
Table 1
Study Area
Control Intersection Data Collection
Roundabout NE High School Road & Madison Avenue N. February, 2017
Two-Way Stop
Wallace Way NE & Madison Avenue N. May, 2017
Wallace Way NW & Grow Avenue NW May, 2017
Wallace Way NW & Nakata Ave NW/Taurnic Pl NW May, 2017
NE High School Road & Grow Avenue NW May, 2017
All-Way Stop Wyatt Way NW/NE & Madison Avenue N. February, 2017
Wyatt Way NW & Grow Avenue NW November, 20141
1 Data from the Wyatt Way NW & Grow Avenue NW intersection was increased by 1.5 percent annually to account for
population growth and recent construction in the area to reflect estimated 2017 volumes.
8
9
10
3.3. Roadway Improvements
A review of a current Section Seven 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Plan of the City of
Bainbridge Island indicates there are improvement projects near the site. A list of projects
in the vicinity of the site is listed below.
6-Year CIP
Wyatt Way Reconstruction – Phase 1:
This project plans on adding capacity related improvements to the Wyatt Way corridor
from Madison Avenue N to Lovell Avenue NW to improve level of service. Installing
complete sidewalks and bicycle facilities are also planned.
20-Year CIP
Other projects are outlined in the 20 year CIP and can aid in potential future capacity
improvement and consist of the following:
Roadway Reconstruction Projects:
Winslow Way Reconstruction – Phase 2
Wyatt Way Reconstruction – Phase 2
Intersection Improvement Projects:
Madison & New Brooklyn
Madison & Wyatt (Possible Roundabout or Traffic Signal)
3.4. Existing Level of Service
Existing peak hour delays were determined through the use of the 2016 Highway Capacity
Manual. Capacity analysis is used to determine level of service (LOS) which is an
established measure of congestion for transportation facilities. LOS is defined for a variety
of facilities including intersections, freeways, arterials, etc. A complete definition of level of
service and related criteria can be found in the HCM.
The methodology for determining the LOS at unsignalized intersections strives to
determine the potential capacities for the various vehicle movements and ultimately
determines the average total delay for each movement. Potential Capacity represents the
number of additional vehicles that could effectively utilize a particular movement, which is
essentially the equivalent of the difference between the movement capacity and the
existing movement volume. Total delay is described as the elapsed time from when a
vehicle stops at the end of a queue until the vehicle departs from the stop line. Average
11
total delay is simply the mean total delay over the entire stream. A number of factors
influence potential capacity and total delay including the availability/usefulness of gaps.
The range for intersection level of service is LOS A to LOS F with the former indicating the
best operating conditions with low control delays and the latter indicating the worst
conditions with heavy control delays. Existing LOS for the peak hours of travel are shown
below in Table 2. Delay analysis involved the use of the Synchro 10 analysis program.
Table 2 shows the morning and evening peak hour delay for the intersections of study.
Table 2
Existing Level of Service
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
NE High School Road Roundabout A 9.3 B 11.2
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 12.3 C 21.9
Madison Avenue North &
Wyatt Way NW/NE AWSC B 13.5 C 15.3
Grow Avenue NW &
Wyatt Way NW AWSC B 13.7 B 13.0
Grow Avenue NW &
Wallace Way NE TWSC A 9.9 A 9.3
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW TWSC A 8.5 -- --
Grow Avenue NE &
NE High School Road TWSC B 13.6 C 15.1
(TWSC: Two-Way Stop Control; AWSC: All-Way Stop Control; --: No Turning Movements)
Table 2 above indicates existing delays to be mild at LOS C or better, operating with
average to little disrupt to vehicular flow. The project site is located in the Winslow area
which has a recommended Level of Service Standard of LOS D for arterials and collectors
and LOS C for local roadways2. Based on the analysis above, all roadways and arterials
currently operate below the City LOS standard.
2 Island Wide Transportation Study, Chapter 3: Operations and Mobility. Bainbridge Island, 2016
12
3.5. Pedestrian and Bicycle Activity
Pedestrian and bicycle activity was observed on the nearby street segments studied for
this project. Observations were made during routine peak hour movement counts. A
significant amount of bicycle and pedestrian activity was noted at the intersections of
study. The Madison Avenue North corridor currently offers sidewalks, marked crosswalks,
and bicycle lanes. Furthermore, and as stated in the City’s 6-Year Capital Improvement
Plan, non-motorized facilities are planned with the Wyatt Way Reconstruction Phase 1
project. Given the small amount of project-generated traffic relative to the local roadway
system, no adverse impact is anticipated to pedestrian and bicycle safety and/or level of
service.
3.6. Public Transit
A review of the Kitsap Transit regional bus schedule shows that a number of routes and
transit service is provided to the vicinity of the project. The nearest stop is provided via
Routes 90 and 99 at the Madison Avenue North & Wallace Way NE. Route 90 provides
service from the Bainbridge Island Ferry Terminal to the North Viking Transit Center in
Poulsbo with weekday service from 6:15 AM to 7:40 PM; Saturday service is available.
Route 99 provides service from the Eagle Harbor Drive NE & New Sweden Road NE
intersection to the Bainbridge Island Ferry with weekday service only from 4:29 AM to 7:17
PM. Routes 93, 95, 97, 98, and 106 also provides stops within 1 mile of the proposed site.
Refer to the Kitsap Transit schedule for detailed route information.
3.7. Sight Distance at Access Driveways
As mentioned previously, three access alternatives were analyzed in this impact analysis:
Alternative 1 includes a full-access to the west via Wallace Way NW roadway extension;
Alternative 1-2 includes the full-access to the west AND an egress only to the east at
Madison Avenue North; Alternative 2 includes a full-access to the east at Madison Avenue
North only.
Assessments of the proposed access driveway scenarios were made to determine
whether or not adequate entering sight distance (ESD) can be provided for project traffic.
Sight distance requirements were obtained from the American Association of State
Highway and Transportation Officials (AASHTO) standards for right- and left-turn
movements and require 240 and 280 feet, respectively, for the 25 mph speed limits found
on Nakata Avenue NW to the west and Madison Avenue North to the east. Based on
preliminary examinations, sight distance appears to be met at all locations with the
exception of Alternative 1 and 1-2 when looking south (Taurnic Place NW) due to the
horizontal curvature. Should either Alternative 1 or 1-2 be chosen for buildout, the new
13
access should be built to maximize available sight distance. Six dwelling units exist on the
dead-end Taurnic Place NW cul-de-sac, however, and are likely to be traveling with
speeds less than 25 mph given the horizontal curvature and overall length of the roadway.
No safety issues are anticipated with the proposed access locations for each respective
alternative.
4. FUTURE TRAFFIC DEMAND
4.1. Trip Generation
Trip generation is used to determine the magnitude of project impacts on the surrounding
street system. Data presented in this report was taken from the Institute of Transportation
Engineer's publication Trip Generation, 9th Edition. The designated land use for the site is
defined as Dwelling Units of Single Family Detached Housing (LUC 210). ITE average
rates were used. Data for the peak hours are shown below in Table 3 for the nineteen
(19) proposed dwelling units. Given are AWDT (Average Weekday Daily Traffic), AM peak
hour, and PM peak hour trip generation volumes.
Table 3
Project Trip Generation
19 Net New Single Family Dwelling Units
Time Period Volume
AWDT 181 vpd
AM Peak Inbound 4 vph
AM Peak Outbound 10 vph
AM Peak Total 14 vph
PM Peak Inbound 12 vph
PM Peak Outbound 7 vph
PM Peak Total 19 vph
(vpd: vehicles per day; vph: vehicles per hour)
4.2. Trip Assignment and Distribution
The pattern by which project trips disperse on the roadway network is highly variable and
largely depends on driver behavior and psychological factors. Nonetheless, general
estimations of traffic distribution are needed to determine the impact of a project on nearby
arterials. Trips generated by the project are expected to follow the percent distribution and
assignment as shown in Figure 5 for Alternative 1; Figure 6 for Alternative 1-2; and Figure
14
7 for Alternative 2. Distribution percentages are based on existing travel patterns and
similar projects completed in the past.
4.3. Future Traffic Volumes With and Without the Project
2020 and 2035 were used as the horizon study years in order to assess future impacts on
the surrounding roadway. Future 20 20 and 2035 traffic volumes were derived by applying
a 1.0 percent compound annual growth rate to the existing volumes of Figures 3 and 4.
This growth rate should be considered conservative as the Kitsap Countywide Population
& Housing Growth document lists an annual growth rate of 0.55 percent for the City of
Bainbridge Island. Further, the latest WSDOT Annual Traffic Report indicates little to no
growth along SR-305 in the vicinity.
Forecast 2020 AM background volumes and volumes with project generated traffic for
Alternative 1; Alternative 1-2; Alternative 2 are portrayed on Figures 8-11, respectively.
Forecast 2020 PM background volumes and volumes with project generated traffic for
Alternative 1; Alternative 1-2; Alternative 2 are portrayed on Figures 12-15, respectively.
Forecast 2035 AM background volumes and volumes with project generated traffic for
Alternative 1; Alternative 1-2; Alternative 2 are portrayed on Figures 16-19, respectively.
Forecast 2035 PM background volumes and volumes with project generated traffic for
Alternative 1; Alternative 1-2; Alternative 2 are portrayed on Figures 20-23, respectively.
All Figures are attached and located in the appendix for reference.
4.4. Future Level of Service
Level of service analyses were made of the future AM and PM peak hour volumes with
project-generated trips for the 2020 horizon year and the 2035 horizon year. This analysis
once again involved the use of the Synchro 10 HCM analysis programs. Delays for the
key intersections under future conditions are shown on the following pages in Tables 4-6
for the 2020 build-out year access alternatives and in Table 7-10 for the 2035 horizon year
access alternatives.
15
Table 4
2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
NE High School Road Roundabout A 9.7 B 11.9
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 12.4 C 23.2
Madison Avenue North &
Wyatt Way NW/NE AWSC B 14.1 C 16.1
Grow Avenue NW &
Wyatt Way NW AWSC B 14.5 B 13.7
Grow Avenue NW &
Wallace Way NE TWSC B 10.0 A 9.6
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW Yield A 6.8 A 6.8
Grow Avenue NE &
NE High School Road TWSC B 14.0 C 15.6
It should be noted that the control at the Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Place NW & Wallace
Way NW intersection was analyzed as an all-way yield or uncontrolled for Alternatives 1 &
1-2. Given the low volumes currently observed, implementing a two-way stop may
increase delays and create unnecessary stop movements. Further, the proposed
entrance at Madison Avenue North for Alternative 1-2 was analyzed as outbound project
traffic only; Alternative 2 was analyzed as a full-access with cumulative volumes captured
in the field counts from the existing entrance directly to the south.
Table 5
2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1-2
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 13.8 C 23.4
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW Yield A 6.7 A 6.8
For Alternative 1-2, only an access analysis was conducted. Intersection delays will
remain relatively unchanged from Alternative 1 with the exception of the entrance point(s).
16
Table 6
2020 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 2
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
NE High School Road Roundabout A 9.7 B 12.0
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 13.2 C 24.3
Madison Avenue North &
Wyatt Way NW/NE AWSC B 14.1 C 16.4
Grow Avenue NW &
Wyatt Way NW AWSC B 14.5 B 13.5
Grow Avenue NW &
Wallace Way NE TWSC A 9.9 A 9.3
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW TWSC A 8.5 -- --
Grow Avenue NE &
NE High School Road TWSC B 13.9 C 15.6
Future 2020 delays are expected to remain mild at LOS C or better for the AM and PM
peak hours of travel. All intersections operate within the City LOS standards for all
analyzed Alternatives. Given the amount of peak hour trips anticipated to be generated
with the incoming project, intersection LOS will have only minor impacts for each
respective alternative.
Forecast 2035 LOS Alternatives are portrayed on the following pages.
17
Table 7
2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
NE High School Road Roundabout B 12.9 C 17.6
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 13.8 D 34.2
Madison Avenue North &
Wyatt Way NW/NE AWSC C 19.2 C 24.5
Grow Avenue NW &
Wyatt Way NW AWSC C 21.1 C 19.0
Grow Avenue NW &
Wallace Way NE TWSC B 10.3 A 9.8
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW Yield A 6.8 A 6.9
Grow Avenue NE &
NE High School Road TWSC C 16.1 C 19.3
Table 8
2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 1-2
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC C 15.4 D 34.7
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW Yield A 6.7 A 6.8
18
Table 9
2035 Level of Service with Project – Alternative 2
Delays given in seconds per vehicle
AM Peak Hour PM Peak Hour
Intersection Control LOS Delay LOS Delay
Madison Avenue North &
NE High School Road Roundabout B 12.9 C 17.6
Madison Avenue North &
Entrance/Wallace Way NE TWSC B 14.5 E 36.4
Madison Avenue North &
Wyatt Way NW/NE AWSC C 19.4 D 25.3
Grow Avenue NW &
Wyatt Way NW AWSC C 21.0 C 18.0
Grow Avenue NW &
Wallace Way NE TWSC B 10.2 A 9.6
Nakata Avenue NW/Taurnic Pl NW
& Wallace Way NW TWSC A 8.5 -- --
Grow Avenue NE &
NE High School Road TWSC C 15.9 C 19.0
Future 2035 delays are shown to operate within the City LOS standards with the exceptio n
of the Madison Avenue North & Wallace Way NE/Project Entrance (Alternative 2) which is
shown to operate at LOS E (crossing the LOS D/E threshold by 1.4 seconds). It should be
noted that the 36.4 seconds of delay is calculated for the westbound movements at
Wallace Way NE while the eastbound movements (project trips) are anticipated to operate
at LOS C 16.5 seconds of delay (see LOS sheets attached in appendix).
As mentioned in the Section Seven 2015-2020 Capital Improvement Plan of the City of
Bainbridge Island, intersection improvements at Madison Avenue North & Wyatt Way NW
are planned and include a potential roundabout or traffic signal. Either alternative would
improve capacity, therefore, reducing vehicular delays and LOS. The analysis above
reflects the current all-way stop control.
4.5. Turn Lane Warrants
Left turn lanes are a means of providing necessary storage space for left turning vehicles
at intersections. For a two-lane or four-lane arterial with no left turn storage, delays are
often created by vehicles waiting to complete the desired left turn movement. These
turning vehicles typically block the heavier through movement, thereby causing some
19
disruption to traffic flow and subsequent congestion. Methods have been developed by
various agencies to determine under what circumstances a left turn lane would be needed.
For this impact study, procedures described by WSDOT Design Manual (Figure 1310-7a)
were used to ascertain storage requirements on Madison Avenue North at the project
entrance based on 2035 PM peak hour volumes with the project. The results of this
assessment indicate that a left turn lane would not be warranted. Refer to the appendix
for input values and the WSDOT left turn warrant chart.
5. CONCLUSIONS AND MITIGATION
The Wallace Cottages project proposes to construct 19 new single family dwelling units in
the City of Bainbridge Island. Construction will take place on 4 undeveloped parcels
located on the west side of Madison Avenue North and opposite of Wallace Way NE. On
a daily basis, approximately 181 new trip movements to/from the site can be expected. Of
this total daily traffic 14 trips may be associated with the AM peak hour and 19 trips
associated with the PM peak hour based on ITE data.
Three access alternatives were analyzed for this study:
Alternative 1: One (1) Full-access to the west via Wallace Way NW easement
extension only.
Alternative 1-2: One (1) Full-access to the west via Wallace Way NW easement
extension AND one (1) one-way egress at Madison Avenue North.
Alternative 2: One (1) Full-access to the east at Madison Avenue North only.
Existing level of service (LOS) is mild at LOS C or better for the AM and PM peak hours of
travel. Forecast analysis consisted of a 2020 scenario to reflect conditions at time of
project buildout and a horizon year of 2035 to reflect future conditions. Forecast LOS
delays are portrayed in Tables 4-9. All proposed alternatives are anticipated to meet the
City of Bainbridge Island LOS standards with the exception of one intersection under 2035
PM peak hour conditions. As shown in Table 9, the Madison Avenue North & Wallace
Way NE/Project Entrance is shown to operate with delays up to LOS E (36.4 seconds).
Again these delays are for westbound traffic at Wallace Way NE while the eastbound
(project traffic) movements are shown to operate with delays at LOS C (16.5 seconds of
delays).
Forecast analysis included an uncontrolled intersection at the Wallace Way NW & Nakata
Avenue NW/Taurnic Place NW for Alternatives 1 & 1-2 given the low vehicular volumes.
Alternative 2 analyzed the proposed access at Madison Avenue North as a shared access
20
with cumulative volumes captured from the field counts at the existing entrance directly to
the south. A left turn lane warrant was conducted for Alternative 2 at the project entrance
at Madison Avenue North and is not warranted based on 2035 PM Peak hour volumes.
Based on the findings of the report the recommended mitigation for the site is as follows:
1. Pay traffic impacts fees to the City of Bainbridge Island per Ordinance No. 2015-07 at
$1,632.47 per PM peak hour trip. Therefore:
(19 PM trips) x ($1,632.47) = $31,016.93
Exact fees and calculations will be determined by the City. No other mitigation is identified
at this time.
21
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The following are excerpts from the 2016 Highway Capacity Manual - Transportation
Research Board Special Report 209.
Quality of service requires quantitative measures to characterize operational conditions
within a traffic stream. Level of service (LOS) is a quality measure describing operational
conditions within a traffic stream, generally in terms of such service measures as speed
and travel time, freedom to maneuver, traffic interruptions, and comfort and convenience.
Six LOS are defined for each type of facility that has analysis procedures available.
Letters designate each level, from A to F, with LOS A representing the best operating
conditions and LOS F the worst. Each level of service represents a range of operating
conditions and the driver’s perception of those conditions.
Level-of-Service definitions
The following definitions generally define the various levels of service for arterials.
Level of service A represents primarily free-flow operations at average travel speeds,
usually about 90 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. Vehicles are
seldom impeded in their ability to maneuver in the traffic stream. Delay at signalized
intersections is minimal.
Level of service B represents reasonably unimpeded operations at average travel speeds,
usually about 70 percent of the free-flow speed for the arterial classification. The ability to
maneuver in the traffic stream is only slightly restricted and delays are not bothersome.
Level of service C represents stable operations; however, ability to maneuver and change
lanes in midblock locations may be more restricted than in LOS B, and longer queues,
adverse signal coordination, or both may contribute to lower average travel speeds of
about 50 percent of the average free-flow speed for the arterial classification.
Level of service D borders on a range in which small increases in flow may cause
substantial increases in approach delay and hence decreases in arterial speed. LOS D
may be due to adverse signal progression, inappropriate signal timing, high volumes, or
some combination of these. Average travel speeds are about 40 percent of free-flow
speed.
Level of service E is characterized by significant delays and average travel speeds of one-
third the free-flow speed or less. Such operations are caused by some combination of
22
adverse progression, high signal density, high volumes, extensive delays at critical
intersections, and inappropriate signal timing.
Level of service F characterizes arterial flow at extremely low speeds, from less than one-
third to one-quarter of the free-flow speed. Intersection congestion is likely at critical
signalized locations, with long delays and extensive queuing.
These definitions are general and conceptual in nature, and they apply primarily to
uninterrupted flow. Levels of service for interrupted flow facilities vary widely in terms of
both the user's perception of service quality and the operational variables used to describe
them.
For each type of facility, levels of service are defined based on one or more operational
parameters that best describe operating quality for the subject facility type. While the
concept of level of service attempts to address a wide range of operating conditions,
limitations on data collection and availability make it impractical to treat the full range of
operational parameters for every type of facility. The parameters selected to define levels
of service for each facility type are called "measures of effectiveness" or "MOE's", and
represent available measures that best describe the quality of operation on the subject
facility type.
Each level of service represents a range of conditions, as defined by a range in the
parameters given. Thus, a level of service is not a discrete condition, but rather a range of
conditions for which boundaries are established.
The following tables describe levels of service for signalized and unsignalized
intersections. Level of service for signalized intersections is defined in terms of average
control delay. Delay is a measure of driver discomfort, frustration, fuel consumption and
lost travel time, as well as time from movements at slower speeds and stops on
intersection approaches as vehicles move up in queue position or slow down upstream of
an intersection. Level of service for unsignalized intersections is determined by the
computed or measured control delay and is determined for each minor movement.
Signalized Intersections - Level of Service
Control Delay per
Level of Service Vehicle (sec)
A 10
B 10 and 20
C 20 and 35
D 35 and 55
E 55 and 80
F 80
23
Unsignalized Intersections - Level of Service
Average Total Delay
Level of Service per Vehicle (sec)
A 10
B 10 and 15
C 15 and 25
D 25 and 35
E 35 and 50
F 50
As described in the 2000 Highway Capacity Manual, level of service breakpoints for all-
way stop controlled (AWSC) intersections are somewhat different than the criteria used for
signalized intersections. The primary reason for this difference is that drivers expect
different levels of performance from distinct kinds of transportation facilities. T he
expectation is that a signalized intersection is designed to carry higher traffic volumes than
an AWSC intersection. Thus a higher level of control delay is acceptable at a signalized
intersection for the same level of service.
AWSC Intersections - Level of Service
Average Total Delay
Level of Service per Vehicle (sec)
A 10
B 10 and 15
C 15 and 25
D 25 and 35
E 35 and 50
F 50
24
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRIP GENERATION
APPENDIX
25
26
27
28
29
30
31
32
33
34
35
36
37
38
39
40
41
42
43
44
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
TRIP GENERATION
APPENDIX
45
Tr
i
p
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
S
u
m
m
a
r
y
Open Date:Ana lysis Date:7/5/2017 7/5/2017
Pr
o
j
e
c
t
:
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
C
o
t
t
a
g
e
s
Al
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
:
A
l
t
e
r
n
a
t
i
v
e
1
Ph
a
s
e
:
IT
E
L
a
n
d
U
s
e
En
t
e
r
E
x
i
t
Enter
E
x
i
t
En
t
e
r
E
x
i
t
Total
To
t
a
l
To
t
a
l
*
*
*
W
e
e
k
d
a
y
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
D
a
i
l
y
T
r
i
p
s
W
e
e
k
d
a
y
A
M
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
o
f
Ad
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
Weekday PM Peak Hour of Adjacent Street Traffic
21
0
S
i
n
g
l
e
F
a
m
i
l
y
D
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
U
n
19
D
w
e
l
l
i
n
g
U
n
i
t
s
91
9
0
1
8
1
4
1
0
1
4
12
7
1
9
Un
a
d
j
u
s
t
e
d
V
o
l
u
m
e
91
9
0
1
8
1
4
1
0
1
4
12
7
1
9
In
t
e
r
n
a
l
C
a
p
t
u
r
e
T
r
i
p
s
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
0
91
9
0
1
8
1
4
1
0
1
4
12
7
1
9
Pa
s
s
-
B
y
T
r
i
p
s
Vo
l
u
m
e
A
d
d
e
d
t
o
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
s
To
t
a
l
W
e
e
k
d
a
y
A
v
e
r
a
g
e
D
a
i
l
y
T
r
i
p
s
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
C
a
p
t
u
r
e
=
0
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
W
e
e
k
d
a
y
A
M
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
o
f
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
C
a
p
t
u
r
e
=
0
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
To
t
a
l
W
e
e
k
d
a
y
P
M
P
e
a
k
H
o
u
r
o
f
A
d
j
a
c
e
n
t
S
t
r
e
e
t
T
r
a
f
f
i
c
I
n
t
e
r
n
a
l
C
a
p
t
u
r
e
=
0
P
e
r
c
e
n
t
P.
1
TR
I
P
G
E
N
E
R
A
T
I
O
N
2
0
1
4
,
T
R
A
F
F
I
C
W
A
R
E
,
L
L
C
So
u
r
c
e
:
I
n
s
t
i
t
u
t
e
o
f
T
r
a
n
s
p
o
r
t
a
t
i
o
n
E
n
g
i
n
e
e
r
s
,
T
r
i
p
G
e
n
e
r
a
t
i
o
n
M
a
n
u
a
l
9
t
h
E
d
i
t
i
o
n
,
2
0
1
2
-
C
u
s
t
o
m
r
a
t
e
u
s
e
d
f
o
r
s
e
l
e
c
t
e
d
t
i
m
e
p
e
r
i
o
d
.
*
46
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
FIELD COUNTS
APPENDIX
47
File Name : 3968g
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Southbound
High School Road NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
High School Road NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 38 2 40 3 0 0 3 3 30 0 33 76
07:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 33 11 44 8 0 1 9 5 66 0 71 124
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 42 6 48 10 0 3 13 14 123 0 137 198
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 62 16 78 8 0 4 12 15 82 0 97 187
Total 0 0 0 0 0 175 35 210 29 0 8 37 37 301 0 338 585
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 45 11 56 13 0 2 15 19 97 0 116 187
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 61 16 77 12 0 2 14 21 114 0 135 226
08:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 46 15 61 11 0 4 15 10 102 0 112 188
08:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 59 5 64 3 0 4 7 14 77 0 91 162
Total 0 0 0 0 0 211 47 258 39 0 12 51 64 390 0 454 763
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 386 82 468 68 0 20 88 101 691 0 792 1348
Apprch %0 0 0 0 82.5 17.5 77.3 0 22.7 12.8 87.2 0
Total %0 0 0 0 0 28.6 6.1 34.7 5 0 1.5 6.5 7.5 51.3 0 58.8
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
3
8
6
L
e
f
t
8
2
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
7
5
9
4
6
8
1
2
2
7
Left
20
Thru
0
Right
68
Out TotalIn
183 88 271
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
69
1
Ri
g
h
t
10
1
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
40
6
7
9
2
1
1
9
8
5/31/2017 07:00 AM
5/31/2017 08:45 AM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
48
File Name : 3968g
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Southbound
High School Road NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
High School Road NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 0 0 0 0 42 6 48 10 0 3 13 14 123 0 137 198
07:45 AM 0 0 0 0 0 62 16 78 8 0 4 12 15 82 0 97 187
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 45 11 56 13 0 2 15 19 97 0 116 187
08:15 AM 0 0 0 0 0 61 16 77 12 0 2 14 21 114 0 135 226
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 210 49 259 43 0 11 54 69 416 0 485 798
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 81.1 18.9 79.6 0 20.4 14.2 85.8 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .847 .766 .830 .827 .000 .688 .900 .821 .846 .000 .885 .883
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
2
1
0
L
e
f
t
4
9
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
4
5
9
2
5
9
7
1
8
Left
11
Thru
0
Right
43
Out TotalIn
118 54 172
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
41
6
Ri
g
h
t
69
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
22
1
4
8
5
7
0
6
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
49
File Name : 3968h
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Southbound
High School Road NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
High School Road NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 87 11 98 13 0 8 21 11 79 0 90 209
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 71 6 77 14 0 7 21 10 80 0 90 188
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 101 15 116 14 0 9 23 7 65 0 72 211
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 94 13 107 9 0 8 17 11 97 0 108 232
Total 0 0 0 0 0 353 45 398 50 0 32 82 39 321 0 360 840
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 82 11 93 10 0 10 20 10 88 0 98 211
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 92 21 113 20 0 7 27 11 82 0 93 233
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 95 16 111 13 0 7 20 3 60 0 63 194
05:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 98 8 106 3 0 2 5 5 79 0 84 195
Total 0 0 0 0 0 367 56 423 46 0 26 72 29 309 0 338 833
Grand Total 0 0 0 0 0 720 101 821 96 0 58 154 68 630 0 698 1673
Apprch %0 0 0 0 87.7 12.3 62.3 0 37.7 9.7 90.3 0
Total %0 0 0 0 0 43 6 49.1 5.7 0 3.5 9.2 4.1 37.7 0 41.7
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
7
2
0
L
e
f
t
1
0
1
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
7
2
6
8
2
1
1
5
4
7
Left
58
Thru
0
Right
96
Out TotalIn
169 154 323
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
63
0
Ri
g
h
t
68
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
77
8
6
9
8
1
4
7
6
5/31/2017 04:00 PM
5/31/2017 05:45 PM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
50
File Name : 3968h
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Southbound
High School Road NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
High School Road NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 101 15 116 14 0 9 23 7 65 0 72 211
04:45 PM 0 0 0 0 0 94 13 107 9 0 8 17 11 97 0 108 232
05:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 82 11 93 10 0 10 20 10 88 0 98 211
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 92 21 113 20 0 7 27 11 82 0 93 233
Total Volume 0 0 0 0 0 369 60 429 53 0 34 87 39 332 0 371 887
% App. Total 0 0 0 0 86 14 60.9 0 39.1 10.5 89.5 0
PHF .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .913 .714 .925 .663 .000 .850 .806 .886 .856 .000 .859 .952
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 0 0
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
3
6
9
L
e
f
t
6
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
3
8
5
4
2
9
8
1
4
Left
34
Thru
0
Right
53
Out TotalIn
99 87 186
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
33
2
Ri
g
h
t
39
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
40
3
3
7
1
7
7
4
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
51
File Name : 3968a
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wallace Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 2 1 0 1 2 7
07:15 AM 0 7 0 7 1 0 0 1 1 13 0 14 0 0 1 1 23
07:30 AM 0 14 0 14 0 0 2 2 0 5 0 5 1 0 1 2 23
07:45 AM 1 17 0 18 1 0 1 2 0 13 1 14 0 0 0 0 34
Total 1 41 0 42 2 0 3 5 1 33 1 35 2 0 3 5 87
08:00 AM 0 21 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 2 2 39
08:15 AM 1 28 2 31 4 0 1 5 1 18 0 19 2 0 7 9 64
08:30 AM 1 28 1 30 0 0 2 2 0 12 0 12 0 0 6 6 50
08:45 AM 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 4 0 0 0 0 20
Total 2 93 4 99 4 0 3 7 1 49 0 50 2 0 15 17 173
Grand Total 3 134 4 141 6 0 6 12 2 82 1 85 4 0 18 22 260
Apprch %2.1 95 2.8 50 0 50 2.4 96.5 1.2 18.2 0 81.8
Total %1.2 51.5 1.5 54.2 2.3 0 2.3 4.6 0.8 31.5 0.4 32.7 1.5 0 6.9 8.5
Grow Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
3
Thru
134
Left
4
InOut Total
106 141 247
R
i
g
h
t
6
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
6
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
6
1
2
1
8
Left
1
Thru
82
Right
2
Out TotalIn
144 85 229
Le
f
t
18
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
4
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
4
2
2
2
6
5/31/2017 07:00 AM
5/31/2017 08:45 AM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
52
File Name : 3968a
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wallace Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 14 0 14 0 0 2 2 0 5 0 5 1 0 1 2 23
07:45 AM 1 17 0 18 1 0 1 2 0 13 1 14 0 0 0 0 34
08:00 AM 0 21 1 22 0 0 0 0 0 15 0 15 0 0 2 2 39
08:15 AM 1 28 2 31 4 0 1 5 1 18 0 19 2 0 7 9 64
Total Volume 2 80 3 85 5 0 4 9 1 51 1 53 3 0 10 13 160
% App. Total 2.4 94.1 3.5 55.6 0 44.4 1.9 96.2 1.9 23.1 0 76.9
PHF .500 .714 .375 .685 .313 .000 .500 .450 .250 .708 .250 .697 .375 .000 .357 .361 .625
Grow Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
2
Thru
80
Left
3
InOut Total
66 85 151
R
i
g
h
t
5
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
4
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
4
9
1
3
Left
1
Thru
51
Right
1
Out TotalIn
87 53 140
Le
f
t
10
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
3
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
3
1
3
1
6
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
53
File Name : 3968b
Site Code : 00003698
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wallace Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
04:00 PM 0 16 0 16 0 0 0 0 1 11 0 12 0 0 0 0 28
04:15 PM 0 16 0 16 1 0 1 2 1 16 0 17 0 0 0 0 35
04:30 PM 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 34
04:45 PM 0 23 0 23 0 0 2 2 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 43
Total 0 72 0 72 1 0 3 4 4 60 0 64 0 0 0 0 140
05:00 PM 0 23 1 24 1 0 1 2 1 22 0 23 0 0 0 0 49
05:15 PM 0 27 0 27 1 0 0 1 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 50
05:30 PM 0 11 3 14 0 0 0 0 2 13 0 15 0 0 0 0 29
05:45 PM 0 16 1 17 0 0 0 0 0 8 0 8 0 0 0 0 25
Total 0 77 5 82 2 0 1 3 3 65 0 68 0 0 0 0 153
Grand Total 0 149 5 154 3 0 4 7 7 125 0 132 0 0 0 0 293
Apprch %0 96.8 3.2 42.9 0 57.1 5.3 94.7 0 0 0 0
Total %0 50.9 1.7 52.6 1 0 1.4 2.4 2.4 42.7 0 45.1 0 0 0 0
Grow Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
149
Left
5
InOut Total
128 154 282
R
i
g
h
t
3
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
4
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
1
2
7
1
9
Left
0
Thru
125
Right
7
Out TotalIn
153 132 285
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
0
0
0
5/31/2017 04:00 PM
5/31/2017 05:45 PM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
54
File Name : 3968b
Site Code : 00003698
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wallace Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 0 17 0 17 0 0 0 0 2 15 0 17 0 0 0 0 34
04:45 PM 0 23 0 23 0 0 2 2 0 18 0 18 0 0 0 0 43
05:00 PM 0 23 1 24 1 0 1 2 1 22 0 23 0 0 0 0 49
05:15 PM 0 27 0 27 1 0 0 1 0 22 0 22 0 0 0 0 50
Total Volume 0 90 1 91 2 0 3 5 3 77 0 80 0 0 0 0 176
% App. Total 0 98.9 1.1 40 0 60 3.8 96.2 0 0 0 0
PHF .000 .833 .250 .843 .500 .000 .375 .625 .375 .875 .000 .870 .000 .000 .000 .000 .880
Grow Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
0
Thru
90
Left
1
InOut Total
79 91 170
R
i
g
h
t
2
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
3
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
4
5
9
Left
0
Thru
77
Right
3
Out TotalIn
93 80 173
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
0
0
0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
55
Heath & Associates, Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3560c
Site Code : 00003560
Start Date : 11/10/2014
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Waytt Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
06:00 AM 2 11 1 1 6 0 0 1 3 16 35 2 78
06:15 AM 0 2 1 0 11 0 2 1 4 6 13 0 40
06:30 AM 0 3 0 1 2 0 0 3 0 15 37 1 62
06:45 AM 1 5 3 0 15 0 1 2 7 4 55 1 94
Total 3 21 5 2 34 0 3 7 14 41 140 4 274
07:00 AM 1 9 0 2 26 2 2 4 10 7 15 1 79
07:15 AM 1 10 0 1 9 2 2 4 5 13 4 3 54
07:30 AM 2 13 7 1 14 2 2 6 5 38 69 3 162
07:45 AM 3 15 7 2 32 3 5 10 14 27 56 6 180
Total 7 47 14 6 81 9 11 24 34 85 144 13 475
08:00 AM 0 16 4 0 13 5 3 10 3 14 44 10 122
08:15 AM 6 16 7 1 13 3 2 10 5 26 53 10 152
08:30 AM 15 25 16 1 39 7 5 9 19 40 88 10 274
08:45 AM 1 14 6 1 23 1 1 12 14 26 43 1 143
Total 22 71 33 3 88 16 11 41 41 106 228 31 691
Grand Total 32 139 52 11 203 25 25 72 89 232 512 48 1440
Apprch % 14.3 62.3 23.3 4.6 84.9 10.5 13.4 38.7 47.8 29.3 64.6 6.1
Total % 2.2 9.7 3.6 0.8 14.1 1.7 1.7 5.0 6.2 16.1 35.6 3.3
Grow Avenue NW
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
y
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
32
Thru
139
Left
52
InOut Total
131 223 354
R
i
g
h
t
1
1
T
h
r
u
2
0
3
L
e
f
t
2
5
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
5
8
9
2
3
9
8
2
8
Left
89
Thru
72
Right
25
Out TotalIn
396 186 582
Le
f
t
48
Th
r
u
51
2
Ri
g
h
t
23
2
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
32
4
7
9
2
1
1
1
6
11/10/2014 6:00:00 AM
11/10/2014 8:45:00 AM
Group 1
North
56
Heath & Associates, Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3560c
Site Code : 00003560
Start Date : 11/10/2014
Page No : 2
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Waytt Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total
Int.
Total
Peak Hour From 06:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Intersection 07:45 AM
Volume 24 72 34 130 4 97 18 119 15 39 41 95 107 241 36 384 728
Percent 18.5 55.4 26.2 3.4 81.5 15.1 15.8 41.1 43.2 27.9 62.8 9.4
08:30
Volume 15 25 16 56 1 39 7 47 5 9 19 33 40 88 10 138 274
Peak Factor 0.664
High Int. 08:30 AM 08:30 AM 08:30 AM 08:30 AM
Volume 15 25 16 56 1 39 7 47 5 9 19 33 40 88 10 138
Peak Factor 0.580 0.633 0.720 0.696
Grow Avenue NW
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
a
y
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
24
Thru
72
Left
34
InOut Total
79 130 209
R
i
g
h
t
4
T
h
r
u
9
7
L
e
f
t
1
8
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
2
9
0
1
1
9
4
0
9
Left
41
Thru
39
Right
15
Out TotalIn
197 95 292
Le
f
t
36
Th
r
u
24
1
Ri
g
h
t
10
7
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
16
2
3
8
4
5
4
6
11/10/2014 7:45:00 AM
11/10/2014 8:30:00 AM
Group 1
North
57
Heath & Associates, Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3560e
Site Code : 3560____
Start Date : 11/10/2014
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wyatt Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 1 12 0 3 51 2 1 6 19 23 52 4 174
04:15 PM 5 10 5 1 62 3 2 7 24 24 43 3 189
04:30 PM 2 10 0 4 74 3 2 9 24 14 35 2 179
04:45 PM 3 11 3 1 51 5 2 17 11 22 41 2 169
Total 11 43 8 9 238 13 7 39 78 83 171 11 711
05:00 PM 2 20 5 1 63 4 3 10 24 26 57 2 217
05:15 PM 4 7 1 6 83 3 1 5 27 19 33 2 191
05:30 PM 3 7 1 3 64 3 0 13 35 16 27 3 175
05:45 PM 4 10 0 4 53 0 3 10 21 17 42 1 165
Total 13 44 7 14 263 10 7 38 107 78 159 8 748
06:00 PM 2 13 1 2 92 4 2 10 32 20 45 3 226
06:15 PM 2 6 1 1 64 1 2 10 28 8 23 3 149
06:30 PM 4 9 2 2 48 1 2 5 11 8 38 3 133
06:45 PM 2 7 3 0 43 1 0 6 15 15 44 4 140
Total 10 35 7 5 247 7 6 31 86 51 150 13 648
Grand Total 34 122 22 28 748 30 20 108 271 212 480 32 2107
Apprch % 19.1 68.5 12.4 3.5 92.8 3.7 5.0 27.1 67.9 29.3 66.3 4.4
Total % 1.6 5.8 1.0 1.3 35.5 1.4 0.9 5.1 12.9 10.1 22.8 1.5
Grow Avenue NW
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
34
Thru
122
Left
22
InOut Total
168 178 346
R
i
g
h
t
2
8
T
h
r
u
7
4
8
L
e
f
t
3
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
5
2
2
8
0
6
1
3
2
8
Left
271
Thru
108
Right
20
Out TotalIn
364 399 763
Le
f
t
32
Th
r
u
48
0
Ri
g
h
t
21
2
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
10
5
3
7
2
4
1
7
7
7
11/10/2014 4:00:00 PM
11/10/2014 6:45:00 PM
Group 1
North
58
Heath & Associates, Inc.
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371 File Name : 3560e
Site Code : 3560____
Start Date : 11/10/2014
Page No : 2
Grow Avenue NW
Southbound
Wyatt Way NW
Westbound
Grow Avenue NW
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total Right Thru Left App.
Total
Int.
Total
Peak Hour From 04:00 PM to 06:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Intersection 05:15 PM
Volume 13 37 3 53 15 292 10 317 6 38 115 159 72 147 9 228 757
Percent 24.5 69.8 5.7 4.7 92.1 3.2 3.8 23.9 72.3 31.6 64.5 3.9
06:00
Volume 2 13 1 16 2 92 4 98 2 10 32 44 20 45 3 68 226
Peak Factor 0.837
High Int. 06:00 PM 06:00 PM 05:30 PM 06:00 PM
Volume 2 13 1 16 2 92 4 98 0 13 35 48 20 45 3 68
Peak Factor 0.828 0.809 0.828 0.838
Grow Avenue NW
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
Grow Avenue NW
Right
13
Thru
37
Left
3
InOut Total
62 53 115
R
i
g
h
t
1
5
T
h
r
u
2
9
2
L
e
f
t
1
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
1
5
6
3
1
7
4
7
3
Left
115
Thru
38
Right
6
Out TotalIn
119 159 278
Le
f
t
9
Th
r
u
14
7
Ri
g
h
t
72
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
42
0
2
2
8
6
4
8
11/10/2014 5:15:00 PM
11/10/2014 6:00:00 PM
Group 1
North
59
File Name : 3911a
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
High School Road NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
High School Road NE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07:00 AM 18 33 6 7 29 6 9 14 1 6 13 6 148
07:15 AM 28 16 18 10 32 26 10 16 4 5 36 17 218
07:30 AM 31 14 37 25 29 20 21 25 9 10 78 27 326
07:45 AM 32 55 27 33 49 16 24 17 12 18 47 26 356
Total 109 118 88 75 139 68 64 72 26 39 174 76 1048
08:00 AM 28 47 24 20 38 18 27 18 8 20 54 20 322
08:15 AM 55 34 11 28 77 19 27 36 16 15 61 27 406
08:30 AM 25 52 35 25 52 21 35 27 9 19 73 19 392
08:45 AM 32 47 32 32 46 18 31 25 11 32 46 11 363
Total 140 180 102 105 213 76 120 106 44 86 234 77 1483
Grand Total 249 298 190 180 352 144 184 178 70 125 408 153 2531
Apprch %33.8 40.4 25.8 26.6 52.1 21.3 42.6 41.2 16.2 18.2 59.5 22.3
Total %9.8 11.8 7.5 7.1 13.9 5.7 7.3 7 2.8 4.9 16.1 6
Madison Avenue North
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
249
Thru
298
Left
190
InOut Total
511 737 1248
R
i
g
h
t
1
8
0
T
h
r
u
3
5
2
L
e
f
t
1
4
4
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
7
8
2
6
7
6
1
4
5
8
Left
70
Thru
178
Right
184
Out TotalIn
567 432 999
Le
f
t
15
3
Th
r
u
40
8
Ri
g
h
t
12
5
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
67
1
6
8
6
1
3
5
7
2/2/2017 07:00 AM
2/2/2017 08:45 AM
Group 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
60
File Name : 3911a
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
High School Road NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
High School Road NE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 28 47 24 99 20 38 18 76 27 18 8 53 20 54 20 94 322
08:15 AM 55 34 11 100 28 77 19 124 27 36 16 79 15 61 27 103 406
08:30 AM 25 52 35 112 25 52 21 98 35 27 9 71 19 73 19 111 392
08:45 AM 32 47 32 111 32 46 18 96 31 25 11 67 32 46 11 89 363
Total Volume 140 180 102 422 105 213 76 394 120 106 44 270 86 234 77 397 1483
% App. Total 33.2 42.7 24.2 26.6 54.1 19.3 44.4 39.3 16.3 21.7 58.9 19.4
PHF .636 .865 .729 .942 .820 .692 .905 .794 .857 .736 .688 .854 .672 .801 .713 .894 .913
Madison Avenue North
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
140
Thru
180
Left
102
InOut Total
288 422 710
R
i
g
h
t
1
0
5
T
h
r
u
2
1
3
L
e
f
t
7
6
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
4
5
6
3
9
4
8
5
0
Left
44
Thru
106
Right
120
Out TotalIn
342 270 612
Le
f
t
77
Th
r
u
23
4
Ri
g
h
t
86
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
39
7
3
9
7
7
9
4
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Group 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
61
File Name : 3911b
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
High School Road NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
High School Road NE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 23 24 12 59 12 55 16 83 51 55 22 128 16 56 25 97 367
04:15 PM 20 35 21 76 27 64 14 105 51 43 13 107 23 50 17 90 378
04:30 PM 28 35 23 86 27 64 35 126 50 50 19 119 22 63 15 100 431
04:45 PM 23 44 17 84 18 71 20 109 47 49 24 120 21 61 9 91 404
Total 94 138 73 305 84 254 85 423 199 197 78 474 82 230 66 378 1580
05:00 PM 24 44 16 84 17 63 23 103 53 71 22 146 13 66 23 102 435
05:15 PM 29 39 18 86 25 87 32 144 45 74 17 136 14 58 11 83 449
05:30 PM 22 31 19 72 16 82 43 141 57 61 25 143 14 39 17 70 426
05:45 PM 23 44 25 92 25 62 37 124 39 65 11 115 11 39 26 76 407
Total 98 158 78 334 83 294 135 512 194 271 75 540 52 202 77 331 1717
Grand Total 192 296 151 639 167 548 220 935 393 468 153 1014 134 432 143 709 3297
Apprch %30 46.3 23.6 17.9 58.6 23.5 38.8 46.2 15.1 18.9 60.9 20.2
Total %5.8 9 4.6 19.4 5.1 16.6 6.7 28.4 11.9 14.2 4.6 30.8 4.1 13.1 4.3 21.5
Madison Avenue North
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
192
Thru
296
Left
151
InOut Total
778 639 1417
R
i
g
h
t
1
6
7
T
h
r
u
5
4
8
L
e
f
t
2
2
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
9
7
6
9
3
5
1
9
1
1
Left
153
Thru
468
Right
393
Out TotalIn
650 1014 1664
Le
f
t
14
3
Th
r
u
43
2
Ri
g
h
t
13
4
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
89
3
7
0
9
1
6
0
2
2/2/2017 04:00 PM
2/2/2017 05:45 PM
Group 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
62
File Name : 3911b
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
High School Road NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
High School Road NE
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:30 PM
04:30 PM 28 35 23 86 27 64 35 126 50 50 19 119 22 63 15 100 431
04:45 PM 23 44 17 84 18 71 20 109 47 49 24 120 21 61 9 91 404
05:00 PM 24 44 16 84 17 63 23 103 53 71 22 146 13 66 23 102 435
05:15 PM 29 39 18 86 25 87 32 144 45 74 17 136 14 58 11 83 449
Total Volume 104 162 74 340 87 285 110 482 195 244 82 521 70 248 58 376 1719
% App. Total 30.6 47.6 21.8 18 59.1 22.8 37.4 46.8 15.7 18.6 66 15.4
PHF .897 .920 .804 .988 .806 .819 .786 .837 .920 .824 .854 .892 .795 .939 .630 .922 .957
Madison Avenue North
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
H
i
g
h
S
c
h
o
o
l
R
o
a
d
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
104
Thru
162
Left
74
InOut Total
389 340 729
R
i
g
h
t
8
7
T
h
r
u
2
8
5
L
e
f
t
1
1
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
5
1
7
4
8
2
9
9
9
Left
82
Thru
244
Right
195
Out TotalIn
342 521 863
Le
f
t
58
Th
r
u
24
8
Ri
g
h
t
70
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
47
1
3
7
6
8
4
7
Peak Hour Begins at 04:30 PM
Group 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
63
File Name : 3968e
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Madison Avenue N
Southbound
Wallace Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue N
Northbound
Entrance
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
07:00 AM 2 37 4 43 2 1 1 4 1 32 0 33 0 0 2 2 82
07:15 AM 2 37 1 40 0 0 0 0 1 45 4 50 2 0 2 4 94
07:30 AM 0 68 7 75 4 0 1 5 3 46 2 51 0 0 0 0 131
07:45 AM 0 87 8 95 4 0 5 9 2 47 0 49 0 0 0 0 153
Total 4 229 20 253 10 1 7 18 7 170 6 183 2 0 4 6 460
08:00 AM 3 78 5 86 6 0 4 10 6 58 0 64 0 0 0 0 160
08:15 AM 1 70 7 78 3 0 4 7 4 75 0 79 1 0 0 1 165
08:30 AM 1 19 14 34 2 0 4 6 2 81 0 83 0 0 0 0 123
08:45 AM 3 95 11 109 5 0 8 13 8 45 0 53 0 0 0 0 175
Total 8 262 37 307 16 0 20 36 20 259 0 279 1 0 0 1 623
Grand Total 12 491 57 560 26 1 27 54 27 429 6 462 3 0 4 7 1083
Apprch %2.1 87.7 10.2 48.1 1.9 50 5.8 92.9 1.3 42.9 0 57.1
Total %1.1 45.3 5.3 51.7 2.4 0.1 2.5 5 2.5 39.6 0.6 42.7 0.3 0 0.4 0.6
Madison Avenue N
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue N
Right
12
Thru
491
Left
57
InOut Total
459 560 1019
R
i
g
h
t
2
6
T
h
r
u
1
L
e
f
t
2
7
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
8
4
5
4
1
3
8
Left
6
Thru
429
Right
27
Out TotalIn
521 462 983
Le
f
t
4
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
3
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
19
7
2
6
5/31/2017 07:00 AM
5/31/2017 08:45 AM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
64
File Name : 3968e
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue N
Southbound
Wallace Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue N
Northbound
Entrance
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 0 68 7 75 4 0 1 5 3 46 2 51 0 0 0 0 131
07:45 AM 0 87 8 95 4 0 5 9 2 47 0 49 0 0 0 0 153
08:00 AM 3 78 5 86 6 0 4 10 6 58 0 64 0 0 0 0 160
08:15 AM 1 70 7 78 3 0 4 7 4 75 0 79 1 0 0 1 165
Total Volume 4 303 27 334 17 0 14 31 15 226 2 243 1 0 0 1 609
% App. Total 1.2 90.7 8.1 54.8 0 45.2 6.2 93 0.8 100 0 0
PHF .333 .871 .844 .879 .708 .000 .700 .775 .625 .753 .250 .769 .250 .000 .000 .250 .923
Madison Avenue N
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue N
Right
4
Thru
303
Left
27
InOut Total
243 334 577
R
i
g
h
t
1
7
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
1
4
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
4
2
3
1
7
3
Left
2
Thru
226
Right
15
Out TotalIn
318 243 561
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
1
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
6
1
7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
65
File Name : 3968f
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Madison Avenue N
Southbound
Wallace Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue N
Northbound
Entrance
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
04:00 PM 1 71 6 78 10 1 7 18 7 118 0 125 0 0 0 0 221
04:15 PM 1 80 3 84 7 0 13 20 9 96 0 105 0 0 0 0 209
04:30 PM 0 77 8 85 9 0 16 25 10 140 0 150 0 0 0 0 260
04:45 PM 0 65 9 74 14 0 14 28 10 120 0 130 0 0 0 0 232
Total 2 293 26 321 40 1 50 91 36 474 0 510 0 0 0 0 922
05:00 PM 0 75 6 81 14 0 9 23 6 125 0 131 0 0 0 0 235
05:15 PM 1 65 7 73 10 0 8 18 4 99 0 103 0 0 0 0 194
05:30 PM 2 56 3 61 10 0 6 16 6 121 0 127 0 0 0 0 204
05:45 PM 1 85 6 92 7 0 4 11 6 85 1 92 0 0 0 0 195
Total 4 281 22 307 41 0 27 68 22 430 1 453 0 0 0 0 828
Grand Total 6 574 48 628 81 1 77 159 58 904 1 963 0 0 0 0 1750
Apprch %1 91.4 7.6 50.9 0.6 48.4 6 93.9 0.1 0 0 0
Total %0.3 32.8 2.7 35.9 4.6 0.1 4.4 9.1 3.3 51.7 0.1 55 0 0 0 0
Madison Avenue N
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue N
Right
6
Thru
574
Left
48
InOut Total
985 628 1613
R
i
g
h
t
8
1
T
h
r
u
1
L
e
f
t
7
7
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
1
0
6
1
5
9
2
6
5
Left
1
Thru
904
Right
58
Out TotalIn
651 963 1614
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
8
0
8
5/31/2017 04:00 PM
5/31/2017 05:45 PM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
66
File Name : 3968f
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue N
Southbound
Wallace Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue N
Northbound
Entrance
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 1 80 3 84 7 0 13 20 9 96 0 105 0 0 0 0 209
04:30 PM 0 77 8 85 9 0 16 25 10 140 0 150 0 0 0 0 260
04:45 PM 0 65 9 74 14 0 14 28 10 120 0 130 0 0 0 0 232
05:00 PM 0 75 6 81 14 0 9 23 6 125 0 131 0 0 0 0 235
Total Volume 1 297 26 324 44 0 52 96 35 481 0 516 0 0 0 0 936
% App. Total 0.3 91.7 8 45.8 0 54.2 6.8 93.2 0 0 0 0
PHF .250 .928 .722 .953 .786 .000 .813 .857 .875 .859 .000 .860 .000 .000 .000 .000 .900
Madison Avenue N
E
n
t
r
a
n
c
e
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue N
Right
1
Thru
297
Left
26
InOut Total
525 324 849
R
i
g
h
t
4
4
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
5
2
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
6
1
9
6
1
5
7
Left
0
Thru
481
Right
35
Out TotalIn
349 516 865
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
1
0
1
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
67
File Name : 3911c
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 3/2/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
Wyatt Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
07:00 AM 5 35 0 40 0 6 1 7 0 15 10 25 9 4 2 15 87
07:15 AM 3 31 0 34 2 4 1 7 1 13 2 16 13 14 16 43 100
07:30 AM 2 37 6 45 4 5 3 12 1 18 7 26 51 33 12 96 179
07:45 AM 6 69 11 86 0 11 1 12 0 36 14 50 26 25 20 71 219
Total 16 172 17 205 6 26 6 38 2 82 33 117 99 76 50 225 585
08:00 AM 7 53 6 66 2 9 1 12 0 26 16 42 18 9 27 54 174
08:15 AM 13 51 3 67 2 5 0 7 4 36 15 55 36 30 40 106 235
08:30 AM 11 61 4 76 3 13 1 17 1 28 24 53 32 17 28 77 223
08:45 AM 14 85 11 110 3 8 3 14 1 36 13 50 27 24 17 68 242
Total 45 250 24 319 10 35 5 50 6 126 68 200 113 80 112 305 874
Grand Total 61 422 41 524 16 61 11 88 8 208 101 317 212 156 162 530 1459
Apprch %11.6 80.5 7.8 18.2 69.3 12.5 2.5 65.6 31.9 40 29.4 30.6
Total %4.2 28.9 2.8 35.9 1.1 4.2 0.8 6 0.5 14.3 6.9 21.7 14.5 10.7 11.1 36.3
Madison Avenue North
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
61
Thru
422
Left
41
InOut Total
386 524 910
R
i
g
h
t
1
6
T
h
r
u
6
1
L
e
f
t
1
1
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
2
0
5
8
8
2
9
3
Left
101
Thru
208
Right
8
Out TotalIn
645 317 962
Le
f
t
16
2
Th
r
u
15
6
Ri
g
h
t
21
2
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
22
3
5
3
0
7
5
3
3/2/2017 07:00 AM
3/2/2017 08:45 AM
Group 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
68
File Name : 3911c
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 3/2/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
Wyatt Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:45 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 08:00 AM
08:00 AM 7 53 6 66 2 9 1 12 0 26 16 42 18 9 27 54 174
08:15 AM 13 51 3 67 2 5 0 7 4 36 15 55 36 30 40 106 235
08:30 AM 11 61 4 76 3 13 1 17 1 28 24 53 32 17 28 77 223
08:45 AM 14 85 11 110 3 8 3 14 1 36 13 50 27 24 17 68 242
Total Volume 45 250 24 319 10 35 5 50 6 126 68 200 113 80 112 305 874
% App. Total 14.1 78.4 7.5 20 70 10 3 63 34 37 26.2 36.7
PHF .804 .735 .545 .725 .833 .673 .417 .735 .375 .875 .708 .909 .785 .667 .700 .719 .903
Madison Avenue North
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
45
Thru
250
Left
24
InOut Total
248 319 567
R
i
g
h
t
1
0
T
h
r
u
3
5
L
e
f
t
5
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
1
1
0
5
0
1
6
0
Left
68
Thru
126
Right
6
Out TotalIn
368 200 568
Le
f
t
11
2
Th
r
u
80
Ri
g
h
t
11
3
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
14
8
3
0
5
4
5
3
Peak Hour Begins at 08:00 AM
Group 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
69
File Name : 3911d
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Group 1
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
Wyatt Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Right Thru Left Int. Total
Factor 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
04:00 PM 17 63 2 6 20 1 1 77 33 30 14 8 272
04:15 PM 9 65 5 4 19 1 2 58 29 24 13 17 246
04:30 PM 15 51 9 7 42 4 2 74 38 19 11 16 288
04:45 PM 14 66 4 4 25 4 5 69 27 28 10 22 278
Total 55 245 20 21 106 10 10 278 127 101 48 63 1084
05:00 PM 12 59 4 1 25 1 3 82 27 30 10 16 270
05:15 PM 12 66 1 6 22 5 2 64 32 27 10 22 269
05:30 PM 11 53 3 8 43 4 2 88 44 14 8 18 296
05:45 PM 14 62 8 7 19 2 5 63 27 19 5 18 249
Total 49 240 16 22 109 12 12 297 130 90 33 74 1084
Grand Total 104 485 36 43 215 22 22 575 257 191 81 137 2168
Apprch %16.6 77.6 5.8 15.4 76.8 7.9 2.6 67.3 30.1 46.7 19.8 33.5
Total %4.8 22.4 1.7 2 9.9 1 1 26.5 11.9 8.8 3.7 6.3
Madison Avenue North
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
104
Thru
485
Left
36
InOut Total
755 625 1380
R
i
g
h
t
4
3
T
h
r
u
2
1
5
L
e
f
t
2
2
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
1
3
9
2
8
0
4
1
9
Left
257
Thru
575
Right
22
Out TotalIn
698 854 1552
Le
f
t
13
7
Th
r
u
81
Ri
g
h
t
19
1
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
57
6
4
0
9
9
8
5
2/2/2017 04:00 PM
2/2/2017 05:45 PM
Group 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
70
File Name : 3911d
Site Code : 00003911
Start Date : 2/2/2017
Page No : 2
Madison Avenue North
Southbound
Wyatt Way NE
Westbound
Madison Avenue North
Northbound
Wyatt Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:45 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:45 PM
04:45 PM 14 66 4 84 4 25 4 33 5 69 27 101 28 10 22 60 278
05:00 PM 12 59 4 75 1 25 1 27 3 82 27 112 30 10 16 56 270
05:15 PM 12 66 1 79 6 22 5 33 2 64 32 98 27 10 22 59 269
05:30 PM 11 53 3 67 8 43 4 55 2 88 44 134 14 8 18 40 296
Total Volume 49 244 12 305 19 115 14 148 12 303 130 445 99 38 78 215 1113
% App. Total 16.1 80 3.9 12.8 77.7 9.5 2.7 68.1 29.2 46 17.7 36.3
PHF .875 .924 .750 .908 .594 .669 .700 .673 .600 .861 .739 .830 .825 .950 .886 .896 .940
Madison Avenue North
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
W
W
y
a
t
t
W
a
y
N
E
Madison Avenue North
Right
49
Thru
244
Left
12
InOut Total
400 305 705
R
i
g
h
t
1
9
T
h
r
u
1
1
5
L
e
f
t
1
4
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
6
2
1
4
8
2
1
0
Left
130
Thru
303
Right
12
Out TotalIn
357 445 802
Le
f
t
78
Th
r
u
38
Ri
g
h
t
99
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
29
4
2
1
5
5
0
9
Peak Hour Begins at 04:45 PM
Group 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
71
File Name : 3968c
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Nakata Avenue NW
Southbound Westbound
Taurnic Pl NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
*** BREAK ***
07:15 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
07:30 AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
Total 4 0 0 4 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 5
*** BREAK ***
08:15 AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3
08:30 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1
*** BREAK ***
Total 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 4
Grand Total 7 0 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 9
Apprch %100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
Total %77.8 0 0 77.8 0 0 0 0 0 0 22.2 22.2 0 0 0 0
Nakata Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Taurnic Pl NW
Right
7
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 7 7
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
0
0
0
Left
2
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
0 2 2
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
9
0
9
5/31/2017 07:00 AM
5/31/2017 08:45 AM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
72
File Name : 3968c
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Nakata Avenue NW
Southbound Westbound
Taurnic Pl NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 07:00 AM to 08:15 AM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 07:30 AM
07:30 AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
07:45 AM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 2
08:00 AM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
08:15 AM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 3
Total Volume 5 0 0 5 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 2 0 0 0 0 7
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 0 0 0
PHF .625 .000 .000 .625 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .500 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .583
Nakata Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Taurnic Pl NW
Right
5
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
0 5 5
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
0
0
0
Left
2
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
0 2 2
Le
f
t
0
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
0
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
7
0
7
Peak Hour Begins at 07:30 AM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
73
File Name : 3968d
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 1
Groups Printed- Class 1
Nakata Avenue NW
Southbound Westbound
Taurnic Pl NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
04:00 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
04:30 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
04:45 PM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
Total 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 3 3 6
05:00 PM 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 5
05:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 0 0 0 0 1
05:30 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 4 0 1 5 5
*** BREAK ***
Total 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 2 7 11
Grand Total 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 5 0 5 10 17
Apprch %100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 100 50 0 50
Total %35.3 0 0 35.3 0 0 0 0 0 0 5.9 5.9 29.4 0 29.4 58.8
Nakata Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Taurnic Pl NW
Right
6
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
5 6 11
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
0
0
0
Left
1
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
5 1 6
Le
f
t
5
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
5
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
7
1
0
1
7
5/31/2017 04:00 PM
5/31/2017 05:45 PM
Class 1
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
74
File Name : 3968d
Site Code : 00003968
Start Date : 5/31/2017
Page No : 2
Nakata Avenue NW
Southbound Westbound
Taurnic Pl NW
Northbound
Wallace Way NW
Eastbound
Start Time Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Right Thru Left App. Total Int. Total
Peak Hour Analysis From 04:00 PM to 05:15 PM - Peak 1 of 1
Peak Hour for Entire Intersection Begins at 04:15 PM
04:15 PM 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 1
04:30 PM 1 0 0 1 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 1 2
04:45 PM 2 0 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2
05:00 PM 3 0 0 3 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 1 2 5
Total Volume 6 0 0 6 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 0 3 4 10
% App. Total 100 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 25 0 75
PHF .500 .000 .000 .500 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .000 .250 .000 .750 .500 .500
Nakata Avenue NW
W
a
l
l
a
c
e
W
a
y
N
W
Taurnic Pl NW
Right
6
Thru
0
Left
0
InOut Total
3 6 9
R
i
g
h
t
0
T
h
r
u
0
L
e
f
t
0
O
u
t
T
o
t
a
l
I
n
0
0
0
Left
0
Thru
0
Right
0
Out TotalIn
1 0 1
Le
f
t
3
Th
r
u
0
Ri
g
h
t
1
To
t
a
l
Ou
t
In
6
4
1
0
Peak Hour Begins at 04:15 PM
Class 1
Peak Hour Data
North
Heath & Associates, Inc
2214 Tacoma Road
Puyallup, WA 98371
75
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEVEL OF SERVICE
APPENDIX
76
HCM 6th Roundabout Existing AM Peak Hour
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.3
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 437 433 296 464
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 446 442 302 473
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 402 254 463 374
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 445 511 385 322
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.2 7.9 8.3 10.3
Approach LOS B A A B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 446 442 302 473
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 916 1065 861 942
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.980 0.979 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 437 433 296 464
Cap Entry, veh/h 897 1044 843 924
V/C Ratio 0.487 0.415 0.351 0.502
Control Delay, s/veh 10.2 7.9 8.3 10.3
LOS B A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 2 3
77
HCM 6th TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 14 0 17 2 226 15 27 303 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 14 0 17 2 226 15 27 303 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 15 0 18 2 246 16 29 329 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 656 655 331 648 649 254 333 0 0 262 0 0
Stage 1 389 389 - 258 258 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 267 266 - 390 391 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 382 388 715 386 391 790 1238 - - 1314 - -
Stage 1 639 612 - 751 698 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 743 692 - 638 611 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 365 377 715 377 380 790 1238 - - 1314 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 365 377 - 377 380 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 638 595 - 749 697 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 724 691 - 620 595 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 12.3 0.1 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1238 - - 715 529 1314 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.002 0.064 0.022 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 10 12.3 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.2 0.1 - -
78
HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 112 80 113 0 5 35 10 0 68 126 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 112 80 113 0 5 35 10 0 68 126 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 124 89 126 0 6 39 11 0 76 140 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.3 9.8 10.9
HCM LOS B A B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, %0% 95% 26% 70% 78%
Vol Right, %0% 5% 37% 20% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 68 132 305 50 319
LT Vol 68 0 112 5 24
Through Vol 0 126 80 35 250
RT Vol 0 6 113 10 45
Lane Flow Rate 76 147 339 56 354
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.141 0.251 0.516 0.094 0.541
Departure Headway (Hd)6.696 6.156 5.48 6.104 5.495
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 534 582 657 583 656
Service Time 4.451 3.91 3.53 4.18 3.542
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.142 0.253 0.516 0.096 0.54
HCM Control Delay 10.6 11 14.3 9.8 14.9
HCM Lane LOS B B B A B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1 3 0.3 3.3
79
HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 24 250 45
Future Vol, veh/h 0 24 250 45
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 27 278 50
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 14.9
HCM LOS B
80
HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.7
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 38 256 114 0 19 103 4 0 44 41 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 38 256 114 0 19 103 4 0 44 41 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 45 305 136 0 23 123 5 0 52 49 19
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 16.7 10.1 10.3
HCM LOS C B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %44% 9% 15% 26%
Vol Thru, %41% 63% 82% 55%
Vol Right, %16% 28% 3% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 101 408 126 137
LT Vol 44 38 19 36
Through Vol 41 256 103 76
RT Vol 16 114 4 25
Lane Flow Rate 120 486 150 163
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.196 0.655 0.228 0.26
Departure Headway (Hd)5.862 4.857 5.469 5.728
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 611 743 656 626
Service Time 3.908 2.889 3.512 3.771
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.196 0.654 0.229 0.26
HCM Control Delay 10.3 16.7 10.1 10.8
HCM Lane LOS B C B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 4.9 0.9 1
81
HCM 6th AWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 36 76 25
Future Vol, veh/h 0 36 76 25
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 43 90 30
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 10.8
HCM LOS B
82
HCM 6th TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 4 0 5 1 51 1 3 80 2
Future Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 4 0 5 1 51 1 3 80 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 16 0 5 6 0 8 2 81 2 5 127 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 229 226 129 227 226 82 130 0 0 83 0 0
Stage 1 139 139 - 86 86 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 90 87 - 141 140 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 730 677 926 733 677 983 1468 - - 1527 - -
Stage 1 869 785 - 927 827 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 922 827 - 867 785 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 721 674 926 726 674 983 1468 - - 1527 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 721 674 - 726 674 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 868 782 - 926 826 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 914 826 - 859 782 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 9.3 0.1 0.3
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1468 - - 760 849 1527 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.027 0.017 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.9 9.3 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
83
HCM 6th TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 59 59 59 59 59 59
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 4 4 - 0
Stage 1 4 4 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1023 896 - -
Stage 1 1024 897 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1023 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1023 0 - -
Stage 1 1024 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.5 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1023 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - -
84
HCM 6th TWSC Existing AM Peak Hour
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 416 69 49 210 11 43
Future Vol, veh/h 416 69 49 210 11 43
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 473 78 56 239 13 49
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 551 0 863 512
Stage 1 - -- -512 -
Stage 2 - -- -351 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1019 -325 562
Stage 1 - -- -602 -
Stage 2 - -- -713 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1019 -305 562
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -305 -
Stage 1 - -- -564 -
Stage 2 - -- -713 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.7 13.6
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)480 - - 1019 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.128 - - 0.055 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.6 - - 8.7 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.4 - - 0.2 -
85
HCM 6th Roundabout Existing PM Peak Hour
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.2
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 391 503 542 354
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 398 513 553 361
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 368 407 403 507
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 500 549 363 413
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 8.7 11.9 13.0 10.1
Approach LOS A B B B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 398 513 553 361
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 948 911 915 823
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.981 0.980 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 391 503 542 354
Cap Entry, veh/h 931 893 896 806
V/C Ratio 0.420 0.563 0.604 0.439
Control Delay, s/veh 8.7 11.9 13.0 10.1
LOS A B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 4 4 2
86
HCM 6th TWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 52 0 44 0 481 35 26 297 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 52 0 44 0 481 35 26 297 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 58 0 49 0 534 39 29 330 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 967 962 331 943 943 554 331 0 0 573 0 0
Stage 1 389 389 - 554 554 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 578 573 - 389 389 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 236 258 715 245 265 536 1240 - - 1010 - -
Stage 1 639 612 - 520 517 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 505 507 - 639 612 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 209 249 715 238 256 536 1240 - - 1010 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 209 249 - 238 256 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 639 591 - 520 517 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 459 507 - 617 591 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 21.9 0 0.7
HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1240 - - - 319 1010 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.334 0.029 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 21.9 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.4 0.1 - -
87
HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 15.3
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 78 38 99 0 14 115 19 0 130 303 12
Future Vol, veh/h 0 78 38 99 0 14 115 19 0 130 303 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 83 40 105 0 15 122 20 0 138 322 13
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 13.7 12.5 16.3
HCM LOS B B C
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 36% 9% 4%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 18% 78% 80%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 46% 13% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 130 315 215 148 305
LT Vol 130 0 78 14 12
Through Vol 0 303 38 115 244
RT Vol 0 12 99 19 49
Lane Flow Rate 138 335 229 157 324
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.266 0.594 0.405 0.293 0.55
Departure Headway (Hd)6.915 6.379 6.369 6.71 6.104
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 521 570 565 534 594
Service Time 4.627 4.091 4.418 4.765 4.117
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.265 0.588 0.405 0.294 0.545
HCM Control Delay 12.1 18 13.7 12.5 16.3
HCM Lane LOS B C B B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 3.9 2 1.2 3.3
88
HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 244 49
Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 244 49
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 13 260 52
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 16.3
HCM LOS C
89
HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 10 156 76 0 11 310 16 0 122 40 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 10 156 76 0 11 310 16 0 122 40 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 12 186 90 0 13 369 19 0 145 48 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 11.8 14.9 11.9
HCM LOS B B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %73% 4% 3% 5%
Vol Thru, %24% 64% 92% 70%
Vol Right, %4% 31% 5% 25%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 168 242 337 56
LT Vol 122 10 11 3
Through Vol 40 156 310 39
RT Vol 6 76 16 14
Lane Flow Rate 200 288 401 67
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.33 0.413 0.574 0.111
Departure Headway (Hd)5.948 5.156 5.15 5.994
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 604 697 698 595
Service Time 3.997 3.199 3.189 4.055
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.331 0.413 0.574 0.113
HCM Control Delay 11.9 11.8 14.9 9.8
HCM Lane LOS B B B A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.4 2 3.7 0.4
90
HCM 6th AWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 39 14
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 39 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 4 46 17
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 9.8
HCM LOS A
91
HCM 6th TWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 77 3 1 90 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 77 3 1 90 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 88 3 1 102 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 195 195 102 194 194 90 102 0 0 91 0 0
Stage 1 104 104 - 90 90 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 91 91 - 104 104 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 769 704 959 770 705 973 1503 - - 1517 - -
Stage 1 907 813 - 922 824 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 921 823 - 907 813 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 767 703 959 769 704 973 1503 - - 1517 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 767 703 - 769 704 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 907 812 - 922 824 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 919 823 - 906 812 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 9.3 0 0.1
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1503 - - - 839 1517 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.007 0.001 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 9.3 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -
92
HCM 6th TWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 0 0 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 0 0 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 6 2 0 0 0 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 6 6 - 0
Stage 1 6 6 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 893 - -
Stage 1 1022 895 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1021 0 - -
Stage 1 1022 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)- - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - -
93
HCM 6th TWSC Existing PM Peak Hour
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 332 39 60 369 34 53
Future Vol, veh/h 332 39 60 369 34 53
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 349 41 63 388 36 56
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 390 0 884 370
Stage 1 - -- -370 -
Stage 2 - -- -514 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1169 -316 676
Stage 1 - -- -699 -
Stage 2 - -- -600 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1169 -294 676
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -294 -
Stage 1 - -- -651 -
Stage 2 - -- -600 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 15.1
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)448 - - 1169 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.204 - - 0.054 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.1 - - 8.3 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 0.2 -
94
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.7
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 453 448 305 476
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 462 457 311 485
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 412 261 481 386
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 459 531 393 332
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.7 8.2 8.7 10.8
Approach LOS B A A B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 462 457 311 485
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 906 1057 845 931
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.979 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 453 448 305 476
Cap Entry, veh/h 888 1037 827 913
V/C Ratio 0.510 0.432 0.368 0.521
Control Delay, s/veh 10.7 8.2 8.7 10.8
LOS B A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 2 3
95
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 14 0 18 2 233 15 28 312 4
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 14 0 18 2 233 15 28 312 4
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 15 0 20 2 253 16 30 339 4
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 676 674 341 667 668 261 343 0 0 269 0 0
Stage 1 401 401 - 265 265 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 275 273 - 402 403 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 370 379 706 375 382 783 1227 - - 1306 - -
Stage 1 630 604 - 745 693 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 736 688 - 629 603 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 353 368 706 366 371 783 1227 - - 1306 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 353 368 - 366 371 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 629 587 - 744 692 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 716 687 - 610 586 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.1 12.4 0.1 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1227 - - 706 523 1306 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.002 0.067 0.023 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.9 0 - 10.1 12.4 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.2 0.1 - -
96
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 115 82 118 0 5 36 10 0 71 130 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 115 82 118 0 5 36 10 0 71 130 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 128 91 131 0 6 40 11 0 79 144 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15 10 11
HCM LOS B A B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 26% 71% 78%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 37% 20% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 71 136 315 51 329
LT Vol 71 0 115 5 25
Through Vol 0 130 82 36 258
RT Vol 0 6 118 10 46
Lane Flow Rate 79 151 350 57 366
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.148 0.262 0.539 0.098 0.565
Departure Headway (Hd)6.773 6.233 5.544 6.213 5.563
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 528 574 648 573 647
Service Time 4.537 3.997 3.6 4.296 3.616
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.15 0.263 0.54 0.099 0.566
HCM Control Delay 10.7 11.2 15 10 15.7
HCM Lane LOS B B B A C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1 3.2 0.3 3.5
97
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 258 46
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 258 46
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 28 287 51
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 15.7
HCM LOS C
98
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 40 264 117 0 20 106 5 0 45 42 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 40 264 117 0 20 106 5 0 45 42 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 48 314 139 0 24 126 6 0 54 50 19
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 18 10.4 10.5
HCM LOS C B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %44% 10% 15% 27%
Vol Thru, %41% 63% 81% 54%
Vol Right, %16% 28% 4% 19%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 103 421 131 145
LT Vol 45 40 20 39
Through Vol 42 264 106 79
RT Vol 16 117 5 27
Lane Flow Rate 123 501 156 173
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.203 0.685 0.24 0.278
Departure Headway (Hd)5.961 4.917 5.548 5.807
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 601 737 646 618
Service Time 4.016 2.952 3.597 3.858
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.205 0.68 0.241 0.28
HCM Control Delay 10.5 18 10.4 11.1
HCM Lane LOS B C B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 5.5 0.9 1.1
99
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 79 27
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 79 27
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 46 94 32
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 11.1
HCM LOS B
100
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 8 0 11 1 53 3 5 82 2
Future Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 8 0 11 1 53 3 5 82 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 16 0 5 13 0 17 2 84 5 8 130 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 247 241 132 241 240 87 133 0 0 89 0 0
Stage 1 148 148 - 91 91 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 99 93 - 150 149 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 711 664 923 717 665 977 1464 - - 1519 - -
Stage 1 859 779 - 921 823 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 912 822 - 857 778 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 695 659 923 710 660 977 1464 - - 1519 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 695 659 - 710 660 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 858 774 - 920 822 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 895 821 - 847 773 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10 9.4 0.1 0.4
HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1464 - - 737 843 1519 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.028 0.036 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10 9.4 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
101
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Future Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.59 0.92 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 4 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 8
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)4 11 3 8
Volume Left (vph)0 0 3 0
Volume Right (vph)0 0 0 8
Hadj (s)0.03 0.03 0.20 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.3
Degree Utilization, x 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)898 901 853 1068
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.2 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.2 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.8
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
102
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/14/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 429 71 52 216 12 49
Future Vol, veh/h 429 71 52 216 12 49
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 488 81 59 245 14 56
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 569 0 892 529
Stage 1 - -- -529 -
Stage 2 - -- -363 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1003 -312 550
Stage 1 - -- -591 -
Stage 2 - -- -704 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1003 -291 550
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -291 -
Stage 1 - -- -551 -
Stage 2 - -- -704 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.7 14
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)468 - - 1003 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.148 - - 0.059 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 14 - - 8.8 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0.2 -
103
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 2 14 0 18 0 233 15 28 312 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 2 14 0 18 0 233 15 28 312 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 5 0 2 15 0 20 0 253 16 30 339 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 670 668 339 661 660 261 339 0 0 269 0 0
Stage 1 399 399 - 261 261 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 271 269 - 400 399 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 373 382 708 379 386 783 1231 - - 1306 - -
Stage 1 631 606 - 748 696 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 739 690 - 630 606 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 356 371 708 370 375 783 1231 - - 1306 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 356 371 - 370 375 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 631 589 - 748 696 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 721 690 - 610 589 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.8 12.3 0 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1231 - - 415 526 1306 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.018 0.066 0.023 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 13.8 12.3 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
104
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Future Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 5
Peak Hour Factor 0.59 0.92 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 8
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)4 3 3 8
Volume Left (vph)0 0 3 0
Volume Right (vph)0 0 0 8
Hadj (s)0.03 0.03 0.20 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.3
Degree Utilization, x 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)900 901 868 1076
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.1 6.3
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.1 6.3
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.7
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
105
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 9.7
Intersection LOS A
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 448 448 313 476
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 457 457 319 485
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 414 263 476 388
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 459 532 395 332
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 10.7 8.3 8.8 10.8
Approach LOS B A A B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 457 457 319 485
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 905 1055 849 929
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.980 0.981
Flow Entry, veh/h 448 448 313 476
Cap Entry, veh/h 886 1035 832 912
V/C Ratio 0.505 0.433 0.376 0.522
Control Delay, s/veh 10.7 8.3 8.8 10.8
LOS B A A B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 2 2 3
106
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 0 5 14 0 18 4 233 15 28 312 6
Future Vol, veh/h 6 0 5 14 0 18 4 233 15 28 312 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 7 0 5 15 0 20 4 253 16 30 339 7
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 682 680 343 674 675 261 346 0 0 269 0 0
Stage 1 403 403 - 269 269 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 279 277 - 405 406 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 367 376 704 371 378 783 1224 - - 1306 - -
Stage 1 628 603 - 741 690 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 732 685 - 626 601 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 349 364 704 359 366 783 1224 - - 1306 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 349 364 - 359 366 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 625 586 - 738 687 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 711 682 - 604 584 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 13.2 12.5 0.1 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1224 - - 453 516 1306 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.026 0.067 0.023 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 13.2 12.5 7.8 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.2 0.1 - -
107
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.1
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 116 82 116 0 5 36 10 0 70 131 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 116 82 116 0 5 36 10 0 70 131 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 129 91 129 0 6 40 11 0 78 146 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15 10 11
HCM LOS B A B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 26% 71% 78%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 37% 20% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 70 137 314 51 333
LT Vol 70 0 116 5 25
Through Vol 0 131 82 36 261
RT Vol 0 6 116 10 47
Lane Flow Rate 78 152 349 57 370
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.146 0.264 0.539 0.098 0.572
Departure Headway (Hd)6.779 6.239 5.56 6.226 5.562
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 527 574 645 571 648
Service Time 4.544 4.004 3.617 4.312 3.616
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.148 0.265 0.541 0.1 0.571
HCM Control Delay 10.7 11.2 15 10 15.8
HCM Lane LOS B B B A C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.5 1.1 3.2 0.3 3.6
108
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 25 261 47
Future Vol, veh/h 0 25 261 47
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 28 290 52
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 15.8
HCM LOS C
109
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 14.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 39 265 117 0 20 107 4 0 45 42 16
Future Vol, veh/h 0 39 265 117 0 20 107 4 0 45 42 16
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 46 315 139 0 24 127 5 0 54 50 19
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 17.9 10.3 10.5
HCM LOS C B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %44% 9% 15% 26%
Vol Thru, %41% 63% 82% 55%
Vol Right, %16% 28% 3% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 103 421 131 141
LT Vol 45 39 20 37
Through Vol 42 265 107 78
RT Vol 16 117 4 26
Lane Flow Rate 123 501 156 168
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.203 0.683 0.24 0.271
Departure Headway (Hd)5.947 4.903 5.535 5.803
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 602 737 647 618
Service Time 4.002 2.938 3.584 3.854
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.204 0.68 0.241 0.272
HCM Control Delay 10.5 17.9 10.3 11
HCM Lane LOS B C B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.8 5.4 0.9 1.1
110
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 37 78 26
Future Vol, veh/h 0 37 78 26
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 44 93 31
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 11
HCM LOS B
111
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.5
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 4 0 5 1 53 1 3 82 2
Future Vol, veh/h 10 0 3 4 0 5 1 53 1 3 82 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 16 0 5 6 0 8 2 84 2 5 130 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 235 232 132 233 232 85 133 0 0 86 0 0
Stage 1 142 142 - 89 89 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 93 90 - 144 143 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 724 672 923 726 672 980 1464 - - 1523 - -
Stage 1 866 783 - 923 825 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 919 824 - 864 782 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 715 669 923 719 669 980 1464 - - 1523 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 715 669 - 719 669 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 865 780 - 922 824 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 911 823 - 856 779 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 9.9 9.3 0.1 0.3
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1464 - - 754 844 1523 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.027 0.017 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 9.9 9.3 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
112
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length --- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 59 59 59 59 59 59
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 4 4 - 0
Stage 1 4 4 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1023 896 - -
Stage 1 1024 897 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1023 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1023 0 - -
Stage 1 1024 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.5 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1023 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - -
113
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 429 71 50 217 11 44
Future Vol, veh/h 429 71 50 217 11 44
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 488 81 57 247 13 50
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 569 0 890 529
Stage 1 - -- -529 -
Stage 2 - -- -361 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1003 -313 550
Stage 1 - -- -591 -
Stage 2 - -- -705 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1003 -292 550
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -292 -
Stage 1 - -- -552 -
Stage 2 - -- -705 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.6 13.9
HCM LOS B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)467 - - 1003 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.134 - - 0.057 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 13.9 - - 8.8 0
HCM Lane LOS B - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.5 - - 0.2 -
114
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 11.9
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 407 522 558 364
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 414 532 569 371
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 378 420 419 526
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 519 568 373 426
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 12.8 14.0 10.7
Approach LOS A B B B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 414 532 569 371
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 938 899 900 807
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.982 0.981 0.980 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 407 522 558 364
Cap Entry, veh/h 922 882 882 791
V/C Ratio 0.441 0.592 0.632 0.460
Control Delay, s/veh 9.2 12.8 14.0 10.7
LOS A B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 4 5 2
115
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 45 0 496 36 27 306 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 54 0 45 0 496 36 27 306 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 60 0 50 0 551 40 30 340 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 997 992 341 972 972 571 341 0 0 591 0 0
Stage 1 401 401 - 571 571 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 596 591 - 401 401 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 225 248 706 234 254 524 1229 - - 995 - -
Stage 1 630 604 - 509 508 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 494 498 - 630 604 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 198 239 706 227 245 524 1229 - - 995 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 198 239 - 227 245 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 630 582 - 509 508 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 447 498 - 607 582 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 23.2 0 0.7
HCM LOS A C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1229 - - - 306 995 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.359 0.03 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 23.2 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 1.6 0.1 - -
116
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 80 39 105 0 14 118 20 0 139 312 12
Future Vol, veh/h 0 80 39 105 0 14 118 20 0 139 312 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 85 41 112 0 15 126 21 0 148 332 13
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.3 12.9 17.1
HCM LOS B B C
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 36% 9% 4%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 17% 78% 80%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 47% 13% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 139 324 224 152 313
LT Vol 139 0 80 14 12
Through Vol 0 312 39 118 251
RT Vol 0 12 105 20 50
Lane Flow Rate 148 345 238 162 333
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.287 0.618 0.429 0.308 0.573
Departure Headway (Hd)6.994 6.458 6.481 6.849 6.194
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 513 558 555 524 583
Service Time 4.738 4.201 4.528 4.9 4.24
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.288 0.618 0.429 0.309 0.571
HCM Control Delay 12.5 19.1 14.3 12.9 17.3
HCM Lane LOS B C B B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.2 4.2 2.1 1.3 3.6
117
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 251 50
Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 251 50
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 13 267 53
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 17.3
HCM LOS C
118
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.7
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 11 161 78 0 11 319 21 0 126 42 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 11 161 78 0 11 319 21 0 126 42 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 13 192 93 0 13 380 25 0 150 50 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.3 16.1 12.3
HCM LOS B C B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %72% 4% 3% 10%
Vol Thru, %24% 64% 91% 66%
Vol Right, %3% 31% 6% 24%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 174 250 351 62
LT Vol 126 11 11 6
Through Vol 42 161 319 41
RT Vol 6 78 21 15
Lane Flow Rate 207 298 418 74
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.348 0.435 0.607 0.126
Departure Headway (Hd)6.056 5.258 5.228 6.129
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 592 682 689 582
Service Time 4.115 3.309 3.274 4.202
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.35 0.437 0.607 0.127
HCM Control Delay 12.3 12.3 16.1 10.1
HCM Lane LOS B B C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.6 2.2 4.1 0.4
119
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 6 41 15
Future Vol, veh/h 0 6 41 15
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 7 49 18
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 10.1
HCM LOS B
120
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 79 10 6 93 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 8 0 4 0 79 10 6 93 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 9 0 5 0 90 11 7 106 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 218 221 106 216 216 96 106 0 0 101 0 0
Stage 1 120 120 - 96 96 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 98 101 - 120 120 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 743 681 954 745 685 966 1498 - - 1504 - -
Stage 1 889 800 - 916 819 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 913 815 - 889 800 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 736 678 954 742 682 966 1498 - - 1504 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 736 678 - 742 682 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 889 796 - 916 819 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 909 815 - 885 796 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 9.6 0 0.4
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1498 - - - 804 1504 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.017 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 9.6 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 0 - -
121
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)3 12 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Future Volume (vph)3 12 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Hourly flow rate (vph)6 13 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)21 8 0 12
Volume Left (vph)6 0 0 0
Volume Right (vph)2 0 0 12
Hadj (s)0.02 0.03 0.00 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.4
Degree Utilization, x 0.02 0.01 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)901 897 900 1056
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 0.0 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.8
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
122
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 342 41 66 380 35 57
Future Vol, veh/h 342 41 66 380 35 57
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 360 43 69 400 37 60
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 403 0 920 382
Stage 1 - -- -382 -
Stage 2 - -- -538 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1156 -301 665
Stage 1 - -- -690 -
Stage 2 - -- -585 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1156 -278 665
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -278 -
Stage 1 - -- -637 -
Stage 2 - -- -585 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 15.6
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)435 - - 1156 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.223 - - 0.06 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.6 - - 8.3 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 0.2 -
123
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.7
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 54 0 45 0 496 36 27 306 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 54 0 45 0 496 36 27 306 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 2 0 3 60 0 50 0 551 40 30 340 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 996 991 340 973 971 571 340 0 0 591 0 0
Stage 1 400 400 - 571 571 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 596 591 - 402 400 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 225 248 707 233 255 524 1230 - - 995 - -
Stage 1 630 605 - 509 508 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 494 498 - 629 605 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 198 239 707 225 246 524 1230 - - 995 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 198 239 - 225 246 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 630 583 - 509 508 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 447 498 - 603 583 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.5 23.4 0 0.7
HCM LOS C C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1230 - - 349 304 995 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.016 0.362 0.03 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 15.5 23.4 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 1.6 0.1 - -
124
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)3 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Future Volume (vph)3 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Hourly flow rate (vph)6 13 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 12
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)21 2 0 12
Volume Left (vph)6 0 0 0
Volume Right (vph)2 0 0 12
Hadj (s)0.02 0.03 0.00 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 3.9 4.0 4.0 3.3
Degree Utilization, x 0.02 0.00 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)903 897 900 1062
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.0 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 0.0 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.8
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
125
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.0
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 406 522 560 364
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 414 532 571 371
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 382 420 417 526
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 515 568 379 426
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 9.2 12.8 14.0 10.7
Approach LOS A B B B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 414 532 571 371
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 935 899 902 807
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.980 0.981 0.980 0.980
Flow Entry, veh/h 406 522 560 364
Cap Entry, veh/h 916 882 884 791
V/C Ratio 0.443 0.592 0.633 0.460
Control Delay, s/veh 9.2 12.8 14.0 10.7
LOS A B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 2 4 5 2
126
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 5 54 0 45 7 496 36 27 306 6
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 5 54 0 45 7 496 36 27 306 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 2 0 6 60 0 50 8 551 40 30 340 7
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1016 1011 344 994 994 571 347 0 0 591 0 0
Stage 1 404 404 - 587 587 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 612 607 - 407 407 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 218 241 703 226 247 524 1223 - - 995 - -
Stage 1 627 603 - 499 500 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 484 489 - 625 601 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 190 230 703 216 235 524 1223 - - 995 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 190 230 - 216 235 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 621 581 - 494 495 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 433 484 - 597 579 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.2 24.3 0.1 0.7
HCM LOS B C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1223 - - 397 295 995 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.006 - - 0.02 0.373 0.03 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8 0 - 14.2 24.3 8.7 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B C A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 1.7 0.1 - -
127
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 16.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 81 39 102 0 14 118 20 0 134 318 12
Future Vol, veh/h 0 81 39 102 0 14 118 20 0 134 318 12
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 86 41 109 0 15 126 21 0 143 338 13
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 14.4 13 17.6
HCM LOS B B C
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 36% 9% 4%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 18% 78% 80%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 46% 13% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 134 330 222 152 318
LT Vol 134 0 81 14 12
Through Vol 0 318 39 118 255
RT Vol 0 12 102 20 51
Lane Flow Rate 143 351 236 162 338
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.277 0.631 0.427 0.309 0.582
Departure Headway (Hd)7.001 6.466 6.515 6.873 6.197
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 513 558 553 522 582
Service Time 4.745 4.209 4.564 4.925 4.244
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.279 0.629 0.427 0.31 0.581
HCM Control Delay 12.4 19.7 14.4 13 17.6
HCM Lane LOS B C B B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.1 4.4 2.1 1.3 3.7
128
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 255 51
Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 255 51
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 13 271 54
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 17.6
HCM LOS C
129
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 13.5
Intersection LOS B
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 10 162 78 0 11 320 16 0 126 41 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 10 162 78 0 11 320 16 0 126 41 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 12 193 93 0 13 381 19 0 150 49 7
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 12.2 15.7 12.2
HCM LOS B C B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %73% 4% 3% 5%
Vol Thru, %24% 65% 92% 70%
Vol Right, %3% 31% 5% 25%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 173 250 347 57
LT Vol 126 10 11 3
Through Vol 41 162 320 40
RT Vol 6 78 16 14
Lane Flow Rate 206 298 413 68
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.345 0.431 0.597 0.115
Departure Headway (Hd)6.022 5.218 5.205 6.091
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 595 688 694 586
Service Time 4.075 3.267 3.249 4.159
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.346 0.433 0.595 0.116
HCM Control Delay 12.2 12.2 15.7 10
HCM Lane LOS B B C A
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.5 2.2 4 0.4
130
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 3 40 14
Future Vol, veh/h 0 3 40 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 4 48 17
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 10
HCM LOS A
131
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 79 3 1 93 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 79 3 1 93 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 3 0 2 0 90 3 1 106 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 201 201 106 200 200 92 106 0 0 93 0 0
Stage 1 108 108 - 92 92 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 93 93 - 108 108 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 762 699 954 763 699 971 1498 - - 1514 - -
Stage 1 902 810 - 920 823 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 919 822 - 902 810 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 760 698 954 762 698 971 1498 - - 1514 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 760 698 - 762 698 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 902 809 - 920 823 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 917 822 - 901 809 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 9.3 0 0.1
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1498 - - - 834 1514 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.007 0.001 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 9.3 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -
132
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 3 1 0 0 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 3 1 0 0 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 6 2 0 0 0 12
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 6 6 - 0
Stage 1 6 6 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 893 - -
Stage 1 1022 895 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1021 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1021 0 - -
Stage 1 1022 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)- - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - -
133
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2020 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 343 40 62 380 35 55
Future Vol, veh/h 343 40 62 380 35 55
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 361 42 65 400 37 58
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 403 0 912 382
Stage 1 - -- -382 -
Stage 2 - -- -530 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1156 -304 665
Stage 1 - -- -690 -
Stage 2 - -- -590 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1156 -282 665
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -282 -
Stage 1 - -- -640 -
Stage 2 - -- -590 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 15.6
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)435 - - 1156 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.218 - - 0.056 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.6 - - 8.3 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.8 - - 0.2 -
134
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.9
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 527 520 356 554
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 537 531 363 566
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 480 305 559 449
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 535 617 458 387
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.7 10.2 11.1 14.9
Approach LOS B B B B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 537 531 363 566
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 846 1011 780 873
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.981 0.979
Flow Entry, veh/h 527 520 356 554
Cap Entry, veh/h 830 991 766 855
V/C Ratio 0.635 0.525 0.465 0.648
Control Delay, s/veh 14.7 10.2 11.1 14.9
LOS B B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 5 3 2 5
135
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 17 0 20 2 270 18 32 362 5
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 1 17 0 20 2 270 18 32 362 5
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 1 18 0 22 2 293 20 35 393 5
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 784 783 396 773 775 303 398 0 0 313 0 0
Stage 1 466 466 - 307 307 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 318 317 - 466 468 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 313 328 658 319 331 741 1172 - - 1259 - -
Stage 1 581 566 - 707 665 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 698 658 - 581 565 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 295 316 658 309 318 741 1172 - - 1259 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 295 316 - 309 318 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 580 546 - 706 664 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 676 657 - 559 545 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.5 13.8 0.1 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1172 - - 658 451 1259 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.002 - - 0.002 0.089 0.028 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 10.5 13.8 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0 0.3 0.1 - -
136
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 19.2
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 134 96 137 0 6 42 12 0 82 151 7
Future Vol, veh/h 0 134 96 137 0 6 42 12 0 82 151 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 149 107 152 0 7 47 13 0 91 168 8
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 21.1 11.1 12.5
HCM LOS C B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 26% 70% 78%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 37% 20% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 82 158 367 60 382
LT Vol 82 0 134 6 29
Through Vol 0 151 96 42 299
RT Vol 0 7 137 12 54
Lane Flow Rate 91 176 408 67 424
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.186 0.332 0.683 0.129 0.714
Departure Headway (Hd)7.357 6.813 6.03 6.967 6.058
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 487 527 599 513 598
Service Time 5.108 4.565 4.051 5.029 4.086
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.187 0.334 0.681 0.131 0.709
HCM Control Delay 11.8 12.9 21.1 11.1 22.8
HCM Lane LOS B B C B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 1.4 5.3 0.4 5.9
137
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 29 299 54
Future Vol, veh/h 0 29 299 54
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 32 332 60
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 22.8
HCM LOS C
138
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21.1
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 46 306 136 0 23 123 6 0 53 49 19
Future Vol, veh/h 0 46 306 136 0 23 123 6 0 53 49 19
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 55 364 162 0 27 146 7 0 63 58 23
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 29.3 11.6 11.8
HCM LOS D B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %44% 9% 15% 27%
Vol Thru, %40% 63% 81% 54%
Vol Right, %16% 28% 4% 19%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 121 488 152 167
LT Vol 53 46 23 45
Through Vol 49 306 123 91
RT Vol 19 136 6 31
Lane Flow Rate 144 581 181 199
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.257 0.838 0.299 0.345
Departure Headway (Hd)6.426 5.192 5.958 6.243
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 555 691 597 571
Service Time 4.525 3.256 4.049 4.335
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 0.841 0.303 0.349
HCM Control Delay 11.8 29.3 11.6 12.6
HCM Lane LOS B D B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1 9.3 1.2 1.5
139
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 45 91 31
Future Vol, veh/h 0 45 91 31
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 54 108 37
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 12.6
HCM LOS B
140
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 0 4 9 0 12 1 61 3 6 96 2
Future Vol, veh/h 12 0 4 9 0 12 1 61 3 6 96 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 19 0 6 14 0 19 2 97 5 10 152 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 287 280 154 281 279 100 155 0 0 102 0 0
Stage 1 174 174 - 104 104 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 113 106 - 177 175 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 669 632 897 675 632 961 1438 - - 1503 - -
Stage 1 833 759 - 907 813 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 897 811 - 829 758 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 652 627 897 666 627 961 1438 - - 1503 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 652 627 - 666 627 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 832 754 - 906 812 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 878 810 - 817 753 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.3 9.6 0.1 0.4
HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1438 - - 700 808 1503 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.036 0.041 0.006 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10.3 9.6 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
141
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Future Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 10 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.59 0.92 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 4 0 0 11 0 3 0 0 0 0 10
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)4 11 3 10
Volume Left (vph)0 0 3 0
Volume Right (vph)0 0 0 10
Hadj (s)0.03 0.03 0.20 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.3
Degree Utilization, x 0.00 0.01 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)897 900 853 1068
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.2 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.2 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.8
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
142
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.8
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 498 83 61 251 14 56
Future Vol, veh/h 498 83 61 251 14 56
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 566 94 69 285 16 64
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 660 0 1036 613
Stage 1 - -- -613 -
Stage 2 - -- -423 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 928 -256 492
Stage 1 - -- -541 -
Stage 2 - -- -661 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 928 -233 492
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -233 -
Stage 1 - -- -493 -
Stage 2 - -- -661 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.8 16.1
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)403 - - 928 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.197 - - 0.075 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 16.1 - - 9.2 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.7 - - 0.2 -
143
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.2
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 5 0 2 17 0 20 0 270 18 32 362 0
Future Vol, veh/h 5 0 2 17 0 20 0 270 18 32 362 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 5 0 2 18 0 22 0 293 20 35 393 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 777 776 393 767 766 303 393 0 0 313 0 0
Stage 1 463 463 - 303 303 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 314 313 - 464 463 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 317 331 660 322 335 741 1177 - - 1259 - -
Stage 1 583 568 - 711 667 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 701 661 - 582 568 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 299 319 660 312 323 741 1177 - - 1259 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 299 319 - 312 323 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 583 548 - 711 667 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 680 661 - 559 548 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 15.4 13.7 0 0.6
HCM LOS C B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1177 - - 354 454 1259 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.021 0.089 0.028 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 15.4 13.7 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0.1 - -
144
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Future Volume (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 2 0 0 0 0 6
Peak Hour Factor 0.59 0.92 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59 0.92 0.92 0.59 0.59
Hourly flow rate (vph)0 4 0 0 3 0 3 0 0 0 0 10
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)4 3 3 10
Volume Left (vph)0 0 3 0
Volume Right (vph)0 0 0 10
Hadj (s)0.03 0.03 0.20 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.1 3.3
Degree Utilization, x 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)899 900 858 1076
Control Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.1 6.3
Approach Delay (s)7.0 7.0 7.1 6.3
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.7
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 13.3% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
145
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 12.9
Intersection LOS B
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 522 520 363 554
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 532 531 370 566
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 482 306 554 450
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 534 618 460 387
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 14.6 10.2 11.1 14.9
Approach LOS B B B B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 532 531 370 566
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 844 1010 784 872
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.982 0.979
Flow Entry, veh/h 522 520 363 554
Cap Entry, veh/h 828 990 770 854
V/C Ratio 0.630 0.526 0.472 0.649
Control Delay, s/veh 14.6 10.2 11.1 14.9
LOS B B B B
95th %tile Queue, veh 5 3 3 5
146
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 6 0 5 17 0 20 4 270 18 32 362 7
Future Vol, veh/h 6 0 5 17 0 20 4 270 18 32 362 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92 92
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 7 0 5 18 0 22 4 293 20 35 393 8
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 789 788 397 781 782 303 401 0 0 313 0 0
Stage 1 467 467 - 311 311 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 322 321 - 470 471 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 311 326 657 315 328 741 1169 - - 1259 - -
Stage 1 580 565 - 704 662 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 694 655 - 578 563 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 293 313 657 303 315 741 1169 - - 1259 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 293 313 - 303 315 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 578 545 - 701 659 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 671 652 - 553 543 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 14.5 13.9 0.1 0.6
HCM LOS B B
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1169 - - 392 445 1259 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.004 - - 0.031 0.09 0.028 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 14.5 13.9 7.9 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B B A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.3 0.1 - -
147
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 19.4
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 135 96 135 0 6 42 12 0 81 152 7
Future Vol, veh/h 0 135 96 135 0 6 42 12 0 81 152 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 150 107 150 0 7 47 13 0 90 169 8
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 21.1 11.1 12.6
HCM LOS C B B
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 8%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 26% 70% 78%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 37% 20% 14%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 81 159 366 60 386
LT Vol 81 0 135 6 29
Through Vol 0 152 96 42 302
RT Vol 0 7 135 12 55
Lane Flow Rate 90 177 407 67 429
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.184 0.335 0.683 0.129 0.722
Departure Headway (Hd)7.367 6.824 6.048 6.985 6.061
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 487 526 598 512 596
Service Time 5.118 4.574 4.071 5.049 4.087
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.185 0.337 0.681 0.131 0.72
HCM Control Delay 11.8 13 21.1 11.1 23.3
HCM Lane LOS B B C B C
HCM 95th-tile Q 0.7 1.5 5.3 0.4 6
148
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 29 302 55
Future Vol, veh/h 0 29 302 55
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.90 0.90 0.90
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 32 336 61
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 23.3
HCM LOS C
149
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 21
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 45 307 136 0 23 124 5 0 53 49 19
Future Vol, veh/h 0 45 307 136 0 23 124 5 0 53 49 19
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 54 365 162 0 27 148 6 0 63 58 23
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 29.1 11.6 11.7
HCM LOS D B B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %44% 9% 15% 26%
Vol Thru, %40% 63% 82% 55%
Vol Right, %16% 28% 3% 18%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 121 488 152 164
LT Vol 53 45 23 43
Through Vol 49 307 124 91
RT Vol 19 136 5 30
Lane Flow Rate 144 581 181 195
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.257 0.836 0.299 0.338
Departure Headway (Hd)6.411 5.179 5.945 6.238
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 555 697 599 572
Service Time 4.51 3.241 4.035 4.331
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.259 0.834 0.302 0.341
HCM Control Delay 11.7 29.1 11.6 12.5
HCM Lane LOS B D B B
HCM 95th-tile Q 1 9.2 1.2 1.5
150
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 43 91 30
Future Vol, veh/h 0 43 91 30
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 51 108 36
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 12.5
HCM LOS B
151
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 12 0 4 5 0 6 1 61 1 4 96 2
Future Vol, veh/h 12 0 4 5 0 6 1 61 1 4 96 2
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63 63
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 19 0 6 8 0 10 2 97 2 6 152 3
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 273 269 154 271 269 98 155 0 0 99 0 0
Stage 1 166 166 - 102 102 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 107 103 - 169 167 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 684 641 897 686 641 963 1438 - - 1507 - -
Stage 1 841 765 - 909 815 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 903 814 - 838 764 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 674 638 897 678 638 963 1438 - - 1507 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 674 638 - 678 638 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 840 762 - 908 814 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 893 813 - 829 761 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 10.2 9.5 0.1 0.3
HCM LOS B A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1438 - - 719 809 1507 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.001 - - 0.035 0.022 0.004 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 7.5 0 - 10.2 9.5 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - B A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 0.1 0 - -
152
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.1
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 6
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 2 0 0 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length --- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 59 59 59 59 59 59
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 3 0 0 10
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 5 5 - 0
Stage 1 5 5 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1022 894 - -
Stage 1 1023 896 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1022 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1022 0 - -
Stage 1 1023 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 8.5 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1022 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.003 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.5 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - -
153
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 AM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 1.6
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 498 83 59 252 13 51
Future Vol, veh/h 498 83 59 252 13 51
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 566 94 67 286 15 58
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 660 0 1033 613
Stage 1 - -- -613 -
Stage 2 - -- -420 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 928 -258 492
Stage 1 - -- -541 -
Stage 2 - -- -663 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 928 -236 492
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -236 -
Stage 1 - -- -494 -
Stage 2 - -- -663 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.7 15.9
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)403 - - 928 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.18 - - 0.072 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 15.9 - - 9.2 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0.6 - - 0.2 -
154
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.6
Intersection LOS C
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 471 605 649 424
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 480 617 662 433
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 442 487 485 611
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 602 660 437 493
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.8 19.1 22.3 14.7
Approach LOS B C C B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 480 617 662 433
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 879 840 841 740
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.980 0.979
Flow Entry, veh/h 471 605 649 424
Cap Entry, veh/h 862 823 825 725
V/C Ratio 0.546 0.735 0.787 0.585
Control Delay, s/veh 11.8 19.1 22.3 14.7
LOS B C C B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 7 8 4
155
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 62 0 53 0 575 42 32 355 1
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 62 0 53 0 575 42 32 355 1
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 69 0 59 0 639 47 36 394 1
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1159 1153 395 1130 1130 663 395 0 0 686 0 0
Stage 1 467 467 - 663 663 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 692 686 - 467 467 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 174 199 659 183 205 465 1175 - - 917 - -
Stage 1 580 565 - 454 462 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 437 451 - 580 565 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 146 189 659 176 195 465 1175 - - 917 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 146 189 - 176 195 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 580 537 - 454 462 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 382 451 - 551 537 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 34.2 0 0.7
HCM LOS A D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1175 - - - 247 917 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.517 0.039 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 34.2 9.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 2.7 0.1 - -
156
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 24.5
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 93 45 121 0 17 138 23 0 160 362 14
Future Vol, veh/h 0 93 45 121 0 17 138 23 0 160 362 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 99 48 129 0 18 147 24 0 170 385 15
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 19.2 16.1 27.5
HCM LOS C C D
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 36% 10% 4%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 17% 78% 80%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 47% 13% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 160 376 259 178 365
LT Vol 160 0 93 17 14
Through Vol 0 362 45 138 292
RT Vol 0 14 121 23 59
Lane Flow Rate 170 400 276 189 388
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.366 0.8 0.557 0.407 0.751
Departure Headway (Hd)7.738 7.198 7.272 7.746 6.961
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 466 504 496 464 520
Service Time 5.456 4.917 5.331 5.813 4.975
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.365 0.794 0.556 0.407 0.746
HCM Control Delay 14.9 32.9 19.2 16.1 28.1
HCM Lane LOS B D C C D
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.7 7.5 3.4 1.9 6.5
157
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 292 59
Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 292 59
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 15 311 63
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 28.1
HCM LOS D
158
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 19
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 13 187 91 0 13 371 24 0 146 49 7
Future Vol, veh/h 0 13 187 91 0 13 371 24 0 146 49 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 15 223 108 0 15 442 29 0 174 58 8
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15.8 24.8 14.8
HCM LOS C C B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %72% 4% 3% 10%
Vol Thru, %24% 64% 91% 66%
Vol Right, %3% 31% 6% 25%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 202 291 408 73
LT Vol 146 13 13 7
Through Vol 49 187 371 48
RT Vol 7 91 24 18
Lane Flow Rate 240 346 486 87
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.441 0.555 0.766 0.165
Departure Headway (Hd)6.609 5.768 5.678 6.837
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 543 627 641 523
Service Time 4.657 3.784 3.69 4.899
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.442 0.552 0.758 0.166
HCM Control Delay 14.8 15.8 24.8 11.3
HCM Lane LOS B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.2 3.4 7.1 0.6
159
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 7 48 18
Future Vol, veh/h 0 7 48 18
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 8 57 21
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 11.3
HCM LOS B
160
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.8
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 92 11 6 108 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 9 0 4 0 92 11 6 108 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 10 0 5 0 105 13 7 123 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 251 255 123 249 249 112 123 0 0 118 0 0
Stage 1 137 137 - 112 112 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 114 118 - 137 137 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 707 652 933 709 657 947 1477 - - 1483 - -
Stage 1 871 787 - 898 807 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 896 802 - 871 787 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 701 649 933 706 654 947 1477 - - 1483 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 701 649 - 706 654 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 871 783 - 898 807 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 892 802 - 867 783 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 9.8 0 0.4
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1477 - - - 766 1483 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.019 0.005 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 9.8 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0.1 0 - -
161
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)4 12 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Future Volume (vph)4 12 1 0 7 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Hourly flow rate (vph)8 13 2 0 8 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)23 8 0 14
Volume Left (vph)8 0 0 0
Volume Right (vph)2 0 0 14
Hadj (s)0.04 0.03 0.00 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.4
Degree Utilization, x 0.03 0.01 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)897 895 900 1054
Control Delay (s)7.1 7.0 7.0 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.1 7.0 0.0 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.9
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
162
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.5
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 397 48 74 445 41 63
Future Vol, veh/h 397 48 74 445 41 63
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 418 51 78 468 43 66
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 469 0 1068 444
Stage 1 - -- -444 -
Stage 2 - -- -624 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1093 -245 614
Stage 1 - -- -646 -
Stage 2 - -- -534 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1093 -221 614
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -221 -
Stage 1 - -- -584 -
Stage 2 - -- -534 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 19.3
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)361 - - 1093 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.303 - - 0.071 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 19.3 - - 8.5 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.3 - - 0.2 -
163
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 3.9
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 62 0 53 0 575 42 32 355 0
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 3 62 0 53 0 575 42 32 355 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 2 0 3 69 0 59 0 639 47 36 394 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1158 1152 394 1131 1129 663 394 0 0 686 0 0
Stage 1 466 466 - 663 663 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 692 686 - 468 466 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 175 199 659 182 206 465 1176 - - 917 - -
Stage 1 581 566 - 454 462 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 437 451 - 579 566 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 147 189 659 174 196 465 1176 - - 917 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 147 189 - 174 196 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 581 538 - 454 462 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 382 451 - 547 538 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 18.4 34.7 0 0.8
HCM LOS C D
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1176 - - 275 245 917 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - 0.02 0.522 0.039 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 18.4 34.7 9.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - C D A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 2.8 0.1 - -
164
HCM Unsignalized Intersection Capacity Analysis Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 1-2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW/Project Entrance 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Sign Control Yield Yield Yield Yield
Traffic Volume (vph)4 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Future Volume (vph)4 12 1 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.50 0.92 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50 0.92 0.92 0.50 0.50
Hourly flow rate (vph)8 13 2 0 2 0 0 0 0 0 0 14
Direction, Lane #EB 1 WB 1 NB 1 SB 1
Volume Total (vph)23 2 0 14
Volume Left (vph)8 0 0 0
Volume Right (vph)2 0 0 14
Hadj (s)0.04 0.03 0.00 -0.60
Departure Headway (s) 4.0 4.0 4.0 3.4
Degree Utilization, x 0.03 0.00 0.00 0.01
Capacity (veh/h)898 895 900 1060
Control Delay (s)7.1 7.0 7.0 6.4
Approach Delay (s)7.1 7.0 0.0 6.4
Approach LOS A A A A
Intersection Summary
Delay 6.8
Level of Service A
Intersection Capacity Utilization 14.2% ICU Level of Service A
Analysis Period (min)15
165
HCM 6th Roundabout Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
15: Madison Avenue N & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 17.6
Intersection LOS C
Approach EB WB NB SB
Entry Lanes 1 1 1 1
Conflicting Circle Lanes 1 1 1 1
Adj Approach Flow, veh/h 470 605 651 424
Demand Flow Rate, veh/h 479 617 664 433
Vehicles Circulating, veh/h 446 487 483 611
Vehicles Exiting, veh/h 598 660 442 493
Ped Vol Crossing Leg, #/h 0 0 0 0
Ped Cap Adj 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Approach Delay, s/veh 11.9 19.1 22.4 14.7
Approach LOS B C C B
Lane Left Left Left Left
Designated Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
Assumed Moves LTR LTR LTR LTR
RT Channelized
Lane Util 1.000 1.000 1.000 1.000
Follow-Up Headway, s 2.609 2.609 2.609 2.609
Critical Headway, s 4.976 4.976 4.976 4.976
Entry Flow, veh/h 479 617 664 433
Cap Entry Lane, veh/h 876 840 843 740
Entry HV Adj Factor 0.981 0.980 0.980 0.979
Flow Entry, veh/h 470 605 651 424
Cap Entry, veh/h 859 823 827 725
V/C Ratio 0.547 0.735 0.788 0.585
Control Delay, s/veh 11.9 19.1 22.4 14.7
LOS B C C B
95th %tile Queue, veh 3 7 8 4
166
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
9: Madison Avenue N & Entrance/Wallace Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 4.1
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 2 0 5 62 0 53 7 575 42 31 355 6
Future Vol, veh/h 2 0 5 62 0 53 7 575 42 31 355 6
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90 90
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 2 0 6 69 0 59 8 639 47 34 394 7
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 1174 1168 398 1148 1148 663 401 0 0 686 0 0
Stage 1 466 466 - 679 679 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 708 702 - 469 469 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 170 195 656 177 200 465 1169 - - 917 - -
Stage 1 581 566 - 445 454 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 429 443 - 579 564 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 142 184 656 168 188 465 1169 - - 917 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 142 184 - 168 188 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 575 539 - 440 449 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 371 438 - 547 537 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 16.5 36.4 0.1 0.7
HCM LOS C E
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1169 - - 322 238 917 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.007 - - 0.024 0.537 0.038 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 8.1 0 - 16.5 36.4 9.1 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A A - C E A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - 0.1 2.9 0.1 - -
167
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 25.3
Intersection LOS D
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 94 45 118 0 17 138 23 0 155 368 14
Future Vol, veh/h 0 94 45 118 0 17 138 23 0 155 368 14
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 100 48 126 0 18 147 24 0 165 391 15
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 1 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 2 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 2 1 1
HCM Control Delay 19.2 16.2 28.7
HCM LOS C C D
Lane NBLn1 NBLn2 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %100% 0% 37% 10% 4%
Vol Thru, %0% 96% 18% 78% 80%
Vol Right, %0% 4% 46% 13% 16%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 155 382 257 178 370
LT Vol 155 0 94 17 14
Through Vol 0 368 45 138 296
RT Vol 0 14 118 23 60
Lane Flow Rate 165 406 273 189 394
Geometry Grp 7 7 2 2 5
Degree of Util (X)0.355 0.814 0.556 0.409 0.762
Departure Headway (Hd)7.755 7.215 7.316 7.78 6.973
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 465 504 492 462 520
Service Time 5.473 4.933 5.375 5.848 4.988
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.355 0.806 0.555 0.409 0.758
HCM Control Delay 14.7 34.4 19.2 16.2 29
HCM Lane LOS B D C C D
HCM 95th-tile Q 1.6 7.8 3.3 2 6.7
168
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
2: Madison Avenue N & Wyatt Way NW/Wyatt Way NE 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 14 296 60
Future Vol, veh/h 0 14 296 60
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.94 0.94 0.94
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 15 315 64
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 2
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 29
HCM LOS D
169
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh 18
Intersection LOS C
Movement EBU EBL EBT EBR WBU WBL WBT WBR NBU NBL NBT NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 12 188 91 0 13 372 19 0 146 48 7
Future Vol, veh/h 0 12 188 91 0 13 372 19 0 146 48 7
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 14 224 108 0 15 443 23 0 174 57 8
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0 0 0 1 0
Approach EB WB NB
Opposing Approach WB EB SB
Opposing Lanes 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Left SB NB EB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1 1 1
Conflicting Approach Right NB SB WB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1 1 1
HCM Control Delay 15.2 23 14.5
HCM LOS C C B
Lane NBLn1 EBLn1 WBLn1 SBLn1
Vol Left, %73% 4% 3% 6%
Vol Thru, %24% 65% 92% 69%
Vol Right, %3% 31% 5% 25%
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop
Traffic Vol by Lane 201 291 404 68
LT Vol 146 12 13 4
Through Vol 48 188 372 47
RT Vol 7 91 19 17
Lane Flow Rate 239 346 481 81
Geometry Grp 1 1 1 1
Degree of Util (X)0.436 0.539 0.74 0.153
Departure Headway (Hd)6.565 5.714 5.643 6.785
Convergence, Y/N Yes Yes Yes Yes
Cap 553 634 644 531
Service Time 4.565 3.714 3.643 4.797
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.432 0.546 0.747 0.153
HCM Control Delay 14.5 15.2 23 11
HCM Lane LOS B C C B
HCM 95th-tile Q 2.2 3.2 6.5 0.5
170
HCM 6th AWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
3: Grow Avenue NW & Wyatt Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 2
Intersection
Intersection Delay, s/veh
Intersection LOS
Movement SBU SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 4 47 17
Future Vol, veh/h 0 4 47 17
Peak Hour Factor 0.92 0.84 0.84 0.84
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 0 5 56 20
Number of Lanes 0 0 1 0
Approach SB
Opposing Approach NB
Opposing Lanes 1
Conflicting Approach Left WB
Conflicting Lanes Left 1
Conflicting Approach Right EB
Conflicting Lanes Right 1
HCM Control Delay 11
HCM LOS B
171
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
11: Grow Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0.3
Movement EBL EBT EBR WBL WBT WBR NBL NBT NBR SBL SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 92 4 1 108 0
Future Vol, veh/h 0 0 0 4 0 2 0 92 4 1 108 0
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Stop Free Free Free Free Free Free
RT Channelized - - None - - None - - None - - None
Storage Length - - -- - -- - -- - -
Veh in Median Storage, # - 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Grade, %- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -- 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88 88
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0 0 2 0 0 2 0
Mvmt Flow 0 0 0 5 0 2 0 105 5 1 123 0
Major/Minor Minor2 Minor1 Major1 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 234 235 123 233 233 108 123 0 0 110 0 0
Stage 1 125 125 - 108 108 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 109 110 - 125 125 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy 7.1 6.5 6.2 7.1 6.5 6.2 4.1 - - 4.1 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 6.1 5.5 - 6.1 5.5 -- - -- - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 3.3 3.5 4 3.3 2.2 - - 2.2 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 725 669 933 726 671 951 1477 - - 1493 - -
Stage 1 884 796 - 902 810 - - - -- - -
Stage 2 901 808 - 884 796 -- - -- - -
Platoon blocked, %- -- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 723 668 933 725 670 951 1477 - - 1493 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 723 668 - 725 670 - - - -- - -
Stage 1 884 795 - 902 810 -- - -- - -
Stage 2 899 808 - 883 795 -- - -- - -
Approach EB WB NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 9.6 0 0.1
HCM LOS A A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBL NBT NBR EBLn1WBLn1 SBL SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)1477 - - - 787 1493 - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - - - 0.009 0.001 - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - - 0 9.6 7.4 0 -
HCM Lane LOS A - - A A A A -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 0 - - - 0 0 - -
172
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
12: Taurnic Pl NW/Nakata Avenue NW & Wallace Way NW 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 0
Movement EBL EBR NBL NBT SBT SBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 4 1 0 0 0 7
Future Vol, veh/h 4 1 0 0 0 7
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Stop Stop Free Free
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length 0 -- -- -
Veh in Median Storage, # 2 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 50 50 50 50 50 50
Heavy Vehicles, %0 0 0 0 0 0
Mvmt Flow 8 2 0 0 0 14
Major/Minor Minor2 Major2
Conflicting Flow All 7 7 - 0
Stage 1 7 7 - -
Stage 2 0 0 - -
Critical Hdwy 6.4 6.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 5.4 5.5 - -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - - - -
Follow-up Hdwy 3.5 4 - -
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver 1019 892 - -
Stage 1 1021 894 - -
Stage 2 - - - -
Platoon blocked, %- -
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver 1019 0 - -
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver 1019 0 - -
Stage 1 1021 0 - -
Stage 2 - 0 - -
Approach NB SB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 0
HCM LOS A
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 SBT SBR
Capacity (veh/h)- - -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio - - -
HCM Control Delay (s) 0 - -
HCM Lane LOS A - -
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) - - -
173
HCM 6th TWSC Forecast 2035 PM Peak Hour - Scenario 2
5: Grow Avenue NW & NE High School Rd 07/17/2017
Baseline Synchro 10 Report
Page 1
Intersection
Int Delay, s/veh 2.4
Movement EBT EBR WBL WBT NBL NBR
Lane Configurations
Traffic Vol, veh/h 398 47 72 441 41 63
Future Vol, veh/h 398 47 72 441 41 63
Conflicting Peds, #/hr 0 0 0 0 0 0
Sign Control Free Free Free Free Stop Stop
RT Channelized - None - None - None
Storage Length - -- -0 -
Veh in Median Storage, #0 -- 0 0 -
Grade, %0 -- 0 0 -
Peak Hour Factor 95 95 95 95 95 95
Heavy Vehicles, %2 2 2 2 2 2
Mvmt Flow 419 49 76 464 43 66
Major/Minor Major1 Major2 Minor1
Conflicting Flow All 0 0 468 0 1060 444
Stage 1 - -- -444 -
Stage 2 - -- -616 -
Critical Hdwy - - 4.12 -6.42 6.22
Critical Hdwy Stg 1 - -- -5.42 -
Critical Hdwy Stg 2 - -- -5.42 -
Follow-up Hdwy - - 2.218 -3.518 3.318
Pot Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1094 -248 614
Stage 1 - -- -646 -
Stage 2 - -- -539 -
Platoon blocked, %- --
Mov Cap-1 Maneuver - - 1094 -225 614
Mov Cap-2 Maneuver - -- -225 -
Stage 1 - -- -585 -
Stage 2 - -- -539 -
Approach EB WB NB
HCM Control Delay, s 0 1.2 19
HCM LOS C
Minor Lane/Major Mvmt NBLn1 EBT EBR WBL WBT
Capacity (veh/h)365 - - 1094 -
HCM Lane V/C Ratio 0.3 - - 0.069 -
HCM Control Delay (s) 19 - - 8.5 0
HCM Lane LOS C - - A A
HCM 95th %tile Q(veh) 1.2 - - 0.2 -
174
WALLACE COTTAGES
TRAFFIC IMPACT ANALYSIS
LEFT TURN WARRANT
APPENDIX
175
176
PLAT OF WALLACE WAY COTTAGES
JOB NO. 17-6173
LOT CLOSURES
1/17/2018
Parcel Map Check
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 1
North: 15518.4542092 East : 26390.2690736
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 72.375
North: 15515.7913559 East : 26462.5950705
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 53.870
North: 15461.9334395 East : 26461.4541340
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.353
North: 15463.4658356 East : 26389.1173635
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 55.000
North: 15518.4537793 East : 26390.2689034
Perimeter: 253.598 Area: 3,939 sq. ft. 0.09 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004624 Course: S 21-36-04.0 W
Error North: -0.00042989 East : -0.00017022
Precision 1: 548,438.581
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 2
North: 15463.4662640 East : 26389.1175290
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.353
North: 15461.9338679 East : 26461.4542996
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15416.9439618 East : 26460.5012247
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.342
North: 15418.4761249 East : 26388.1754517
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15463.4662607 East : 26389.1176207
Perimeter: 234.695 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000917 Course: S 87-57-37.1 E
Error North: -0.00000326 East : 0.00009164
Precision 1: 2,559,378.408
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 3
North: 15418.4761269 East : 26388.1753562
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.342
North: 15416.9439638 East : 26460.5011292
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15371.9540577 East : 26459.5480544
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.331
North: 15373.4859879 East : 26387.2332789
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15418.4761237 East : 26388.1754479
Perimeter: 234.673 Area: 3,255 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000917 Course: S 87-57-37.1 E
Error North: -0.00000326 East : 0.00009164
Precision 1: 2,559,138.495
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 4
North: 15373.4859899 East : 26387.2331834
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.331
North: 15371.9540598 East : 26459.5479589
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15326.9641537 East : 26458.5948840
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.320
North: 15328.4958509 East : 26386.2911061
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15373.4859867 East : 26387.2332751
Perimeter: 234.651 Area: 3,255 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000917 Course: S 87-57-37.1 E
Error North: -0.00000326 East : 0.00009164
Precision 1: 2,558,898.582
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 5
North: 15328.4958529 East : 26386.2910106
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.320
North: 15326.9641557 East : 26458.5947885
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15281.9742496 East : 26457.6417137
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.309
North: 15283.5057138 East : 26385.3489333
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15328.4958496 East : 26386.2911022
Perimeter: 234.629 Area: 3,254 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000917 Course: S 87-57-37.1 E
Error North: -0.00000326 East : 0.00009164
Precision 1: 2,558,658.670
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 6
North: 15283.5057159 East : 26385.3488378
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.309
North: 15281.9742517 East : 26457.6416182
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15236.9843456 East : 26456.6885433
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.298
North: 15238.5155768 East : 26384.4067605
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15283.5057126 East : 26385.3489294
Perimeter: 234.608 Area: 3,254 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000917 Course: S 87-57-37.1 E
Error North: -0.00000326 East : 0.00009164
Precision 1: 2,558,418.757
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 7
North: 15238.5155788 East : 26384.4066650
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.298
North: 15236.9843476 East : 26456.6884478
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 38.303
North: 15198.6899393 East : 26455.8772117
Curve Length: 13.318 Radius: 25.000
Delta: 30-31-20.3 Tangent: 6.821
Chord: 13.161 Course: S 16-28-29.0 W
Course In: N 88-47-11.1 W Course Out: S 58-15-50.8 E
RP North: 15199.2194254 East : 26430.8828194
End North: 15186.0693134 East : 26452.1448644
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 68.822
North: 15187.5269249 East : 26383.3383018
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 51.000
North: 15238.5157455 East : 26384.4060933
Perimeter: 243.741 Area: 3,673 sq. ft. 0.08 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0005954 Course: N 73-45-03.3 W
Error North: 0.00016661 East : -0.00057165
Precision 1: 409,373.530
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 8
North: 15116.5876557 East : 26474.1427417
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15115.0549842 East : 26546.4925093
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 51.000
North: 15064.0664240 East : 26545.4123578
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15065.5990954 East : 26473.0625902
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 51.000
North: 15116.5876557 East : 26474.1427417
Perimeter: 246.732 Area: 3,691 sq. ft. 0.08 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 246,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 9
North: 15161.5775616 East : 26475.0958232
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15160.0448901 East : 26547.4455908
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15115.0549841 East : 26546.4925160
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15116.5876555 East : 26474.1427483
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15161.5775616 East : 26475.0958232
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 10
North: 15201.5685891 East : 26475.9430068
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15200.0359176 East : 26548.2927744
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 40.000
North: 15160.0448900 East : 26547.4455967
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15161.5775615 East : 26475.0958291
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 40.000
North: 15201.5685891 East : 26475.9430068
Perimeter: 224.732 Area: 2,895 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 224,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 11
North: 15241.5596166 East : 26476.7901903
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15240.0269451 East : 26549.1399579
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 40.000
North: 15200.0359175 East : 26548.2927803
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15201.5685890 East : 26475.9430127
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 40.000
North: 15241.5596166 East : 26476.7901903
Perimeter: 224.732 Area: 2,895 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 224,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 12
North: 15286.5495225 East : 26477.7432718
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15285.0168511 East : 26550.0930394
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15240.0269450 East : 26549.1399646
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15241.5596164 East : 26476.7901970
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15286.5495225 East : 26477.7432718
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 13
North: 15331.5394284 East : 26478.6963533
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15330.0067570 East : 26551.0461209
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15285.0168509 East : 26550.0930461
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15286.5495224 East : 26477.7432785
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15331.5394284 East : 26478.6963533
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 14
North: 15376.5293344 East : 26479.6494348
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15374.9966629 East : 26551.9992024
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15330.0067569 East : 26551.0461276
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15331.5394283 East : 26478.6963600
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15376.5293344 East : 26479.6494348
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 15
North: 15421.5192403 East : 26480.6025163
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15419.9865689 East : 26552.9522839
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15374.9966628 East : 26551.9992091
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15376.5293342 East : 26479.6494415
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15421.5192403 East : 26480.6025163
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 16
North: 15466.5091462 East : 26481.5555978
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15464.9764748 East : 26553.9053654
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 45.000
North: 15419.9865687 East : 26552.9522906
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15421.5192402 East : 26480.6025230
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 45.000
North: 15466.5091462 East : 26481.5555978
Perimeter: 234.732 Area: 3,256 sq. ft. 0.07 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0000000 Course: S 90-00-00.0 E
Error North: 0.00000000 East : 0.00000000
Precision 1: 234,732,000.000
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 17
North: 15515.0553996 East : 26482.5840182
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 72.375
North: 15512.3925464 East : 26554.9100152
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 47.427
North: 15464.9761847 East : 26553.9055378
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15466.5088561 East : 26481.5557702
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 48.557
North: 15515.0549643 East : 26482.5841803
Perimeter: 240.725 Area: 3,473 sq. ft. 0.08 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004645 Course: S 20-25-33.9 E
Error North: -0.00043532 East : 0.00016212
Precision 1: 518,245.425
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 18
North: 15627.6304783 East : 26491.4348009
Line Course: S 88-46-52.4 E Length: 34.000
North: 15626.9072956 East : 26525.4271089
Line Course: S 01-13-07.6 W Length: 68.361
North: 15558.5617611 East : 26523.9730649
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 33.990
North: 15559.8123364 East : 26490.0060786
Line Course: N 01-12-25.5 E Length: 67.833
North: 15627.6302833 East : 26491.4350499
Perimeter: 204.184 Area: 2,315 sq. ft. 0.05 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0003163 Course: S 51-56-31.1 E
Error North: -0.00019498 East : 0.00024904
Precision 1: 645,539.045
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lot 19
North: 15626.9072938 East : 26525.4271089
Line Course: S 88-46-52.4 E Length: 33.964
North: 15626.1848768 East : 26559.3834251
Line Course: S 01-13-07.6 W Length: 68.888
North: 15557.3124616 East : 26557.9181718
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 33.968
North: 15558.5622274 East : 26523.9731705
Line Course: N 01-13-07.6 E Length: 68.361
North: 15626.9077618 East : 26525.4272145
Perimeter: 205.180 Area: 2,331 sq. ft. 0.05 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004798 Course: N 12-43-03.1 E
Error North: 0.00046801 East : 0.00010562
Precision 1: 427,638.599
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lots 1-7
North: 15518.4542092 East : 26390.2690736
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 72.375
North: 15515.7913559 East : 26462.5950705
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 317.173
North: 15198.6895009 East : 26455.8775236
Curve Length: 13.318 Radius: 25.000
Delta: 30-31-20.3 Tangent: 6.821
Chord: 13.161 Course: S 16-28-29.0 W
Course In: N 88-47-11.1 W Course Out: S 58-15-50.8 E
RP North: 15199.2189869 East : 26430.8831314
End North: 15186.0688749 East : 26452.1451763
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 68.822
North: 15187.5264864 East : 26383.3386138
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 331.000
North: 15518.4539296 East : 26390.2687899
Perimeter: 802.687 Area: 23,885 sq. ft. 0.55 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0003983 Course: S 45-24-43.8 W
Error North: -0.00027960 East : -0.00028365
Precision 1: 2,015,284.961
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Lots 8-17
North: 15515.0553996 East : 26482.5840182
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 72.375
North: 15512.3925464 East : 26554.9100152
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 448.427
North: 15064.0661328 East : 26545.4125819
Line Course: N 88-47-11.1 W Length: 72.366
North: 15065.5988042 East : 26473.0628143
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 449.557
North: 15515.0549643 East : 26482.5841803
Perimeter: 1042.725 Area: 32,492 sq. ft. 0.75 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004645 Course: S 20-25-33.9 E
Error North: -0.00043532 East : 0.00016212
Precision 1: 2,244,833.154
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Open Space North end of plat
North: 15710.4468479 East : 26493.1798138
Line Course: S 87-53-01.0 E Length: 131.840
North: 15705.5780553 East : 26624.9298819
Line Course: S 01-13-07.6 W Length: 150.649
North: 15554.9631372 East : 26621.7255655
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 63.851
North: 15557.3123717 East : 26557.9177972
Line Course: N 01-13-07.6 E Length: 68.888
North: 15626.1847869 East : 26559.3830505
Line Course: N 88-46-52.4 W Length: 67.964
North: 15627.6303867 East : 26491.4344263
Line Course: N 01-12-25.5 E Length: 82.835
North: 15710.4470045 East : 26493.1794301
Perimeter: 566.027 Area: 15,212 sq. ft. 0.35 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004145 Course: N 67-47-48.3 W
Error North: 0.00015662 East : -0.00038373
Precision 1: 1,365,565.742
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Open Space South end of plat
North: 15187.5267569 East : 26383.3388691
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 68.822
North: 15186.0691454 East : 26452.1454317
Curve Length: 23.268 Radius: 25.000
Delta: 53-19-37.4 Tangent: 12.554
Chord: 22.438 Course: S 58-23-57.9 W
Course In: N 58-15-50.8 W Course Out: S 04-56-13.4 E
RP North: 15199.2192573 East : 26430.8833867
End North: 15174.3120112 East : 26433.0349188
Curve Length: 180.871 Radius: 45.000
Delta: 230-17-31.4 Tangent: 95.864
Chord: 81.470 Course: S 30-04-59.1 E
Course In: S 04-56-13.4 E Course Out: S 55-13-44.8 E
RP North: 15129.4789682 East : 26436.9076766
End North: 15103.8156356 East : 26473.8724349
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 38.225
North: 15065.5992098 East : 26473.0628507
Line Course: S 88-47-11.1 E Length: 72.366
North: 15064.0665383 East : 26545.4126184
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 18.555
North: 15045.5157004 East : 26545.0196338
Line Course: N 87-54-57.3 W Length: 164.638
North: 15051.5029417 East : 26380.4905361
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 136.054
North: 15187.5271180 East : 26383.3391107
Perimeter: 702.800 Area: 7,240 sq. ft. 0.17 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0004345 Course: N 33-47-14.6 E
Error North: 0.00036108 East : 0.00024160
Precision 1: 1,617,489.068
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Parcel name: Right of Way
North: 15559.8126363 East : 26490.0058200
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 370.426
North: 15546.1837576 East : 26860.1810152
Line Course: S 01-14-29.0 W Length: 15.002
North: 15531.1852787 East : 26859.8560024
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 304.517
North: 15542.3892040 East : 26555.5451822
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 30.004
North: 15512.3919342 East : 26554.9097142
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 72.375
North: 15515.0547875 East : 26482.5837172
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 411.332
North: 15103.8150531 East : 26473.8719353
Curve Length: 180.871 Radius: 45.000
Delta: 230-17-31.4 Tangent: 95.864
Chord: 81.470 Course: N 30-04-59.1 W
Course In: N 55-13-44.8 W Course Out: N 04-56-13.4 W
RP North: 15129.4783858 East : 26436.9071770
End North: 15174.3114288 East : 26433.0344193
Curve Length: 36.586 Radius: 25.000
Delta: 83-50-57.7 Tangent: 22.451
Chord: 33.408 Course: N 43-08-17.8 E
Course In: N 04-56-13.4 W Course Out: S 88-47-11.1 E
RP North: 15199.2186749 East : 26430.8828872
End North: 15198.6891889 East : 26455.8772795
Line Course: N 01-12-48.9 E Length: 317.173
North: 15515.7910440 East : 26462.5948264
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 72.375
North: 15518.4538973 East : 26390.2688294
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 30.004
North: 15548.4513202 East : 26390.8970258
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 98.859
North: 15544.8140558 East : 26489.6890912
Line Course: N 01-12-25.5 E Length: 15.002
North: 15559.8127267 East : 26490.0051236
Perimeter: 1954.525 Area: 23,789 sq. ft. 0.55 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0007022 Course: N 82-36-11.0 W
Error North: 0.00009041 East : -0.00069638
Precision 1: 2,783,432.071
Parcel name: Total
North: 15710.4468479 East : 26493.1798138
Line Course: S 87-53-01.0 E Length: 131.840
North: 15705.5780553 East : 26624.9298819
Line Course: S 01-13-07.6 W Length: 150.649
North: 15554.9631372 East : 26621.7255655
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 238.617
North: 15546.1838341 East : 26860.1810048
Line Course: S 01-14-29.0 W Length: 15.002
North: 15531.1853552 East : 26859.8559920
Line Course: N 87-53-29.3 W Length: 304.517
North: 15542.3892805 East : 26555.5451718
Line Course: S 01-12-48.9 W Length: 496.986
North: 15045.5147592 East : 26545.0192860
Line Course: N 87-54-57.3 W Length: 164.638
North: 15051.5020004 East : 26380.4901883
Line Course: N 01-11-58.9 E Length: 497.058
North: 15548.4510429 East : 26390.8971354
Line Course: S 87-53-29.3 E Length: 98.859
North: 15544.8137785 East : 26489.6892009
Line Course: N 01-12-25.5 E Length: 165.670
North: 15710.4470141 East : 26493.1792084
Perimeter: 2263.835 Area: 107,263 sq. ft. 2.46 acres
Mapcheck Closure - (Uses listed courses, radii, and deltas)
Error Closure: 0.0006278 Course: N 74-38-49.6 W
Error North: 0.00016621 East : -0.00060537
Precision 1: 3,605,982.797
Plat of Wallace Cottages
City of Bainbridge Island
Open Space Management Plan
Application File No. PLN 50589SUB
DATE: April 10, 2018
APPLICANT: Central Highlands, Inc.
PO Box 2879
Poulsbo, WA 98370
OPEN SPACE OWNERSHIP AND MANAGEMENT ENTITY:
Private ownership and management by the Wallace Cottages Homeowners
Association. The Homeowners Association shall be responsible for the maintenance of
the Open Space in accordance with the Open Space Management Plan.
APPROVED USES WITHIN OPEN SPACE AREA
1. Formal and informal passive recreation, including pervious trails.
2. Planting of native vegetation.
3. Planting of non-invasive, non-native vegetation except in designated community
garden.
4. Removal of invasive vegetation.
5. Construction and maintenance of utilities including but not limited to storm drainage
systems, sewer lines, and underground utilities within the easement areas delineated on
the plat (consistent with BIMC 17.12.030.A.7.f)
6. Low impact fencing or signs marking the open space boundary.
Page 2
Wallace Cottages Open Space Management Plan
7. Active recreation uses consistent with BIMC 17.12.030.7.
8. Agricultural uses and fencing necessary for animal control, excepting those
agricultural uses that require permanent buildings.
9. Construction, maintenance and use of a bicycle storage facility.
LIMITATIONS
1. Buildings are not permitted within any open space areas except bicycle storage,
temporary buildings which are associated with agriculture, picnic shelter, playground
equipment, garden shed, buildings, composting bins consistent with BIMC 17.12.030.7
and the intent of the HDDP program.
2. Existing vegetation shall be retained and maintained except for utility corridors, trails
and hazard trees, conflicts with the allowed uses (e.g. removal of invasive species,
playground installation, and neighborhood gardens). Significant trees approved for
removal shall be replaced by trees of similar species. No cutting or clearing or other
removal of existing and/or native vegetation shall be allowed in the designated Open
Space except in areas designated for active recreation as provided for in item 8 above and
within utilities easements.
3. No construction activities or staging shall be permitted in the Open Space areas except
within designated easement areas. Prior to construction on each lot temporary chainlink
fencing, orange construction fencing, or other construction fencing satisfactory to the
Director, shall be placed around Open Space areas as required by the Director. Hazard
trees within any Open Space area can and should be removed with the approval of the
Director during the clearing and grading phase of construction.
4. No building, clearing or grading shall occur in designated significant tree retention
areas or within the root zone of significant trees designated for preservation, without a
report from a consulting arborist and approval of the Department of Planning and
Community Development.
Page 3
Wallace Cottages Open Space Management Plan
OPEN SPACE MAINTENANCE PLAN
Open space areas shall be maintained by the Wallace Cottages Homeowners Association.
Maintenance activities shall include, at a minimum, annual inspections of open space
areas for compliance with the Open Space Management Plan.
Prior to site development, open space areas shall, as necessary, be protected to prevent
damage during construction by the installation of temporary construction fencing or
netting around the Open Space.
Significant trees within the open space that become diseased, die or are determined to be
a hazard to life or property may be removed and replanted following the procedure
outlined in the Municipal Code.
A low impact fence (e.g., split rail) delineating the boundary of the open space area shall
be maintained along the boundary between the open space and the lots or right of way.
If open space is not maintained consistent with this Open Space Management Plan, the
City shall have the right to provide the maintenance thereof, and bill the owner for the
cost of maintenance.
SIGNATURES
__________________________________
Central Highlands, Inc
Nick Smith, Project Manager
____________________________________
Date
Page 4
Wallace Way Cottages Open Space Management Plan
State of Washington
County of Kitsap
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Nick Smith is the person who
appeared before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in
the instrument.
Dated: ___________________
_____________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing in ____________________________
My appointment expires __________________
ADMINISTRATIVE APPROVAL
I have reviewed and considered the proposed Open Space Management Plan consistent
with the requirements and standards contained in Title 17 of the Bainbridge Island
Municipal Code. I hereby approve the Open Space Management Plan
___________________________________
Gary Christensen, AICP, Planning Director
Planning & Community Development
Page 5
Wallace Way Cottages Open Space Management Plan
State of Washington
County of Kitsap
I certify that I know or have satisfactory evidence that Gary Christensen, Director, City of
Bainbridge Island Planning and Community Development, is the person who appeared
before me, and said person acknowledged that he signed this instrument and
acknowledged it to be his free and voluntary act for the uses and purposes mentioned in
the instrument.
Dated: ___________________
_____________________________________
Notary Public in and for the State of Washington
Residing in ____________________________
My appointment expires __________________
Page 1 of 8
PUBLIC BENEFIT, DEVELOPMENT AND PERMIT PROCESSING AGREEMENT
(Central Highlands, Wallace, Madison, and City)
THIS PUBLIC BENEFIT, DEVELOPMENT AND PERMIT PROCESSING
AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and entered into by and between the City of Bainbridge
Island, a Washington municipal corporation (“City”), Central Highlands Inc., a Washington
corporation (“Central Highlands”), Wallace Cottages, LLC, a Washington limited liability
company (“Wallace”), and Madison Place, LLC, a Washington limited liability company
(“Madison”) (each a “Party” and together the “Parties”). The effective date (“Effective Date”)
of this Agreement shall be the date of complete execution hereof.
RECITALS
A. Central Highlands and Wallace are proposing a 19-lot preliminary plat subdivision
(Project No. PLN50589 SUB) located on tax parcels 27250210232005, 27250211552005,
27250211542006, and 27250211532007 (“Wallace Cottages”). Wallace Cottages is
proposing to obtain access from the existing right-of-way located at the intersection of
Nakata Ave NW, Wallace Way NW, and Taurnic PL NW (“Wallace Cottages Wallace
Way Access”). The homeowners in the community adjacent to the Wallace Cottages
Wallace Way Access objected to authorizing access through their neighborhood and
requested that Central Highlands find a way to obtain primary access from Madison
Avenue (“Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access”). The Wallace Cottages property
includes a lot that connects to Madison Avenue but the portion of that property that
connects to Madison Avenue is only 15 feet wide and therefore is not wide enough to
provide the desired Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access.
B. Central Highlands and Madison are proposing an 18-lot preliminary plat subdivision
(Project No. PLN50892 SUB) located on tax parcel 27250210602009 (“Madison
Place”).
C. Mattis Consulting Group LLC, a Washington limited liability company (“Mattis”), is the
consulting company working with DeNova Northwest LLC, a Washington limited
liability company (“DeNova”) regarding its approved 12-lot preliminary plat subdivision
(Project No. PLN50622 SUB) located at 7340 Finch Road NE (“The Reserve at
Winslow”).
D. CCHD LLC, a Washington limited liability company (“CCHD”), is the consulting
company working with Gary and Susan Ohrt, a married couple (“Ohrt”), the applicants
for the proposed 8-lot Madison Grove subdivision (Project No. PLN50667 SUB)
(“Madison Grove Project”) and the forthcoming townhouse project (PLN50879SPR)
(“Madison Landing”). Both the Madison Grove Project and Madison Landing will occur
on property located between Madison Avenue N. and Nakata Avenue NW in the City of
Bainbridge Island. The Madison Grove subdivision is planned to include tax parcels
27250211262001, 27250211402003, 27250211412002, and 27250212142004 (“Madison
Grove Property”). Madison Landing is planned to include tax parcels 27250210662003,
27250210212007, and 27250210222006 (“Madison Landing Property”).
Page 2 of 8
E. Ohrt is a party to a purchase and sale agreement for the purchase of Kitsap County parcel
no. 27250210222006 (the “Vet Clinic Property”), which is the southernmost lot of the
Madison Landing Property. Ohrt anticipates closing on the Vet Clinic Property on March
21, 2018. Ohrt anticipates conveying the Madison Landing Property to Madison
Landings Inc., a Washington corporation (“Madison Landings Company”).
F. The City, Ohrt, CCHD, and Mattis are parties to that certain Agreement for Improvement
to Public Trail and Processing of Vacation of Disputed Street, dated December 1, 2017
(the “Trail Connection Agreement”). The Trail Connection Agreement was entered
into, in part, to resolve a dispute between the parties thereto regarding whether a right-of-
way (the “Disputed Street”) exists on the Madison Grove Property. Among other things,
the Trail Connection Agreement provides that the City would process a street vacation
for the Disputed Street and, in exchange, Ohrt, CCHD, and Mattis would waive their
potential claims against the City and Ohrt would construct certain public trail
improvements which would result in a continuous public trail system between Sportsman
Club Road and Weaver Road (“Public Trail Connection”), which trail would include a
bridge over Hirawaka Creek.
G. The City approved the street vacation in City Ordinance No. 2018-04 (“Vacation
Ordinance”) within the initial time required by the Trail Connection Agreement but, in
doing so, imposed a condition on the vacation. The ordinance provides that the vacation
is effective upon the satisfaction of the following condition: “The vacation of [the
Disputed Street] is conditioned upon the grant of a right-of-way consisting of the south
15 feet of parcel number 272502-1-022-2006.” In imposing the condition, the City
Council indicated that the public benefit related to the vacation of Duane Lane would best
be served if Ohrt granted sufficient right-of-way to allow Central Highlands and Wallace
to achieve the Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access described in Recital A above.
H. Central Highlands, Wallace, and Madison are entering into this Agreement to resolve the
City’s concerns and the neighbors’ concerns regarding the Wallace Cottages Wallace
Way Access, as well as mitigate their losses and provide for certain assurances regarding
the processing of permits and for clear permit processing timelines for Wallace Cottages
and Madison Place.
I. Central Highlands and Wallace are entering into a separate agreement with Ohrt,
Madison Landings and CCHD titled “MADISON AVENUE ACCESS AGREEMENT”
and dated March 16, 2018 (“Madison Avenue Access Agreement”). The Madison
Avenue Access Agreement is intended to achieve the construction and use of the Wallace
Cottages Wallace Way Access.
J. Ohrt, Madison Landings, CCHD, and Mattis are entering into another separate agreement
with the City titled “PUBLIC BENEFIT, DEVELOPMENT AND PERMIT
PROCESSING AGREEMENT” dated March 15, 2018 (“Ohrt Permit Processing
Agreement”), in order to effectuate the vacation of the Disputed Street and resolve and
fully consummate the Trail Connection Agreement, as well as to mitigate their losses and
provide for certain assurances regarding the processing of permits and for clear permit
processing timelines for Madison Grove, The Reserve at Winslow, and Madison Landing.
Page 3 of 8
K. The City is entering into this Agreement and the Ohrt Permit Processing Agreement to
achieve certain public benefits, including the completion of the Public Trail Connection,
the release of potential claims by Ohrt, CCHD, Mattis, Central Highlands, Wallace, and
Madison, and to achieve the Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access desired by the
City and the neighborhood.
L. The Parties are entering into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions under
which the issues described above shall be resolved to their mutual satisfaction.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and considerations set forth
below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Madison Avenue Access. Pursuant to the Madison Avenue Access Agreement,
Central Highlands, Wallace, CCHD, Ohrt, and the Madison Landings Company have agreed to
process a boundary line adjustment to incorporate the eastern panhandle portion of Kitsap
County parcel no. 272502-1-023-2005 (approximately the eastern 240 feet thereof) (the
“Panhandle”) into the Vet Clinic Property, and CCHD, Ohrt and the Madison Landings
Company have agreed to grant a thirty (30) foot right-of-way (the “ROW Property”) over the
south boundary of the Vet Clinic Property (as enlarged by inclusion of the Panhandle via the
boundary line adjustment). The City shall process a boundary line adjustment prior to the
vacation of the Disputed Street, which shall incorporate into the Madison Landing Property those
portions of Kitsap County parcel no. 272502-1-126-2001 and 272502-1-214-2004 that are zoned
Madison Avenue District (“Duane Lane BLA Property”). The boundary line adjustments
involving the ROW Property and the Duane Lane BLA Property may be included in the same
application or applications submitted together. Prior to the vacation of the Disputed Street and
prior to or after the dedication of a right-of-way on the ROW Property, the City shall allow
Madison Landing to include the ROW Property and the Duane Lane BLA Property in its
calculation of the floor area ratio for Madison Landing. The City agrees that the ROW Property,
once dedicated, shall be sufficient to serve both Wallace Cottages and Madison Landing, and no
additional right-of-way shall be required for the Madison Landing project. The City shall not
require stormwater detention related to the ROW Property to occur within the ROW Property or
within the Madison Landing Property; provided that a bioretention system may be located within
the portion of the roadway located on the ROW Property. The City shall require setbacks no
greater than 7.5 feet on the Madison Landing Property from the ROW Property and from any
right-of-way along the north boundary of the Madison Landing Property. If the applicant applies
for a variance to authorize a 5-foot setback from such adjacent rights-of-way, then the City shall
support such variance application throughout the City’s variance processing procedures.
2. City Confirmation Regarding Vested Rights. The City hereby confirms that the
City’s Moratorium Ordinance (Ord. No. 2018-05, as amended by Ord. No. 2018-09) and the
City’s newly adopted Critical Areas Ordinance (Ord. No. 2018-01) do not and will not apply to
Wallace Cottages and Madison Place, and future building permits related thereto, because
pursuant to state law said projects became vested to the applicable regulations in effect at the
time of submitting a complete preliminary plat application and/or complete building permit
Page 4 of 8
applications, as applicable. The City further confirms that the projects described in this Section 2
shall remain vested despite any revisions resulting from actions necessary or convenient to
provide the Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access.
3. City Waiver of Transportation Impact Fees. The City shall waive and not require
any payment of transportation impact fees associated with Wallace Cottages.
4. City Permit Processing. The City shall process the permits and approvals for the
following projects as stated in this Section 4. All review times stated below shall commence on
the later of the execution date of this Agreement, submittal date, or resubmittal date.
Important Note: Regarding the timelines to follow in this Section 4:
The City’s commitments (including timelines) are predicated on timely submittal of complete
new or revised documentation from the applicant. City staff do not control the recommendations
or action that will be taken by the Planning Commission or the Hearing Examiner, including the
availability of those bodies for meetings and the number of meetings those bodies regard as
necessary as part of their consideration of subject projects.
a. Wallace Cottages.
i. Within seven (7) days after the execution of this Agreement, City staff
will communicate to the Planning Commission that this Agreement
has been executed and that terms in the Agreement could potentially
affect the Planning Commission’s consideration regarding the Wallace
Cottages project, to the extent that the Commission’s decision was
based on concerns about access to Madison Avenue.
ii. City staff will schedule a preliminary plat hearing date with the
Hearing Examiner as soon as practicable and shall make best efforts to
schedule such hearing no later than May 4, 2018.
iii. Public Works review and comments including bond quantity amounts,
permit fees, and related matters shall be ready within fourteen (14)
days of the Hearing Examiner’s preliminary plat decision and shall
allow construction to start as soon as possible upon the City obtaining
the required bonds, fees, and agreements. However, if the Hearing
Examiner’s decision includes conditions that require changes to the
civil improvement drawings, the 14-day period will commence at the
time of resubmittal of the revised civil improvement drawings to the
City. The City shall allow construction to start as soon as possible
upon the City obtaining the required bonds, fees, and agreements.
iv. The City shall complete its reviews and provide its response to the
applicant for all building permits submitted for lots within Wallace
Cottages within thirty (30) days of submission of a fully completed
building permit application. The City shall complete its reviews and
provide its response to the applicant within fourteen (14) days of
receiving from the applicant a response to a correction notice.
Page 5 of 8
b. Madison Place.
i. Following the execution of this Agreement, City staff will schedule the
Madison Place project for Planning Commission consideration at the
Planning Commission’s April 26, 2018, meeting, subject to Planning
Commission availability.
ii. The City (Public Works) shall complete review of civil drawings and
provide comments to the applicant within fourteen (14) days of
submittal. The City shall complete its reviews and provide its response
to the applicant within fourteen (14) days of receiving from the
applicant a response to a correction notice.
iii. The City will schedule a preliminary plat hearing date with the
Hearing Examiner as soon as practicable and shall make best efforts to
schedule such hearing no later than May 18, 2018.
iv. Public Works review and comments including bond quantity amounts,
permit fees, and related matters shall be ready within fourteen (14)
days of the Hearing Examiner’s preliminary plat decision and shall
allow construction to start as soon as possible upon the City obtaining
the required bonds, fees, and agreements. However, if the Hearing
Examiner’s decision includes conditions that require changes to the
civil improvement drawings, the 14-day period will commence at the
time of resubmittal of the revised civil improvement drawings to the
City. The City shall allow construction to start as soon as possible
upon the City obtaining the required bonds, fees, and agreements.
v. The City shall complete its reviews and provide its response to the
applicant for all building permits submitted for lots within Wallace
Cottages within thirty (30) days of submission of a fully completed
building permit application. The City shall complete its reviews and
provide its response to the applicant within fourteen (14) days of
receiving from the applicant a response to a correction notice.
5. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Agreement
shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such order or judgment
shall be confined in its operation to the controversy in which it was rendered and shall not affect
or invalidate the remainder of any part of this Agreement and to this end the provisions of each
clause, sentence, paragraph, section, or part of this Agreement are hereby declared to be
severable.
6. Relationship to Other Agreements. The default by Ohrt, Madison Landings,
and/or CCHD under the Madison Avenue Access Agreement shall not excuse the performance of
an obligation under this Agreement, including, without limitation, the City’s obligation to make
best efforts to schedule the Hearing Examiner hearings for Wallace Cottages and Madison Place
on or before the specified dates, subject to the Hearing Examiner’s availability.
7. Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate and work together in good faith and
without delay to take the actions and issue the approvals described in this Agreement.
Page 6 of 8
8. Attorneys’ Fees. In any court proceeding brought to enforce or interpret this
Agreement, the substantially prevailing party (as determined by the court) shall recover from the
other party its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, including costs and fees on appeal.
9. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington. In any action brought to enforce or interpret the
provisions of this Agreement, venue shall be exclusively in Kitsap County Superior Court.
10. Time. Time is of the essence for all provisions of this Agreement.
11. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only
and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
12. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the
parties and their respective successors and assigns.
13. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement represents the entire agreement
of the Parties and supersedes any prior communications, written or oral. This Agreement is the
product of negotiation and shall not be construed against either party as the drafter hereof. No
amendment, modification, or waiver of any rights hereunder shall be binding unless in writing
and signed by the party or parties potentially adversely affected hereby.
14. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all
of which taken together shall constitute one instrument.
15. Authority. Each party signing this Agreement, whether signing individually or on
behalf of an entity, represents that he/she has full authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of
himself/herself or such entity.
16. Calculation of Time. Unless clearly stated otherwise in this Agreement, all
references to days shall be to calendar days, not business days.
17. Notices. All notices, requests, and other communications that may be or are
required to be given hereunder or with respect hereto shall be in writing and shall be given by
overnight delivery service and by electronic mail, and shall be deemed to have been given on the
next day following the date such notice was sent by overnight delivery service. Such notices,
requests, and other communications shall be addressed as follows:
If to Central Highlands, Wallace, or Madison:
Hayes Gori
Law Office of Hayes Gori, PLLC
271 Wyatt Way NE, #112
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Phone: 206-842-6462
Email: hayes@hayesthelawyer.com
With a copy via email to:
Page 7 of 8
David Smith
Email: smithhouse4@comcast.net
If to City:
Joe Levan
City Attorney, City of Bainbridge Island
280 Madison Ave. N
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
(206) 780-8622
Email: jlevan@bainbridge.wa.gov
With a copy via email to:
Doug Schulze
City Manager, City of Bainbridge Island
Email: dschulze@bainbridgewa.gov
[Signature Pages Follow]
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 1 of 7
MADISON AVENUE ACCESS AGREEMENT
(Ohrt, Madison Landings Company, CCHD, Central Highlands, and Wallace Cottages)
THIS MADISON AVENUE ACCESS AGREEMENT (“Agreement”) is made and
entered into by and between Gary and Susan Ohrt, a married couple (“Ohrt”), Madison
Landings Inc., a Washington corporation (“Madison Landings Company”), Central Highlands
Inc., a Washington corporation (“Central Highlands”), Wallace Cottages, LLC, a Washington
limited liability company (“Wallace”), and CCHD LLC, a Washington limited liability company
(“CCHD”) (each a “Party” and together the “Parties”). The effective date (“Effective Date”) of
this Agreement shall be the date of complete execution hereof.
RECITALS
A. CCHD is the consulting company working with Ohrt, the applicant for the proposed 8-lot
Madison Grove subdivision (Project No. PLN50667 SUB) (“Madison Grove Project”)
and forthcoming townhouse project (PLN50879SPR) (“Madison Landing”). Both the
Madison Grove Project and Madison Landing will occur on property located between
Madison Avenue N. and Nakata Avenue NW in the City of Bainbridge Island. The
Madison Grove subdivision is planned to include tax parcels 27250211262001,
27250211402003, 27250211412002, and 27250212142004 (“Madison Grove
Property”). Madison Landing is planned to include tax parcels 27250210662003,
27250210212007, and 27250210222006 (“Madison Landing Property”).
B. Ohrt is a party to a purchase and sale agreement for the purchase of Kitsap County parcel
no. 27250210222006 (the “Vet Clinic Property”), which is the southernmost lot of the
Madison Landing Property. Ohrt anticipates closing on the Vet Clinic Property on March
21, 2018. Ohrt anticipates conveying the Madison Landing Property to the Madison
Landings Company.
C. Central Highlands and Wallace are proposing a 19-lot preliminary plat subdivision
(Project No. PLN50589 SUB) located on tax parcels 27250210232005, 27250211552005,
27250211542006, and 27250211532007 (“Wallace Cottages”). Wallace Cottages is
proposed to take access from the existing right-of-way located at the intersection of
Nakata Ave NW, Wallace Way NW and Taurnic PL NW (“Wallace Cottages Wallace
Way Access”). The homeowners in the community adjacent to the Wallace Cottages
Wallace Way Access vociferously objected to authorizing access through their
neighborhood and requested that Central Highlands find a way to take primary access
from Madison Avenue (“Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access”). The Wallace
Cottages property includes a lot that connects to Madison Avenue but the portion of that
property that connects to Madison Avenue is only 15 feet wide and therefore is not wide
enough to provide the desired Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access.
D. The City of Bainbridge Island (“City”), Ohrt, CCHD, and Mattis Consulting Group, a
Washington limited liability company (“Mattis”) are parties to that certain Agreement
for Improvement to Public Trail and Processing of Vacation of Disputed Street, dated
December 1, 2017 (the “Trail Connection Agreement”). The Trail Connection
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 2 of 7
Agreement was intended to resolve a dispute between the parties thereto regarding
whether a right-of-way (the “Disputed Street”) exists or does not exist on the Madison
Grove Property. Among other things, the Trail Connection Agreement provided that the
City would process a street vacation for the Disputed Street and, in exchange, Ohrt,
CCHD and Mattis would waive their potential claims against the City and Ohrt would
construct certain public trail improvements which would result in a continuous public
trail system between Sportsman Club Road and Weaver Road (“Public Trail
Connection”), which trail would include a bridge over Hirawaka Creek.
E. The City did not approve the street vacation within the initial time required by the Trail
Connection Agreement. Instead, the City approved City Ordinance No. 2018-04
(“Vacation Ordinance”), which provides approval of the street vacation if the following
condition is met: “The vacation of [the Disputed Street] is conditioned upon the grant of a
right-of-way consisting of the south 15 feet of parcel number 272502-1-022-2006.” The
right-of-way grant stated in the condition is intended to force Ohrt to grant sufficient
right-of-way to allow Central Highlands and Wallace to achieve the Wallace Cottages
Madison Avenue Access described in Recital C above.
F. There is no legal requirement for Ohrt to grant a right-of-way or otherwise solve Central
Highlands’ access issue. Ohrt’s Madison Landing already has been designed and building
permits have been submitted. If Ohrt granted the right-of-way requested by the City in
the Vacation Ordinance, then Ohrt would need to redesign Madison Landing at an
additional cost of more than $100,000. To incentivize Ohrt to enter into this Agreement,
the City and Central Highlands have proposed certain terms under which Ohrt’s
additional project costs would be mitigated.
G. Ohrt, CCHD, the Madison Landings Company, Central Highlands and Wallace are
entering into this Agreement to achieve the construction and use of the Wallace Cottages
Madison Avenue Access as described herein.
H. Ohrt, CCHD, Mattis and the City of Bainbridge Island (“City”) have entered into a
separate agreement titled “Public Benefit, Development and Permit Processing
Agreement” dated March 15, 2018 (“Ohrt Permit Processing Agreement”) in order to
effectuate the vacation of the Disputed Street and resolve and fully consummate the Trail
Connection Agreement, as well as to mitigate their losses and provide for certain
assurances regarding the processing of permits and for clear permit processing timelines
for Madison Grove, the approved 12-lot preliminary plat subdivision (Project No.
PLN50622 SUB) located at 7340 Finch Road NE (“The Reserve at Winslow”), and
Madison Landing.
I. Central Highlands, Wallace and Madison have entered into another separate agreement
with the City titled “Central Highlands Permit Processing Agreement” and dated March
16, 2018 (“Central Highlands Permit Processing Agreement”). The Central
Highlands Permit Processing Agreement is intended to resolve the City’s concerns and
the neighbors’ concerns regarding the Wallace Cottages Wallace Way Access, as well as
mitigate their losses and provide for certain assurances regarding the processing of
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 3 of 7
permits and for clear permit processing timelines for Wallace Cottages and Madison
Place.
J. The Parties are entering into this Agreement to set forth the terms and conditions under
which the issues described above shall be resolved to their mutual satisfaction.
AGREEMENT
NOW THEREFORE, in consideration of the mutual promises and considerations set forth
below and other good and valuable consideration, the receipt and sufficiency of which are hereby
acknowledged, the Parties agree as follows:
1. Boundary Line Adjustment. As soon as practicable after execution of this
Agreement, Ohrt and Central Highlands and Wallace shall prepare, sign, and take all such other
actions as are necessary or convenient to submit to and obtain approval from the City a boundary
line adjustment to incorporate the eastern panhandle portion of Kitsap County parcel no.
272502-1-023-2005 (approximately the eastern 240 feet thereof) (the “Panhandle”) into Kitsap
County parcel no. 272502-1-022-2006 (“Vet Clinic Property”). In other words, the boundary
line adjustment will effectively add the Panhandle to the Vet Clinic Property. Ohrt shall be
responsible for the costs of processing the boundary line adjustment, provided that Ohrt may use
and Central Highlands and Wallace shall provide any survey, topographical data or other
applicable plans or work product related to the properties involved in such boundary line
adjustment that are controlled or possessed by Central Highlands and Wallace and that may be
useful in the application for or completion of the boundary line adjustment.
2. Ohrt to Grant 30-foot Right-of-Way to City Providing the Wallace Cottages
Madison Avenue Access. In conjunction with the development of Madison Landing and Wallace
Cottages, Ohrt shall grant to the City a thirty (30) foot right-of-way over the south boundary of
the Vet Clinic Property (as enlarged by inclusion of the Panhandle via the boundary line
adjustment described in Section 1 herein) (“Vet Clinic ROW”); provided that the property
included in said right-of-way shall first be included in the floor area ratio calculation for
Madison Landing. The Parties agree that Ohrt shall have no obligation to grant more than the 30-
feet of right-of-way described in this Section 2.
3. Design and Construction of 30-Foot Right of Way. Central Highlands and/or
Wallace shall be responsible for the design, including all costs related thereto, of the Wallace
Cottages Madison Avenue Access, including that portion occurring within the Vet Clinic ROW
(“Vet Clinic Street”). Central Highlands and/or Wallace shall coordinate with Ohrt regarding
such design and Ohrt must first approve the design prior to final approval by the City. If the Vet
Clinic Street has not been designed and constructed prior to the time when Ohrt is ready to
proceed with construction on Madison Landing, then Ohrt may pursue a permit for the
construction of the Vet Clinic Street and authorize the remaining portion of the Wallace Cottages
Madison Avenue Access to be permitted separately and at a later time. Ohrt and Central
Highlands and/or Wallace shall share equally the construction costs for the Vet Clinic Street,
including costs for curb/gutter/pavement/water/sewer/sidewalks/grading/landscaping/required
bonding, and any other related construction costs. Within five (5) business days of the permit for
the Vet Clinic Street improvements being issued for whichever Party is first to construct, the
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 4 of 7
other Party shall deposit into escrow fifty percent (50%) of the estimated construction cost. No
increase over the estimated construction cost resulting from a change order or other action shall
be approved unless the increase is first approved by all Parties. Upon completion of the
construction of the Vet Clinic Street, the escrow funds shall be released to the constructing Party
and any overpayment or underpayment resulting from the difference between the estimated and
actual construction costs shall be paid to the appropriate Party within fourteen (14) days of notice
by the Party that was underpaid or the Party that overpaid. If Ohrt disapproves of the design of
the Wallace Cottages Madison Avenue Access, Ohrt will notify Central Highlands immediately
and the Parties will mutually agree upon required design changes. Upon such agreement, Central
Highlands and/or Wallace will have the plans amended to include the agreed upon changes at its
expense within thirty (30) days.
4. Central Highlands Payment to Ohrt. Within seven (7) calendar days of recording
of the deed conveying the Vet Clinic Property to Ohrt or Madison Landings Company, Central
Highlands and/or Wallace shall pay to Ohrt the sum of Seventy-One Thousand Two Hundred
Forty Dollars ($71,240.00) (the “Payment Amount”).
5. Interest. Any required payment under this Agreement that remains unpaid after
such payment is due shall accrue interest at a rate of twelve percent (12%) per annum.
6. Severability. If any clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this
Agreement shall be adjudged by any court of competent jurisdiction to be invalid, such order or
judgment shall be confined in its operation to the controversy in which it was rendered and shall
not affect or invalidate the remainder of any part of this Agreement and to this end the provisions
of each clause, sentence, paragraph, section or part of this Agreement are hereby declared to be
severable.
7. Cooperation. The Parties agree to cooperate and work together in good faith and
without delay to take the actions and issue the approvals described in this Agreement.
8. Specific Performance. The Parties acknowledges that this Agreement
contemplates the conveyance of certain real property which is critical to each Party’s interest,
including access, development rights and the public interest. As such, the Parties agree that
monetary damages may not sufficiently compensate for a breach or default by a Party and that
specific performance would be an appropriate remedy for the failure to convey or dedicate any
portion of the Vet Clinic ROW in accordance with the terms and conditions of this Agreement.
9. Attorneys’ Fees. In any court proceeding brought to enforce or interpret this
Agreement, the substantially prevailing party (as determined by the court) shall recover from the
other party its costs and reasonable attorneys’ fees, including costs and fees on appeal.
10. Governing Law. This Agreement shall be governed and interpreted in accordance
with the laws of the State of Washington. In any action brought to enforce or interpret the
provisions of this Agreement, venue shall be exclusively in Kitsap County Superior Court.
11. Time. Time is of the essence for all provisions of this Agreement.
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 5 of 7
12. Headings. The headings contained in this Agreement are for reference purposes only
and shall not in any way affect the meaning or interpretation of this Agreement.
13. Binding Effect. This Agreement shall be binding on and inure to the benefit of the
Parties and their respective successors and assigns. It is anticipated that Ohrt will transfer the
Madison Landing Property to the Madison Landings Company and any obligations of Ohrt’s
with respect to such property shall be binding upon Madison Landings Company.
14. Entire Agreement; Amendment. This Agreement represents the entire agreement
of the Parties and supersedes any prior communications, written or oral. This Agreement is the
product of negotiation and shall not be construed against either Party as the drafter hereof. No
amendment, modification, or waiver of any rights hereunder shall be binding unless in writing
and signed by the Party or Parties potentially adversely affected hereby.
15. Counterparts. This Agreement may be executed in any number of counterparts, all
of which taken together shall constitute one instrument.
16. Authority. Each Party signing this Agreement, whether signing individually or on
behalf of an entity, represents that he/she has full authority to sign this Agreement on behalf of
himself/herself or such entity.
17. Calculation of Time. Unless clearly stated otherwise in this Agreement, all
references to days shall be to calendar days, not business days.
18. Notices. All notices, requests, and other communications that may be or are
required to be given hereunder or with respect hereto shall be in writing and shall be given by
overnight delivery service and by electronic mail, and shall be deemed to have been given on the
next day following the date such notice was sent by overnight delivery service. Such notices,
requests, and other communications shall be addressed as follows:
If to Ohrt, CCHD, or Madison Landings Company:
Randall P. Olsen
Cairncross & Hempelmann, P.S.
524 Second Ave., Suite 500
Seattle, WA 98104-2323
Phone: 206-254-4418
Email: rolsen@cairncross.com
With a copy via email to:
Todd McKittrick
Email: todd@millennialbuilders.com
If to Central Highlands, Wallace, or Madison:
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 6 of 7
Hayes Gori
Law Office of Hayes Gori, PLLC
271 Wyatt Way NE, Suite 112
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
(206) 842-6462
hayes@hayesthelawyer.com
With a copy via email to:
David Smith
Email: smithhouse4@comcast.net
Nick Smith
Email: nick.centralhighlands@gmail.com
[Signatures on Following Page]
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
{03510264.DOCX;2 } Page 7 of 7
EXECUTED by the Parties on the dates set forth below.
MADISON LANDINGS COMPANY:
Madison Landings Inc., a
Washington corporation
By:
Print name:
Its:
CCHD:
CCHD, a Washington limited liability
company
By:
Print name: Lanya McKittrick
Its: Manager
Date signed:
OHRT:
Gary and Susan Ohrt, a married couple
____________________________
Gary Ohrt
Date signed:
____________________________
Susan Ohrt
Date signed:
CENTRAL HIGHLANDS:
Central Highlands Inc., a
Washington corporation
_____________________________
Print Name:___________________
Its: _________________________
WALLACE:
Wallace Cottages, LLC, a
Washington limited liability corporation
_____________________________
Print Name:___________________
Its: _________________________
DocuSign Envelope ID: 335B7AE0-5796-43BE-9B36-7B48FBDCD890
3/16/2018
3/16/2018
3/16/2018
President
Updated:
Updated 9-JAN-17
Wyatt Way
High School Road
Ma
d
i
s
o
n
Gr
o
w
Na
k
a
t
a
Knechtel
Ma
d
i
s
o
n
A
v
e
n
u
e
Trail connection
Ord 2018-04
Road Vacation
Ord 2018-04
ROW Dedication
Ord 2018-04
Table 2.16.020.Q-2 Housing Diversity Scoring Method
Affordable Housing Unit Size Unit Type
Project includes a number of housing units that
are designated affordable for a period of 50
years to the spectrum of income levels as
defined by BIMC 18.36.030.16 and 18.21.020.A.
Rental housing is encouraged by awarding more
points for the creation of rental housing.
Project includes a variety of unit sizes, excluding garages, that provide
for a broad mix of income levels and family size. In order to score a point
in a unit size range, the project shall provide at least 10% of the total
number of units in that range. For example, in a 40-unit development, at
least 4 units sized between 1,001 and 1,200 ft2 would be needed to
score points in that range.
Unit type: Project includes a variety of housing unit types (i.e., single-family
style, townhouse, flat, age-in-place, ADUs, cottages) or innovative type of
housing. In order to score points for different unit types, the project shall
provide at least 10% of the total number units of that type. For example, in a
40-unit development of townhomes and duplexes, at least 4 units of
townhomes would be needed to score points for having 2 different unit types.
TIER
Total Housing Diversity
Points Required
% Affordable
Units
Ownership
Value
Rental Value Unit Size Range Value Number of Different Unit Types Value
10% 10 12 < 800 ft2 1 2 2
11 – 15% 12 14 801 – 1,000 ft2 1 3 3
16 – 20% 14 16 1,001 – 1,200 ft2 1 4 4
21 – 25% 16 18 1,201 – 1,400 ft2 1 5 5
More than 25% 20 22 1,401 – 1,600 ft2 1
Minimum % Required Size Requirement Min. Pts. Required Min. Pts. Required
4 10 pts 10% Max. home size 1,600 ft2 NA NA
3 20 pts 50% Max. home size 1,600 ft2 NA NA
2
12 pts (projects < 20 units) 10% Max. home size 1,600 ft2 NA Projects ≥ 20 units must get 3 pts in “unit type”
15 pts (projects ≥ 20 units)
1
4 pts (projects < 20 units) NA Max. home size 1,600 ft2 NA Projects ≥ 20 units must get 2 pts in “unit type”
5 pts (projects ≥ 20 units)
Table 2.16.020.Q-3 Innovative Site Development Scoring Method
TIER
Minimum
Site
Development
Point
Requirement
WATER QUALITY & CONSERVATION
Projects use methods to decrease water usage and improve stormwater
runoff quality through an integrated approach to stormwater management
such as greywater use, stormwater collection in cisterns, green roofs and
covered parking.
All HDDP projects will follow the WA State DOE 2012 Stormwater
Management Manual for Western Washington, as amended in December
2014.
LANDSCAPING & OPEN SPACE
Project provides well-designed common open space, with at least 5 percent
of the gross land area, set aside as open space and designed as an
integrated part of the project rather than an isolated element. The common
open space must be outside of critical areas and their buffers and required
roadside buffers. Appropriate community amenities such as playgrounds,
composting and neighborhood gardens promoting the production of locally
grown food are encouraged. Resident neighborhood community gardens
can be in common open space areas, and shall be appropriately located for
solar exposure, and include water availability, soil amenities, and storage for
garden tools. Required growing space for neighborhood gardens is 60
square feet per dwelling unit, not including any existing orchard area. Open
space dedicated to the public pursuant to the standards of BIMC Sections
17.12.030. A1, A2, A3, A6 & A7 is encouraged.
TRANSPORTATION
Project design provides enhanced sensitivity to pedestrian and
bicycle travel to promote the people getting around without a
car, a reduced carbon footprint, improved health of humans, and
lower pollution levels. Project internally preserves existing
informal internal connection to external non-motorized facilities,
furthering the Island-wide Transportation Plan (IW TP) and using
such solutions as woonerfs, green streets, and natural trails and
paths. Project reduces reliance on automobiles and trip counts,
and promotes alternative transportation, such as integrating
parking and charging facilities for electric cars, or bus shelters.
4 30
REQUIREMENT VALUE
Number of dwelling units that integrate greywater reuse
components into building design:
10% 1
11-20% 2
21-30% 3
Over 31% 4
Percentage of total roof area qualifying as
“green roofs”: 15-30%
Over 31%
2
4
Project integrates cisterns: % of total roof
area directed to cisterns: 15-30%
Over 31%
2
4
Percentage of total parking spaces that are covered (i.e.
parking garage, carport):
5-20% 1
21-40% 2
41-60% 3
61-80% 4
Over 81% 5
% OF OPEN SPACE VALUE VALUE IF
PUBLIC
5-10% 2 4
11-15% 4 6
16-20% 6 8
21-25% 8 10
Greater than 25% 10 12
Incorporates neighborhood garden 2
Preserves tree that qualifies as a
“Heritage tree” under City
Program. The tree is not otherwise
required to be preserved.
2 per tree
All Private yard areas ≤ 20% turf 4
Project landscaping integrates at
least 60% native or drought
tolerant plants
4
.
TRANSPORTATION COMPONENTS VALUE
Project preserves, creates or
integrates internal and external non-
motorized connections.
2
Provides public walkways, separated
paths, or bike lanes. No points for
facilities required by IWTP.
3
On-site car sharing program 1 per each
car
Electric vehicle charging stations for
3% of vehicle parking capacity.
3
Covered, consolidated bike parking
for subdivisions 3
Bus Shelter 2
3 25
2 25
1 14
Staff Scoring: Water Quality subtotal 2 Landscape / Open Space Subtotal 16 Transportation subtotal 11
Grand Total: 29
Bainbridge Island Fire Department
Memo
May 17, 2017
TO: Kelly Tayara, Planning Department
FR: Assistant Chief Luke Carpenter, Fire Marshal
RE: Wallace Cottages PLN50589SUB
The submittal has been reviewed resulting in the following comments:
1. The proposed project shall comply with all provisions of the adopted
Fire Code.
2. The turning radius of the cul-de-sac shall not be less than 39 feet
3. The 10 foot private road width is allowed in conjunction with the 5
foot flush sidewalk. If the sidewalk is required to be raised then the
road width shall be not less than 12 feet.
4. The proposed location of fire hydrants is acceptable at this time. A
fire flow test performed by the Fire Marshal’s Office will be required
prior to occupancy.
REVISED NOTICE OF APPLICATION/SEPA COMMENT PERIOD
This project is being renoticed because some properties were inadvertently omitted from the original comment
period that occurred from June 2, 2017 to June 16, 2017. All commen ts received during the original comment period
are still valid. The SEPA is withdrawn and a new SEPA threshold determination will be issued after the revised
comment period commences.
Tentative Hearing Date: July 11, 2018; the City website will be updated to reflect the hearing date
The City of Bainbridge Island has received the following land use application:
Date of Issuance:
Project Name & Number:
Project Type:
Owner:
Project Site & Tax Parcel:
June 1, 2018 (Revised)
Wallace Cottages HDDP PLN50589 SUB
Preliminary Subdivision
Wallace Cottages LLC
27250210232005, 27250211532007,27250211542006, 27250211552005
Wallace Way between Madison Avenue and Nakata Avenue
Project Description:
19 lot subdivision of four lots totaling 2.5 acres
Environmental Review:
This proposal is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as
provided in WAC 197-11-800. The City, acting as lead agency expects to
issue a Determination of Non-significance (DNS) threshold determination
for this proposal. Utilizing the optional DNS process provided in WAC
197-11-355, the comment period specified in this notice may be the only
opportunity to comment on the environmental impact of this proposal. The
proposal may include mitigation measures under applicable codes, and the
project review process may incorporate or require mitigation measures
regardless of whether an EIS is prepared. A copy of the subsequent
threshold determination for the proposal may be obtained upon request.
Comment period:
The City will not take a final action on the proposal nor make a threshold
determination for 14 days from the date of this notice. Any person may
comment on the proposal and/or the SEPA review. Additionally, any person
may participate in a public hearing, if any, and my request a copy of any
decision. For consideration under SEPA environmental review,
comments must be submitted by June 15, 2018.
Vicinity Map
For questions or to submit
comment, contact:
Kelly Tayara, Senior Planner
City of Bainbridge Island
280 Madison Ave North
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
pcd@bainbridgewa.gov or
206.780.3787
Subject Properties
N
1
To: Hearing Examiner and Gary Christensen, Planning and Community Development Director
From: Sanjay Bhatt, Bainbridge Island resident
May 17, 2018
I am writing to express my concerns with the city’s process and some features of Madison Place HDDP
(PLN 50892 SUB) and Wallace Cottages HDDP (PLN 50589 SUB), which are both being developed by
Central Highlands and have very much been reviewed as connected projects, the latter depending on
the former for drainage and the former depending on the latter for a pea patch and playground.
NOTICE OF APPLICATION/SEPA NOTICE NOT PROVIDED
It came to my attention this month that these projects were in fact really happening. My neighbors and I
at the Courtyards on Madison Condominiums (see image below) were surprised because we never
received the city’s SEPA notice as required by state law. I e-mailed planner Kelly Tayara on May 14,
2018, and she told me on May 15 that the notice of application / SEPA comment period were sent to
homeowners “within a 500 foot radius of the subject property on 6/2/2017 (Wallace Cottages) and
12/22/2017 (Madison Place).”
I examined the mailing lists for these two projects and could not spot my name nor those of my
neighbors. I followed up with a phone call on May 17 to Jane Rasely, administrative specialist in
Courtyards on
Madison
Condominiums
Madison Place
2
Planning, and she informed me that the department had assigned a new employee last year the task of
these notices and that this person made “an honest mistake.” Because the property assessor number for
the parcels is longer for condominiums, the city has to take an extra step to obtain the mailing addresses
for condo owners, and the new employee failed to do that and the mistake was not caught, she told me.
The result was that the condominium owners were never given any notices by mail of these projects.
She apologized for the city’s error and assured me it would not happen again. Unfortunately, it
happened to us not once, but twice with two big projects that share our property line.
So while the city may have made an honest mistake, not once, but twice, we have to say that this
mistake cost our residents the opportunity to have input on the project and meaningfully participate. I
can only wonder how many other condominiums were affected by this lapse by the city on other
projects. To be sure, the Madison Place site has a small sign on it, but we’ve also heard the city had
imposed a building moratorium. Needless to say, it’s confusing for an average person.
In researching this further, I see the city’s Comprehensive Plan land-use policy element 6.5 states
“process applications for development approval … in order to ensure affordability, fairness, citizen
notification and predictability in the land development process” (emphasis added).
SPECIFIC PROJECT CONCERNS
My concerns with the Madison Place project fall into three categories:
• Bird habitat / retention of trees
• Stormwater Drainage
• Parking / Vehicular Traffic
• Setback from Courtyards property line
BIRD HABITAT / RETENTION OF TREES
According to staff, the site is part of the Pacific Flyway migration route, a major north-south flyway for
migratory birds in America. (See page 10 of “Ex 12 SEPA checklist with staff response.”) One of the best
things I love at the Courtyards is hearing the song of birds outside my window. We are blessed to have
so many trees surrounding our property. The developer has proposed to cut down 30 Douglas firs and 2
madronas, while maintaining about 20 Douglas firs, madronas and holly shrubs. But the same developer
has proposed to clear-cut trees along our western boundary for a utility easement, a move that would
seem to disrupt the migration route. Similarly we have a stand of cedars on the southern boundary with
the Madison Place site, and it’s a bit unclear to us what effect the clear-cutting of the site will do to our
row of cedars. We’ve not been able to get a straight answer to that.
The removal of many trees seems to go against several of the Comp Plan’s guiding policies:
Guiding Policy 1.1 Develop an island-wide conservation strategy to identify and apply effective methods
to preserve the natural and scenic qualities that make the Island a special place, including better
protection for the shoreline, trees, soils, native plants, and farms.
3
Guiding Policy 5.3 Preserve and enhance the Island’s natural systems, natural beauty and environmental
quality.
Policy LU 4.11 To the greatest degree practical, prohibit clearcutting and grading of the natural
landscape.
STORMWATER DRAINAGE
We learned recently that the city’s engineer, Peter Corelis, had given conditional approval to this
project, but we were trying to understand this language in the staff report (page 18):
A hydrologic and hydraulic analysis must be performed to demonstrate that the future buildout
conditions from the site combined with the existing offsite drainage tributary to the storm drain
system will not exceed the capacity of the existing or proposed storm drain system in Madison
Avenue North. Where the existing capacity of the system is insufficient, the project shall
mitigate on-site to match the existing 100-year storm flows leaving the project site, or, upgrade
the storm system to provide the needed capacity as defined below. The capacity analysis shall
include an assessment of all backwater effects on the existing system up Madison Avenue
North. The design storm for capacity analysis is a 25-year storm event. The 25-year hydraulic
grade line (HGL) shall be below the rim elevations of all drainage structures. The 100-year storm
event shall be shown to not overtop the crest of any roadways.
The plans we have seen indicate a storm drain from Wallace Cottages would need to cross our property
to reach Madison Place, and from there connect to the city main on Madison Avenue North. A report
from the developer’s consultant last year seemed to indicate there were already pipe failures and
obstructions from tree roots in the city main on Madison Avenue North.
As residents upstream, we want to understand what this all means for us. We want to understand
whether the system will be able to handle not only the additional volume from the multiple
developments proposed in the vicinity (Wallace Cottages, Madison Place, Madison Landing, Madison
Grove) but also the volumes from severe storms and floods. I reached out this week by email and phone
to City Engineer Peter Corelis to ask him what this language meant, but he has not responded.
PARKING / VEHICULAR TRAFFIC
The code allows for parking reductions, yet the proposal still provides for two parking spaces per unit.
That seems at odds with the spirit of the HDDP and the city’s Comp Plan:
Policy LU 6.2 Promote dense residential and commercial development and encourage human
activity within Winslow, the heart of Bainbridge Island. In order to create a vibrant city center
direct growth where infrastructure exists, reduce reliance on the automobile, provide
opportunities for affordable housing and absorb growth that would otherwise be scattered in
outlying areas…
4
The Madison Place site is right in front of a Kitsap Transit bus stop, and Kitsap Transit is increasing the
level of bus service along Madison Avenue. Even the developer acknowledges in the SEPA staff checklist
document that the site is served by Kitsap Transit and is within walking distance of the ferry terminal. So
why not reduce parking to 1.5 spaces per unit? Why not consider a bus shelter on both sides of Madison
Avenue that could incentivize more transit riders and fewer car trips?
The developer’s traffic impact analysis should not be considered in isolation. The city should look at the
number of average daily trips added to Madison Avenue not only by Madison Place, but by Wallace
Cottages, Madison Landing and Madison Grove.
Wallace Cottages and Madison Place will add more than 340 average daily trips to Madison Avenue. Yes,
some of them may be electric vehicles, but they will add to the existing congestion. The city seems to be
accepting a Level Of Service (LOS) of a “D” on Madison Avenue going forward.
The SEPA staff checklist also indicates the Madison Place project will dedicate 10 feet to Madison
Avenue for possible future widening. That sounds like widening Madison Avenue to encourage more
automobile traffic, which is the opposite of the direction provided in city’s Comp Plan. The intent of the
widening in the future is not clear. The city needs to be more transparent with the community on the
purpose of the widening of the road. Lots of school children use the sidewalks along Madison Avenue, so
I would be concerned if the widening of the road here could mean future reduction of the sidewalk
upstream of this site.
SETBACK FROM COURTYARDS PROPERTY LINE
As a “built green” development, Madison Place is not subject to the same setback requirements as a
standard development. As a result, the minimum setback from a home in Madison Place to our
subdivision’s boundary line is 5 feet. Is that the setback we can expect?
CONCLUSION
I’ve tried to summarize my major concerns about this project. Overall, I am a big believer in urban
density, more housing choices, and green building practices. However, the developer is getting some
incentives here from the city that seem out of proportion to the benefits to the public. The project
scored fairly low in the HDDP program and is a Tier 1 (lowest) category. It would be nice if the city could
slow down and give the community that was left out of the loop the opportunity to participate in the
final shape of this project.
1
Jane Rasely
From:Kay Morgan <jamesk7smyrna@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, June 4, 2018 6:45 PM
To:PCD
Subject:Madison Grove Pln, Madison Landing Pln, Wallace Cottages Plan, Madison Place Pln, Wyatt Apts Pln
As a fourth generation Kitsap County individual, as a granddaughter of a County Commitioner, in Kitsap Country, as a
psychologist who lives who sees women and abuse and who works on Madison Avenue, I am shocked and appalled by
the proposal to squeeze in five new developments onto our already busy area. And to what purpose?
I remember listening to my Grandfather talking about "progress". Indeed, my family owned all the farmland property
which became the Kitsap Mall. He was mightily against this so-called progress. And it turned out that he
was correct. Look at SIlverdale, now. He was also right about the cutting down of trees (his own father, my Great-
Grandfather, was the person who brought the poplar trees to SIlverdale in the late eighteen hundreds. As a "tree expert",
my Grandfather knew that land requires trees and that trees require land.
And you are proposing that dozens of mature fir trees be cut down. Are you sure you know the damage you are
doing? And, for what? For money?
Gig Harbor has made a decision to put a halt to new such plans. Why don't we?
It is said that approximately 744 average daily car trips will be added to Madison Way, a one way small town street. What
do you say to this? Is this progress? Is this really what you want to happen? It sounds pretty ugly and ill-thought-out to
me.
There is a "Greaves" Road which now exists in Silverdale, in honor of my family of origin. I moved to Bainbridge from
Silverdale to get away from the craziness of the consistent and scandalizing movement towards what some called
"progress".
There are many people here on Bainbridge who will fight this every. step. of. the. way.
And I will be amongst them. And my family's tears expertise and wisdom will be with me while I protest with all my heart
and soul.
Dr. Kay Morgan
1
Jane Rasely
From:Kay Morgan <jamesk7smyrna@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, June 4, 2018 6:52 PM
To:PCD
Subject:Madison Grover, Madison Landing, Wallace Cottages, Madison Place, Wyatt Apts.
As a 4rth generation Kitsap County individual who moved to Bainbridge Island when Silverdale, with its greedy eyes
turned only to businesses and away from the people who had lived there, I write in condemnation of the proposed 5 new
housing units.
As a member of the family who brought the beautiful poplar trees to Silverdale, as a member of the family who once
owned farmland which was to become the Kitsap Mall, I condemn the idea of the 5 housing units.
As a granddaughter of a Kitsap County Commissioner who knew what so called "progress" meant - - greed, insult to the
peoples who had already lived in the area for so long, and avarice, I understand what it is you are proposing.
1
Jane Rasely
From:Kay Morgan <jamesk7smyrna@yahoo.com>
Sent:Monday, June 4, 2018 6:57 PM
To:PCD
Subject:My two e-mails already sent, regarding the 5 Madison Ave. Development Proposals
Alas, my computer "decided" to send both e-mails which you have, by now, received - without allowing me any time to
reread them. - - and disallowing me to even sign the first e-mail. My name is Kay Elaine Greaves Morgan. My phone
number is 206-855-2948. I had no idea my computer sent the second of the e-mails, which is why you received the first
message (the one without my name). Please do know that I am well known in this community and in other communities
inside Kitsap County and I will do everything in my power to stop the poor planning behind building these five
developments. What greed. What lack of knowledge about the environment. What sadness.
Kay Morgan, Ph.D.
1
Kelly Tayara
From:PCD
Sent:Wednesday, June 6, 2018 9:11 AM
To:Kelly Tayara
Subject:FW: Negative affects of the 118 new house development on Madison
Kelly,
I am forwarding this information to you because I believe the facts may not be correct.
Thank you,
Jane Rasely
Administrative Specialist
www.bainbridgewa.gov
facebook.com/citybainbridgeisland/
206.780.3758 (office) 206.780.5104
‐‐‐‐‐Original Message‐‐‐‐‐
From: David Seligman <dsdrinc@gmail.com>
Sent: Wednesday, June 6, 2018 5:55 AM
To: PCD <pcd@bainbridgewa.gov>
Subject: Negative affects of the 118 new house development on Madison
Please recognize for all of us who cherish Bainbridge Island that this project is one more invasive move to lowering
quality of life and possibly worse.
I hope the city will stop this project or investigate and regulate it thoroughly.
Thanks,
David Seligman
637 Madison Ave.
Bainbridge, WA 98110
1
Jane Rasely
From:Wendy Reid <wendyreid710@hotmail.com>
Sent:Wednesday, June 6, 2018 5:48 PM
To:PCD
Subject:Re: Madison Place Subdivison PLN 50892
Dear Ms. Tayara
Senior Planner
City of Bainbridge IS WA
As a resident and owner of Madison Ave Condo I have several questions concerning the proposed Madison Place
development.
The 5 proposed developments will add 180 cars to the area and also over 700 daily car trips up and down Madison Ave. I
am concerned about entering and exiting our property. Also if there is an imergency and our fire dept. and police are
called on to help will they be able to get thru traffic? There are time in the day currently that the traffic is so congested
that it can take quite some time to go up or down Madison Ave. Please explain to me the traffic study the examined this
problem.
Thank you for answering my questions and forwarding my concerns to the planning department.
Sincerely Wendy Reid
790 Madison Ave. BI
Wendy Reid
1
Jane Rasely
From:Martha Bien <marthabien@msn.com>
Sent:Friday, June 8, 2018 10:51 AM
To:City Admin
Cc:Ron Peltier; Rasham Nassar; Leslie Schneider; Kol Medina; Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman
Subject:Overdevelopment of Madison Ave
I am writing to state my objection to the 5 new planned developments to be started very soon. I only recently learned
about them. Unfortunately, the generic letters that were sent out did little to explain in layman’s terms the extent of
these housing plans. If I had been given the total picture, I would have been very, very concerned about: traffic, the
aquifer, the lack of affordable housing and much more.
What is wrong with this city that developers have the upper hand over the residents? I live on Wallace Way in a very
small (8 unit) condo development and have seen a deterioration of our neighborhood along Madison increase over the
past 20 years.
I am 74 years old and was looking forward to being close to town since I might not be driving sometime in the future.
However, I never expected this congestion when I moved here. I hope it is not too late to do something about this.
Sincerely,
Martha Bien
Sent from my iPad
1
Jane Rasely
From:Kirk Eichenberger <keichenbee@gmail.com>
Sent:Friday, June 8, 2018 11:02 AM
To:PCD
Cc:City Admin; Ron Peltier; Rasham Nassar; Leslie Schneider; Kol Medina; Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman
Subject:Comments on Madison Place HDDP PLN50892 SUB
Attachments:Comments on Madison Place HDDP PLN50892 SUB.pdf
Kelly Tayara,
Please see my attached comments on the proposed Madison Place development. Comments are due by today (June 8,
2018). Thank you for your consideration. Kirk
Kirk Eichenberger
keichenbee@gmail.com
cell: 231‐881‐2045
1
Jane Rasely
From:Christine Kane <christinekane17@gmail.com>
Sent:Thursday, June 7, 2018 9:49 PM
To:PCD
Cc:City Admin; Ron Peltier; Rasham Nassar; Leslie Schneider; Kol Medina; Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman
Subject:Madison Landing and Madison Place
I am a resident of Bainbridge Island who has lived here for 24 years. I became a
homeowner 17 years ago when I bought my condo at the Courtyards on Madison.
I knew there were some new developments that were being planned in the downtown
corridor but no one put together the big picture until my neighbor did the research.
I, and many others, are shocked to realize that you have approved so many new
developments in just a couple of short blocks. Not including the brand new development
already in the process on Madrona Lane, there will be an additional 111 new housing
units and the potential for adding approximately 744 more daily car trips on Madison
Ave. alone.
Has anyone even considered what the cumulative effect of all that development
will do to those of us living here in the downtown corridor???? I’ve already seen
and experienced the evidence of an increase in traffic on Madison Ave. over the last
couple of years. It can take quite a while for me to be able to even exit the Courtyards
and then I find myself in stop and go traffic just to get to Wyatt. When you finally get to
downtown it’s often nearly impossible to find any parking.
How in the world is adding at least 111 more homes and 2 cars per household going to
improve the problems that already exist??
Seems to me that we will be adding to air pollution, noise pollution, destroying the last
little bits of green space and making life more unpleasant for those of us who live here.
I feel as though the city has done nothing to make us all aware of the scope of all the
building planned. It took one of my resourceful neighbors to realize that we were never
even notified about any of these developments last November because we at the
Courtyards on Madison were left off the mailing list. (And we will be just feet away from
Madison Place.) It took that same neighbor to paint the big picture for us. We’ve had
next to no time to process all this or have any discussion as the comment deadline was
so quickly set.
Why is the city allowing all this? Is the infrastructure set up to handle all this additional
load from sewer and storm water?? What about the city’s aquifers?
Is it sadly the case that the city is only thinking about collecting more money in property
taxes without regard for the quality of life of the people who actually live here?
2
I sincerely hope you will reconsider some of the details of all this development and allow
more time for input from the actual residents of the downtown area.
Christine Kane
Right-click or tap and hold here to download pictuprotect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatthis picture from the Internet.
Virus-free. www.avast.com
1
Jane Rasely
From:Barbara Hotchkin <hotchkin_barb@yahoo.com>
Sent:Thursday, June 7, 2018 2:44 PM
To:PCD
Cc:Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman; Rasham Nassar; Sarah Blossom; Ron Peltier; Kol Medina; Leslie Schneider
Subject:Re: Madison Landing Project, PLN 50879 Madison Place Project, PLN 50892
My apologies - the first email was sent before I added the content.
Madison Landing Project, PLN 50879
Madison Place Project, PLN 50892
Dear Ms. Tayara:
We are writing to express our concern about the two subject projects, particularly with regard to traffic along Madison
Avenue between Wyatt Way and High School Road.
We live in Madison Cottages, and generally access Madison Avenue from Knechtel Way. We already have problems
during certain times of day taking a left turn from Knechtel onto Madison. With the roundabout at High School and the
one proposed at Wyatt, there will be relatively steady streams of traffic in both directions making it difficult for vehicles on
side streets to take a left turn onto Madison -- not just from Knechtel, but also from Wallace, Ihland, Sadie Lane, Jacolet
Lane, and the proposed access roads for planned developments. While we recognize the benefits of centralized
ingress/egress for each development, the high density of the developments will contribute considerable additional traffic
on Madison.
For the Madison Landing project, it does not appear that the intersection of Madison and Knechtel was included in the
traffic study, which is disappointing. For the Madison Place project, Table 1 in the traffic study is clearly incorrect, as it
indicates there is a roundabout at Madison and Knechtel and a two way stop at High School and Madison. When
something this basic is amiss in a technical report, the validity of the entire report seems questionable.
It is not clear if either traffic study has sufficiently addressed the cumulative impacts associated with all of the major
residential units planned or proposed along Madison, including Madison Grove, Wallace Cottages, and Wyatt Apartments.
The five projects together will add over 700 daily car trips from the over 100 housing units. Each project alone may not
adversely affect the level of service to a major extent, but considered cumulatively with other anticipated traffic increases
in the corridor, it is difficult to see how they will not. Please ensure that the traffic analyses adequately address impacts at
all potentially affected intersections, including cumulative impacts.
We generally support high density development in Winslow, but the number of units to be placed on these small parcels
seems excessive. Also, these homes will be in walking distance to shops, grocery stores, restaurants, and the ferry
terminal. We question the need for two parking places per unit, as it will discourage rather than encourage walking in
Winslow.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Barbara Hotchkin
Michael Hotchkin
2
On Thursday, June 7, 2018, 2:40:38 PM PDT, Barbara Hotchkin <hotchkin_barb@yahoo.com> wrote:
1
Jane Rasely
From:Doug Schulze
Sent:Thursday, June 7, 2018 11:12 AM
To:PCD
Subject:FW: Madison Landing and Madison Place
Doug Schulze, ICMA-CM
City Manager
From: City Admin
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:46 AM
To: Doug Schulze <dschulze@bainbridgewa.gov>
Subject: FW: Madison Landing and Madison Place
From: Jeffrey Curnes <bloo.skies3@gmail.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 7, 2018 10:36 AM
To: City Admin <cityadmin@bainbridgewa.gov>; Ron Peltier <rpeltier@bainbridgewa.gov>; Rasham Nassar
<rnassar@bainbridgewa.gov>; Kol Medina <kmedina@bainbridgewa.gov>; Joe Deets <jdeets@bainbridgewa.gov>;
Matthew Tirman <mtirman@bainbridgewa.gov>
Subject: Madison Landing and Madison Place
Good morning,
I am writing to you as a home owner on Madison Avenue to voice concerns I have regarding development of Madison
Landing and Madison Place.
The proposed developments have a great impact on current residents and I would ask for consideration of the following
points before granting approval for these plans.
1. According to traffic consultant estimates, these and other proposed developments in the Madison neighborhood will
collectively add 744 daily car trips on an already congested 2‐lane surface street. Already residents have difficulty
entering and exiting driveways during peak hours.
2. According to the plans made public, there is little to no affordable housing being created. The estimated price of each
unit is $600,000.
3. In consideration of “Green” construction, what is being done to assure implementation of the Housing Design
Demonstration Program? Dozens of mature Douglas Firs and other established trees will be destroyed for these
supposedly “green” and “sustainable” townhomes. According to City Staff’s notes, these properties are part of the
Pacific Flyway, an international bird migration route.
4. How can a development be designated as “Green” with each proposed unit allotted 2 vehicles. Both of these
proposed developments are on existing bus lines and within walking distance to downtown businesses and the ferry
terminal.
5. The infrastructure is already stressed and in need of replacement. A study last year of the stormwater drain below
Madison Avenue found cracked pipes, leaks and tree root infiltration. Can this system handle these additional
2
residential developments without major investment by the city to improve utilities? Is the electrical grid sufficient to
support use?
6. There are currently five development projects being proposed within a quarter mile stretch of Madison Avenue
(between Wyatt and Wallace). Please consider the overwhelming impact of construction and density to this already
populated neighborhood and busy arterial.
These are just a few of my concerns. Add to that the inconvenience of months to years of heavy construction. The
added density is not balanced with a benefit to current residents of Madison Avenue and little benefit to our community
as a whole. The stress on our current infrastructure and the tranquility of our neighborhoods is at stake. Please carefully
consider the price of development to our peaceful community.
Sincerely and with great concern,
Jeffrey Curnes
141 Sadie Lane NW ‐ Courtyards on Madison
1
Jane Rasely
From:Barbara Hotchkin <hotchkin_barb@yahoo.com>
Sent:Friday, June 8, 2018 1:06 PM
To:PCD
Cc:Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman; Rasham Nassar; Sarah Blossom; Ron Peltier; Kol Medina; Leslie
Schneider; City Admin
Subject:Re: Madison Landing Project, PLN 50879 Madison Place Project, PLN 50892
We are following up on the comments we sent yesterday, as we have just heard some disturbing new news. The
Planning Manager disclosed to a neighbor that the City may prohibit left turns during peak hours onto Madison Ave to deal
with traffic congestion. If this is likely, or even a possibility, then it should be addressed in the traffic studies for all of the
residential development projects along Madison Ave:
Madison Landing (PLN 50879)
Madison Place (PLN 50892)
Wallace Cottages (PLN 50589)
Wyatt Apartments (PLN 50165B)
Madison Grover (PLN 50667)
Such changes in traffic patterns could have ripple effects at numerous other intersections. It suggests the need for a
comprehensive study and strategy for dealing with traffic along the Madison Avenue corridor. We request this strategy be
developed before any additional high density development projects are approved.
On Thursday, June 7, 2018, 2:43:31 PM PDT, Barbara Hotchkin <hotchkin_barb@yahoo.com> wrote:
My apologies - the first email was sent before I added the content.
Madison Landing Project, PLN 50879
Madison Place Project, PLN 50892
Dear Ms. Tayara:
We are writing to express our concern about the two subject projects, particularly with regard to traffic along Madison
Avenue between Wyatt Way and High School Road.
We live in Madison Cottages, and generally access Madison Avenue from Knechtel Way. We already have problems
during certain times of day taking a left turn from Knechtel onto Madison. With the roundabout at High School and the
one proposed at Wyatt, there will be relatively steady streams of traffic in both directions making it difficult for vehicles on
side streets to take a left turn onto Madison -- not just from Knechtel, but also from Wallace, Ihland, Sadie Lane, Jacolet
Lane, and the proposed access roads for planned developments. While we recognize the benefits of centralized
ingress/egress for each development, the high density of the developments will contribute considerable additional traffic
on Madison.
For the Madison Landing project, it does not appear that the intersection of Madison and Knechtel was included in the
traffic study, which is disappointing. For the Madison Place project, Table 1 in the traffic study is clearly incorrect, as it
indicates there is a roundabout at Madison and Knechtel and a two way stop at High School and Madison. When
something this basic is amiss in a technical report, the validity of the entire report seems questionable.
2
It is not clear if either traffic study has sufficiently addressed the cumulative impacts associated with all of the major
residential units planned or proposed along Madison, including Madison Grove, Wallace Cottages, and Wyatt Apartments.
The five projects together will add over 700 daily car trips from the over 100 housing units. Each project alone may not
adversely affect the level of service to a major extent, but considered cumulatively with other anticipated traffic increases
in the corridor, it is difficult to see how they will not. Please ensure that the traffic analyses adequately address impacts at
all potentially affected intersections, including cumulative impacts.
We generally support high density development in Winslow, but the number of units to be placed on these small parcels
seems excessive. Also, these homes will be in walking distance to shops, grocery stores, restaurants, and the ferry
terminal. We question the need for two parking places per unit, as it will discourage rather than encourage walking in
Winslow.
Thank you for the opportunity to comment.
Barbara Hotchkin
Michael Hotchkin
On Thursday, June 7, 2018, 2:40:38 PM PDT, Barbara Hotchkin <hotchkin_barb@yahoo.com> wrote:
1
Jane Rasely
From:Steve Goll <steve@stevegoll.com>
Sent:Friday, June 8, 2018 4:23 PM
To:PCD; Ron Peltier; Rasham Nassar; Leslie Schneider; Kol Medina; Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman
Cc:Nancy Goll; Barbara Hotchkin; madisonavecoalition@gmail.com; City Admin
Subject:Public comment on Madison Avenue developments
Dear Kelly Tayara and City Council Members,
We understand today is a deadline to provide public comments on some of the proposed developments
planned along or near Madison Avenue, possibly including Madison Landing, Madison Place, Wallace
Cottages, Wyatt Apartments, and the already approved Madison Grove.
Given the sheer number of these concurrent developments focused in a small geographic area, we feel
that the city has not done an adequate job of communicating the potential impacts to the public. It has
taken a grass-roots effort on the part of a small number of concerned community members to raise a
modicum of awareness among the greater number of Island neighbors such as ourselves, those who live
busy lives working full time jobs, raising children, looking after the needs of their aging parents,
maintaining their homes, etc.
We vote for and elect City Council members who represent our values, trusting that they will be good
stewards of the community that we all love.
In the case of these current developments, we plead with the City Council to slow down the process, and
consider the scale of these developments, and consider whether the social and environmental impacts
truly align with our community's vision and values, and the health of the environment of which we are
stewards.
Based on the information that has been shared with us (see key points below), the impacts on storm
water, utilities, transit, traffic, parking, mobility, the environment, and quality of life, seem too great. We
worry that we're in the process of destroying the character and quality of our beloved Winslow core
because we don't have a long-term strategy for the Madison Avenue corridor.
We urge the City Council to hit the pause button on these developments, and consider developing an
inclusive, collaborative long-term strategy for the Madison Avenue corridor, where the entire community
wins.
Sincerely,
Steve and Nancy Goll
682 Madison Avenue North
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Some key points about the Madison Ave developments
1. According to traffic consultant estimates, they will collectively add 744 average daily car trips
(ADTs) on an already congested, 2-lane Madison Ave. What will happen during peak hours when
residents of Madison Ave need to turn into or turn out of their developments? How about requiring
a parking ratio reduction (1-1.5 spaces per unit) instead of allowing 2 parking spaces per unit and
requiring the developer install a bus shelter to incentivize use of public transit? Where is the city's
long-term strategy for the Madison Ave corridor -- or is it really willing to accept a poor Level of
Service (LOS) with such slow movement of people and goods that nobody wins?
2
2. There is little to no affordable housing being created here in exchange for density bonuses at
Wallace Cottages and Madison Place. The city should require more than 10 percent of the units be
affordable.
3. The Housing Design Demonstration Program (HDDP) as it's being implemented here is neither
innovative nor green. Dozens of mature Douglas firs and other trees will be destroyed for these
supposedly "green" and "sustainable" $600,000 townhomes. Some have characterized the HDDP as
a sham.
4. The trees that will be cut down are part of the Pacific Flyway, an international bird migration route,
according to the city staff's notes. The green area where Wallace Cottages will be built should be
turned into a city park and trail.
5. A study last year of the stormwater drain below Madison Ave found cracked pipes, leaks and huge
tree roots clogging the system. This is not a system ready to take on large new volumes of
stormwater from 4 new subdivisions. How about the city's aquifers? electrical grid? We need to
understand how our infrastructure is doing now before we add more loads
1
Jane Rasely
From:Robert Thiele <rjthiele@gmail.com>
Sent:Sunday, June 10, 2018 6:48 PM
To:PCD
Cc:City Admin; Ron Peltier; Rasham Nassar; Leslie Schneider; Kol Medina; Joe Deets; Matthew Tirman
Subject:Wallace Cottages
Kelly Tayara, Senior Planner
City of Bainbridge Island
Thank you for the opportunity to offer comments on the Wallace Cottages development. As I note below, the Wallace
Cottages project is one of five similar high density residential developments along a short stretch of Madison Avenue
that should be considered for their combined impact. However, Wallace Cottages by itself is not a viable sustainable
development even if the collective impact is not assessed.
Today the land proposed for use for the Wallace Cottages project is open space covered in vegetation and trees. The
parcel is landlocked, with no direct access to roads, or utility services. Vehicle access is shown on the notice
documentation as a long, narrow drive stretching between the two adjacent properties that front Madison
Avenue. There is no apparent path for the utilities needed to support a high density residential project, in particular
sloped piping for gravity waste and storm drains. By all reasonable appearances this parcel is far more suitable as
community open space, than developed land with vehicle and utility access that must be unnaturally directed to
Madison Avenue.
I have worked in design and construction of energy conservation projects (the old school term) and sustainable/green
projects (the more modern designation) for over 40 years. One of the fundamental lessons I have learned is the purpose
of this work is not only to improve the physical environment and conserve resources, but also to enhance the human
experience and health of its communities.
Sustainable construction involves many considerations that are key to maintaining the beauty, wonder and resources of
the planet and its communities, and the health and welfare of the people that inhabit those communities. These
considerations include many that are important to the City of Bainbridge Island:
Storm water management
Access to quality public transportation
Protecting/restoring habitat
Providing open space
Optimizing energy performance
Reduced parking footprint
Reduce vehicle emissions
Walkability
A sustainable outcome for a building projects does not depend on merely one or two of these considerations, but
require best effort to incorporate many. High density development within walking distance of Winslow Center, or
energy efficiency alone is not enough. Likewise, projects are not constructed in a vacuum, existing and planned
neighborhood conditions and diversity must be included in the evaluation.
There are presently five high density developments planned along the same, very short stretch of Madison Ave,
Including Wallace Cottages. Given the proximity in time, location and infrastructure requirements of Wallace Cottages
and the four other developments, the impact and sustainable footprint of all must be assessed as one. Particularly,
2
since Wallace Cottages is approximately 2.5 acres of presently open space that is landlocked and must be connected to
Madison Avenue for transportation and utilities to be useful for residential use.
The combined negative impacts when looking at the Madison Avenue developments together include:
Significant reduction in rainwater infiltration: The five developments together will involve almost 9 acres of land
that are mostly open today. The new developments will construct new impervious surfaces (housing, parking,
driveway, sidewalks, etc.) over a significant portion of this land that will prevent rainwater infiltration into the
soil and increase runoff into the existing storm water systems.
Significant reduction in open space: The five developments will reduce the open space in this area that now
benefits the people of Bainbridge Island, and the birds using the Pacific Flyway, an international migration
route.
Significant reduction in mature trees: The construction of the five developments will require the destruction of
dozens of mature Douglas firs and other trees in the 9 acres to be used for high density residential.
Significant increase in vehicle exhaust emissions: Traffic consultant estimates indicate an additional 744 average
daily car trips can be expected on Madison Avenue.
Significant increase in traffic: As noted above, an additional 744 average daily car trips are anticipated on
Madison Avenue, which today is a congested 2‐lane urban street.
What should be done to mitigate the impact of developing infill sites near Winslow Center? That is a community
conversation that should consider whether additional development benefits the community and should be allowed at
all. If there is a decision to support development, then robust sustainable/green concepts must be implemented in the
projects. This must include measures that not only lessen the environmental impact of the developments, but also
improve the comfort, health and safety of the immediate community and the City of Bainbridge Island at large, such as:
Increase the open space in and around each new development
Plan the site and orient structures in each development to preserve existing trees
Maintain the landlocked Wallace Cottages acreage as community space for park land and trails
Incentivize a reduction in vehicles in the Madison corridor; e.g., reduce parking in developments, and have the
developers fund additional public transportation.
Prioritize rain water management by creating open areas for filtration and retention, and requiring permeable
surfaces for parking, drives and sidewalks.
As a resident of the Madison Avenue corridor, I respectfully request the city reexamine the planning decisions regarding
the five Madison Avenue developments. The impact on the community must be considered as a whole, rather than as
separate projects individually. I believe the planning and approval process must to be slowed to allow the careful and
considered assessment that is necessary.
Thank you for your consideration.
Respectfully,
Robert Thiele, P.E., LEED BD+C
136 Sadie Ln NW
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
1
Jane Rasely
From:steven mendelsohn <stevenmendel2001@yahoo.com>
Sent:Sunday, June 10, 2018 7:22 PM
To:Kelly Tayara; PCD
Subject:"Wallace Cottages" SEPA
Attachments:Lettter ver2 RE SEPA to KT - S Mendelsohn 6-20-2018 .docx
Please refer to my attached letter,
Thank you,
Steven Mendelsohn
Right-click or tap and hold here to download pictures. To help protect your privacy, Outlook prevented automatic download of this picture from the Internet.
Virus-free. www.avast.com
FROM STEVEN MENDELSOHN,
StevenMendel2001@ Yahoo.Com
Ms. Tayara;
Please do me a favor and let me know that you have receive my letter.
As you know I am the owner of the lot immediately to the south of the proposed development PLN50589
As you know are aware the easement AFB 200103260191 refers to an easement on Lot B and adjacent to my property
immediately to the south.
This easement clearly states that it was written for the purpose of providing fire services to at that time a hospital to the
north and was otherwise for the benefit of the properties to the south by increasing the view to our north and providing
landscaping and a solid fence to the north.
I am writing concerning the SEPA application. I only received the notice very recent and the given the complexity of the
changes as they relate to the development adjacent to and lying immediately to the north of my property, my response
arrives towards the end of the response period.
As has been my position ever since the inception of this p roject – that it is my goal to preserve the rights and benefits to me
that are detailed in AFB 200103260191. I will point out that I have remained in contact with the developer and we have been
strivings towards an amicable solution.
My current concerns relate to both inaccuracies of the PDF’s (specifically the drawings) for the SEPA (4/11/2018) and less
than clear wording in the “Open space management plan”. I believe that these inaccuracies and lack of clarity could
significantly complicate the overall project.
The drawings below are directly copied and pasted from SEPA application.
My other concern is the wording of the “Open Space Mgt Plan 4-20-2018” and how it relates AFB 200103260191. Perhaps
you will be able to clarify for me the intent of the “Open Space Mgt Plan 4-20-2018” as it relates to building a split rail fence
between “open space” and “the lot or right of way”.
1. Specifically both drawings below shows a setback of 18.56 feet between Lot 8 and the southern boundary line of lot
B. However, AFB 200103260191 specifies a setback of 35 feet. My understanding from the builder is that the plans
have changed and that the drawing on the SEPA document are likely in error and reflect an older document. Be
that as it may, the SEPA plan as it stands is likely in error and I feel the SEPA plan should be corrected specific
parties involve have ample time to review it. Once again, I point out that we were informed by the city that we were
one of the properties did not receive the initial notification of the SEPA application.
2. Another concern is that “Open Space” is shown immediately to the south of Lot 8. Again , there is potential conflict
with AFB200103260191 wherein the plan show that shown open space lies within the easement. The open space
management plan contains the wording “A low impact fence eg split rail delineating the boundary of the open
space area shall be maintained along the boundary between the open space and the lot or right of way.” I have
two problems with the above conflict.
• I find the language of the open space manage plan vague wherein the wording “ lot or right of way” lacks clarity.
Furthermore, I believe that the specific drawing (below) detailing the open space contains substantial error in the
placement of Lot 8 (off by 17 feet to the south) and therefore making me lose confidence in the intended
placement of the “open space”. In other words, will the “open space” lie within the easement or will it be
adjacent to the north border of the easement or both? Furthermore, because of shading issues it is not clear if the
open space will stop at the “utilities easement” or could it possibly lie over the utilities easement.
• In either case above (ie. open space either within the easement or immediately north of the easement) the
easement AFB 200103260191 absolutely specifies the details of a solid fence (ie. Not split rail) In fact the fence
remains in place and is located as shown (with a minor error) on the bottom drawing. And I beg you to recall the
purpose of the easement was for the benefit of the property to the south as regards the view and placement of the
open space.
• Therefore, the potential requirement for a split rail either along my property or along the north side of the
easement creates a significant future legal issue between the builder , myself and the city. Particularly, as to the
properties referenced on AFB 200103260191 strive to rewrite the easement so as to enable the project .
3. Finally the “utilities easement” AFB (?) has not yet been signed off on by the parties involved.
Sincerely,
Steven Mendelsohn
Please refer to the two drawings copied below from “Revised Plat Sheets 4,5,6 and 7.PDF
ABOVE ITEM is 4/22/1028 Revised Opens Space Management Plan 4-10-18.PDF The southern most aspect of this
drawing outlines a “Restricted improvement area per agreement 920003260191
Furthermore The same document below shows the same land as “Opens Space” and does not show that it is in fact a
“Restricted Improvement area per Agreement 920003260191”
******************************************************************
We ( myself and the owner to the south of me) have had an ongoing dialog with the developer as regards to drainage for
his property along the eastern portion of out lots.
1
Jane Rasely
From:Novak, Bob <NOVAKB@seattleu.edu>
Sent:Sunday, June 10, 2018 7:53 PM
To:PCD
Subject:Comment on Wallace Cottages
My name is Robert Novak and I’m a resident at the Courtyards on Madison (Sadie Lane). I live at #140 on the west side
of our property so the proposed Wallace Cottages (PLN 50589) would be directly behind me.
My main concern is the potential loss of the buffer of mature trees and bushes.
At present my house is well screened off from the buildings on Fir Acres to the west. I would really hate to see all the
foliage cut down as a result of construction of the Wallace Cottages. Clear cutting and then replanting is a process that
takes several years before any significant screening is established. I hope the city will require the developer to maintain
a substantial buffer throughout the building period.
Thank you,
Robert Novak
140 Sadie Lane NW
novakb@seattleu.edu
(206) 780‐3961
1
Jane Rasely
From:NICOLA YARBROUGH <nicolayarbrough@msn.com>
Sent:Monday, June 11, 2018 3:51 PM
To:PCD
Subject:Wallace Cottages;PLN50589
From: nicolayarbrough@msn.com
Sent: Wednesday, June 06, 2018 7:10 PM
To: 'pcd@bainbridgewa.gov'
Subject: Madison Place PLN 50892
Ms. Tayara Kelly,
Senior Planner,
City of Bainbridge Island, Washington
Ms Kelly,
I am a resident and owner at the Madison Avenue Condominiums.
The public must be assured by the planning department that the mitigations imposed on the developer of “Madison
Place” are sufficient to protect the natural and the urban environment.
I understand and support the concept of urban density vs. open space but the current projected density is alarming to
me.
Sincerely, Nicola Yarbrough
1
Jane Rasely
From:NICOLA YARBROUGH <nicolayarbrough@msn.com>
Sent:Monday, June 11, 2018 4:02 PM
To:PCD
Subject:FW: Wallace Cottages;PLN50589
From: nicolayarbrough@msn.com
Sent: Monday, June 11, 2018 3:51 PM
To: 'pcd@bainbridgewa.gov'
Subject: Wallace Cottages;PLN50589
Ms. Tayara Kelly,
Senior Planner,
City of Bainbridge Island, Washington
Ms Kelly,
I am a resident and owner at the Madison Avenue Condominiums.
The public must be assured by the planning department that the mitigations imposed on the developer of “Madison
Place” are sufficient to protect the natural and the urban environment.
I understand and support the concept of urban density vs. open space but the current projected density is alarming to
me.
Sincerely, Nicola Yarbrough
To: Kelly Tayara, Senior Planner
From: Stephanie Farwell, Madison Ave Resident
Date: June 15, 2018
Re: SEPA comments Wyatt Apartments PLN 50165 SPR
At the present time the city is processing or has recently approved multiple
applications for high density development in and around the area of Madison Ave
between the High School roundabout and Wyatt.
Those developments include:
Madison Landing- 24 condominium residences
Wallace Cottages - 19 single family residences
Madison Place - 18 single family residences
Wyatt Apartments – 42 dwelling units
Madison Grove - 8 single family residences
All of the above developments, singularly and combined, will have an impact on
the environment regarding their effect on the load capacity of the existing aquifer,
the load capacity of Madison avenue, the load capacity of the electrical grid, and the
load capacity of the storm/sewer system –because they all affect the same
infrastructure.
When these individual projects are evaluated however, the reality of their combined
effects with other currently proposed developments does not seem to be considered
in any analysis of whether that circumstance creates a significant environmental
impact
Given the reality of increased demand on our overburdened infrastructure that will
obviously result from introduction of these projects into a very limited land area,
along with the reduction of undeveloped land available to proportionally buffer the
intense density allowed by the zoning code—Isn’t it clear by any reasonable analysis
that this and other projects by virtue of their size, scale, and demand on the limited
infrastructure when considered together most certainly constitute a significant
environmental impact in the subject area?
The critical issue that must be addressed is how much more high density
development can the Madison ave area absorb without an overall and significant
decline in the livability of the area. Unfortunately this issue will never be
meaningfully addressed in the land use review process until the combined effects of
high density projects on and around Madison Ave are considered together.
As it appears the city is currently evaluating multiple projects on or around Madison
Ave between the High School roundabout and Wyatt, under a contractually based
mandated time line, this would be a perfect opportunity to consider the combined
effects of all high density projects recently proposed for this subject area.
Thank you for your consideration of my comments and questions.
Stephanie Farwell
islandverde@yahoo.com
February 22, 2017
Planning Commission Review
of Wallace Cottages HDDP Preliminary Subdivision (File No.: PLN 50589 SUB)
Information from the Project File
As noted in Minutes from the Design Review Board meeting on Nov. 21, 2016, Central Highland Homes
Inc., the firm proposing the Wallace Cottages project, has completed several other developments on
Bainbridge Island: Stonecress, the Hamlet, Weaver Creek, Colegrove, Fernbrook, and Phase I of the
Ferncliff Village affordable housing project. (The Central Highland Homes website emphasizes the firm’s
commitment to “green building” and “green land development.”)
The four tax lots for Wallace Cottages amount to 2.46 acres, zoned R-4.3, allowing up to ten housing
units. Seeking doubled density as allowed by the terms of Tier II of the Housing Design Demonstration
Project (HDDP), 19 units are proposed, two of which will be administered by Housing Resources
Bainbridge and affordable for income-qualified owners.
Preliminary notification that the project qualified for consideration under the HDDP criteria was
provided on April 6, 2017. The preliminary subdivision application was submitted on April 27, 2017, and
it was deemed complete on May 30, 2017.
The utility plan dated 4/26/2017 was part of the preliminary plat submittal. It indicates, on page C 1, a
two-way access road to units 1 through 17 from Madison Avenue, with a narrower roadway connecting
to the affordable units in a duplex structure. Pages C 3 and C 4 show two alternative road plans.
Alternative #1 shows two-way access along Wallace Way to the west, connecting with Grow Ave., and a
narrow single-lane road and walkway connecting with Madison Avenue. Alternative #2, “pending
boundary line adjustment,” shows the two-way access eastward to Madison Avenue.
A revised utility plan dated 12/8/2017, responding to COBI comments dated 8.14.2017, forms part of
the file presented to the Planning Commission for consideration at their meeting on January 25, 2017.
In this plan the Madison Avenue alternative has been abandoned, except for pedestrians and cyclists.
The two-way access road (Wallace Way) intersects with Nakata Ave. to the right and Taurnic Place to the
left, with Wallace continuing westward to Grow Avenue. Eastward to Madison, there is only a paved
sidewalk, not a narrow roadway.
A brief Vision Statement describes the project: “The Wallace cottages project is to provide smaller more
affordable homes within walking distance of shopping and transportation facilities. Almost 3 times the
required open space has been proposed to allow the homeowners a playground, pea patch and open
areas to utilize beyond their small lots.” However, almost all of the designated open space (0.35 of an
acre) is located on lot A (0.58 of an acre), at the northern end of the development.
The Tree Retention Plan calls for retaining 15% of the existing trees, and all of the retained trees are
found on lot A, which is also the site of the pea patch, a playground, and the two affordable homes
(1051 sq. ft. each, in a duplex structure). Lot A is also subject to a legal dispute with a neighboring lot
owner over the western boundary line, which may affect the applicant’s ability to meet legal
requirements for a setback from the property line.
2
A second brief statement by the applicant describes “how the proposed development is consistent with
the surrounding neighborhood character”: “The project forms a transition from the R-4.3 density
present on Nakata, Taurnic, and Wallace neighborhoods to the MUTC Madison Overlay District. The
homes to be constructed in the proposed 19 lot plat are to be a modern take on a craftsman style that
will be consistent with the craftsman and ranch style homes present in the existing neighborhoods.”
In fact, the neighborhoods to the west and to the north of the Wallace Cottages, served by Fir Acres
Drive, Taurnic Place, Wallace Way, Nakata Ave., and Ihland Way, are characterized by modest homes on
relatively large lots where many trees have been preserved. The houses are varied in style and were
built at different times by many different hands; some lots remain undeveloped. The Wallace Cottages
development is more compatible with the neighboring Courtyards on Madison condominiums, except
that the Cottages are designed for families needing two or three bedrooms, and perhaps two cars.
A Geotechnical Report prepared by Terra Associates, dated December 9, 2016, identifies “no
geotechnical considerations that would preclude development of the site as currently planned.” The
report’s contents are in stark contrast to the four paragraphs of comment # 9 on page 2 of the
Memorandum dated August 14, 2017, by the City’s Development Engineer, Peter Corelis. These
requirements are reiterated in the Development Engineer’s Memorandum dated December 28, 2017,
which details 28 conditions of approval.
Discussion
The purpose and goal of the HDDP is to “allow the development of housing design demonstration
projects that increase the variety of housing choices available to residents across underserved portions
of the socio-economic spectrum, and to promote compact, low-impact development where it is most
appropriate” (emphasis added). BIMC Section 2.16.020(Q)(1).
The Planning Commission is tasked with reviewing and making recommendations on all HDDP
applications, including those involving land subdivision. BIMC Section 2.14.020(B)(3); Section
2.16.020(Q)(3)(d). That review is not limited solely to whether the project is consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan, but includes all aspects of HDDP requirements. Under the HDDP regulations, the
decision to approve or deny a HDDP application is made as part of the underlying land use permit
approval – in this case the long subdivision permit approval regulations – and is based on decision
criteria of the underlying planning permit (long subdivision requirements) and the approval criteria
outlined in Subsection Q.5 of the HDDP. BIMC Section 2.16.020(3)(e).
The approval criteria begin with reference to the project’s score as evaluated by the supervising planner,
and then involve a judgment on how the project’s innovative design required relief such as setback
reductions and limits on lot coverage. The third criterion is especially important in this case: “The
project does not adversely impact existing public service levels for surrounding properties.” The fourth
criterion, compliance with other portions of the BIMC, goes to the relevance of long subdivision
requirements; the next (“If a project will be phased”) is not applicable, and the last is satisfied by
inclusion of the two units to be added to the HRB stock of affordable housing, meeting the minimum
requirement for Tier II approval.
3
Innovation in Building Design and Site Development
According to the applicant’s geotechnical report, it should be easy to clear the site, removing “all
vegetation, organic surface soils, and other deleterious material,” and then initiating “cut and fill
operations . . . to establish desired building grades.” Terra Associates advise that the native soils will
need to be supplemented with a considerable amount of imported structural fill and, if necessary, a
geotextile fabric, to “establish a stable bearing surface.” The applicant’s SEPA checklist states, however,
“The site is a flat 4% slope and the grading plan will attempt to balance, thus there should be neither
import or export of dirt.” In any case, we do not see innovation in this phase of site development, but
rather a conventional approach where the existing surface site conditions are erased to facilitate ease of
construction.
It remains to be seen how much of the proposed tree retention plan can be maintained in conjunction
with the affordable housing units, the vegetable garden, and the playground. Clearly, something has to
give. Even if the project provides “almost 3 times the required open space,” it is not a generous
amount, and it is somewhat isolated from the market rate properties. The amount of open space left at
the south end seems too fragmented by the turn-around (which does not qualify as open space) and the
bioretention features.
An entry on the SEPA checklist (p. 10) regarding proposed landscaping describes entry gardens for each
home, including street trees. It also states, “about 30% of the existing significant trees are to be
retained,” but this hardly seems credible.
The 17 market rate properties are arranged to face each other in two straight lines, seven on one side
and ten on the other. In their footprints, the house plans range from 1169 sq. ft. to 1578 sq. ft., and the
SEPA checklist (p. 15) states that they “will be at entry level new home prices for Bainbridge $500,000 to
$600,000, affordable for young professionals.” They take full advantage of the reduced setback (5 ft.) of
buildings from the exterior subdivision boundary. Buildings on the west side of the development benefit
from the ‘borrowed landscape’ provided by trees and other vegetation on the Taurnic Place and Fir
Acres properties. Five lots on the east side back up to the open space surrounding the Island Health &
Rehabilitation Center. The footprints on four other lots are somewhat constrained by a 25 ft. vegetated
setback from the adjoining property, where a building backs right up to the property line.
Buyers of the 17 market rate homes will choose between four models; the developer promises “at least
2 homes of each of the models.” The homes vary in size between one and two stories, two or three
bedrooms, and 1.5 to 2.5 baths. All models provide space for two cars, and this is at odds with the
stipulation, in the HDDP criteria for review, that the project “reduces reliance on automobiles and trip
counts, and promotes alternative transportation and public transit,” and also “minimizes the visual
dominance of automobiles throughout the project.” BIMC 2.16.020(Q)(4)(b)(iv). Credit is due for a
commitment to Built Green Level 5 standards, but otherwise it is hard to see what is innovative in the
building design. Little effort is made to shape or accommodate lifestyles to in-town, low-impact living in
the 21st century, unless (in two of the models) it is “aging in place” with room for family members or a
care-giver.
The numerous and stringent conditions of approval imposed by the COBI Development Engineer speak
to concerns with unplanned-for impacts arising from the doubled density. It is noteworthy that these
strategic measures were not designed-in from the start.
4
We have seen developments in which conditions of approval were not satisfied by the completed
project – sometimes with dire consequences. The City assumes incalculable risks when a marginally
acceptable project is green-lighted.
The Planning Commission is expected to focus on the project as proposed by the applicant, considering
it in relation to the site’s constraints and its context in the built environment, which in this case is an
established and stable neighborhood and one of the main streets of Winslow. It does not seem feasible
to condition approval of this project on any number of tweaks to the design, any more than it would be
appropriate to respond with a radically different approach to siting compact units and achieving low-
impact development.
Traffic Impacts
Access to the Wallace Cottages project is proposed by extending Wallace Way west from the Wallace
Cottages site to Grow Avenue. The traffic study estimated approximately 190 trips per day (ADT) would
be generated from the 19 houses proposed. The small Nakata neighborhood community exists west of
the project, with Taurnic Place intersecting with Wallace Way from the south and Nakata Avenue
intersecting with Wallace Way to the north. Because Nakata Avenue intersects with Grow Avenue via
Ihland Way, Wallace Cottages residents could use Nakata Avenue as a “cut through” road to access
Grow Avenue.
Access for Wallace Cottages has been an unsettled issue since the project was initially considered by the
Design Review Board (DRB) on November 21, 2016. At that time, the project applicant stated that they
were working with adjacent property owners to provide vehicular circulation and ingress/egress to the
neighborhood. Neighbors expressed concern that extending Wallace Way to Grow Avenue as access for
the project would impact the quality of the Nakata and Taurnic Place neighborhoods.
On December 19, 2016, the project was again before the DRB, when it was determined that the project
applicant still had to resolve property line, right of way, easement and access issues. Neighbors at that
time expressed opposition to extending Wallace Way from Grow Avenue to Madison Avenue. On
March 6, 2017, the DRB again considered the project, with neighbors opposing a connection via Wallace
Way between Grow Avenue and Madison Avenue, thereby requiring traffic from a high density
development to flow through low density neighborhoods onto Grow Avenue, a secondary road. The
DRB chair then recommended access to the project from Madison Avenue, without a through
connection to Grow Avenue. It was also noted at that meeting that 5 projects were proposed for
construction between Madison Avenue and Nakata Avenue, with discussion about reviewing the
projects cumulatively to ensure traffic impacts were properly understood and addressed. It was also
recommended that the impact of HDDP developments on surrounding neighborhoods be evaluated.
Consistency with the Comprehensive Plan
The Comprehensive Plan goals and policies seek to protect neighborhoods from the impacts of cut-
through vehicle traffic. One of the purposes and goals of the HDDP process is “to promote compact,
low-impact development where it is most appropriate.” While such development is certainly most
appropriate within the area served by Winslow’s water and sewer system, it is not necessarily
appropriate in all parts of Winslow. Appropriateness must be guided by the polices and goals of the
Comprehensive Plan, which includes a Neighborhoods element with the following Goal and Policies:
5
GOAL TR-8
Consider the special needs of neighborhood safety, pedestrian and bicycle facilities, transit use and
facilities and traffic flow in the development of transportation improvements that affect
neighborhoods.
Policy TR 8.1
Protect residential neighborhoods from the impacts of cut-through motor vehicle traffic by providing
appropriate connecting routes and applying appropriate traffic-calming measures to control vehicle
volumes while maintaining emergency vehicle response times.
Policy TR 8.3
Develop a circulation and access management plan for neighborhoods and neighborhood centers so that
as properties develop, vehicular and non-motorized connectivity and circulation are maintained.
The January 19, 2018 City Staff Report includes a public comment describing the Nakata Avenue
neighborhood as “reminiscent of the 1950s with children playing in the street, be it catch, hopscotch,
Frisbee, 4-square and other games, moving out of the way when cars need to go by, often waving to
friends’ parents as they drive by. The neighborhood design functions perfectly. There are no speed
bumps or other traffic-slowing retrofits, or signs asking drivers to slow down because they are not
needed. The design of the neighborhood lends itself to driving slowly.” The Staff Report further
documents neighborhood concerns about increasing traffic on Grow Avenue, noting that Grow does not
currently provide for the traffic it has, especially regarding children walking or riding bikes to school
(Grow Avenue connects to High School Road to the north, which provides walking/biking access to
Bainbridge High School, Commodore and Ordway Elementary School) and does not have fog lanes or
bike lanes.
Proposing to route 190 ADTs per day from Wallace Cottages through the established adjoining
neighborhood via Wallace Way and Nakata Avenue via Ihland Way and onto Grow Avenue is not
consistent with Goal TR-8 or Policy TR 8.1 or TR 8.3. This is particularly apparent in light of the 5 other
projects that currently are being proposed for development between Madison Avenue and Nakata
Avenue. An access to and from Madison Avenue that serves all 5 projects without cutting through
established neighborhoods is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan and also satisfies the HDDP goal
of limiting environmental impacts.
Public Safety Concerns
BIMC subdivision standards require compliance with RCW Title 58 provisions for public health, safety
and general and public use and interest. Under RCW 58.17.110, a proposed subdivision shall not be
approved unless the City makes written findings that: (a) Appropriate provisions are made for the
public health, safety, and general welfare and for such open spaces, drainage ways, streets or roads,
alleys, other public ways, transit stops, potable water supplies, sanitary wastes, parks and recreation,
playgrounds, schools and schoolgrounds and all other relevant facts, including sidewalks and other
planning features that assure safe walking conditions for students who only walk to and from school;
and (b) the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision and dedication
(emphasis added).
6
Given the significant traffic and public safety impacts that are posed by an estimated 190 daily traffic
trips through the Nakata neighborhood to Grow Avenue via Wallace Way, Nakata Avenue and Ihland
Way, and the relatively small public benefit of only 2 affordable housing units in comparison to an
increase in allowable density from 10 to 19 homes, it does not appear that these requirements are
satisfied for approval of the Wallace Cottages project as a subdivision utilizing the HDDP process.
Possible Recommendations
1. Approve the Wallace Cottages project as a HDDP, provided that vehicle access is from Madison
Avenue to the project site and does not connect to Grow Avenue via Wallace Way, Nakata Avenue or
Ihland Way.
2. Deny the Wallace Cottages project as a HDDP because it is not consistent with the
Comprehensive Plan and does not meet the goals and purposes of the HDDP, due to traffic impacts and
public safety impacts on surrounding neighborhoods resulting from the proposed traffic access via
Wallace Way to Grow Avenue.
Memorandum on Adverse Possession Claim
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 1 of 2
BEFORE THE HEARING EXAMINER
FOR THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
In the Matter of the Application of ) No. PLN 50589 SUB
)
David Smith, on behalf of Central )
Highlands, Inc. ) Wallace Cottages Housing Design
) Demonstration Project Subdivision
)
) MEMORANDUM ON
For Approval of a Preliminary Plat ) ADVERSE POSSESSION CLAIM
TO: Mr. Hayes Gori, Attorney for Applicant
Via email to: Hayes@Hayesthelawyer.com
Mr. Stephen Crampton
Via email to: SteveSings@gmail.com
Ms. Kelly Tayara, Associate City Planner
Via email to: ktayara@bainbridgewa.gov
The Hearing Examiner held an open-record hearing on the above referenced application on April
20, 2018. At the outset of the hearing, Stephen Crampton entered into the record a claim of
ownership of a portion of the property submitted by the Applicant for subdivision. Following a
recital of applicable law by the Hearing Examiner, including an expression of concern about the
advisability of processing the application if property ownership is disputed, the Applicant
conceded that the property claimed by Mr. Crampton would be transferred to him so that the
hearing could continue without a disputed ownership claim. To implement this agreement, it
was agreed as follows:
By April 27, 2018, the Applicant and Mr. Crampton will sign an agreement whereby the
property claimed by Mr. Crampton will be assigned to him by the Applicant by
agreement to properly execute and record a quit claim deed, perpetual easement, or other
appropriate document whereby the Applicant no longer can claim a property interest in
that property claimed by Mr. Crampton by adverse possession.
By April 27, 2018, the Applicant will submit a revised site plan to the City without
inclusion of that portion of the property claimed by Mr. Crampton.
Memorandum on Adverse Possession Claim
City of Bainbridge Island Hearing Examiner
Wallace Cottages HDDP and Preliminary Plat, No. PLN 50589 SUB
Page 2 of 2
By April 27, 2018, the City shall identify any parties of record who may have provided
written comment on the application prior to the hearing to determine who should be
notified of any revised site plan submitted for subdivision approval. This list shall be
provided to the Applicant and Hearing Examiner. No one from the public other than Mr.
Crampton testified on the property dispute at the April 20th hearing.
By May 4, 2018, the City will prepare a report to the Hearing Examiner and Applicant
that either confirms the initial recommendation to approve the application, with
conditions made by the Associate Planner at the April 20th hearing, or notifies the
Applicant of any recommendation to the Hearing Examiner that includes a
recommendation for modification of the proposed conditions. If modifications are made
to the initial recommendation, the City shall provide the revised recommendation to those
identified as parties of record.
By May 8, 2018, the Applicant shall provide a response to any recommendations for
modification to the City, which shall provide a copy to the Hearing Examiner upon
receipt. If objections to proposed modifications are made, the Hearing Examiner may re-
open the hearing, with notice, to take testimony on the revised recommendation of the
City.
A decision on the application will be issued by the Hearing Examiner, following review
and consideration of all evidence submitted, within ten business days of the close of the
record.
This memorandum is a good faith effort by the Hearing Examiner to memorialize the agreement
reached between the Applicant, Mr. Crampton, and the City during the hearing on April 20th. It
is not a final decision, but is intended to facilitate review of the subdivision application in an
efficient and timely manner.
Dated this 23rd day of April 2018.
THEODORE PAUL HUNTER
Hearing Examiner
Sound Law Center