ORD 2000-42 2001 UPDATE SIX-YEAR FINANCING PLAN CFEORDINANCE NO. 2000-42
AN ORDINANCE OF THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,
WASHINGTON ADOPTING THE 2001 LIPDATE OF THE SIX-
YEAR FINANCING PLAN OF THE CAPITAL FACILITIES
ELEMENT OF THE BAINBRIDGE ISLAND COMPREHENSIVE
PLAN.
~VHEREAS, in accordance with the Growth Management Act, the City of
Bainbridge Island adopted a Comprehensive Plan on September 1, 1994, which Plan
contains a capital facilities element that establishes goals and policies for the provision
and financing of capital facilities for the citizens of Bainbridge Island; and
~,VHEREAS, the Growth Management Act requires that the six-year financing
plan be updated at least biennially and adopted as an amendment to the Comprehensive
Plan and Comprehensive Plan Policy CF1.7 requires annual updates; and
WHEREAS, the 2001 updated Six-Year Financing Plan addresses all of the goals
and requirements set forth in the Growth Management Act and the Bainbridge Island
Comprehensive Plan; and
WHEREAS, the 2001 update of the Six-Year Financing Plan is in conformance
with the decision criteria for amendments to the Comprehensive Plan as set forth in
BIMC 18.117.060; and
WHEREAS, through its staff, the Planning Commission and the City Council
have received, discussed and considered the testimony, written comments and material
from the public; now therefore
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, DOES
ORDAIN AS FOLLOWS:
Section 1. The 2001 update of the Six-Year Financing Plan of the Capital
Facilities Element of the Bainbridge Island. Comprehensive Plan is adopted as of
December 20, 2000. .- -
Section 2. In the event that there are instances where the dollar amounts or
timing of capital projects included in this update differ from those in other sections of the
Comprehensive Plan, the amounts and timing in this update shall prevail.
Section 3. This Ordinance authorizes the reformatting of the information in this
update of the Capital Facilities Plan and the transmission of this information to the State
of Washington as the City's Transportation Improvement Plan which is required on or
before July 31, 2001.
Section 4. This Ordinance shall take effect and be in force five days from and
after its passage, approval and publication as required by law.
PASSED by the City Council this 20th day of December 2000.
APPROVED by the Mayor this 21st day of December 2000.
Dx~GHT SUTTON, Mayo'er
ATTEST/AUTHENTICATE:
APPROVED AS TO FORM:
ROD P. KASEGUMA, City Attorney
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
PUBLISHED:
EFFECTIVE DATE:
ORDINANCE NO.:
November 16, 2000
December 20, 2000
December 27, 2000
January 2, 2001
2000-42
RESOLUTION NO. 2000-38
A RESOLUTION of the City of Bainbridge Island,
Washington, Approving the annual update to the City' s
annual State Transportation Improvement Program.
WHEREAS, the State requires the City Council to annually hold a public hearing
and to approve the City' s annual State Transportation Improvement Program (STIP); and
WHEREAS, a public hearing was held on November 28, 2000; and
WHEREAS, Ordinance No. 2000-42, approved the annual update of the City's
State Transportation Improvement Program; now, therefore,
THE CITY COUNCIL OF THE CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND,
WASHINGTON, DOES RESOLVE AS FOLLOWS:
The annual update to the City'S State Transportation Improvement Program is
approved, and a copy shall be provided to the Washington
State Department of Transportation.
PASSED by the City Council this 20th day of December, 2000.
APPROVED by the Mayor this 21st day of December, 2000.
DWIGHT SUTTON, Mayor '
ATTE S T/AUTHEN TIC ATE:
'&KASPER, City Clerk
FILED WITH THE CITY CLERK:
PASSED BY THE CITY COUNCIL:
RESOLUTION NO.
November 15, 2000
December 20, 2000
2000-38
City of Bainbridge Island
2001 Capital Facilities Plan
INTRODUCTION
The 2001 update of the Capital Facilities Plan continues to build on the prior updates. Because the City
has begun a major review and update of the Comprehensive Plan, almost no policy changes have been
considered this year. Also, plan updates from other local govemments are included. As in the past two
As in last year's Plan, projects anticipated to be worked on after the six-year planning horizon are
shown in a single column described as "After 2006" rather than in separate categories. This choice
matches real!ty in that at present the City really has little idea when after the year 2006 these projects
will actually be constructed.
5
As mentioned in the prior para~aph, the efforts of the City to plan capital facilities using a 20 year time
horizon are, as yet, somewhat uneven. As is the case with most long-range planning, we have a better
vision of the near-term than of the far. Further, the different agencies included in the Plan have not used
a consistent planning horizon. The City has shown projects to be done for the full twenty years but has
not paid much attention to those past the six-year horizon of the Financial Capacity Analysis. Schools
have not yet planned beyond 2004. Fire planned for a ten year period; while Parks planned
throu~h 2005. Sewer District 1'4o. 7 appears not to have updated their plan since at least 1998. Also,
because the planning schedule for each of the local governments differs, summaries of plans for
multiple agencies are not inclusive.
This concentration on the six-year plan involves, the inclusion of the details of the major capital projects
of the City and also an improved Financial Capacity Analysis. The City and the special purpose districts:
Schools, Parks, Fire, and Sewer continue to work together to integrate their capital planning efforts to
to provide a more even tax impact and to prioritize their projects while still providing quality facilities
and services for the citizens they serve. This is consistent with Goal 6 of the Framework of the
Comprehensive Plan (pg. 51 of the Land Use Element):
All government entities strive to cooperate and serve their constituents in a fiscally sound manner;
and Policy CFI. 10 (pg. 9) of the Capital Facilities Element: The City shall coordinate with otherpublic
entities which provide public services 'within the City to ensure that the Capital Facilities Plans of each
of these entities are consistent ~uith the City's Comprehensive Plan.
This Element and the 2001 Plan update have been developed in accordance with the RCW 36.70A, the
Grow-th Management Act (GMA), and WAG 365-195, the Procedural Criteria. It begins with a short
review of some of the concepts behind the Capital Facilities'Plan and the Capital Facilities Element of
the Comprehensive Plan
Relation of Capital Facilities Plan to the Budget
The Capital Facilities Plan and the City's Budget serve different but overlapping purposes. Both
are prepared annually, although each could be prepared biennialIy under Washington law. The
Budget authorizes the amount to be spent during the coming year; whereas the Capital Facilities
Plan identifies needed capital facilities over a twenty year period. A requirement for the Capital
Facilities Plan is that it show how the needed facilities will be paid for during at least a six-year period.
Because Washin~on law requires that, for cities required to plan under the Growth Management
As Approved by the City Council 1
6
Act, no money can be spent on capital projects which are not shown in the Capital Facilities Plan,
it is important that the Budget not authorize spending on capital facilities not in the Plan. The following
table shows a summary of the City's 2001 Preliminary Budget and shows (in bold) where the projects
in the CapitaI Facilities Plan 'fit in the budget:
Description
Beginning Balances
Revenues
Other $ (Bonds, etc.)
Interfund Transfers
Total $ Available
Operating Costs
Debt Service Costs
Capital Equipment
Capital Projects
Ending Balances
+
+
Net
Summary of 2001 Preliminary Budget
All Other Wtr/Swr Util Total
$7,970,036~ $2,815,366 $10,785,402
15,889,300 2,523,000 18,412,300
0 1,858,883 1858883
~ 0
23,859,336 ~ 7, 197,249 ~ 31,056,585
12,410,449 2,424,326 14,884,775
2,153,616 288,520 2,442,136
142,800 98, 100 240,900
5,598,000 2,198,000 7,796,000
$3,554,471 $2,138,303 $5,692,774
Notes
As of 12/31/2000
Nets to Zero
Not in CFP
in CFP
Set by policy
The above table shows a very simplified view of the Budget. This (and any) budget starts with an
estimate of the money available to be spent at the beginning of the budget year. To'that is added the
income and revenues expected to be received during the coming year. Also added are any direct
additions to capital and any bonds or loans received from which costs can be paid. Also included for
individual funds are interfund transfers. During 2001, these are expected to total $6.9 million; however,
by their very nature these net to zero, and because of the way the above chart is simplified none occur
between the categories shown. From the sum of the money available is subtracted the various
categories of costs: operating, debt service an capital. While most capital spending (and all projects) is
is included in the Capital Facilities Plan, some equipment and computer software is not. What remains
are the ending cash balances which both provide a reserve for emergencies and can be used to help
pay for the next year's spending.
One source of paying for capital facilities which is not shown in the Budget is required "contributions" from
developers. For example, part of the cost of widening Madison Avenue north of High School Road
next year is expected to be paid by the developer of the property east of Madison as a requirement of
approving the project. That contribution is not shown in the Budget because the amount is not fixed and
it does not directly affect the City's cash records. Other non-cash are expected during the six-year period.
What is a Capital' Facili_ty?
Capital facilities are those public facilities, including utilities, that are necessary for a government to
carry out its functions to provide services to its citizens. Examples are roads, public buildings, schools,
parks, water and sewer systems, fire protection, police protection, and libraries. Often the entire
collection of these facilities is referred. to as infrastructure.
There are several categories of capital expenditures proposed in this plan. A key distinction is whether
new or expanded facilities will-serve existing residents or new growth. Expenditures may also be
proposed to maintain or repair existing capital facilities (cure deficiencies). The categories are as
follows and will be used to identify specific projects proposed in the six-year plan:
As Approved by the City Council 2
(M) Major maintenance, repair, renovation, or replacement of an existing facility. Many of
the road projects are in this category.
(E) New facilities or improvements to existing facilities that provide added capacity to serve
the existing population.
(N) New facilities or improvements to existing facilities that are built primarily to provide
added capacity to serve new population or employment growth.
Plans and Studies
A significant amount of the projects anticipated to be included in the Capital Facilities Plan rely on
various plans and studies needed to determine the capacity of various systems and the extent of problems
in those systems. Although these studies drive many of the projects in the Capital Facilities Plan,
because they are operating costs, they are not included in the Plan. The following table summarizes
the plans and studies the City expects to complete in the next few years:
2001 Listing of Studies & Plans
Name of Study or Plan
Non-Motorized Transportation Plan .
Pavement Management System Update
Sewer System Plan
'South End Sewer Study
'Surface Water / Drainage Plan
y Transportation Plan
Water System Plan
'Water Supply Plan
Wellhead Study
Total
Cost I Due
s35,000 16/01
50,000 2001
100,000 2001
100,000 3/01
40,0001 ? ? ?
100,000 9/01
100,000 2001
????l???
50,0001 2002
$575,000t
7
Levels of Service (LOS)
Levels of Service (LOS) are usually quanti~able measures of the amount and/or quality of public facilities
or services that are provided to the community and are usually expressed as a ratio of amount of service
to a selected demand unit. For example, sewer LOS is expressed as 100 gallon per capita per day, public
school LOS may be expressed as the number of square feet available per student or as the number of
students per classroom. Police or Fire protection may be expressed as the average response time for
emergency calls. Parks LOS is often expressed as the number of acres of park per 1,000 population. Once
the level of service is decided upon it can then be determined what capital improvements are necessary
to 1 ) cure any existing deficiencies, and 2) maintain that level as the community grows.
The Capital Facilities Financinl~ Plan
The GMA requires that the Capital Facilities Element contain a financing plan that identifies the type and
location of expanded or new capital facilities and the sources of funding that will used to pay for them
There are two questions that must be satisfactorily answered:
1) What is the quantity ofth~ public facilities that will be required during the six years?
(identified in the inventory and needs analysis);
2) Is it financially feasible to provide the quantity of facilities that are required? (do we now,
or will we, have the money to pay for them?)
As Approved by the City Council 3
8
Dependable revenue sources must be identified that equal or exceed the anticipated costs. If the
costs exceed the revenue, the local government must reduce its level of service, or otherwise reduce
costs; or else modify the land use element to bring future development into balance with available or
affordable facilities and services. This plan will examine each type of facility separately. The costs of
all the facilities will then be added together in order to determine the financial feasibility of the plan.
The Capital Facilities Plan is intended to be a planning document. It, therefore, does not contain the
level of detail that the annual budget must contain. Some costs in the plan are estimated in order to
give citizens a general idea of how much certain types of projects or facilities may cost.
Criteria for Project Prioritization
One of the problems with determining which projects to work on when has been the difficulty in
determining project priorities. To some extent, priorities are set by the Growth Management Act
and are noted in the section on "What is a Capital Facility" on page 2 above as "M", "E", and "N"
(that is, curing deficiencies is, by law, a higher priority than building to serve new growth). Beyond
that, the City Council has used an ad hoc method of identifying high priority projects (maintenance
of existing facilities mandated projects, targets of opportunity, etc.). This year's Capital Facilities
Plan update process has proposed using four sets of criteria together. The four sets are:
1. Strong citizen support as measured by the Community Values Survey.
2. The criteria for policy CF 1.2 mentioned above (the "m", "e", and "n").
3. Financial effects (availability of grants and/or cost/benefit). and.
4. Sequencing/Coordination (including timing factors).-
By evaluating each project against these four sets of criteria, it is hoped that the resulting priorities
assigned capital facilities projects will optimize the sequencing of the projects and the effectiveness
of the City funds used to pay for them.
Capital Facilities Planning
This Capital Facilities Plan is the product of many separate but coordinated planning documents and
planning bodies. Each of the special districts (schools, fire, parks, etc.) has its own capital plan. The
City has a Water System Plan, a Sewer System Plan, a Winslow Drainage System Plan and a
Pavement Management System Plan. Each capital facility may have several sources of funding that
include combinations of federal and state grant money, loans and general revenues (tax dollars). In
addition, there are several subarea and neighborhood plans in progress, including the Island Center
and Lynwood Center Special Planning Areas, and the Winslow Master Plan (now being implemented)
each with its own capital requirements. Most facilities must be planned for years in advance and
planning means determining not only when a facility will be needed but how it will be financed. For
facilities that are projected for five to seven years in the .future, capital costs are more estimates than
actual. As the time for construction nears, actual costs are narrowed as design and engineering are
completed. It is important to remember that Capital Facilities planning is not a once a year 0~: once
every two years effort, but an ongoing process requiring continual review as new information
becomes available, conditions change, and priorities evolve.
As Approved by the City Council
City of Bainbridge Island
The following is the City's 2001 Capital Facilities Plan. The Plan is organized by project category and
each category includes: 1) a current inventory of facilities; 2) a narrative providing a general background
of the planning activities and some discussion of future plans; 3) a discussion of level of service (LOS), if
applicable; and 4) a six-year project financing plan which identifies projects and funding sources for
that section. A listing of known needs (sometimes without cost estimates) beyond the six-year period
follows. The timing of projects beyond the six-years horizon is also very nebulous.
Other Comprehensive Plan policies that are implemented or furthered by this Capital Facilities Plan
are the following:
CF 1.2: The City shall prioritize the allocation of resources to meet its capital needs in the following
order: 1) major maintenance of existing facilities; 2) elimination of existing deficiencies; and, 3)'provision
of new or expanded facilities to accommodate new growth.
CF 1.6: Funding of major capital facilities shall typically rely on long-term financing and not current
revenues. The term of financing should generally be no longer than the useful life of the facility.
CF 1.8: The City may apply various, alternative, funding mechanisms in the development ofcapit~)l
improvements identified in the Capital Facilities Element in order to optimally use limited City
resources. Such mechanisms include joint ventures with the private sector, grants, or other means.
CF 1.12: Funding for the City's water and sewer facilities shall be paid for primarily by users' except in
unusual circumstances where the public benefit may justify the use of general funds. Drainage improve-
ments and facilities shall funded by the City Stormwater utility which, as an Island-wide utility, may be
supplemented by general revenue. When utility improvements, provide benefits primarily to a limited
group of users the costs will generally be paid by the benefited parties through Local Improvement'
Districts CL.I.D.'s) or other means.
9
As Approved by the City Council 5
10
City Administration
Ci.ty Offices
Employees and offices of the City are located at several sites because of space constraints at the Winslow
City Hall location. City staff has grown to 113 full time employees and seven part time employees as of '
December, 1999, an increase often full-time employees and one part-time employee since the 1999 up-
date. There are 5 employees located at the Municipal Court at Rolling Bay, 26 at the Police Station in
the old city hall, 27 at the Public Works facility on Hidden Cove Road, and about 70 at the new City Hall.
Building and Location
City Hall
280 Madison Ave. N
Former City Hall
625 Winslow Way E
Municipal Court
10255 NE Valley Rd.
Portable Office Trailers,
Former Public Works Yard
'Portable Ofc Trailer, Police
Subtotal Staff Office Space
Bainbridge Island Commons
223 Bjune Ave.
Bainbridge Performing Arts
(land only) 200 Madison Ave. N
Helpline House
~Public Works Facility
[7305 NE Hidden Cove Road
~ UnimprOved !and:
High School Rd. near
Madison (BPA exchange)
off Madison near Wyatt
Lumpkin Property
Suzuki Property
Weaver Rd. near Wyatt
Misc. unimproved land
I Total
2001 City Land and Office Facility Inventory
i Building Owned or'
Land Area i Area Leased
1.92 Ac ~ 24, 107 SqFt Owned
0.82 Ac 7,000 SqFt Owned
n/a
2,289 SqFt Leased
ilfa
rda
1,840 SqFt Owned
320 SqFt Owned
2.74 Ac 35,556 SqFt
0.38 Ac 4,975 SqFt Owned
2.45 Ac n/a
Owned
1.07 Ac
15.42 Ac
4,400 SqFt
n/a
Owned
Owned
12.62 Ac
23,792 SqFt
Owned
1.42 Ac
0.43 Ac
11.00 Ac
15.00 Ac
0.92 Ac
1.32 Ac'
64.77 Act
68,723 SqFt
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Owned
Office Uses
Administration, Finance,
Planning, & Engineering
Police
Municipal Court,
Hearing Examiner
Public Works Operations
& Maintenance
Not Occupied
Social Services, Council
& Committee Meetings
Land leased to BPA for
$1/yr through May, 2081
No-cost lease to
Helpline House
Wells, pump stations, etc.
O&M Offices, Shop, and
Covered Equipment Storage
No use specified
Future pocket park
Open space
Future Police/Court Facilty
No use specified
No use specified
As Approved by the City Council
CiW Hall
It: 1997, the City Council selected a site for City Hall on property in the vicinity of the Bainbridge
Performing Arts building, northeast of the intersection of Winslow Way and Madison Ave. In addition
tO property on the site already owned by the City, four additional parcels were identified for acquisition
19 assemble a site sufficient for the long range needs of a City Hall, a "Town Square", and parking.
Construction of the new City Hall was completed in early 2000 and the building was occupied in mid-
February. This decision implements Policy W 1.6 of the Land Use Element (pg. 56) of the
Comprehensive Plan: "The permanent location of City Hall shall be in downtown Winslow."
Public Works Operations and Maintenance Facili.ty
In late 1998, the Public Works Yard was relocated from the 5-acre John Nelson Park site just north
of Winslow Way on the east side of SR305 to a new, 12.6 acre site at Hidden Cove Road and SR305.
Drainage problems, discovered during construction, are in the process of being corrected. Phase II
of the construction of the new Public Works Facility at Hidden Cove has been deferred until after 2005.
11
Police & Court
During 2000, the former City Hall building was remodeled for use by the Police. Also, a 15 acre site was
recently purchased at a cost of $450,000 for a permanent Police and Municipal Court facility. It is
expected that the Police will occupy the former City Hall building and the Court to continue to lease space
for seven to ten years before a permanent facility is built on the new site.
Open Space / Al~ricultural Land Acquisition
In late 1998, the City Council voted to encumber the City with $500,000 in LTGO debt for the purpose
of acquiring open space and/or agricultural land and development rights. An unspecified amount of
funding for open space was included in the 1999 LTGO Bond issue. Although the City has put in place
ordinances governing both the purchase and transfer of development rights, .policies governing open
space acquisition have not yet been determined despite the acquisition of 7 acres of shoreline for open
space in early 2000. The intent is to support the goals for Agricultural Land in the Land Use Element.
2001 Capital Facilities Projects -- City Administration / Facilities
Project
PW Yard North Annex
ROW / Land Acquisition (E)
Police &'Court (N)
PWYard South Annex (E)
Total Projects
Pri- Before
orit 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006
2001
$250
50
50
0 350
5o
5O
100
5O 5O 50 50
200
250 50 501
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 2009 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
,
'WMP' indicates that this project relates to the Winslow Master Plan.
A priority of "N" indicates that a project has not )'el been given a priority. Once the indicated
project has been prioritized, funding and timing will be assigned.
A~eF
2006 *
1,950
5,000
450
7,400
Project
Total
$2,200
300
5,050
700
8,250
As Approved by the City Council 7
12
2001 Public Works Facilities Inventory
Facility Floor Area Function
Portable office trailers (2) 1,840 SqFt * Houses telemetry equipment &storage
Steel shop building 2,400 SqFt Storage
Wood frame building 1,245 SqFt Storage
Small wood frame building 663 SqFt Storage
Portable steel building 100 SqFt Oil storage shed
PW Facility - Shop 14,000 SqFt * Mechanics Shop / Equipment Maintenance
PW Facility - Covered Equip't Stg 8,000 SqFt * Covered Euipment Storage
PW Facility - Office Trailer 1,792 SqFt * O & M Office
, Total 30,040 SqFt
· These facilities are also counted in the main office inventory on page 4.
The inventory of heavy equipment includes only those items with an estimated replacement value
of $20,000 or more. Equipment replacement is based upon a standard of useful life for each type of
equipment in the inventory. Smaller items (over $5,000) are treated as operating costs in this document
but as capital in the annual budget and financial reports.
2001 Public Works Equipment Inventory
Type of Equipment
Water & Sewer Utility - Heavy Equipment
Water & Sewer Utility - Other Vehicles
Streets, SSWM & General - Heavy Equipment
Streets, SSWM & General - Other Vehicles
Total
Quantity
11
8
28
26
73
Parks & Trails
Most of the parks and trails on Bainbridge Island are owned and run by the Bainbridge Island Park and
Recreation District. However, the City has a few which it owns but which are generally maintained (with
the exception of Waterfront Park) by the Park District under contract to the City. In 1997, the City
developed a plan for the expansion of the facilities at Waterfront Park. This plan is expected to be
implemented in stages over the next eight to ten years.
2001 Capital Facilities Projects -- City Parks & Trails
Project
Open Space & Ag Land (N)
Land fill Reclamation (E)
Winslow Parks/Trails - WMP (N)
Road End Improvements (E)
Waterfront Park (E)
John Nelson Park Rehab (M)
Acq. WF Park Residence (E)
Total Projects
Pri-
orit
1
2
3
4
5
N
N
Before
2001
2001 2002 1-.2003 2004
$500~ $I,000~'$1,000 $!,000
500~ 5001
3001 300 300 300
24{ 25 26 27
~ ~ 300 250
1,324 [ 1,825 1,626 1,577
2005
$500
300
28
828
Note: All amounts are S in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
As Approved by the City Council
ARer
2006 2006 *
$500
300 300
300
125~ 510
250
350
925 1,710
Projeet
Total
2,100
430
1,185
250
350
9,815
Transportation Facilities (Roads, Bike Lanes, Sidewalks, Trails)
Of the five types of capital facilities that are construcied, operated and maintained by the City, the most
costly and most familiar to citizens are the transportation facilities. Where there are facility needs that
involve SR305 or the ferries, the Washington State Department of Transportation assumes the costs.
Kitsap Transit pays for facilities that support transit service. The citizens do pay indirectly for these
services through other taxes. However, following with passage of Initiative 695, one of the largest source
of such funding, the Motor Vehicle Excise Tax, was repealed. At present, particularly given the possible
passage of Initiatives 722 and 745, funding for public transportation in general (including all activities not
directly under the control of the City is at risk of severe reductions and/or threatened elimination.
The transportation system outside of historic Winslow has suffered from "deferred maintenance". The
Pavement Management System (PMS) study conducted for the City in 1992/1995 indicated the wearing
surface of many of the roads to be at or near failure, especially the smaller suburban roads. Since many
of the Island's roads were initially only scraped and then a thin layer of asphalt applied, the maintenance
performed by the City is usually more extensive, and costly, than normal maintenance of "paved" roads.
Many roads, having no substantial base before placing asphalt, need considerable base preparation. The
PMS study indicated a need for $600,000 per year for 10-12 years in the annual roads maintenance and
repaying program to maintain the roads at the then current status; but that study assumed a normal road
base. The City has attempted to "reconstruct" some of the roads, rather than just "maintain" their wearing
surface, and while it is more time consuming and more costly (initially), the life-cycle costs will be less, a
the citizens will have better roads to travel over. Because the $600,000 annual amount has proven inade-
quate to cover the more extensive "reconstruction" as well as normal repaying, beginning in 1998 the City
Council increased the annual amount for repaying to $1,000,000. Also, in 1998 the City began a pro~am
using a "chip-seal" which has allowed many more lane miles to be recovered for the same cost as tradi-
tional asphalt overlays. Chip-sealing the roads to halt their deterioration is intended to buy the City time
to accomplish the needed, and expensive, reconstruction before the failure of more of the Island's roads.
13
The Public Works Department has been aggressive in obtaining grants and low interest loans to address
many of the City's transportation improvement needs. Passage of Initiative 695 and the threat of Initiative
722 has made continued access to this sort of funding uncertain at best. As a result, this year's update of
the Capital Facilities Plan places less reliance on grants and low interest loans, and instead relies primarily
on voter-approved bonds.
Although not called for in the Comprehensive Plan, a draft Island-wide Transportatior~ System Plan is
in the process of preparation, with additional funding inclt/ded in the 2001 budget. At this point,
acceptance of that plan by the citizens and approval by the City Council is obviously. uncertain.
A complete discussion of transportation facilities and a detailed description of levels of service and
proposed improvements can be found in the Transportation Element.
.:
Other Comprehensive Plan Goals and Policies that are implemented or furthered by the following
transportation projects:
TR 3.4: The transportation system infrastructure should be maintained in a safe and usable condition.
As Approved by the City Council 9
14
TR 3.10: Provide safe bicycle travel along roadways identified in the Bike Access Plan in Winslow,
along designated school routes, and where needed for safety reasons.
TR 3.11: Sidewalks shall be required in Winslow, along designated school routes, in areas where
sidewalks have been historically located ( e.g., Fort Ward), and where needed for safety reasons.
TR 4.21: Undertake spot improvement projects. Safety improvements could include: Reconstruction
of key traffic bottlenecks and unsafe road segments; elimination of poor sight distances.
TR 5.3: Aggressively seek available county, state, and federal money to: 1) pay for (or at least mitigate)
the effects of county, state, and federal mandates; 2) fund appropriate demonstration projects; 3) fund
improvement projects which meet the overall Island transportation objectives.
TR 5.4: Ensure that the Island's transportation system is planned in advance to have revenue sources
sufficient to build and maintain it.
Type of Facility
FRC 1 *
FRC 2 *
FRC 3 *
FRC 4 *
FRC 5 *
FRC 6 *
Subtotal
Without SR305
Bike lanes**
Sidewalks
Trails
2001 Inventory of Transportation Facilities
Description ! Example I Length
State Highway SR305 7 miles
Secondary Arterial Miller Road 36 miles-
Collectors Oddfellows Road 43 miles
Residential Urban I Wood .Avenue 11 miles
Residential Suburban } Spargur Loop Road 29 miles
Unimproved City Roads (gravel) Walden Lane 13 miles
139 miles
gravel roads
Shared roadway on paved shoulders
Paved walkway
pedestrian, bike, equestrian, etc.
119 miles
I High School Road 23.5 miles
Madison Ave. 7.6 miles
The Grand Forest 6.9 miles
*FRC = Functional Road Classification; Source: Public Works Department, Pavement Management Program
(Klohn Leonoff)
* * With the exception of SR305, bike lanes on Bainbridge Island are three to five foot paved shoulders.
Bike lanes are reported in lane miles. SR305 is included here.
The proposed projects listed below are identified as to whether they are for maintenance and/or
repair (M), for added capacity for existing residents (E), or for added capacity for new population
or empl.oyment (N).
Winslow Master Plan and Timin~ of Proiects ·
#
In 1998, the City Council approved the Winslow Master Plan. That plan included the identif'rcati0n of
many projects intended to attract growth to Winslow in order to meet the concentration targets of the
Comprehensive Plan. While the need to complete these projects has been established, their timing and
method of funding have not. For example, the Winslow Master Plan calls for many of the projects to be
funded by developer contributions. As a result, the timing of these projects depends on the timing of the
As Approved by the City Council I0
related development. To accommodate this timing uncertainty, many of the Winslow .Master Plan
projects have been shown as occurring after 2006. This is when the City can afford to build the
projects if they are to be funded by taxes; however, the hope and intent is that they would be completed
sooner with the help of the developers. An example of this is the upgrading of the water main on
Madison Avenue which has been completed five to ten years earlier than otherwise with the help of
contributions from The Pavilion Theater, Island Healthcare Center, and the Courtyards on Madison.
15
Project
Roads Resurfacing - Annual
Bike Lanes - Annual
Pedestrian Access - Annual
Enhancements-Intersect'n/Transit
WMP - Parking (E)
High School Road (M)
Manitou Beach Rd. Phase I (M)
Wyatt Way Reconst. (M)
Madison Ave-WMP (E)
Ericksen Tff. Calming (E)
Winslow Loop/Non-Motor PIn (E !
WinWay Do~vntown (M)
Halls Hill/Blakely Hill (E)
Ft. Ward Hill Reconst. (M)
Ericksen-WinWay I/S-South (M)
Ericksen-Hildebrand Opening ('N)!
Ericksen-HSRD I/S (N)
Manitou Beach Phase II (E)
r ByEass Road-WMP (N)
! Wing Pt. Road Reconstruct'n (M)
i Upper Crystal Springs (E)
' High School Rd-WMP (E)
[_Sands Avenue ( N )
~ Shephard Way (N)
! Day Road East (N)
[Winslow Way W. - WMP ('N)
Winslow Way E. - WMP (N)
MFNB Intersection - Phase II (N) .
Page Total
2001 Capital Facilities Projects ~- Transportation'
Pri- Before
orit 2001
I
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
2001 2002 2003
$861 $1,000 $1,000
100 I00[
50 50
501 50 50
1,500
658]
228 · 228 1,714
191 191
114 I 836~
100 1,000 1,000
257
170
168 562
220
!
01 3,194 3,872 5,382
2004
$1,000
50
1,000
1,782
255
4,087
2005 2006
$1,000l $1,000
100
! 50
50[ 50
750
900
833
3,533' 1,200
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
"XVMP" indicates that this project relates to the Winslow Master Plan.
A priority of "N" indicates that a project has not yet been given a priority.
After
2006 *
$14,000
1,400
700
700
414
1,500
384
1,005
866
159
524
21,652
Project
Total
$19,861.
1,700
850
1.,000
'750
1,500
658
2,170
382
950
4,000
2,039
170
730
220
n/a
n/a
414
1,500
1,088
n/a
384
rl/a
n/a
1,005
866
159
524
42,920
· As Approved by the City Council 11
16
Project
! CONNECTIVITY PROJECTS::
'Agatewood Rd ('1'4)
Country Club Rd (E)
; Darden Lane
~.Deerpath Lane
~Dingty/Alder/Fairview
1 Erickson Avenue (N)
i Hails Hill Rd
: Mandus Olson Road ('N)
~ Marshall Ave
Paulanna Ln
'Shepard Way (N) Springridge Rd
SR305/Pheips Road Inter'n (E)
NE Tolo Rd
Wardwell Road
Wyatt to 8R305 (N)
Wyatt Way/Fletcher Bay (N)
2001 Capital Facilities Projects -- Transportation (Continued)
Pri-
orit
Total Projects -This Page
Total of Prior Page
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
N
Before
2001 2001
2002
2003
2004
2005 2006
n/a
0 0
3,194 3,872
C331
(21j
(2401
480
5,382
(126Z (311
(131i (206;
(265).' (776~
0 0 0
48o 480
4,087 3,533
i
(3~6:~ (2155
(327j (132~
(370~ (215~
I
4.80t 480
Less Amounts Charged to Utilities:
Charged to Water
Charged to Sewer
:__ Charged to SSW~I
!Transportation Equipment
Note: All amounts we $ in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
"~V~IP" indicates that this project relates to the Winslow Master Plan.
1,200
480
1,680
A priority of "N" indicates that a project has not yet been given a priority. Once the indicated
project has been prioritized, funding and timing will be assigned.
Projects which have not yet been assigned a priority are listed in alphabeti.c. al order.
2006 *
$2,500
999
999
999
999
999
99.9
.999
.997
999
999
999
9.9.9
9.99 '
999
999
999
2,500
21,652
(256)
(1~0)
(667)
6,720
29,839
Project
Total
2,500
9??
999
999
99?
999
999
999
?77
???
999
999
99?
??.9.
???
???
???
2,500
42,920
(1,2572
(927~
(2,5332
9,600
50,303
As Approved by the City Council 12
Water
Domestic drinking water is supplied by the City of Bainbridge Island, North Bainbridge Water Company,
South Bainbridge Water Company, numerous smaller public water systems (2 or more hookups), and over
1,000 private single-dwelling wells. The following information was obtained from the Water Element of
this Comprehensive Plan and from the Bainbridge Island Water System Plan prepared for the Winslow
Water System by R.W. Becl~ and Associates in 1993. Work on an updated plan is presently underway
but has been delayed by the retirement of the Rich Kato, the engineer working on the project.
Level of Service: The levels of service proposed in the Water Element for water systems on Bainbridge
Island are the minimum design standards and performance specifications provided in the 1992 Kitsap
County Coordinated Water System Plan. Fire flow requirements were adopted by ordinance 98-30
and Resolution 98-34 and are tiered to based on zoning and type of construction. Residences can
satisfy deficiencies by installing individual sprinkler systems. Levels of service are as follows:
Levels of Service for Water
Pressure
Pipe sizing
Storage
Quality
Fire Flow
Fire Flow
Fire Flow
30 psi residual
8" diameter min. (where fire system is required)
"Sizing Guidelines for Public Water Systems"
Federal and State minimum standards
Residential Zone R.04 & R. 1 = 500 gpm or sprinkler
Residential Other Zones = 1,000 gpm or sprinkler
Commercial & LM = 1,000 gpm or don't build
17
Inventory: The Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District records indicate approximately 170 water
systems on the Island that have 2 or more households connected. The number Of Group A & B
systems are listed below. Following that is a summary of systems with more than 100 connections:
Group A systems: 15 or more connections 44
Group B systems: Under 15 connections 124
. System
~Meadowmeer
North Bainbridge
South Bainbridge
Winslow
Total
Systems with Over 100 Connections
Capacity Capacity
Connections
212
1,522
1,080
1,869
4,683
Storage
(ERU) (MGD) Volumes (gal.)
398 0.53 235,000
1,576 / 1.08 I711,000
1,414 0.90 !562,000
· 4,501 1.00 2,9 10,000
· 7,889 3.51 4}418,000
Most existing water systems were established under state and local guidelines and generally provide high
quality water at an adequate pressure and flow rate for residential use. However, because of the number
of systems on the Island, it must be ..ooncluded that there are systems that may not be in.compliance with
Department of Health water quality requirements and may not meet minimum requirements of pressure
and reliability. It is also concluded that most of the smaller systems have poor or nonexistent fire protection
designed into their systems due to the cost of providing large diameter pipes and storage tanks.
As Approved by the City Council 13
18
As part of an interlocal agreement between the City and the Kitsap County PUD #I, the City is now
developing an all-Island water system inventory (with the PUD funding the project) which will form the
basis of a Water Comprehensive Plan. This plan is still in preparation and in its third year of work,
although work on other segments of the plan is believed to be near completion.
Winslow Water System
The Winslow Water System is owned and 9perated by the City of Bainbridge Island under the direction
and control of the Department of Public Works. It serves an area similar to the historic Winslow city
limits plus Fletcher Bay and Rockaway Beach. The system gets all of its water from the eleven wells
owned by the City. Water is pumped into the distribution system both directly from the well pumps and
by booster pump stations. The system now has four storage reservoirs, and two additional reservoirs are
planned in the six-year plan.
Inventory of Winslow Water System Wells
Name
Head of Bay #1
Head of Bay #2
Head of Bay #3
Lower Weaver *
Fletcher Bay
Head of Bay #4
Head of Bay #5
Head of Bay #6
Head of Bay # 1A
iSands Ave. #1
Sands Ave. #2
~Commodore Well
Total
Capacity Depth
100 gpm 130 ft.
55 gpm 155 ft.
together with #2 150 ft.
-- 135 ft.
600 gpm 1,550 ft.
300 gpm 135 ft.
together with #4 I 135 ft.
75 gpm ~ 70 ft.
200 gpm ~ 145 ft.
300 gpm I 1,023 ft.
600 gpm ] 1,055 ft.
20 gpm 380 ft.
2,250 gpm
*Not a potable source - used for construction
Present Yield
90 gpm
30 gpm
together with #2
30 gpm
400 gpm
180 gpm
together with #4
55 gpm
85 gpm
200 gpm
600 gpm
20 gpm
1,690 gpm
It has been determined that the Winslow Water System capacity is adequate to serve the needs of the
potential build-out population under existing zoning and build-out to the highest density possible (to
R-28) in the Land Use Element. The available sources are adequate to serve a potential population of
appro>/imately 7,900 or approximately 4,000 units. The system currently serves a population of 3,500
and approximately 3,000 residential equivalent units. There are, however, upgrades necessary to provide
adequate fire flow in most areas, which have been identified in the Bainbridge Island Water System Plan,
by R.W. Beck and the update to this plan done in July, 1995 (and now in the process of being ,updated).
The two most significant upgrades needed for fire flow are two large storage tanks. Other improvements
include increasing the size of several of the City's water mains, which will be accomplished as major street
are repaved. In 1998, the City completed the connection to City water of 33 homes previously served by
the Commodore Lane Water System, which had been condemned by the State Department of Health.
?
As Approved by the City Council 14
Other Water Services Provided by the City
In addition to the Winslow Water System, the City has acquired a water system providing water to
some 65 residences at Rockaway Beach. As part of the acquisition, the City replaced a private system
which had the distinction of having the only public water system in the nation with a well in the middle of
a Superfund site as its sole source of water. A replacement system was provided by the City in 1995
with funding from a local improvement district and grants from the US Environmental Protection Agency
and the Washington State Department of Ecology.
Under state law revenues cannot significantly exceed the cost to provide service but must not be less
than that cost. New hookups are charged according to the cost to connect plus a system "participation
fee" to purchase a share of the capital cost of the system. A restructuring of these participation fees was
completed in late 1997 so that the charges would match the demand placed on the system by new
connection. Approval of Initiatives 695 and Initiative 722 have raised legal questions regarding the
City's ability to comply with State laws regarding the sufficiency of the City's water rates (the City's water
utility has shown net losses over the past few years).
19
Comprehensive Plan policies that are implemented or furthered by the following water projects are:
WR 2.2: The City shall be responsible for facilitating reliable, high-quality water services and
resources Island-wide. The City shall work with other governmental agencies, water purveyors,
and citizens to preserve and protect the water resources of Bainbridge Island. The City shall
assist citizens and water system purveyors to obtain reliable, high quality water service.
WR 2.4: The construction of new water systems and the upgrading of or connection to existing
systems shall be paid for through user fees, Local Utility Districts (LUDs), or other mechanisms
that ensure that the cost is paid for by the service recipients.
WR 2.5: Engineering specifications of new public water systems an~l expansions or improvements
to existing public water systems shall meet City or other regulatory standards.
CF 1.2: The City shall prioritize the allocation of resources to meet its capital needs in the
following order: 1) major maintenance of existing facilities; 2) elimination of existing deficiencies;
and, 3) provision of new or expanded facilities to accommodate new growth.
As Approved by the City Council 15
20
Funding Sources:
', Beginning Cash & Investments
· Service Charges
: Interest & Other Revenues
: Participation Fees
Bonds & Other Sources (Net)
Total Funding
Less: Operating Costs - Finance
Debt Service Costs
Operating Costs - PW
fFunding Avail. for Projects:
2001 Capital Facilities Plan
2001
975
1,II1
139
346
0
1,596
93
253
40
2,184
2002 ] 2003
1,1891 1,260
391 45
353I 356
5001 0
2,080{ 1,661
93[ 98
666 708
527 561
7951 2941
Water
2004
1,355i
372
o!
1,746
104I
708i
606I
328{
2005
1,456
26
389
0
1,871
111
706
654
400
Projects:
Water/viains Upgrade - Annual
High Zone Reservoir (E)
Water Property Acquisition (N)
High School Tank Modification
Rockaway Manganese (M)
Head of the Bay Wells (2) (M)
Telemetry Equip. Upgrade (E)
Lov,' Zone Reservoir (E)
Water Treatment Equipment (M)
Wellfield Emerg. Power (E)
Wyatt-High Zone Main (E)
2 Pressure Zone Extension (N)
. Water Quality -Ferry-x, VMP (E)
Mandus Olson Tank (N)
Grow Ave-WNIP (HS-Gideon)(N)~
· Grow-High Zone Main (N)
· Shepherd-High Zone Main (N)
Wellhead Protection (M)
'AC Line Replacement (M)
Share of Transportation Projects
Total Projects
Pri-
orit
Before
2001
n/a
2001
$50
500
II0
75
25
33
793
2002 2003
$50 $50
1,000
200
25
40
200
100
50
25
50
80
1261 311
1,6411 666
2004
$50
320
50
316
736
2005
$50
215
265
Annual Excess / (Shortfall)
'Cumulative Excess / (Shortfall)
· Ending Cash & Investments
1,391
1,391
2006
1,565{
77{
406{
0!
2,049
!18
325
707
899
'2006
$50
50
173[ (235~, (I 748
Note: All amounts ate $ in 000's and ate in 2000"$ (that is, ncradjustment has been made for inflation).
A priority of "N" indicates that a priority has not yet been assigned to this project.
"VVMP" indicates that this project relates to the Winslow Master Phm.
6 Year
Total
7,936
346
2,221
500
11,004
618
3,367
3,094
3,924
ARer
2006 *
$700
500
176
100
80
500
256
2,312
6 Year
TOtal
1,612
1,612
1,612
Project
Total
$1,000
1,000
1,000
200
110
100
75
370
75
40
200
100
80
0
176
100
80
0
500
1,257
6,463
As Approved by the City Council 16
Sanitary. Sewage Disposal
The City of Bainbridge Island provides for the collection, treatment, and disposal of effluent in the
Winslow service area. The Kitsap County Sewer District #7 treatment plant north of Fort Ward Park
serving customers within the District's service area at the south end of the Island was completed in 1997.
That system was extended in 1998 to allow connection by the Lynwood Center area, where sewage
disposal had been deemed inadequate by the Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District. Details of the
Sewer District No. 7 system can be found in the Water Element. More detailed information on the
Island's wastewater facilities may be found in the Wastewater Facility Improvement Plan, February,
1994. Brown & Caldwell Consultants. Funding to update this plan was contained in the 2000 budget.
The City is studying the creation four local improvement districts (Emerald Heights, Noah Pleasant
Beach, Point White, and Rocka~vay Beach) to connect areas of failing septic systems to Sewer District
No. 7's treatment plant. The cost of these LID's has not yet been fully determined, but will be fully
borne by the users. All other residents not within the service areas of the above districts rely upon
on-site septic systems that require approval from the Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District.
Level of Service: Levels of service for wastewater treatment systems are typically expressed as the
number of gallons of flow per capita per day and the level of treatment provided by the treatment plant.
The current and proposed level of service for the Winslow service area follow the Department of Ecology
guidelines of 100 gallons per capita per day (flow) and secondary treatment. In areas not served by
treatment plants, on-site septic systems must be built to Bremerton-Kitsap County Health District standards
that consider combinations of lot size, soil type, infiltration capacity, depth to hardpan, and proximity to
surface water among others.
Inventory of Winslow Sewerage Facilities: The Winslow sanitary sewer system consists of two separate
parts: the collection system, and the treatment plant.
Collection system: 5.12 miles gravity sewer with pipes 8" to 16" in diameter
2.69 miles of force main with pipes 4" to 12" in diameter
11 pumping stations with 100-2,300 gpm pumping capacity
Treatment plant: Secondary treatment facility located on Donald Place NE
just east of the ferry terminal.
The existing collection system capacity has been judged to be adequate through the year 2010 with
periodic upgrades in pumping facilities, although the City like other sewage utility providers experiences
seasonal inflow and infiltration problems. In t 997 with the acquisition of a television camera to check
sewer lines, the City began an effort to locate points of inflow. The City plans to begin to correct inflow
problems over the next two years as shown in the attached plan. The existing treatment plant was designed
to accommodate an effective population of 10,000 and now serves a population equivalent to 5,500 (with
conversion ofmultifamily and commercial customers to single-family residential equivalents). An upgrade
was completed in January, 1996, at a cost of $2.5 million. A number of additional improvements costing
some $2.9 million have been identifieh by H R Esvel.t Engineering. Those improvements are anticipated
to be phased in over the next few years. The City had added emergency generators and telemetry to
the system to significantly curtail demands. Where possible, pump stations have been taken out of
21
As Approved by the City Council 17
22
service to further reduce system costs. The sewer system plan was updated in July, 1995 by R. W. Beck
and Associates (with an update budgeted for 2000), and the system (plant and delivery system) was found
to have adequate capacity for the projected growth for Winslow well past 2012 (the overlap of this
assessment and the Esvelt study is unclear). Other capital projects may be indicated following an inflow/
infiltration analysis being done at the request of the Department of Ecology.
In a separate effort, a comprehensive study of sewer needs has just been completed and is available
for public comment. The study, entitled "South Bainbridge Island General Sewer Service Plan", by
H.R. Esvelt Engineering and American Engineering is also referred to as the "South End Sewer Plan."
Funding Sources:
Beginning Cash & Investments
Service Charges
Interest & Other Revenues
Participation Fees
Bonds & Other Sources (Net)
Total Funding
Less: Operating Costs - Finance
Debt Service Costs
Operating Costs - PW
Funding Avail. for'Projects:
2001 Capital Facilities Plan -- Sewage Disposal
~ 2001 2002 2003 ] 2004 ~ 2005
2,282
1,154
133
348
1,000
2,635
93
174
(29)
4,679
1,235t 1,309t 1,4071 1,513t
211 3271 299i 305I
355 359i 3751 392I
1,o00
2,80~ ~,9941.2,08~t2,2101
93 97 ~ 102 108
120 123[ 123. 121
(98)~ 472~ 1,0091 1,0741
2,6861 1,302I 847t 907[
2006
1,626-
335
410
0
2,370
114
502
1,144
6101
6Yeari
Total
8,243~
1,609~
2,239
2,000
14,092
608 i '
1,163~
3,572!
8,7491
]Pri-
Projects: ~orit
Collection System Upgrades Anndal
Lift Station Upgrades
Infiltration/Inflow (I/I) (M)
WWTP Recommendations (E) N
Telcruelty Equip. Upgrade (E) N
South End Sewer: (E) N
Share of Transportation Projects
Total Projects
Annual Excess / (Shortfall)
Cumulative Excess / (Shortfall)
Ending Cash & Investments
Before
2001
1,000
2001 2002 2003 ! 2004 i 2005
$531 $551 ssTI $59 s61
301404ols0
5ol 5o 5oi so 5o
3oi I 300 aoo 540
I 75
~ 1,000
1311
1,351~
21
206, 327i 132
653. 1,286 ! 783
3,493~ 1,335 6491 (439~ 124
3,495 ~ 4,830 5,4791 5,040 ~ 5, 164
2006
$63
5O
113
497
5,661
A~er
2006 *
$854
1,200
110
2,164
6 Year
Total
6,585~
6,585
6,585i
Project
Total
$1,202
160
300
2,870
75
2,000
927
7,534
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 1999 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
A priority of "T" indicates that this project is part of a Transportation project.
As Approved by the City Council 18
Storm & Surface Water Management
In the Winslow urban area stormwater is managed by a combination of piped collectors, roadside ditches
and natural stream channels and is well-defined in the City of Winslow Storm Water Drainage Plan, 1985.
All other watersheds and sub-basins on the Island are drained by natural streams and roadside ditches only
The existing natural drainage system consists of wetlands, streams, springs, ditches, and culverts crossing
the roadways and is labor intensive to maintain. The natural drainage system does currently remove
stormwater but not without signs of distress from erosion, siltation, and water quality degradation. The
drainage system is closely related to road maintenance issues. Due to the somewhat incomplete or
obstructed nature of the natural drainage system, there are many wet areas that are causing localized
problems that result in flooding of private property and roadways failing. With the 2000 Capital Facilities
Plan, the City is significantly increasing its efforts to remedy as many problems as possible. However,
some areas, because of the manner in which they were developed are candidates for Local Improvement
Districts to handle or improve drainage systems.
A review of the City of Winslow Storm Water Drainage Plan, 1985, identified several necessary draihage
projects for the area, for example, the Lower Weaver Outfall Project which was completed in 1996. The
Fletcher Bay culvert repair project was also completed in 1996 and is designed to enhance salmon spawn-
ing in the stream. During 1999, drainage for lower Madison and Winslow Way West was provided.
Under an interlocal agreement with the Kitsap County P.U.D. No. 1, the City is working on a general
update of the 1985 plan to include the entire Island and to consider water quality as well as quantity. This
plan includes four elements: (1) aerial photography and mapping (which is complete), (2) the storm water
drainage plan which is near completion, (3) a water plan (mentioned on pages 11 and 12, and (4) a
drainage basin assessment. The completion of this plan will form the first comprehensive storm water
drainage plan of Bainbridge Island.
23
As Approved by the City Council 19
24
2001 Capital Facilities Plan -- Surface Water Management
Funding Sources:
Beginning Cash & Investments
Service Charges
Interest & Other Revenues
'Transfers from General Fund **
Total Funding
Less: Operating Costs - Finance
Debt Service Costs
Operating Costs - PW
Funding Avail. for Projects:
Projects:
Drain Sys Upgrades
Shoreline Protect'n - ESA Respon
~Fairview/Madrona AREA
McRedmond/Wardwell AREA
Mountain View Drive
'Decant Facility
Manzanita AREA
Halls Hill Area
Upper Crystal Springs
Crystal Springs AREA
i Pt. White Drive AREA
Lynwood Center
~Country Club Rd. Revetment
Battle Point Area
Beck/Pleasant Beach AREA
Eagle Harbor Rd. Cut Stabilizatio
Erickson Ave - WMP - Convertart
Euclid Ave. (Dorsey & Loop)
Lovell Avenue Drainage (HS-Wy
7'Lower Weaver (Sportsman Club)
! Park Avenue
! Phelps Rd. Drainage
!Reitan Road
Rockaway Beach
Rolling Bfiy Walk
Rotary - WMP - Detention
South Beach Drive Revetment
Sunrise AREA
Pri-
orit
2001 2002 2003] 2004
2005 2006
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
N
N
N
N
N
N
Before
2001
261
390
I1
625
.1,026
2
41
705
539
2001
$200
50
x
X
X
275
X
Page Total I .01 52,5
788 ] 1,099~
o
782 1,071~
1~ 1
421 43
6001 1,131
1391 (104).;
2002
$200
50
{
250~
2003
$200
50
250
1,121]
(24~
1,097)
I
43
752
300[
2004
$200
50
250{
0i
1,132i
21
42~
626~
463 [
2005
$200
50
250
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
16
2
42
441
697
2006
$2O0
50
250
6 Year
Total
6,290
10
253
4,255
1,773
After
2006 *
$2,800
700
550
60
225
225
144
350
300
153
40
80
60
175
35
336
85
6,318
Project
Total
$4,000
1,000
190
150
.go
275
150
220
200
379
150
75
550
60
225
225
144
350
300
153-
40
80
60
175
0
35
336
85
9,687
As Approved by the City Council 20
2001 Capital Facilities Plan ~- Surface Water Mgmt (Continued)
i Projects:
Taylor/Ne~v S~veden AREA
Venice Loop AREA
WinWay/Cave - WMP - Conveya
Wyatt Basin A - WMP - Detentio
Wyatt/Grow Basin B - WMP Con
,UShare of Transportation Projects
Total of Prior Page
Total Projects
Pri-
orit
N
N
N
N
N
Before
2001
2001 2002
240
525
765
2003
265 776
1
250 250
1
515 1,026J
2004
2005
370
250
620
2006
215 0
250 250
465 250
After
2006 *
$150
380
297
50
500
667
6,318
8,362
Annual Excess / (Shortfall)
Cumulative Excess / (Shortfall)
Ending Cash & Investments
<226i <376j <I,130~, <3201 <2j
(226~ (602).' (1,732),' (2,052~ (2,054)
447
(1,607~
I
6 Year
Total
(1,607),
(1,607~.
(1,607~
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
"~,V~IP" indicates that this project relates to the Winslow Master Plan.
A priority of "N" indicates that a project has not yet been given a priority. Once
the indicated project has been prioritized, funding and timing will be assigned.
Projects which have not yet been assigned a priority are listed in .alphabetical order.
Project 2 ~
Total t ~'
$150
380
2~7
50
500
2,533
8,093
12,003
As Approved by the City Council 21
26
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND
SIX-YEAR FINANCING PLAN
The capital facilities and services discussed in the previous pages are the responsibility of the City to
provide. The City's Capital Facilities financing plan is presented here, showing all sources of funding and
compiling all of the City's anticipated capital projects (except utilities). Funding sources are displayed so
that debt service on any proposed bonds is accounted for as though they were operating costs. Facilities
and services discussed on the following pages are those of districts or entities that are separate from the
City and have specific funding sources of their own. As the relevant pages show, some districts have
done a greater degree of revenue projections than others.
The City's Financing Plan calls for full funding of the $1 million per year (with an inflation adjustment) in
roads resurfacing in addition to a len~hy list of specific road projects. In December, 1998, the City issued '
$9,900,000 in LTGO bonds ($8.6 million in net new proceeds) to pay for the construction of City Hall and
to provide approximately $2.5 million in funding for major road projects and open space/agricultural land
purchase. In October, 1999, an additional $4.9 million was issued to pay for additional road and drainage
projects plus the roughly $1 million cost of the High Zone Water Reservoir. Thereafter, because of the
limitations placed on the City by the approval of Initiative 695, road and non~motorized transportation,
and open space projects are expected to be funded by voter special levy General Obligation bonds
approved by at least 60 % of Bainbridge Island voters. It is assumed that if the electorate does not
approve the special levy bonds the designated road, non-motorized transportation, open space, and
drainage projects will not be undertaken.
Winslow Master Plan (WMP)
A Winslow Master Plan was developed under the inte~ated GMA/SEPA process and includes an
Environmental Impact Statement. As a result, further EIS's do not need to be sought for projects
described in the WMP. That plan, approved by the City Council in May, 1998, calls for major
infrastructure upgrades in Winslow to serve as a magnet for development. Because a separate
Financial Capacity Analysis was not conducted in conjunction with the WMP, funding for several
of the WMP projects is not available from identified sources within the six year planning horizon.
As a result, completion of some of the projects shown in the WMP has been deferred beyond the six-year
horizon (unless developer contributions are available) and this update consequently amends the WMP.
Critical Assumptions
The following tables are based on a set of economic forecast assumptions that include: a 1.0% - 2.5 %
inflation rate based on the Gross Domestic Price Deflator Index; above average increases in real property
assessed valuation due to a robust market plus new construction; straight-line p0p.ulation increases based
on 23,000 residents in 2000. A more detailed Financial Capacity Analysis of the City can be found in an
Appendix to this document. Financing for utilities (drinking water, sanitary sewer, storm and surface
water management) is shown separately with each utility segment (e.g. drinking water) and is excluded
from the following table. Lists of the, more important economic and financial assumptions are'attached to
the Financial Capacity Analysis. A"General Overview of the Capital Facilities Plan is also attached for '
reference as a quick way to review the changes in this year's update to the Capital Facilities Plan.
As Approved by the City Council 22
27
Summary ofthe CiD"s Six Year Capital Financing Plan (except L.I.D.'s and Utilities)
~Funding Sources:
Beginning Cash & Investments
! Operating Revenues:
L Property Taxes
i Sales & Use Tax
, B & O / Other Taxes
! Licenses & Permit Fees
. Sales Tax Equalization
. Other Intergovernment
..--.
i Charges for Se?vices
Fines & Forfeits
Interest, Misc& Other
Operating Revenues
Dedicated Revenues:
Real Estate Excise & Other Taxes
MV Fuel Tax
Parking Revenues
Grants Received
Interest, Misc& Other
Dedicated Revenues
Bonds & Other Financing Sources
Total Sources of Funds
Operating Costs:
Executive / Legislative
Intergovernment Expend's
Judicial
Finance - General
Finance - Debt Service
Police
'~Planning / Building
Public Works
Street & Road MaintenanCe
Operating Capital Expend's
Net Transfers to Utilities
Operating Costs
City Offices
Public Woi-ks
Transportation Equipment
Transportation Projects
Total Capital
~Total Expenditures
','Annual Excess / (Shortfall)
[ Cumulative Excess / (Shortfall)
~ Ending Cash & Investments
2001
7,020
2002
4,665[ 5,076
2,2581 2,371
1,806} 1,878
913i 1,159
285~ 0
285~ 369
721~ 807
1491 166
214 445
11,296 12,271
1,540
465
275
574
348
3,202
0
21,518
1,515
891
566
1,414
1,676
2,096
1,864
1,804
1,495
214
625
14,160
350
1,324
480
2,900
5,054
19,214
2,304
2,304
1,558
547
283
40
470
2,898
4,450
19,618
1,636
986
594
1,542
1,769
2,253
1,920
1,844
1,470
225
500
14,739
100
1,825
480
3,350
5,755
20,494
(875~
1,428i
2003i 2004
2005. 2006
5,802 6,191
2,442 2,589
1,935 2,622
1,193' 1,465
0 0
379~ 391
831; 881
171 182
416, 412
13,170i 14,731
6,707
2,744
2,740
1,553
0
392
934
193
420
15,682
1,596
558
289
1,048
491
3,981
3,716
20,867
1,671 1,732
578 578
299 309
2,362 798
487 495
5,398! 3,911
1,8571 3,321
21,986! 22,914
1,685
1,025
618
1,588
2,227
2,366
1,958
1,918
1,529
234
0
15,147
250
1,626
480
· 3,614
.5,970
!21,117
1,761
1,081
652
1,659
2,382
2,520
2,027
2,023
1,613
247
0
15,965
5O
1,577
480
3,074
5,181
!21,146
1,840
1,I41
688
1,734
2,659
2,683
2,098
2,135
1,701
260
0
16,940
5O
828
480
2,221
3,579
20,519
(251) 840 2,396
1,178; 2,017 4,413
7,000 '
2,908
2,863
1,646
01
397i
990~
204I
520!
16,5291
1,804
586
320
171
595
3,476
600
20,605
1,923
1,204
726
1,812
2,711
2,858
2,171
2,252I
1,795[
274 !
0{
17,726!
50
925
480
1,200
,2,655
20,3811
224
4,637
6 Year
Total
35,441
15,312
13,843
7,929
285
2,212
5,164
1,065
2,426
83,679
9,900
3,311
1,776
4,993-
2,885
22,866
13,944
120,489
10,361
6,327
3,844
9,750
13,424
14,776
12,038
11,977
9,602
1,453
94,677
850
8,105
2,880
16,359
28,194
122,871
6 Year
Total
4,637
4,637
4,637
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's.
As Approved by the City Council 23
B.I. PARK & RECREATION DISTRICT
The Capital Facilities Plan for the Bainbridge Island Park and Recreation District is unchanged from the
Plan presented last year. The District is only required to update its Capital Facilities Plan every other
year and while they are now in the process of making that update, an updated plan is unlikely to be
final ized for several months after the approval of the City's Plan.
The District provides park and recreation programs to Island residents. Established in 1965, the District
provides services and recreational opportunities to youth, adults, families, seniors, as well as our chal-
lenged populations. Examples of programs offered include aquatics, adult exercise, martial arts,
gymnastics, soccer, and cultural programs. Additionally, the District provides staffing for the Senior
Center and Teen Center Schedules of the District's programs are mailed through brochures to all
Island households four times a year. Examples of events sponsored by the District include bike and
day hikes, Ski School, Spring Arts and Music Festival, Wednesday Concerts in the Park, and youth
baseball, soccer, and basketball camps, as well as volunteer and menloring opportunities.
The District also strives to assist community efforts to acquire open space, trails and aquatic opportu. nities.
In the District's early years, negotiation with the federal government provided transfer of Battle Point,
Eagledale and Strawberry Hill parks through the federal surplus lands program. Apart from two small
state parks, Fort Ward and Fay Bainbridge, other system parks have been acquired through citizen levies,
dedications and grants. Waterfront Park, a City Park, is a destination facility for the District's sailing
pro~am.
In 1998 the District won grant funding through the IAC to assist local efforts to acquire the head of the
bay at Blakely Harbor for cartop water access and a passive park. In 1999, the Blakely Harbor property
was acquired and the District won an ALEA grant from the Department of Natural ResourCes for this
same purchase. Private fundraising, site planning, and creek restoration efforts occured through
1999 for this purchase. Area trails are sought in conjunction with other private and foundation
development projects not pending at the South End.
Other pending developments include the addition of play fields at Hidden Cove Park and at Sands Road.
Construction is scheduled to begin later in 1999. These fields are tied to Level of Service Standards and
population growth. The addition of a new pool adjacent to the current Ray Williamson Pool will occur as
a result of a successful bond levy in February, 1999'. This is consistent with concurrency and growth
management issues. Planning will begin in 1999 and construction should follow in 2000 for the new pool.
Stewardship will continue at Gazzam in site restoration activities, trail and viewpoint development. The
southern twenty-four acre portion of this site is planned for billfold development and an interpretire
center contingent on project review. '
In terms of volunteer efforts, the District continues to offer opportunities for outreach2 The Island Trails
Committee works to maintain connections within parks and to major linkages such as schools and other
facilities. The Trails Committee also works to develop the cross Island trail. The Stewardship Program
was established to assist in the development of an interpretire center at Gazzam and in restoration efforts
at Gazzam including the ridding of invasive species of plants.
The District has an elected board of five volunteer commissioners and maintains a staff of nineteen full
time employees. Funding for operations is by citizen's levy authorized under RCW 36.69.
28
As Approved by the City Council 24
29
Voter approval is required for any major capital projects. Projects are included in this plan to aid
community-wide planning and to provide for grant funding eligibility. The projects and financial data
provided here reflect the 1997 update to the Park District's Capital Facilities Plan prepared in late 1997.
An update since that date has not yet been prepared.
Level of Service: (Existing -- 57.2 acres of park per 1,000 residents)
The DistriCt has identified a variety of service levels for different types of pa. rks and park facilities.
Those levels of service are as follows:
Park Type
{Neighborhood Park '
!Community Park
! Island-Wide Park
':Tennis / Multi-use
Ball Fields
Soccer Fields
Rec. Athletic Fields
. Swimming Pools
Volleyball Courts
~ Mini-Parks/Tot Lots
'Spec Use Facilities
i Linear Parks / Trails
Equestrian Facilities
Definition of Park / Facility
¼ to '/a mile service area & minimum size 5 acres
~ to 3 mile service area & minimum size 20 acres
within ~ mile drive and minimum size 100 acres
Asphalt or concrete courts with nets
Areas designed for softball and baseball
Areas designed for soccer including goals & nets
Large grass areas. Recommended size: 5 acres
Covered pool suitable for year-round use
Outdoor court with net and sand / soil mixture
Not recommended - too expensive to maintain
Public art, parkways, historic sites, etc.
Elongated area with lengthwise road or trail
Areas primarily used by equestrians
Level of Service
.9 acres / 2000
2.1 acres / 1000
5.3 acres i 1000
1 court / 2000
1 field / 2500
1 field / 5000
1 field / 5000 '
1 pool/10000
1 court / 5000
None
Not Determined
Not Determined
Not Determined
As Approved by the City Council 25
The following inventory includes the Park District's land type designation and the park site owner.
Park Site
Resource Co ,servancy :
Meigs Park
Ted Olson Nature Preserve
W. Port Madison Preserve
Manzanita Park
The Grand Forest
Gazzam Lake Preserve
Battle Point Park, North
AthleHc Parks/Playgrounds:
Battle Point Park, South
Strawberry Hill Park
Aaron Tot Park
Eagledale Park
Gideon Park
Hidden Cove Park
Rotary Park
Gazzam Park
Sands Road Park
Resource Activity Parh's :
Camp Hopkins
T"chookwap Park
Waterfront Park
Fay Bainbridge Park
Fort Ward Park
Blakely Harbor Park
Recreation Centers:
Island Center Park
Littear Park / Trail:
Fairy Dell Trail Park
South End Trails
Special Use Facility:
Ray Williamson Pool & Add'n
Point White Pier
Other:
John Nelson Park
Lurekin Property
Total
Inventory of Park Sites
Owner Facilities
~Size in Acres
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
None as yet
Nature trail
Trails, picnic shelters, beach access
Horse & pedestrian trails
Horse & pedestrian trails
Horse & pedestrian trails
Fishing pond, trails, picnicking
67.0
12.0
13.0
120.0
240.0
294.0
45.0
Acres
(3 pcs.)
Park District
Park District
City Park
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
Park District
School District
Park District
City Park
City Park
Sport courts, field sports, trails,
Sport courts, field sports, classrooms,
Historical Museum, picnicking
Childreds play structure
Sport courts, play structure, covered
picnic shelter, art center
Trail and playground
Future ballfields and trails
Ballfields & children's' play structure
Future ball fields, sport courts, trails
Future bailfields
45.0
17.8
0.3
6.7
2.5
7.8
10.0
24.0
5.0
State Park
State Park
ParkDistrict
Multi-use bldg, trail, picnicking
Picnicking
Boat launch, picnicking, tennis
courts, playground
Picnicking; camping, boat launch,
volleyball, sandy beach
Boat launch, picnicking, trails, beach access
Picaicing, hand-carry boat access, shoreline
3.0
0.3
8.1
16.8
137.0
22.0
Park District
Community hall, picnicking
2.5
Park District
Park District
Park District (leased)
Park District
Trail and beach access
Trails, easements, trait implementation
Aquatid: Center
Dock, fishing, clamming
2.5
4 linear miles
1.5
0.3
City Park
City Park
Not presently in use
Shoreline Access
5.0
7.0
1,116.1
Acres
30
As Approved by the City Council 26
31
Funding Sources:
Beginning Cash & Investments
Maint & Opns Tax Levy
, Bonds/CIF Levy & Other Debt
' Grants & Contributions
~ Service Charges & Impact Fees
:'interest & Other Income
Total Funding
Less Operating Costs
Funding Avail. for Projects:
Projects:
Land Acquisition:
Land fill
Winslow Proximity
Facilities: '
Blakely Harbor Park
Fort Ward Neighborhood Park
Ray W'mson Pool Addition
Ray W'mson Pool Renovation
Gazzam Park Active Rec Area
Grand Forest Parking
Gaz. zam Park Wildlife Area
Hidden Cove Park Developm't
Battle Pt Play Equipment
Battle Pt Soccer Field Renovat'n
"Battle Point Picnic Shelter
Battle Point Prlo'Redesign
Battle Point Center (Transmitter Bldg)
Battle Point Hard Court Area
Meigs Interpretlye Center
, Meigs Park Parking
; Eagledale Art Ctr Bldg Renov'n
.Rotary Park Improvements
~ Eagledale Park Access
~ Strawberry Hill Tennis Courts
5lsland Center Restroom
· T'Chookwop Park Development
7 Ballfield Devel at School Sites
7Community Center
' Camp Hopkins Park Developm't
, Total Projects
2000 Capital Facilities Plan -- Parks & Recreation
Pri-
ority
rda
n/a
n/a
rda
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
ns'a
n/a
n/a
2001
950[
n/a
2,500
1,185
200
3,885
n/a
4,835
2000
1,000
100
42
180
20
1 349
2002 2003
rlJa
1,635
40
40
1,715
n/a
1,715
2001
4,500
150
185
4,835
2004. 2005
n/a !
1,165i 650
1,I651 650
n/a i n/a
1,165 1 650
2002
1,oool
500
50
60
80
25
i
1,715t
2003
900
15o.I
115
1,165
n/a
0
n/a
0i
2004I
250
400
650
2006
n/a
0
n/a
0
2005
0
7Xnnual Excess / (Shortfall) n/a 0 0 } 0
Cumulative Excess / (Shorffall) rda 0 0 ~ 0
Ending Cash & Investments
;
Notes: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 1999 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
Note: After 2004 * = See page 0 for further information regarding timing.
These projects have to be voted on by the people in order to go forward.
After
2006 *
rlJa
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
0
rl/a
After
2005 *
260
800
62
350
190
62
65
50
650
800
450
3,679
5 Year
Total
0
0
0
6 Year
Total
-0'
2,500
4,635
40
240
7,415
8,365
Total
1,000
900
500
200
5,500
350
400
50
210
122
150
180
25
185
800
62
0
115
350
.190
20
62
65
50
650
800
450
13,386
As Approved by the City Council 27
B.I. SCHOOL DISTRICT No. 303
Bainbridge Island School District//303 has not updated its Capital Facilities Plan since the last update ·
of the City's Plan. An update of the Schoors Plan is presently underway and is expected shortly.
Bainbridge Island School District #303 offers kindergarten through 12th grade (K-12) education to
Bainbridge Island residents. School facilities are principally funded through voter-approved long-term
bonds, interest on bond proceeds, state matching money and impact fees. School impact fees, collected
and held by the City of Bainbridge Island since 1992, have funded approximately $4 million in
construction of additional space in the High School and Sakai Intermediate School. Special levies can
fund specific capital improvements, such as technology, and can purchase equipment such as school
buses. School District operating costs are principally funded through a state apportionment formula and
local tax levies.
Wilkes Elementary and Blakely Elementary are located in the north and south sections of the Island.
Ordway Elementary, Bainbridge High and Commodore Center are located on the district's main ca .mpus,
a 75-acre site at Madison Ave. NE and NE High School Road. The campus includes district administra-
tion buildings, maintenance and shop facilities, the transportation center, and a nature study area.
The main campus also encompasses land leased to other agencies for a swimming pool, a teen center and
a daycare facility. Woodward Middle School and Sakai Intermediate School are located at Sportsman
Club Road and New Brooklyn, less than a half-mile northwest of the main campus.
LEVEL OF SERVICE: School District LOS considers two criteria: 1) the permanent, physical space
space available to house students; and 2) program capacity, which is a complex calculation involving the
personnel and facilities needed to provide the desired classes and activities. The desired student-to-
teacher ratios are:
Student/Teacher Ratio
Grades K through 2:
Grade 3:
Grades 4 through 5:
Grades 6 through 8:
~Grades 9 through 12
22 students per teacher *
23 students per teacher *
~27 students per teacher *
129 students per teacher
~29 students per teacher
32
* There is currently Federal/State funding available on a year-to-year basis to lower class sizes at Grades
RECENT EVENTS: One goal of the district's strategi~ plan is to partner more with the entire commun-
ity for educational and recreational purposes. To this end the district has agreements with a consortium
of community service agencies, led by Bainbridge Youth Services, to rent part of Commodore Center;
with the City for water provision and surface water/environmental education; with the Park District for '
additional sports fields and transfer of the former alternative high school building at Strawberry Hill Park;
with the Bainbridge Island Education ~ssociation for office space; with the Fire Department for a
transmission tower site; and with the Meadowmere Water utility for a storage tank site. Proceeds from a
technology levy approved in February, 1996 have improved computer access for students at all levels
and for community members.
As Approved by the City Council 28
33
The voters approved a $26.8 million bond in February, 1997. Along with interest and school impact fees,
these bonds funded expansion and improvements at Bainbridge High School, construction of Sakai
Intermediate School, and compliance with federal regulations regarding underground storage tanks and
asbestos abatement.
PLANS FOR THE FUTURE:
Page 1 of the School District's Capital Facilities Plan indicates its purpose is to aid planning to:
2.
3.
4.
5.
Extend the useful life of existing facilities,
Enhance educational opportunities iri program and technology,
Improve the learning environment by improving major systems,
Provide appropriate classrooms for all students, and
Acquire enough land to provide sites for future facilities.
These are still the significant areas to be considered when planning.
As we enter the twenty-first century, the following trends and conditions are expected:
o
8.
9.
10.
Continued enrollment growth,
Continued high expectations for the Island's children and their schools,
Continued rapid technological change,
Educational reform affecting the spaces needed to deliver programs in ways that cannot be
foreseen,
Insufficient funding to support the desired page of educational reform (the pressure to defer
defer maintenance will continue),
Increased concern about building environment and health, requiring updates in materials and
systems,
Continued need for social and recreational facilities, to be met in part by school facilities,
Continued cooperation among Island agencies to meet the needs of children,
Continued dependence on voter-approved bonds to fund capital improvements, and
Continued demand for neighborhood schools and small buildings with smaller student class size
at the elementary level.
The District will need to obtain wide popular support to fund its needed capital improvements through
bond issues. The District's history of using citizen groups to direct its plans for facilities has worked well
and can be expected to continue in the future. This document includes those improvements currently
under construction. Mowever, all of the interest areas and trends will need to be continually monitored
and this plan updated to respond to changing c6nditions..
The District has no plans to pace an additional construction bond on the ballot prior to February, 2002.
OTHER CAPITAL ITEMS: The district's major capital assets include the properties discussed
above, a district-wide technology network, and a vehicle fleet. The fleet currently contains 21 school
buses, of which 11 are new (1999) m':odels;; 7 special education buses of which 2 are new (1999) models;
and 20 miscellaneous maintenance and motor.pool vehicles.
As Approved by the City Council
29
OPERATING COSTS
from state sources, investment earnings, and impact fees. The operating expenses of the District,
including maintenance of facilities, are through state apportionment (74%) and local tax levies (18%).
Federal sources and local efforts each provide about four percent of the operating budget. The state
apportionment funding can be expected to grow in concert with increased enrollment and inflation.
Operating funds are not available to support construction of capital facilities.
New buildings are primarily funded through long-term bonds, with contributions
34
Inventory of Facilities
i Building Building Program Capacity
School Facility I Area Classrooms for Building
Capt. Wilkes Elementary i 40,985 SqFt 14 334
12781 Madison Ave. NE
Capt. Blakely Elementary : 42,450 15 357
.
4707 Blakely Ave. NE
Ordway Elementary 51,193 16 381
8555 Madison Ave. NE
Portables
5!
Subtotal - Elementary
Woodward Middle School
9125 Sportsman Club Road
Bainbridge High School
9330 NE High School Road
'Sakai Middle School
Sportsman Club Road NE
Subtotal - Middle & HS
Total Schools
Commodore Center *
9350 NE High School Road
Administration Center
8489 Madison Avenue NE
Maintenance Center
Transportation Facility
Mandus Olson Property
Sands Road Property
134,628 45 1,072
15
77,547 24' 696 6
206,990 ~ 60 1350
66,536 22 600
351,073 [ 106
485,701 } 151
89,508 35
n/a
2,646
3,718
770
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a n/a
40 acres Undeveloped
10 acres ' Undeveloped
* Commodore Center, formerly an elementary and middle school, now houses alternative elementary and high school
programs, a home school support resource center, some school district offices, and a variety of early childhood and
community service programs. It accommodated overflow from the high school during construction (1998-99) and the
the intermediate school temporarily during fall 1999. Long-term use is not feasible, given the age of the building
and the cost to renovate. When short-term uses are no longer advantageous, major portions of Commodore Center
have been identified for demolition.
As Approved by the City Council 30
35
' Funding Sources:
', Beginning Cash & Investments
LMaint & Opns Tax Levy
i Bonds/CIF Levy & Other Debt
State Matching Funds
Service Charges & Impact Fees
Interest & Other Income
Totnl Funding
: Less Operating Costs
Funding Avail. for Projects:
Projects:
Sakai Intermediate School
7High School Add'n & Mod.
Technology
Pool Improvements
'UST Compliance
Additional Equipment
BIakely Boilers
Woodward Project
System Replacement
Administration Building
New K-8 school
Other Facility Expansion
Real Estate Purchase
Total Projects
1999 Capital Facilities Plan -- School District
2001 2002 2003 2004 2005
Pri-
ority
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
ru'a
n/a
n/a
n/a
rda
n/a
1,481
~a
80
313
1,209
1,602
n/a
3,083
Before
2001
10,329
16,126
680
100
212
38
I00
1,099
28,683
~a
35,000
613
150
35,763
n/a
35,763
2001
50
200
750
230
70
1,500
2,800
n/a ~ n/a
! 1,000
1,213i 613
1,500! 400
2,713! 2,013
n/a ! n/a
2,713~ 2,013i
2002
1,000
150
100
500
1,750
2003
18,000
150
10,000
28,150
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2004
3,500
150
2,000
5,650
Annual Excess / (Shortfall)
Cumulative Excess / (Shortfail)
Ending Cash & Investments
283
283
34,013
34,296
8,859
2006
Note: ~11 amOuntS arc S in 000's and are in 1999 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
2006 I 6 Year
or Later [ Total .
2005
· n/a ; n/a
n/a I nfa
rL/a i n/a
n/a ! n/a
n/a ~ n/a
n/a ~ n/a
nta ! n/a
o i n/a
2006
or Later
rlfa
(3,6375 n/a~ n/a
5,222I n/a i rv'a
'0
35,000
1,000
2,439
2,050
40,489
0
40,489
Project
Total
10,379
38,826
680
100
212
38
I00
1,849'
680
100
10,000
2,570
6 Year
Total
5,222
5,222
5,222
Note the absence of an indicated maintenance & operatiohs ..levy and also of operating costs. This is
because the School District funds much of its operations from state apportionment and'annual special
levies. As a result, there is no operating surplus to fund capital improvements.
The Bainbridge Island School District advises that it has not formulated capital plans past the year 2003,
as so many of its needs are dependent..on enrollment. Additionally, the projects listed have not been
prioritized because funding is available to complete them all.
As Approved by the City Council 31
B.I. FIRE DEPARTMENT
Each year the Bainbridge Island Fire Department (also known as Kitsap .County Fire Protection District
No. 2) reviews and updates a Ten Year Plan to guide future operating costs and capital projects involving
emergency facilities, vehicles and equipment. The Department takes into account six factors in setting
its capital project priorities: (I) completing prior year commitments: (2) meeting response time and
emergency service level standards adopted by the Board of Fire Commissioners; (3) following through
with planned upgrades and replacements of facilities, vehicles and equipment: (4) supporting a
community-based services Department mostly staffed by volunteers; (5) emphasizing the training and
safety of emergency responders; and (6) promoting self-sufficient fire stations for normal operations and
for operations during storms and disasters.
MAJOR ACCOMPLISHMENTS 1997-2000
In 1997, the Department installed a 160 foot emergency communications tower on Mandus Olson Road
to improve radio coverage at emergency incidents. The tower is also utilized by the City's Police
Department.
In 1998, the Department completed a Master Site Plhn for future fire station improvements. Based
on this Plan, the Department completed several projects at the Headquarters Station #21 (Madison
Avenue) including: replacing underground fuel tanks with a new above ground fueling facility;
construction a new housing unit for volunteer resident firefighters; and making site improvements for
drainage control and expanded parking. Planned vehicle purchases over the last two years included
the acquisition of two pureper trucks and the replacement of one medical aid unit.
ANTICIPATED SCHEDULE CHANGES AND FUTURE OUTLOOK
Facility improvements at three existing fire stations will continue to be guided by the Master Site
Plan. Anticipated fire station improvements over the next six years include: (1) construction a wash
bay for vehicles and remodeling the main building at Station #21; and (2) constructing a new housing
unit for volunteer resident firefighters, installing a fueling facility and constructing a wash bay at
Station #22 (Bucklin Hill Road). In 2003, the Department anticipates adding a new aerial ladder
truck to the fleet to enhance emergency operations and support firefighter safety. Within the next
six years the Department will also replace two pureper trucks, two water tenders and two medical
aid units.
36
As Approved by the City Council 32
37
LEVEL OF SERVICE
The Fire Department's mission is to save lives, protect property, and share responsibility for community
safety. The Department responds to fire and medical emergencies, rescue situations and disasters. It also
provides programs aimed at preventing fires and preparing both adults and children for emergencies.
The Department currently responds to about five emergency calls each day, with 75 % of the calls
involving medical aid and 25 % involving fires. The Department's goal is to respond within an average of
five minutes from the notice of a call to arrival at the scene. In 1999, the Department responded to 377
fire calls and 1,345 medical aid calls.
Building
Headquarters Fire Station 21
8895 Madison Ave.
South Satellite Station 22
7943 Bucklin Hill Road
Noah Satellite Station 23
12985 Phelps Road N.E.
i Storage Facility
i9421 NE Day Road East
Taylor Avenue Property
i Mandus Olson Radio Tower
Total
2000 Inventory of Facilities
Floor Area Uses
Administration and operations, resident housing for 4
13,400 SqFt firefighters, 8 stall Apparatus Bay, Multipurpose Room
Facilities and equipment office, resident facilities for
5,000 SqFt 2 firefighters, 4 stall apparatus bay, maintenance shop
Resident facilities for 3 to 4 firefighters, 3 stall apparatus
8,500 SqFt bay, training classroom and tower, trainin~safety..office
Two Stall Concrete Block Apparatus Bay
875 SqFt (currently used for storage)
n/a Vacant Lot
80 SqFt Communications Shed with a 160' Radio Tower
27,855 SqFt
Location
Fire Station21 (Headquarters)
Fire Station 22 (Bucklin Hill Road)
"Fire Station 23 (Phelps Road)
Total Apparatus Count
2000 Inventory of Vehicles
Apparatus
Car
Suburban Truck
Suburban Truck
Van
Van
Pumper
Pumper
Rescue Truck
Tender
Tender
Medic Unit
Aid Unit
Boat Truck '
Boat ·
Maintenance Truck
Pureper
Tender
Aid Unit
Bumper
~ender
Aid Unit
Training pureper
22
Capacity/type
Command / Operations Chief
Command / Duty Officer
Training & Safety'
Fire Code Mgmt Official
General Transport
1500 gallons per minute Attack Engine
1500 gallons per minute Attack Engine
Rescue/Equipment Vehicle
1500 gallon Water Tender
1500 gallon Water Tender
Medic Unit - Advanced Life Support
Aid Unit- Basic Life Support
Marine Rescue
Trailered Marine Rescue. Boat
Utility / Facilities & Equipment
1250 gallons per minute Attack Engine
2500 gallon Water Tender
Aid Unit - Basic Life Support
1250 gallons per minute Attack Engine.
2500 gallon Water Tender
Aid Unit - Basic Life Support
1971 Pumper Engine for Cadet Program
As Approved by the City Council 33
2001 Capital Facilities Plan -- B.I. Fire Department
Funding Sources:
Beginning Cash & Investments .(Expense Fund)
Maint & Opns Tax Levy
Alternative Revenue Sources
Transfer In from Reserve Fund
! Service Charges
: Interest & Other Income
rTotal Funding
Less Operating Costs
Less Debt Service Costs
Less Funds Dedicated to Ending Fund Balance
Funding Avail. for Projects (Capital Transfer)
i Projects:
~ Capital Facilities:
t Headquarters Station Resident Housing
Renovate Headquarters Station
'Station 22 Improvements
Station 23 Improvements
Capital Equipment:
Command / Utility Vehicles
EMS Aid Units
Fire Engines
Aerial Ladder Truck
Tenders
Marine Truck & Rescue Boat
Rescue Truck
Radio System Improvements
Other
Pri-
ority
ll/a
n/a
n/a
[ 2000
694
3,064
9
95
219
4,081
2,656
299
442
684
2000 &
Before
768
201
50
1
n/a 78
n/a 98
n/a [ 358
n/a
rl]a
n/a
n/a
n/a 46
n/a
Total Projects 1,600
2001
'442
3,312
4
98
212
4,068
2,737
306
456
569
2001
482
32
514
2002
456
3,579
4
I01
221
4,361
2,861
303
477
720
2003
477
3,864
5
104
214
4,664
2,989
450
498
727.{
2004
498
4,167
5
107
216
4,993
3,124
460
521
888
2002 2003 2004
1,008 313
128
1,008
732
860
313
1999 Ending Capital Fund Balance 290
Net Annfial Excess / (Shortfall) 173 55 (2882 (133~ 575
Cumulative Excess / (Shortfall) * * * 290 463 518 230 l 97 ~ 672
Ending Capital Fund Balance
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
i
2005!
521
4 369
5
110
254
5,252
3,265~
4781
544!
9651
2005
727
139
652
48
1,566
(6oi)
71
2006
544
4,480
400
5
114
232
5,775
3,411
484
569
1,311
2006
444
929
1,373
(62)t
9
6 Year
Total
23,764
4O0
28
634
1,349
26,869
18,387
2,481
3,065
5,180
After
2006 *
640
7,700
1,042
459
1,103
742
924
124
264
1,000
13,998
6 Year
Total
(281:
9
9
.1
?
As Approved by the City Council 34
39
SEWER DISTRICT No. 7
Unlike the other local governments, Kitsap County Sewer District No. 7 has not updated its Capital
Facilities Plan since the last update of the City's Plan. An update of the Sewer District's Plan is unlikely
because the District believes that, absent changes to its planned capital projects, an update is not needed.
In August, 1996, Kitsap Cotmty Server District No. 7 completed construction of a sewage treatment facilit
with a design capacity equivalent to 408 single-family residences (ERU's), an outfall, and major intercepto'
lines. Funding for the $3,500,000 cost of the facilities consisted of a Department of Ecology grant for
roughly 50 % of the cost and a Washington State Revolving Loan Fund loan for the remainder. The loan
is being repaid from assessments against the property owners served by the facility through Local Improve
ent District #1. The Sewer District serves an area around Fort Ward including approximately 350
parcels of land ranging in size from 6,000 sq.ft. to 20 acres. Presently, the District is serving 76 customers
and has another 25 who have prepaid L.I.D. #1 charges in order to ensure availability of service. More
customers are signing up daily. The District does not have the capacity to serve all the lots which could
be created within its boundaries under existing zoning, although it has sufficient capacity to serve a}l
presently-existing lots within the District. Service availability is offered on a "first come, first served" bas
Roughly three years ago, the District committed'to provide 80 ERU to property owners in and around
Lynwood Center. That agreement is now final and the Lynwood Center customers began connecting
to the sewer in August, 1998. The Lynwood Center customers were required to pay for the cost of the
sewer line to serve them plus a proportionate share of the general facilities cost (L.I.D. #1)
The Sewer District has determined to fund all future improvements through local improvement districts.
L.I.D.'s will only be established when homeowner petitions show a clear desire for the connection. The
following table lists the known or anticipated L.I.D.'s:
1999 Capital Facilities Plan -- Sewage District No. 7
Funding Sources: 1999 2000 2001 [ 2002
L.I.D. Bonds 386 40 [ ? ? ?
All other sources
Total Funding 3861 40 0] 0
Funding Avail. for Projects I 386 ~ 40 ~ 01 0
2003
???
2004
6Year
Total
426
Projects:
LID # 2 - S. Beach Dr
LID # 3 - Soundview
LID # 4 - Virginia Ct
LID # 5 - Parkview Dr
Robertson Avenue
Kitsap Avenue
Total Projects
Before · ...
Priority 1999 1999 2000
I 286
2 40
3 40
4 I 60
n/a
0 386! 40
2001
2002
???
???
0 0
'2003
???
???
0
0 0 426
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 1999 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
01 oi
426
2004
6 Year
Total
426
As Approved by the City Council 35
SUMMARY
The followingsummarizes projects proposed by th~ various taxing' districts on Bainbridge Island,
during 2000-2006 and their effects on the taxpayers. Because different plans are for different time
periods, the summary is not complete for all years.
Summary of Capital Projects for All Bainbridge Island Taxing Districts
District
City - Admin / Facilities
City - Parks & Trails
City - Transportation & Equipm't
Sub-Total: City-Tax Sppt'd
Schools
Parks
Fire
Six Year Total (Excl. Util.)
City - Drinking Water
City - Sewage Disposal
icily - Storm & Surface Water
Swr Dist #7 -Sewage Disposal
Six Y~ar Total
2001
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
2,800
4,835
5141
n/a
n/a
n/a
n/a
nla
2002~ 2003
$350 $250
1,324 1,626
3,380 4,569
5,054 6,445
1,750 28,150
1,715 1,165
1,008 860
9,527 ~ 36,620
793 1,641
1,184 1,351
765 515
40 0
12,309 40,127
,2004 2005
] $50 $50
i 1,577 828
13,554 3,451
i5,181I 4,329
i 5,650 n/a
i 650 0
i 313 1,566
~ 11,7941 5,895
666 736
653 1,286
1,026 620
0 0
14,1391 8,537
6 Year
2006 Total
$50 $750
925 6,280
1,680 16,634
2,655 23,664
n/a n/a
n/a n/a
n/a ~ n/a-'
2,655 1 n/a
265 4,101
783 5,257
465 3,391
01 40
4,168 i n/a
lMemo: Total City [ 0! 7,796t 9,952~ 7,5261 6,9711 4,1681 36,4131
4O
Note: All amounts are $ in 000's and are in 1999/2000 $ (that is, no adjustment has been made for inflation).
,
As Approved by the City Council 36
41
<
O
'r,.)
0
0
C:)Ooo
'~'C) I'-
oOIC~
i ~a~'.
I
i
42
OI/~O0
Cq
,.-, el)
43
Z
-<
Z
Z
Z
(D
C)
C)
0
Z
0
0
0
0
<
0
t'-~OOC)
'-~000
"'-'CDO0
~Smdo c~
i
-<
0
~S~od c~
CD
CD
0
0
0
0
>
0
E
0
Z
0
<
Z
!
!
-<
,--. 0
0 0
e4 ,,--,
o,~-~--~ '-i,
!"- ,--*
CO -,,-,
0
0
o
o
Z
44
45
t~
Z
Or~
0
o
0
0
Z
<
Z
Z
<
z
0
z
o
C~CqO ,-~
0
0
0
0
0
z
4'7
C)
I
i
i
i
I
i
o
48
i
I
0
Z
0
0
~ ~t c'4 0
o c~
0 0
t-
0 t-
O
0
(::3 0
0 0
0
0
0
' 0
49
0
C) CD
CD
~r,.t2,:
50
r~
0
o¢,oo,---~
l"-,
v'~c~lo0o
0
0
0
51
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND -- 2001 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PROJECT
1 Roads Program Annual Program - repaying, patching and/or chip seal or overlay for approximately 15 -
2 Bike Lanes
Annual
3 Pedestrian Access
4 Enhancements-
Intersection/Trails
5 High School Road
(Madison -
Sportsman)
6 Manitou Beach
PHI
(Murden Cove to
Falk)
7 Wyatt Way
Reconstruction
(Madison to
Finch)
8 Madison Avenue
(HS-New Brooklyn)
10
Ericksen Traffic
Calming
(Winslow Way-
Wallace)
Winslow Loop,
Knetchel/Wallace
& Pedobke
Safety/Non-
motorized Plan
Isl-.Wide
11 Winslow Way
Downtown
(S1B05 to
Madison)
12 Halls Hill/Blakely
20 miles of roads. (PMS Program 1993) Note that 2001 project total is reduced to
reflect the anticipated repair carryover from 2000.
2001 - $861
Bike Lane Annual program -
2000 -- Miller Road from Battle Point to Tolo (ROW required)
2001 --Lynwood Road to Eagle Harbor Dr.
2001 -- Blakely Avenue
(PRX 93 Tranp. Plan)
2001 - $I00
Annual program -- intended to provide a pool for trails, sidewalks, etc
2001 - $50
Annual program - Intended to accommodate periodic intersection improvements.
2001 - $50
2001 - $1,500 - construction.
Reconstruction of High School Road (from Sportsman Club Road to Madison Avenue),
with minor vertical sight distance improvements. One 5-foot bike lane in each direction
and concrete sidewalks on both sides and stormwater detention and water quality
treatment vaults. Four concrete transit shelter pads shall be constructed, two on each
side of the roadway. This project will include a biological assessment into the desig'n
and plans.
2000 - Design for improvements to existing roadway and bulkhead & ROW acquisition.
2002 - $ 658 - Construction
2001 - $228 - Design
2002 - $229 - Design and ROW Acquisition.
2003 - $1,714 - Reconstruct and widen.
(URS92/PRX 93/HCWI.,96)
2001 - $191 Design & ROW
2002 - $191 Construction
WMP (Table 7 May 98)
2001 - $114 - Design
2003 - $836 o Construction
2000 - Pilot project: Madison Ave traffic calming measures in 2000.
2000 - O'Connor conceptual ideas for Winsl0w Loop (Grow/Wyatt/WinWay) Earth-
tech for design on Winslow Way section.
2001 - $100 - Additional Design based on 2000 Non-motorized Plan Island-Wide
(Outside Design Consultant) and 2000 Transportation Plan
2002/2003/2004 $1,000 each, 2005 $900 - Construction
Sidewalks both sides & utilities (~,VMP Table 7 May 98)
2002 - $257 - Design
2004 ~ $1,782 - Construction
2002 - $170 - Design & Construction -
In-House
In-House
In-House
. Parametrix
Lee
Jones/IN-
House
In-House if
resources
available
In-House
Peter
O'Connor/
Entranco!
Earth-
Tech/JDL/?
Transport.
Study??
Earth
TecMn-
house
TRN/pwclerks/projects/scope of work 2001 CIP 1
CITY OF BArNBRIDGE ISLAND -- 2001 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
5~
.PRO JEff
Hill Relocation
13 Ft Ward Hill
Reconstruction
14
Erickson Ave
(WinWay I/S to
South)
15 Ericksen-
Hildebrand
Opening
16 Ericksen High
School Rd I/S
17 Manitou Beach
Phase II
(Falk to cu~'e)
18 Bypass Road
(wMP)
19 Wing Pt. Rd.
Reconstruction
20 Upper Crystal
Springs (LID)
21 High School Road
(Madison-Femct iff)
22 Sands Avenue
23 Shepherd Way
24 Day Road East
(SR305-Sunrise)'
25 Winslow Way W.
(Sun Day Cove-Grow)
26 Winslow Way
End ffemeliff-Eagle)
27 Miller/Fletcher
Bay/New
Brooklyn I/S PHIl
27 Roads -
Connectivity
The' City will either be contributing to the reconstruction of this road in conjunction with
Kelly Samson's project or handling improvements as a City project. 2
2002 - $168 - Design
2003 - $562 - Construction
Reconstruction of approximately 3,400' of roadway with bike lanes & drainage
improvements (HCWL 5/96 Estimate)
Design in 2001 (see item 9)
2003 - $220 - Construct
Sidewalks & bike lanes both sides & storm drainage & water improvements
(WMP Table 7 May 98)
See item 9
See item 9
2007+
Options are:
1. Repair existing bulkhead and relocate road slightly to the north.
2. Abandon road on high bluff and build new 2-way connector road north of existing
road.
3. Do nothing
2007+
(Table 7 WMP May 1998)
2004 - $255 - Design/ROW
2005 - S833 - Construction
Reconstruction of road, installation of drainage facilities, roadside ditching, culverts,
construction of keystone wall and 2-inch asphalt overlay. 4' bicycle/pedestrian paths
added to each side. Existing sanitary sewer & watermains will be supported and
adjusted. (Estimate fr Hardhag & Assoc. 1997)
Road improvements to include widening, drainage, paving
2007+ ? '
Roads (Traffic calming, pedestrian enhancements) (x,VMP, Table 7 May 98)
No budget or schedule in current CFE
No budget or schedule in current CFE
$1,005 - 2007+
Reconstruction - Add 5' bike lanes, construct bike lanes in accordance with COBI
secondary arterial street standards. Widen shoulders (both sides) for approximately 1.4
miles. (HCWL estimate May 1996).
$866 - 2007+ ..
$159-2007+
$524-2007+
2007+
.IN-House
Need
Tranp. Plan
TRN/pwclerks/projects/scope of work 2001 CIP 2
53
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND -- 2001 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
:- ;PRO JEff.
Water Mains
Upgrade
Annual Up~ades
2001 - $50 _
2 High Zone
Reservoir
3 Water Property
Acquisition
4 Water Tank
Modification
5 Rockaway Beach
Maganese
6 Head of the Bay
Wells (2)
7 Telemetry
Equipment
8 Low Zone
Reservoir
9 Water Treatment
Equipment
9 Wellfield Emerg.
Power
11 Wyatt-High Zone
Main (Madison-
Grow)
12 Pressure Zone
Extension
13 Water Quality
Ferry Terminal
14 Mandus Olsoh
Tank
15 Grow Ave
(HS-Gideon)
16 Grow- High Zone
Main (Wyatt-
Shepherd)
17 Shepherd - High
Zone Main (Grow
- Government
Way)
18 Wellhead
Protection
2002 - $1,000 - Design/Construction
Construct high zone reservoir (0.5 rag) and proviae approximately 10,000' of 12" main'
from an existing main to the proposed reservoir.
(RW'Beck 9/95 Water System Plan - Table V-4)
2001-$500
1999 - Design - Browne Engineering was contracted for review of the structural
evaluation and potential design to raise the elevation of the existing High School water
tank. If the project proves feasible, they will proceed with a structural design to raise the
elevation of the tank.
2002 - $200 - Design/Construction
2001 -$110
Treatment System
2003 - $100
Property Acq/ROW Realignment
2001 - $75
2003 - $50 - ROW
2004 - $320 - Design/Construction (0.2 rag)
RW Beck 9/95 Water System Plan Section V-6.
2001/2002/2003 - $25 each year
2002- $40
Generators
2002- $200
Extending high zone area
2003 - $50
2004 - $50
2003 - $80
WMP
No schedule or budget in current CFE
(Subject to High School Tank modification resutls)
$176 - 2007+ ;
$100 - 2007+
needs to be done in conjunction with item 12
$80 - 2007+
needs to be done in conjunction with item 12
No schedule or budget in current CFE. Needs: 1) Area delineation - Def'me the areas of
the City's wells that require protection per State regulation. 2). Hazard Inventory of
current and future land use in those areas delineated as wellhead protection zones. 3).
Browne
Engr.
TKN/pwclerks/projects/scope of work 2001 CIP 3
19
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND -- 2001 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
PROJECT
AC Line
Replacement
Develop a plan to reduce the potential to contaminate the groundwater in and around the
City's wells. Specifically, establish wellhead protection areas (WHPA) and record
covenants on effected parcels. '
RWBeck 9/95 Water System Plan.
$500 - 2007+
Drainage - $200 per year- 2001 drainage upgrades include: In-House
Upgrades 2001 (1) Fairview/Madrona Area, (2) McRedmond/Wardwell Area, (3) Mountain View Drive,
(4) Manzanita Area
Annual Program
2001/2002/2003/2004/2005/2006 - $50 each year
2001 - $275 - Construction
Construction of a new decant facility for efficient and effective de-watering of urban
sediment from City stormwater catch basin sumps.
$200 per year - 2002 drainage upgrades include:
(1)Halls Hill Area, (2) Upper Crystal Springs
$200 per year - 2003 Upgrades include:
(1) Crystal Springs Area, Pt. White Drive, (3) Lynwood Center
$200 per year - Drainage Upgrades 2004 - 2007+
Various
2 ESA Response
(Shoreline Protection)
3 Decant Facility
4 Drainage -
Upgrades 2002
5 Drainage
Upgrades 2003
6 Drainage
Upgrades 2004-
2007+
Ron
.Topazi0
1 Collection System
Upgrades Annual
2 Lift Station
Upgrades
3 Infiltration -
Inflow
2001-$53
2001 - $30 - Design
2000 - Continue with smoke testing done by Pacific Engineering and a variety of repair
works primarily on manholes.
2001-2006 - $50 per year- Continuation of program
Pacific
Enger.
4 WWTP
Recommenddtions
5 Telemetry
Equipment
Upgrade
6 South-End Sewer
2001 - $30
Proposed Schedule fr. RS Esvelt Studv:
Year 1 & 2 - Engineering Report, Backup effluent pump, replace hypochlorite pumps.
Year 3 - Headworks - bar screen backup with free screen
Year 4 - UV Disinfection
Year 4 - Second clari~er and sludge pumping - -
Year 5 - Sludge digestion & thickening for continued land application
(HR Esvelt Engineering estimate 11/99)
2002-$75
2001-$1,000
2002- $1,000
Proposed Sewer LIDS
RS Esvelt
Engr.
TRN/Pwclerks, tprojects/scope of work 2001 CIP 4
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND -- 2001 CAPITAL FACILITIES PLAN
1 Open Space & 2001 - $500
AgdOther Land
2 Landfill 2001 - $500
Reclamation
3 Winslow 2001 - S300
Parks/Trails o
WMP WMP Table 7 - May 1998
4 Road End -Annual Upgrades
Improvements 2001 - $24
5 Waterfront Park 2003 - $300
Verdigris
6 John Nelson Park
Rehab
7 Acq. WF Park
Residence
Vettigris Proposed Schedule:
Year 1 - Central Area - Bath house & play area.
Year 2 - Dock & Pier
Year 4 - Upper Brien & Community Center - West Gateway & Activity Area
Year 5+ - Community Center - East Gateway and Bjune
Year 5+ Civic Connections to Winslow Way and the Ferry Terminal
Year 5+ - Lower Terrace, lawn, amphitheater & sport court
Year 5+ - Boat Ramp Pier & Beach Area
(Waterfront Park Master Plan Prepared by Verdigris 11/97)
$250 - 2007+
Remediation
$350 - 2007+
I Public Works $250 - 2001 - Design/Construction for the two rock wall failures on the upper and lower Assoc.
Yard - North potion of the Public Works Facility located at Hidden Cove Road. Earth
Annex $1950 - 2007+ - Phase II Construction Sciences
(AESI)
2 ROW/Land Acq. $50 - 2001-2006 - Annual - Land acquisition for various projects, right-of-way etc.
'3
Police &.Court
-_
Public Works
Yard - South
Annex
$50 - 2001 - Desigrt
$5000 - 2007+ - Construction
$50 - 2002 Design
$200 - 2003 Construction
TRN/pwclerks/projects/scope of work 2001 CIP 5