BAINBRIDGE LANDING - HEXApril 6, 2017
CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WASHINGTON
HEARING EXAMINER
REPORT AND DECISION
Project: Bainbridge Landing Preliminary Long Subdivision and Site Plan Review
File Number: PLN50520SPR & SUB
Applicant: Bainbridge Community Development, LLC, represented by
Charles Wenzlau, Architect
490 Madison Avenue N, #105
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
Location: 259 Ferncliff Avenue, north of Harbor Square
Request:
The applicant is requesting to subdivide a 4.86 acre historic single family
residential site into 27 lots for development of 140 residential units, including 25
townhomes and a 115 unit apartment building. A one acre park on the east side
of the project site abutting Ferncliff Avenue will be publicly dedicated to obtain a
Floor Area Ratio (FAR) Bonus. The Housing Design Demonstration Projects
(HDDP) program will be utilized to construct a Tier 1, LEED certified project.
The project also requires a Site Plan Review approval.
SEPA Review: A Mitigated Determination of Non - Significance was issued on February 2, 2017.
Zoning and Plan Mixed Use Town Center (MUTC) — Ferry Terminal District (FTD) Overlay
Designations:
FINDINGS OF FACT
Site Characteristics
Talc Assessor Information:
A. Tax Lot Numbers: 262502 -3- 008 -2001
B. Owners of Record: William Lowery, James J. Lowery and Marcia C. Wicktom
C. Lot Size: 4.87 acres or 211,952 square feet
D. Land Use: Residential.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 1
2. Terrain: The site is generally level in the northeast portion, sloping to the southwest with site
elevations varying from approximately 135' at the northeast corner to 100' at the southwest
corner.
3. Soils: Mapping indicates that the predominant soil type on the site is Kapowsin gravelly ashy
loam, 0 to 6 %, except in the southeast area, which has 6 to 15% slopes (Soil Survey of Kitsap
County Area, Washington; U.S. Department of Agriculture, Soil Conservation Service, 1977).
4. Existing Site Development: The historic Cave family single family residence (constructed
between 1897 and 1900) exists in the northeast corner of the property.
5. Proposed Access: The proposed development will be accessed from both Ferncliff and Cave
Avenue, with shared use of Gilmore Avenue.
6. Public Services and Utilities: City of Bainbridge Island Water and Sewer.
7, Zoning /Comprehensive Plan Designation: The subject property is zoned Mixed Use Town
Center (MUTC) -Ferry Terminal District (FTD) Overlay
81 Surrounding Zoning /Comprehensive Plan Designation:
A. North: R -4.3, Single - family
B. South: MUTC, FTD
C. East: R -4.3, Single - family
D. West: MUTC, FTD
91 Surrounding Uses:
A. North: Gilmore Avenue and single - family development
B. South: Harbor Square development (mixed use development)
C. East: Ferncliff Avenue and single - family development
D. West: Cave Avenue and residential (single and multi - family).
Procedural History
10. A pre- application conference was held on May 10, 2016. The Design Review Board reviewed
the pre - application proposal on May 16, 2016. A public participation meeting was held on June 6,
2016. Applications for Preliminary Subdivision and Site Plan and Design Review Approvals were
submitted on July 14, 2016, and deemed complete on August 12, 2016.
11. The project is subject to State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review as set forth in
Washington Administrative Code Chapter 197 -11. Utilizing the optional DNS process provided in
WAC 197 -11 -355, the City issued a combined Notice of Application /SEPA comment period on August
26, 2016. The 14 -day comment period ended on September 9, 2016. A modification to the fireflow
options for the proposal application resulted in a revised notice of application /SEPA comment period
being issued on December 30, 2016, with a second 14 -day comment period concluding January 13,
2017. A Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS) was issued on February 2, 2017, with an
appeal period ending February 16, 2017. No appeals were filed.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 2
12. The Design Review Board (DRB) discussed the application at three different meetings, the last
held on November 21, 2016, reviewing the proposal for consistency with the City's multi- family and
} commercial/mixed use design guidelines as well as making general site and building design
recommendations. On October 17, 2016, the Design Review Board motioned to approve the plan
subject to a condition that the architect return to the DRB with alternative concepts for exterior
materials and their placement on the buildings. On November 21, 2016, the applicant met again with
the DRB and described three different potential material designs. The DRB voted in favor of
employing the natural palette color and the applicant has agreed to follow the DRB recommendation.
13. The Planning Commission (PC) held a public meeting on March 9, 2017, to review the project,
with the PC members expressing concern that they had not yet received the full staff report with all
proposed conditions and concluding that absent such items they would be unable to make a
recommendation. The meeting then heard an overview of the project from the applicant, received
public comment, and directed questions to the applicant and staff. The Planning Commission on March
14, 2017, received a full staff report and on March 17, 2017, continued its review of the project. The
Commission made a unanimous recommendation of approval subject to a recommendation for
revisions to specified conditions.
14. Agency technical comments were received from the City's fire marshal, development engineer
and Historic Preservation Commission (HPC). On July 22, 2016, the fire marshal submitted detailed
comments regarding fire flow, location of fire hydrants, fire sprinkler and alarm systems, and fire
apparatus access roads. To meet the fire flow requirements for this project, the applicant proposed two
options: 1) to extend an 8 inch waterline from the Vineyard Lane development to connect to the
existing water line in Gowen Place, or 2) develop a large water tank on site with a pump and back -up
generator. While both concepts were deemed viable, option 1 was preferred by the Fire Marshal's
Office because it will improve fire flow in the adjacent community as well. Option 1 will be
implemented by the applicant.
15. The Historic Preservation Commission (HPC) also took interest in the historic Cave House on
the project site. The applicant contracted with Cultural Resource Consultants (CRC) to provide a report
containing a historic property inventory update and an evaluation of significance for the Cave House
located at 259 Femcliff Avenue. The house could feasibly be relocated to an adjacent parcel to
accommodate the proposed Bainbridge Landing mixed -use development. Cave House was not
recommended as eligible for the National Register of Historic Places but is considered locally
significant and eligible for the Bainbridge Island Register of Historic Places. SEPA conditions nos. 12-
14 provide that should the home not be relocated or preserved on -site, it shall be offered for sale for
relocation.
16. Pursuant to BIMC Chapter 2.16.170, an applicant needing two or more land use applications for
a single project may request that the applications be processed under a single consolidated project
review to be conducted according to the procedures mandated for the highest rated application. The
proposed project needs both Site Plan and Design Review and a Preliminary Subdivision approval,
with the plat proposal requiring a public hearing before the Hearing Examiner. The two applications
were thus subject to review by the Hearing Examiner under the consolidated project review provisions,
with a consolidated public hearing held on March 22, 2017.
Impacts of Concern
17. From the beginning the review process for Bainbridge Landing has offered multiple
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 3
opportunities for public input. In fact, most major issues probably had been fully explored and fleshed
out before the public hearing in this proceeding was scheduled. As documented above, these included
opportunities both to submit written comments and testify at various meetings. Over the course of
review a range of concerns were voiced, including issues regarding traffic, design, environment (air
emissions, noise, light and glare), abutting trees and the type of units proposed (request for less rental
units). But the overwhelming focus was on traffic, particularly the impact of the project on Cave
Avenue.
18. The project is proposing two access routes: on its north side a two way public road connecting
Gilmore to Cave Avenue and, along the southern site boundary adjacent to Harbor Square, a one -way
public road from Ferncliff to Cave. Residents along Cave Avenue objected to directing additional
traffic to their dead -end local access street system, preferring that access roads all exit east to Femcliff
Avenue. They were particularly concerned about the project adding to traffic that currently stacks at the
Cave Avenue /Winslow intersection during peak ferry times.
19. An independent third party traffic consultant, Transportation Solutions, Inc., in November,
2016, submitted a traffic impact analysis (TIA) for the project. Trip generation rates were calculated for
the proposed public park, the detached single family homes and the apartment units. The project was
calculated to generate 33 new vehicle trips during the AM peak hour and 39 during the PM peak hour.
The applicant proposes that the southern access road be configured so that one -way westbound traffic
will exit the site to Cave Avenue north of Winslow Way, and the TIA analyzed the consequences of this
assumption.
20. The TIA evaluated the south access road under both eastbound and westbound one -way flow
scenarios to identify any safety or operational differences between potential on -site flow alternatives. It
concluded that direction of travel on the south access road will have little impact on intersection delays
and levels of service (LOS). The Winslow Way /Cave Avenue intersection operates at LOS B now in
the PM peak hour with a 10.3 second average delay. Based on the proposed circulation pattern, it is
predicted to remain at LOS B, going to 11.0 seconds delay in 2019 with the project and reaching 11.8
seconds in 2035. The Winslow Way/Femcliff Avenue intersection to the east lies opposite the ferry
terminal driveway and thus experiences more traffic; its projections are for 16.9 seconds delay in 2019
(LOS C) and 26.8 seconds delay (LOS D) in 2035.
21. The wild card in the traffic analysis is the congestion that results when the ferry loads and
unloads. The traffic study takes this surge into account via applying a peak hour factor to the hourly
average, but the fact remains that there will be short periods when ferry traffic generates gridlock in the
neighborhood immediately north of the terminal. There is no east/west stop control on Winslow Way at
the Cave Avenue intersection, which means that if the traffic queue on Winslow east of SR 305 backs
up past Cave Avenue, southbound traffic on Cave will be unable to turn until the queue dissipates. But,
also, after Bainbridge Landing is built, Cave traffic will have an additional option to exit east via the
northern access route to Femcliff and thus avoid having to make the turn onto Winslow Way.
22. The ferry is a state facility that is mainly served by a state highway access. It is a circumstance
over which the City has little direct control. From a policy standpoint the City could have chosen to
make ferry traffic avoidance its top priority, in which case it would have zoned the areas immediately
north of the terminal between SR 305 and Ferncliff Avenue for lower density development. But that
was not the choice made.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 4
23. Rather, the policy decision was to concentrate urban development in the Winslow area to take
advantage of convenient access to the ferry terminal and the established Winslow shopping area, with
emphasis placed on improving circulation, transit service and pedestrian access. In addition, a
significant percentage of nearby apartment dwellers were projected to walk onto the ferry to commute
to jobs in downtown Seattle. The introduction to the Land Use Element to the City's Comprehensive
Plan states that the "public purposes identified in the Plan are:
1) Shift density from critical areas and farmland to Winslow.
2) Provide affordable housing.
3) Contribute to public infrastructure and public amenities in excess of what is needed to
mitigate the impacts of development."
24. The MUTC zoning for the Bainbridge Landing property, as supplemented by the Winslow
Master Plan, seeks to create a format for fostering harmonious coexistence between the ferry terminal,
nearby higher density residential development and convenient commercial services. The goal is to
manage inevitable ferry traffic surges while encouraging nearby new residential development to offer
pedestrian friendly amenities and improved street connectivity.
25. Bainbridge Landing is to be evaluated within that relevant policy framework. Ferry traffic is an
unavoidable fact of life in this neighborhood. The TIA demonstrates that the applicant's circulation plan
embodies reasonable choices that will impose only minor level of service impacts and will not
appreciably increase current ferry traffic problems. The isolated and now underserved Cave Avenue
neighborhood will obtain a needed east -west secondary access route north of Winslow Way and the
park dedication will enhance pedestrian - friendly public amenities adjacent to the heavily used ferry
3 terminal access.
Regulatory Analysis
26. This project is mandated to utilize the Housing Design Development Program (HDDP), which
requires the use of innovative site development practices. The development will provide a variety of
unit sizes and unit types, including both fee ownership and rental, and will increase the variety of
housing choices suitable to a range of household sizes and incomes in a manner compatible with the
character of the existing neighborhood. The stated purpose of BIMC 2.16.020(Q) is to foster
development of housing design demonstration projects that increase the variety of housing choices
available to residents across underserved portions of the socio- economic spectrum, and to promote
compact, low- impact development where appropriate. The purpose is also to encourage high quality
and innovation in building design, site development and "green" building practices.
27. The proposal meets the purposes and goals of the HDDP program by providing a variety of
housing choices (town homes, lofts, 1, 2 and 3 bedroom apartments), offering smaller single family
homes ranging in size from 1,414 to 1,600 square feet and entailing construction pursuant to innovative
design and green building practices based on incorporating Leadership in Energy and Environmental
Design (LEED) standards into the development. Only properties located within the Winslow Study
Area of the Winslow Master Plan and the Winslow Sanitary Sewer System Service Area qualify for
approval under the HDDP ordinance.
28. Housing Design Demonstration Project applications are processed in accordance with BIMC
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 5
2.16.020(Q), which involves review by the Design Review Board and the Planning Commission before
going to the Hearing Examiner for a final decision. Each project is evaluated for innovation and
capacity for achievement of HDDP goals pursuant to factors falling within three categories: density;
green building and innovative site development; and housing diversity. Proposals qualifying as
housing design demonstration projects become eligible to use its flexible development standard
incentives.
29. The applicant is seeking approval as a Tier I LEED project. These projects do not receive a
density bonus, must achieve at least 16 points in the innovative site development evaluation, at least
another 5 points in the housing diversity category, and may not construct homes greater than 1,600
square feet in floor area. The project is not proposing nor is it required to provide any affordable
housing units. The site contains no regulated critical areas.
30. The HDDP review process details are described in the planning staff report at pages 18 through
21, which are adopted herein by reference. In summary, the project received qualifying housing
diversity points in the unit size and type categories, and sufficient innovative site development points in
the water quality, common open space and transportation categories. Water quality points were
awarded for underground parking, open space points for the public park, and transportation points for
pedestrian connections and electric vehicle charging stations. Staff's conclusion that the HDDP
decisional criteria enumerated at BIMC 2.16.020(Q)(5) have been met by the proposal is supported by
the record.
31. The staff report also provided a detailed analysis of the project's compliance with BIMC Title
18 Zoning requirements. Of these, the most consequential were the discussions of landscaping and
screening, tree retention, parking, and of course the City's delightfully arcane floor area ratio (FAR)
bonus system. Since 2010 the BIMC 18.09.030 use - specific standards have required that in the Mixed
Use Town Center district new single - family residences shall only be allowed through an approved
subdivision that qualifies as a housing design demonstration project.
32. The table at BIMC 18.12.020 -3 provides the lot dimensional standards for the MUTC zoning
district, including applicable floor area ratio maximums. For the Bainbridge Landing project the
maximum residential FAR without any bonus is 0.4, and the maximum with bonus is 1.1. The size of
the site is 4.87 acres or 212,137 square feet, resulting in a base FAR of 84,854.88 square feet and a
maximum with bonus of 233,350 square feet.
33. The project is proposing 154,229 square feet of floor area. Under BIMC 18.12.030(E) as much
as 60 percent of the maximum FAR bonus may be obtained by providing community open space
equaling the greater of one acre or 20 percent of the parcel area. Qualifying community open space
must exist in the vicinity of locations identified in Figure 4.1 of the Winslow Master Plan, must be
located on the development parcel, and must be on land that is buildable. Adequate public access to the
community open space must be provided.
34. The applicant is proposing more than an acre of open space, with 20% of 4.87 acres equaling
0.974 acres. The maximum FAR bonus available is 89,097 square feet. Of the 154,229 square feet
proposed, 84,854 constitutes the base and 69,375 will be acquired through the density bonus. A flat
one acre park is being proposed along the site's Ferncliff Avenue frontage. This area was earlier
identified in the Winslow Master Plan as a prime target site for a park, and the adjoining Harbor Square
development has a connecting park facility immediately to the south that was also created as part of a
FAR density bonus award. The park will be dedicated to the Parks District, which will design and
maintain it.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 6
35. The project will meet the separation requirements of BIMC 18.12.030(C) by providing 20 foot
setbacks along Cave, Ferncliff and Gilmore Avenues. For Cave Avenue, 10 feet of the partial
landscaping screen will lie within the right -of -way to be dedicated to the City, which will also provide a
sidewalk. The western portion of the 20 foot partial landscaping screen proposed along the site's
northern boundary is currently occupied by a rustic private section of Gilmore Way, which meanders
onto the Bainbridge Landing property.
36. The applicant is endeavoring to meet the partial landscaping screening requirements along the
northern boundary despite the existing encroachment, but is also exploring options for purchasing the
encroaching roadway and removing it. The nearest residential structures lying north of the proposed
apartment site are separated from the project by at least a 50 foot width of trees, so actual screening
adequacy is not an issue. The reverse circumstance obtains, however, along the site's southern flank,
where the adjacent Harbor Square complex lacks onsite boundary screening of any kind. At that
location Bainbridge Landing anticipates exceeding minimum screening requirements in an effort to
achieve a greater element of visual separation between the two projects.
37. Regarding BIMC 18.15.020 parking requirements, the City's normal standard is to require a
minimum of one space per primary small dwelling unit and two spaces for all units exceeding a single
bedroom. For Bainbridge Landing a 50% reduction in parking space requirements is allowed for
multiple bedroom units due to the site's proximity to the ferry. Staff concluded that the applicant's
proposed 187 spaces will meet the parking demands of the development.
38. The 13 townhouse units along the northern boundary will provide two spaces per unit (26
spaces), the Cave Avenue townhouses one space per unit (5 spaces), and the lofts two spaces per unit
(14 spaces). The underbuilding parking garage will supply 111 spaces for the apartment building, and
28 upland lot spaces will be provided for guest parking. The proposed apartment development requires
23 bicycle parking spaces, with bike storage space proposed within the garage.
Comprehensive Plan
39. The framework of the Winslow Master Plan has largely been embodied in the BIMC Title 18
zoning regulations discussed above. In addition, the policies governing coordination of higher density
residential development with background ferry traffic movements were referenced in the traffic
analysis. The Comprehensive Plan and the Winslow Master Plan target the "Winslow Master Plan
Study Area" to accommodate 50% of the City's future population growth based on the premise that
urban infrastructure and facilities either already exist there or can be provided in an efficient manner.
40. The expectation is that the Winslow Master Plan Study Area will contribute to a vibrant and
pedestrian- oriented downtown where people want to live, work and shop, providing a diversity of
higher density housing choices and reducing reliance on the automobile. As proposed, the development
will be a pedestrian- oriented, energy efficient, multi - generational neighborhood comprised of 140
residential units, including apartments, town homes, lofts and a one -acre park. To reduce reliance on
polluting automobiles and encourage pedestrian activity, the project will include electric charging
stations, bicycle parking facilities and provide pedestrian trails through the site connecting to the
neighboring Harbor Square. These amenities will meet the goals and policies of the Comprehensive
Plan Housing Element, including Goals 1 and 3 and Policies H 1.5 and 3.1.
41. The project further meets Goal 1 of the Plan's Non - motorized Transportation Element, which
seeks to "Develop a non - motorized transportation system that effectively serves the needs of
pedestrian, bicycle, and equestrian users and encourages non - motorized travel and provides a
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 7
continuous network of attractive sidewalks, footpaths, multi - purpose trails, and bikeways throughout
the Island that are also connected to regional systems." The project conditions have also been
formulated support retention of the onsite historic house consistent with Historic Preservation Goal 2.
CONCLUSIONS
1. BIMC 2.16.040(E) states the following criteria to be applicable to a site plan and design review
approval:
1. The site plan and design is in conformance with applicable code provisions and development
standards of the applicable zoning district, unless a standard has been modified as a housing
design demonstration projectpursuant to BIMC 2.16.020. Q;
2. The locations of the buildings and structures, open spaces, landscaping, pedestrian, bicycle
and vehicular circulation systems are adequate, safe, efficient and in conformance with the
nonmotorized transportation plan;
3. The Kitsop County health district has determined that the site plan and design meets the
following decision criteria:
a. The proposal conforms to current standards regarding domestic water supply and
sewage disposal; or if the proposal is not to be served by public sewers, then the lot has
sufficient area and soil, topographic and drainage characteristics to permit an on -site
sewage disposal system.
b. If the health district recommends approval of the application with respect to those
items in subsection E.3.a of this section, the health district shall so advise the director.
c. If the health district recommends disapproval of the application, it shall provide a
written explanation to the director.
4. The city engineer has determined that the site plan and design meets the following decision
criteria:
a. The site plan and design conforms to regulations concerning drainage in Chapters
15.20 and 15.21 BIMC; and
b. The site plan and design will not cause an undue burden on the drainage basin or
water quality and will not unreasonably interfere with the use and enjoyment of
properties downstream; and
c. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed align with and are otherwise
coordinated with streets serving adjacent properties; and
d. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed are adequate to accommodate
anticipated traffic; and
e. If the site will rely on public water or sewer services, there is capacity in the water or
sewer system (as applicable) to serve the site, and the applicable service(s) can be made
available at the site; and
f. The site plan and design conforms to the "City of Bainbridge Island Engineering
Design and Development Standards Manual," unless the city engineer has approved a
variation to the road standards in that document based on his or her determination that
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 8
the variation meets the purposes of BIMC Title 18.
5. The site plan and design is consistent with all applicable design guidelines in BIMC Title
unless strict adherence to a guideline has been modified as a housing design demonstration
project pursuant to BIMC 2.16.020. Q;
6. No harmful or unhealthful conditions are likely to result from the proposed site plan;
7. The site plan and design is in conformance with the comprehensive plan and other applicable
adopted community plans;
8. Any property subject to site plan and design review that contains a critical area or buffer, as
defined in Chapter 16.20 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter;
9. Any property subject to site plan and design review that is within shoreline jurisdiction, as
defined in Chapter 16_12 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter;
10. If the applicant is providing privately owned open space and is requesting credit against
dedications for park and recreation facilities required by BIMC 17.20.020. C, the requirements
of BIMC 17.20.020.D have been met,
11. The site plan and design has been prepared consistent with the purpose of the site design
review process and open space goals;
12. For applications in the BII zoning district, the site plan and development proposal include
means to integrate and re -use on -site storm water as site amenities.
2. As summarized in the findings above and documented in both the staff report and the materials
prepared by the applicant, the proposal, as conditioned, is in conformance with the Bainbridge Island
\ Comprehensive Plan and Municipal Code. The proposed development provides for the construction of
residential housing in a manner specified by the Municipal Code for the MUTC zoning district and
qualifies for approval as an HDDP proposal.
3. No adverse comments have been received from the Health District, which will be afforded a
final additional review opportunity based on the final design. The City's Development Engineer
reviewed the submitted civil plans and found them to be consistent with applicable requirements. The
proposed development was reviewed by the Design Review Board during the Site Plan and Design
Review process. The applicant has incorporated relevant Design Review Board recommendations into
the final design of the buildings and layout for the site.
4. The proposed site plan provides building layout, parking and circulation systems that are an
efficient use of the available land while providing required setbacks and screening from the adjacent
properties as well as open space. No critical areas have been identified on the subject property. The
proposed site plan was prepared consistent with the overall purpose and goals of the Site Plan and
Design Review process. This process provided a means for guiding the development in a logical, safe,
attractive and expedient manner. The requirements of BIMC 2.16.040(E) for a site plan and design
review approval have been met by the proposal.
5. The applicable standards for Hearing Examiner approval of a preliminary subdivision
application are stated at BIMC 2.16.125(H):
H. Decision Criteria for Preliminary Long Subdivisions. The hearing examiner's decision shall
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 9
include findings of fact that the application meets all the requirements of the following
subsections:
1. The preliminary long subdivision may be approved or approved with modification if.•
a. The applicable subdivision development standards of BIMC Titles 17 and 18
are satisfied; and
b. The preliminary long subdivision makes appropriate provisions for the public
health, safety and general and public use and interest, including those items
listed in RCW 58.17.110 and
c. The preliminary long subdivision has been prepared consistent with the
requirements of the flexible lot design process, unless a flexible lot standard has
been modified as part of a housing design demonstration project pursuant to
BIMC 2.16.020.Q; and
d. Any portion of a long subdivision that contains a critical area, as defined in
Chapter 16.20 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter; and
e. Any portion of a long subdivision within shoreline jurisdiction, as defined in
Chapter 16.12 BIMC, conforms to all requirements of that chapter; and
f. The city engineer's recommendation contains determinations that the following
decision criteria are met and such determinations are supported by substantial
evidence within the record:
i. The long subdivision conforms to regulations concerning drainage in
Chapters 15.20 and 15.21 BIMC; and
ii. The long subdivision will not cause an undue burden on the drainage
basin or water quality and will not unreasonably interfere with the use
and enjoyment of properties downstream; and
iii. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed align with and are
otherwise coordinated with streets serving adjacent properties; and
iv. The streets and pedestrian ways as proposed are adequate to
accommodate anticipated traffic; and
v If the long subdivision will rely on public water or sewer services, there
is capacity in the water or sewer system (as applicable) to serve the long
subdivision, and the applicable service(s) can be made available at the
site; and
vi. The long subdivision conforms to the "City of Bainbridge Island
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 10
Engineering Design and Development Standards Manual," unless the
i
city engineer has approved a variation to the road standards in that
document based on his or her determination that the variation meets the
purposes of BIMC Title L7; and
g. The subdivision conforms to the requirements of this chapter and the
standards in the "City of Bainbridge Island Design and Construction Standards
and Specifications," unless the city engineer has approved a variation to the
road standards in that document based on his or her determination that the
variation meets the purposes of BIMC Title 17; and
h. The proposal complies with all applicable provisions of this code, unless the
provisions have been modified as part of a housing design demonstration project
pursuant to BIMC 2.16.020.Q; Chapters 36.70A and 58_17 RCW; and all other
applicable provisions of state and federal laws and regulations; and
i. The proposal is in accord with the city's comprehensive plan.
2. A proposed subdivision shall not be approved unless written findings are made that
the public use and interest will be served by the platting of such subdivision.
6. The Hearing Examiner has jurisdiction over this subdivision proceeding and is authorized under
City ordinances to make a final decision on the Bainbridge Landing preliminary subdivision
application. Subdivision public hearing notice requirements have been met.
7. As documented with the findings stated above, the plat application for Bainbridge Landing
meets the decisional criteria stated at BIMC 2.16.125(H) for preliminary plat approval as a HDDP
proposal. It complies with the applicable land use and subdivision development standards of BIMC
Titles 17 and 18, and, as conditioned, makes appropriate provisions for the public health, safety and
general welfare and for the public use and interest, including all items listed in RCW 58.17.110. The
proposed development will be consistent with the City's comprehensive plan. No critical areas exist on
the site.
8. The City Engineer's recommendation for preliminary approval contains determinations that the
City's decisional criteria for drainage, streets and pedestrian ways, road standards and utilities can be
met, and such determinations are supported by substantial evidence within the record.
DECISION
The consolidated Bainbridge Landing Preliminary Long Subdivision and Site Plan and Design Review
applications (file no. PLN50520SPR & SUB) are APPROVED, subject to the following conditions:
SEPA Conditions
1. The project contributes surface stormwater to a City-owned municipal storm drain
conveyance system that outfalls into the Winslow Ravine just south of Winslow Way East. The
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 11
City currently has a planned and funded project to upsize the system in 2017 to address a
capacity shortfall. Connection to the system by the project is conditioned upon the continued
funding and planned or actual construction of the upgrades, unless an alternative option is
pursued by the applicant.
2. Water system concurrency and adequate fire flow shall be provided by performing one
of the two water system improvements proposed in the Developer Extension Agreement
application (off -site water main extension or on -site storage).
3. If the off -site option water system concurrency is pursued, the use may require a special
use review permit from the City of Bainbridge Island prior to commencing any work.
Replanting of any disturbed areas with approved plants would be required.
4. Prior to construction activities, the applicant shall apply for a Construction Stormwater
General Permit (NPDES) through the Washington State Department of Ecology.
5. A Temporary Erosion and Sediment Control Plan shall be approved prior to construction
of both plat infrastructure and the individual lot development. The final plat shall contain a note
for future property owners of the individual lot development requirement.
6. To ensure the protection of significant trees during construction, specifically the heritage
tree on the adjoining Harbor Square property, the applicant shall protect the identified areas of
prohibited disturbance of the significant trees to be retained, buffers, areas of existing
vegetation to be maintained, and future planting areas larger than 400 square feet. The applicant
shall have an arborist on -site or available to monitor the site during grading activities within the
critical root zones. In addition, the contractors shall follow the protection methods as outlined in
BIMC 18.15.010 during construction and as indicated in the report provided by Fischer Bouma
Partnership titled Site Plan Review Landscape Plan Supplemental Information.
7. The limits of clearing and grading shall be clearly marked in the field and inspected by
the City of Bainbridge Island prior to any clearing or grading on site.
8. To provide local pedestrian connectivity for the more intensive use of Cave Avenue NE
presented by the project, a standard 5 -foot wide sidewalk shall be constructed or bonded for as
part of the plat utility work on the east side of Cave Avenue NE from Winslow Way East to
approximately 105 feet to the north. No additional ROW acquisition is required to perform
these improvements.
9. To provide local pedestrian connectivity, the applicant shall construct or bond for new
sidewalks along Femcliff and Cave Avenue frontages, as indicated on the site plans.
10. An ADA compliant access path available to the public shall be provided through the
project site serving both public accessibility ADA egress through, connecting off the site and for
accessible building egress and exit discharge. This is intended from the north access lane
through the courtyard to the south access lane.
11. To ensure recreational opportunities are provided on -site and connected to adjoining
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 12
sites, the project shall provide an on -site pedestrian connection to the adjoining public park on
the Harbor Square property.
12. The site contains a historic home that the Historic Preservation Commission has found to
be eligible for the local register. The applicant has indicated they intend to relocate the house to
the adjoining property. To ensure historic and cultural resource preservation, should the home
not be relocated or preserved on -site, the home shall be offered for sale for relocation. To satisfy
this condition, the applicant shall provide copies of any attempts to sale prior to receiving
approval of a demolition permit for the home.
13. To ensure historic and cultural resource preservation, a completed Washington State
Historic Property Inventory Field Form shall be recorded with the State Department of
Archeology and Historic Preservation prior to the moving or demolition of the historic home on
the property.
14.
To
ensure historic and cultural
resource preservation, historic signage shall be included
in the
park
design to commemorate the
Cave family.
15. The contractor is required to stop work and immediately notify the Department of
Planning and Community Development and the Washington State Department of Archaeology
and Historic Preservation if any historical or archaeological artifacts are uncovered during
excavation or construction.
16. All construction activities shall comply with the construction operating hours limitations
contained in BIMC Chapter 16.16. Noise produced by this development must comply with the
maximum environmental noise levels established by the Washington Administrative Code 173-
60 or its successor.
17. All graded materials removed from the subject property shall be hauled to and deposited
at City approved locations (Note: local regulations require that a grade /fill permit is obtained for
any grading or filling of 50 cubic yards of material or more if the grading or filling occurs on
sites that have not been previously approved for such activities. A SEPA Threshold
Determination is required for any fill over 100 cubic yards on sites that have not been
previously received a SEPA determination).
18. To mitigate the possible impact on adjacent properties from light and glare, all exterior
lighting shall be hooded and shielded so that the bulb is not visible from adjacent properties.
All landscape lighting shall be downcast and lighting within surface parking lots shall be no
higher than 14 feet above grade. All exterior lighting shall comply with BIMC Chapter 15.34.
19. No use in this development shall produce emissions of smoke, dust and /or odors beyond
the property boundary that may unreasonably interfere with any other property owners' use and
enjoyment of his /her property. In addition, all sources and emission units are required to meet
the emission and the ambient air quality standards specified in Chapter 173 -400 WAC, and
administered by the Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Authority (PSAPCA), and shall apply to
all air contaminants listed in that regulation.
20. On site mobile fueling from temporary tanks are prohibited unless the applicant provides
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 13
and is granted approval for a Permit and Best Management Plan that addresses proposed
location, duration, containment, training, vandalism and cleanup. (Reference 1. Uniform Fire
Code 7904.5.4.2.7 and 2. Department of Ecology, Stormwater Management Manual, August
2001, see Volume IV "Source Control BMPs for Mobile Fueling of Vehicles and Heavy
Equipment'.) (Chapter 173 -304 WAC)
21. To mitigate impacts on air quality during earth moving activities, contractors should
conform to Puget Sound Air Pollution Control Agency Regulations which insure that reasonable
precautions are taken to avoid dust emissions.
22. To mitigate potential impacts on air quality, cleared vegetation shall be removed from
the site, processed by chipper or processed using other methods of disposal that does not require
burning.
Project Conditions
23. The project shall meet the requests of the fire marshal including: the applicable
provisions of the fire code, fire flow, and provide for fire hydrants, fire sprinkler and alarm
systems for proposed buildings and underground parking.
24. Prior to applying for a building
permit, the applicant
shall submit
a written approval
from the Kitsap County Health District
based on its review
of the final
project design and
binding commitments for the water and sewer demands for the
project.
25. As requested by the Design Review Board (DRB), the applicant shall provide the natural
palette for the exterior of the buildings; unless another material type is proposed and approved
by the DRB and the Director.
26. Internal pathways shall provide signage to indicate they are public at each entry point
around the perimeter of the site and shall be surfaced with nonskid hard surfaces, meet
accessibility requirements and be designed to provide a minimum of five feet of unobstructed
width. The path required to connect the public park on site to Harbor Square shall also include a
crosswalk on the south access road to further the connectivity of the parks.
27. The project shall conform to the HDDP program criteria for housing diversity,
innovative site development and innovative building design. Prior to the issuance of a building
permit, the application will be reviewed for compliance with the following:
a. The dwelling units shall be at or below 1,600 square feet of floor area;
b. Innovative site design elements including common open space, covered parking,
non - motorized connections, public walkways and electric vehicle charging stations;
C. Landscaping and recreational opportunities that substantially conform to the site
plans,
d. LEED. Building pennit applications, construction and final occupancy shall
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 14
comply with the certification provisions of BIMC 2.16.020.3.f;
C. Proof of ongoing certification with the LEED building rating system shall be
required during construction and project certification shall be completed prior to final
occupancy.
28. Staff shall be able to access the site for tours no more than once every three months with
permission and cooperation of the property owner.
29. Prior to the City issuing the final occupancy building permit for any building that would
need the bonus FAR, the applicant shall have submitted a recorded document legally conveying
the park to the City, have graded and seeded the park and established walking paths, or bonded
for these improvements. Additionally, the applicant shall secure a bond for play structures and
benches.
30. The final plat submittal shall include a sheet that provides the modified setback,
landscaping and height requirements of BIMC 18.12.030.C.
31. The applicant shall provide landscaping as indicated on the landscaping plans. As
indicated and conditioned, the plans shall meet the 20' partial landscaping screen along Gilmore
within the area available for planting, and replant the entire 20' buffer along Gilmore in the
event that Gilmore is realigned on the easement. The 20' partial landscaping screen buffer on
Ferncliff shall be provided within the park. The applicant shall provide the 20' partial landscape
screen in the dedicated portion of the Cave Avenue right -of -way, in addition to the 10' on the
subject property.
32. All landscaping shall be installed, or a performance assurance device shall be submitted
and approved, prior to final inspection of the final building within the phase being constructed.
The installation of landscaping shall be verified by the Landscape Professional or owner and a
landscaping declaration shall be signed. This note shall be on the face of the final plat.
33. Landscape buffers shall be maintained with a maintenance assurance device for a period
of three years. No vegetation within the buffers shall be disturbed without approval of the
Department of Planning and Community Development through an approved clearing, grading
or civil plan. This note shall be on the face of the final plat.
34. The designated guest parking spaces shall have adequate `guest parking' signage
35. On- street parking spaces shall be provided as required by the building official
36. Parking space and aisle dimensions shall meet the design standards in BIMC
18. l 5.020.4. Spaces for compact cars shall not exceed 30% of the amount of spaces.
37. Bicycle storage shall be provided to accommodate at least 23 bicycles.
38. Given the complexity of the proposal, prior to submitting any building permit
applications, the applicant shall schedule a pre - submittal meeting outlining the order of
development improvements and buildings on the site. The applicant shall include information
on the location of parking for construction vehicles, and all construction vehicle parking shall
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 15
remain on -site.
39.
Depending on the
option
chosen by the applicant to achieve fire
flow,
the applicant shall
secure
all necessary
land
use and
building permits prior to commencing
work.
40. Lot coverage shall be recorded on the face of the final plat.
41. Mailbox and pedestrian signage locations shall be indicated on the face of the final plat.
42. The applicant shall provide a sheet that identifies the trees identified for retention. The
following regulations shall be included on that sheet and provided as part of the final plat
submittal:
A property owner may request removal of trees required to be retained pursuant to this chapter
by applying for a clearing permit with a replanting plan. Trees will be approved for removal
only if they meet the hazard tree requirements.
Failure to retain, replace or transplant trees will be enforced as follows; provided, that any fine
shall be no less than three times the value of the trees, as determined by the current standards of
the International Society of Arboriculture. The city may issue the following; stop work orders,
injunction or abatement or any other appropriate action in courts and /or a civil infraction,
subject to enforcement and fines.
43. Survey monumentation shall be provided consistent with the Standards, Section 8 -03.
44. Civil improvement plans ready for construction shall be submitted with an application
for a plat utility permit to COBI for review and approval to construct all necessary infrastructure
serving the divided lots and the offsite improvements proposed in the Developer Extension
Agreement (DEA) application.
45. No building permits for the newly created lots will be issued until the completion of the
civil improvements or performance bonding is established to cover unfinished work to apply for
final plat.
46. Performance bonding for plat civil improvements shall be released and re- bonded only
as determined by a pre- approved work completion phasing plan to be developed with the plat
utility permit application.
47. As -built civil construction plans stamped by a civil engineer shall be provided by the
applicant prior to final plat.
48. The Developer Extension Agreement shall be executed at the plat utilities permitting
application phase for the construction of roads and utilities to be inspected and accepted by the
City.
49. FemcliffAvenue NE fronting the property to the east is classified as a secondary arterial
urban roadway per the COBI Comprehensive Plan. Secondary arterial urban roadways require a
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 16
total of 60 feet of right -of -way (ROW) per the Standards. The current ROW width fronting the
property is 40 feet. A ROW dedication to the City of Bainbridge Island of 30 feet from the
described centerline along the Ferncliff frontage, shall be indicated on the face of the plat. A
note related to the dedication can state that the 30 feet may include areas previously dedicated.
50. Cave Avenue NE fronting the property to the west is classified as a local access roadway
per the COBI Comprehensive Plan and is urban in nature due to the zoning density exceeding
4.3 units per acre. Local access urban roadways require a total of 40 feet ROW per the
Standards. The current ROW width fronting the property is 30 feet. A ROW dedication to the
City of 20 feet from the described centerline shall be indicated on the plat. A note related to the
dedication can state that the 20 feet may include areas previously dedicated.
51. The north plat access road shall meet the standards of an urban local access street per
standard drawing DWG. 7 -050 of the Standards, except as noted. The north plat access road
shall provide two (2) 12 -foot travel lanes for two -way traffic circulation, on- street parking on
the south side adjacent to the apartment building, sidewalks on both sides and a minimum of 40
feet of right -of -way dedication or more as needed to extend from back of sidewalk to back of
sidewalk.
52. The south plat access road shall meet the standards of an urban local access street per
standard drawing DWG. 7 -050 of the Standards, except as noted. The south plat access road
shall provide one -way only vehicular traffic circulation with a 16' wide driveable surface
comprised of an l l -foot travel lane and a 5 -foot bike lane. Sidewalk shall be provided on the
north side of the road only. On- street parking shall be provided on the south side of the road. A
i minimum 40 -foot right -of -way dedication to the City for public streets is required.
53. Flush curbs and sidewalk are approved for use on the upslope side of each plat road
along the frontages of the townhomes, loft homes, and apartments. Pedestrian safety features
shall be incorporated into the edge treatment, including provisions such as bollards.
54.
Speed tables shall be incorporated
as a traffic calming
feature along the north and south
plat
access roadways.
55. All retaining walls required to construct the plat access roads and on- street parking stalls
shall be designed with a minimum of 250 pounds per square foot live loading vehicle surcharge
as required by the 2015 International Building Code (IBC). A separate building permit shall be
submitted for the walls.
56. The existing Gilmore Way NE access shall have a formal access easement dedicated on
the face of the plat that encompasses the entire access way from the northern property line to the
southern existing edge of use of Gilmore, or 15 feet, whichever is greater.
57. Consistent with the City of Bainbridge Island's Non - Motorized Transportation Plan
(NMTP), as incorporated by reference into the Comprehensive Plan, And the Standards for a
secondary arterial urban roadway, shoulder improvements fronting the project along Ferncliff
Avenue NE shall be constructed as part of the project, which requires 5- to 7 -foot sidewalk with
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 17
or without landscaping (see WS -2 NMTP standard).
58. Consistent with the Standards for a residential urban roadway, shoulder improvements
fronting the project along Cave Avenue NE shall be constructed as part of the project, which
requires 5 -foot sidewalk.
59. Non - motorized pedestrian connectivity shall be improved along the eastside of Cave
Avenue NE from Winslow Way East to approximately 105 feet north by installing a standard 5-
foot wide sidewalk.
60. A public pedestrian access easement shall be dedicated between the Cave Avenue NE
townhomes and the apartment building over the private alley to grant pedestrians through
access. The easement width shall be a minimum of 12 feet, or cover the driveable road surface
excluding individual driveway entrances, whichever is greater, and extend the entire length
from the north plat access road to the south plat access road.
61. Remote sidewalks that depart from the public road ROW shall have a 10' minimum
public pedestrian easement dedication noted on the plat.
62. Water system improvements shall be performed under the DEA to add additional
capacity to the system for the purposes of project fire flow requirements. All necessary permits
and easements to provide a second water line feed to the system shall be the responsibility of
the developer.
63. A Stormwater Pollution Prevention Plan (SWPPP) prepared by a civil engineer licensed
in the State of Washington is required prior to construction activities including clearing or
grading or civil improvements for all phases of the project that complies with BIMC 15.20.
64. A final stormwater report shall be submitted detailing compliance with all applicable
minimum requirements as required by BIMC 15.20, prepared by a civil engineer licensed in the
State of Washington.
65. The site has a contributing drainage area that exceeds three (3) acres. A temporary
sediment pond (per BMP C241, Volume II, Ch. 4 of the Manual) shall be required for temporary
runoff and sediment control. Due to the downstream capacity restriction the sediment pond shall
be sized based on a 10 -year peak flow from the site.
66. On -site Best Management Practices for soil management and Low Impact Development
shall be employed consistent with the Stormwater Management Manual for Western
Washington (SWMMWW) BMP T5.13 for surfaces not converted to hard surfaces after
construction.
67. The project contributes surface stormwater to a City -owned municipal storm drain
conveyance system that outfalls into the Winslow Ravine just south of Winslow Way East. The
City currently has a planned and funded project to upsize the system in 2017 to address a
capacity shortfall. Connection to the system by the project is conditioned upon the continued
funding and planned or actual construction of the upgrades to maintain concurrency between the
development and the infrastructure serving it. In the event of non - concurrency, the development
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 18
shall be responsible for performing the system upgrades, or, mitigating for stormwater peak
flows on -site.
68. Low Impact Development (LID) water quality facilities and best practices shall be
employed to the maximum extent feasible to treat stormwater from all pollutant - generating hard
surfaces (PGHS) within the future public ROW.
69. Prior to final plat submittal, the applicant shall submit an operation and maintenance
plan for the on -going maintenance of the storm drainage system.
70. All on -site stormwater facilities on private property shall remain privately owned and
maintained. The owner(s) shall be responsible for maintenance of the storm drainage facilities
for this development following construction. Annual inspection and maintenance reports shall
be provided to the City. A Declaration of Covenant for stormwater system operation and
maintenance will be required to be recorded before final plat submittal. The approved language
for the Declaration of Covenant is found in BIMC Chapter 15.21, Exhibit A. Stormwater
facilities in the right -of -way (ROW) shall be the responsibility of the City.
71. A right -of -way (ROW) construction permit will be required prior to any construction
activities within the right -of -way. The ROW permit will be subject to separate conditions and
bonding requirements.
72. Application for a final plat shall require binding water and sewer availability letters from
the City.
73. Installation of improvements and creation of as -built engineered plans must be
completed prior to approval of final plat. In lieu of completion of those improvements and as-
builts consistent with the conditions of a preliminary plat approval, the City engineer may
accept an assurance device, in an amount and in a form determined by the City, but not to
exceed 125 percent of the established cost of completing the infrastructure that secures and
provides for the actual construction and installation of the improvements or the performance of
the conditions within one year, or such additional time as the city engineer determines is
appropriate after final plat approval.
74. The proposed action(s), phased or concurrent, in their totality would result in more than
one (1) acre of earth disturbance on the site and drain to waters of the State. A Construction
Stormwater General Permit shall be obtained from the Washington State Department of Ecology
and the site shall be monitored for discharge of pollutants and sediment to the wetlands and
stream for the duration of the project. No land clearing or construction permits shall be issued
prior to obtaining the State permit.
75. During construction the applicant shall post the approved site plan along Femcliff and
Cave Avenues. The plan shall inform the public that the design of the park will occur at a later
date to be determined by the Park District.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 19
j
i
ORDERED April 6, 2017.
City of Bainbridge Island
The Hearing Examiner is authorized to make the City of Bainbridge Island's final decision on
consolidated preliminary subdivision and site plan and design review applications. A party with
standing may seek judicial review of this decision by filing a timely suit in Kitsap County Superior
Court under the Land Use Petition Act.
The exhibit list prepared by the Clerk of the Hearing Examiner's Office is attached.
BAINBRIDGE LANDING DECISION - 20
EXHIBIT LIST
Bainbridge Landing PLN50520 SPR & SUB
"fr,ff Contact:
ather Beckmann Wright, Senior Planner
Public Hearing: March 22, 2017
City Hall — Council Chambers
Hearing Examiner: Stafford L. Smith
NO.
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION
DATE
1
Application — Preliminary Subdivision
07/14/2016
Received
2
Application — Site Plan Review
07/14/2016
Received
3
Preliminary Geotechnical Investigation
11/02/2015
Dated
4
Arborist Reports
4/8/20161
7/11/2016, and
08/01/2016
Dated
5
Critical Root Zones
08/05/2016
Dated
6
Design Review Board Guideline Checklist
07/14/2016
Received
7
Zoning Summary
07/14/2016
Dated
8
LEED Design Package
07/14/2016
Dated
9
HDDP Approval Criteria and Scoring Worksheet
07/14/2016
Dated
10
Requests for ROW Deviations
07/14/2016
Dated
11
Site Plan Review Landscape Plan Supplemental Information
07/14/2016
Dated
12
SEPA Checklist with Staff Comments
7114/2016
Dated
13
Landscape Plans
07/14/2016
Dated
14
Site Plans Pre -Sub
07/14/2106
Dated
15
Architectural Design Final Set
07/15/2016
Dated
16
Exterior Design Materials
11/15/2016
Dated
17
Bainbridge Island Fire Department Memos
07/22/2016
and
12/272016
Dated
18
Historic Property Inventory Update and Evaluation
08/11/2016
Dated
19
Fire Flow Correspondence
08/02/2016
Dated
20
Site Plan Review Modifications
08/12/2016
Dated
21
Notice of Application, Mailing List, Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Posting
08/26/2016
Dated
EXHIBIT LIST
Bainbridge Landing PLN50520 SPR & SUB
#Iff Contact:
ather Beckmann Wright, Senior Planner
Public Hearing: March 22, 2017
City Hall — Council Chambers
Hearing Examiner: Stafford L. Smith
NO.
DOCUMENT DESCRIPTION
DATE
22
Development Engineer Memo
10/31/2016
Dated
23
Response to Development Engineer Memo
11/03/2016
Dated
24
Design Review Board Minutes
11/07/2016
and
11/21/2016
Dated
25
Traffic Impact Analysis
11/2016
Dated
26
SEPA Checklist with Staff Comments - Updated
12/21/2016
Dated
27
Water Main Extension
12/21/2016
Dated
28
Notice of Application, Mailing List, Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Posting -
12/30/2016
Revised
Dated
29
Notice of Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance (MDNS)
02/02/2017
Dated
30
Planning Commission Directive Memo
02/09/2017
Dated
31
Development Engineer Memo Preliminary Approval
02/17/2017
Dated
32
Certification of Distribution and Posting /Affidavit of Publication
03/01/2017
33
Public Comments
08/27/2016 to
03/13/2017
34
Draft - Planning Commission Minutes from March 9, 2017 Meeting
03/09/2017
Dated
35
Certificate of Posting Signs
03/16/2017
Dated
36
Staff Report
03/17/2017
Dated
37
Special Meeting of the Planning Commission Minutes
03/16/2017
Dated
38
Additional Public Comment — Sandy Gough, President, Harbor Square Board
03/17/2017
Received
39
Power Point Presentation —Planner, Heather Wright
03/22/2017
Admitted
40
Letter from Linda Mallin, Architect
3/22/2017
Received
41
New Condition inadvertently not included in Staff Report dated 03/17/2017
03/22/2017
Received
42
Power Point Presentation — Architect Charlie Wenzlau
03/22/2017
Admitted