Loading...
GERLACH, MARCUS & SUZANNETo: LEGAL NOTICES Publication Date: March 22, 2013 NOTICE OF ADMINISTRATIVE DECISION AND SEPA MITIGATED DETERMINATION OF NONSIGNIFICANCE (MDNS) Applicant: Marcus and Suzanne Gerlach Permit Request: SSDP13500B Description of Proposal: 110 linear feet of bulkhead; a 174 foot dock with boat hoist; a 196 square foot gatehouse/boathouse; and a 50 linear foot retaining wall Location of Proposal: 579 Stetson Place (Tax Assessor No. 342502 -1- 085 -2001) Permit Decision: Approval of the boathouse /gatehouse, retaining wall and dock subject to conditions set forth below, and denial of the bulkhead. The staff report, containing the statement of facts upon which the decision, including conditions, is based and the conclusions of law derived from those facts, is available to the public upon request. The decision becomes effective after 14 days from the date of issuance, or after April 5, 2013. Following the appeal period, the Department of Ecology has a 21 day appeal period. Development pursuant to this shoreline permit shall not begin and is not authorized until 21 days from the date of filing with the Department of Ecology or until all review proceedings initiated within 21 days from the date of such filing have been terminated, except as provided in Chapter 90.58 RCW or its successor. SEPA Decision: The City of Bainbridge Island (lead agency) has determined that the proposal does not have a probable significant impact on the environment if measures to mitigate the proposal are used. An environmental impact statement (EIS) is not required under RCW 43.21C.030 (2) c. This determination was made and mitigation measures were applied after review of a completed environmental checklist and other information on file with the lead agency. This information is available to the public upon request. This MDNS is issued under WAC 197 -11 -350. The lead agency will not act on this proposal for 14 days. Comments must be submitted by no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 5, 2013. APPEAL: This administrative decision and/or SEPA determination may be appealed by filing a written appeal and paying a $530.00 filing fee to the City Clerk at 280 Madison Avenue North, Bainbridge Island, Washington 98110, in accordance with the procedures set forth in the Bainbridge Island Municipal Code, Section 2.16.130 and /or 16.04.170. An appeal must be filed no later than 4:00 p.m. on April 5, 2013. You should be prepared to make specific factual objections. If you have any questions concerning this application, contact: Heather Beckmann Department of Planning & Community Development 280 Madison Avenue North Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 (206) 780 -3754 Fax: (206) 780 -0955 Email: pcd ci.bainbridae- isl.wa.us CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND CITY OF ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST BAINBRIDGE ISLAND -- FORM MUST BE COMPLETED IN INKS PREFERABLY BLUE. PENCIL WILL NOT BE ACCEPTED, JUL 31 202 DEPT OF PLMINING & COMMUNITY DMIzOPMENT PLEASE READ THE FOLLOWING CAREFULLY BEFORE FILLING OUT THE CHECKLIST PURPOSE OF THE CHECKLIST: The State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA), chapter 43.21 RCW, requires all governmental agencies to consider the environmental impacts of a proposal before making decisions. An environmental impact statement (EIS) must be prepared for all proposals with possible significant adverse impacts on the quality of the environment. The purpose of this checklist is to provide information to help you and the agency identify impacts from your proposal (and to reduce or avoid impacts from the proposal, if it can be done) and to help the agency decide whether an EIS is required. INSTRUCTIONS FOR APPLICANTS: This environmental checklist asks you to describe some basic information about your proposal. Governmental agencies use this checklist to determine whether the environmental impacts of your proposal are significant, requiring preparation of an EIS. Answer the questions briefly, with the most precise information known, or give the best description you can. You must answer each question accurately and carefully, to the best of your knowledge. In most cases, you should be able to answer the questions from your own observations or project plans without the need to hire experts. If you really do not know the answer or if a question does not apply to your proposal, write "do not know" or "does not apply." Complete answers to the questions now may avoid unnecessary delays later. Some questions ask about governmental regulations, such as zoning, shoreline, and landmark designations. Answer these questions if you can. If you have problems, the governmental agencies can assist you. The checklist questions apply to all parts of your proposal, even if you plan to do them over a period of time or on different parcels of land. Attach any additional information that will help describe your proposal or its environmental effects. The agency to which you submit this checklist may ask you to explain your answers or provide additional information reasonably related to determining if there may be significant adverse impact. USE OF CHECKLIST FOR NONPROJECT PROPOSAL: Complete this checklist for nonproject proposals, even though questions may be answered "does not apply." In addition, complete the SUPPLEMENTAL SHEET FOR NONPROJECT ACTIONS (Part D). For nonproject actions, the references in the checklist to the words "project," "applicant," and "property or site" should be read as "proposal," "proposer," and "affected geographic area" respectively. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT 280 MADISON AVENUE NORTH • BAINBRIDGE ISLAND, WA • 98110-1812 PHONE: (206) 842 -2552 • FAX: (206) 780 -0955 • EMAIL: pcd [@r ci.bainbridge- isl.wa.us www.ci.bainbridge- isl.wa.us Revised July 2010 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT, A. Background 1. Name of proposed project, if applicable: Gerlach Residential Dock and Bulkhead 2. Name of applicant: Marcus Gerlach 3. Address and phone number of applicant and contact person: Applicant: Mr. Marcus Gerlach 579 Stetson Place SW Bainbridge Island, WA 98110 206- 842 -8193 Contact: Same 4. Date checklist prepared: June 2012 5. Agency requesting checklist: City of Bainbridge Island 6. Proposed timing or scheduling (including phasing, if applicable) Construction during allowable work window 2012. Construction duration estimated to be 6 -8 weeks. Schedule dependant on permit issuance and work windows. 7. Do you have any plans for future additions, expansion, or further activity related to or connected with this proposal? If yes, explain. No. 8. List any environmental information you know about that has been prepared, or will be prepared, directly related to this proposal. 1. EPA has clone an eelgrass survey in the late 1990s. The City should have a copy on file. 2. A site specific document was prepared by Norwest Marine, LLC (February 1, 2012) documenting "Non Presence of Eelgrass and Determination of Non Marsh Shoreline" 3. A reference Biological Evaluation was prepared in June 2012 by PND Engineers for submittal to the US Army FOR STAFF USE ONLY CI`IY OF BAM PIDGE ISLAND JUL 3 1 2012 DEPT OF PLANNING & CUiMMUNIYY DEVELOPMENT DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 2 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Corps of Engineers. 4. A Geotechnical Reconnaissance was performed by Aspect Consulting in May 2012. 9. Do you know whether applications are pending for governmental approvals of other proposals directly affecting the property covered by your proposal? If yes, explain. A JARPA package will be submitted to WA Dept. of Fish & Wildlife, WA Dept. of Ecology, and U.S. Army Corps of Engineers. A Shoreline Substantial Development permit application to the City of Bainbridge Island is included with this package. A Shorelines Exemption for the proposed bulkhead will be submitted to the City. Consultation with the Suquamish tribe will be accomplished through the Army Corps' review process. 10. List any governmental approvals or permits that will be needed for your proposal, if known. Hydraulic Project Approval (WDFW), Section 10 permit (USACE), Shoreline Substantial Development Permit, Shoreline Exemption and Building permit (CORI), Section 401 (DOE) possible. 11. Give a brief, complete description of your proposal, including the proposed uses and the size of the project. There are several questions later in this checklist that ask you to describe certain aspects of your proposal. You do not need to repeat those answers on this page. (Lead agencies may modify this form to include additional specific information on project description.) Installation of a bulkhead, recreational pier, boarding float, and gatehouse for private use on a residential lot. The pier will feature a hoist to lift the boarding float gangway during bad weather and boat hoist capable of lifting a 28 -32 foot vessel for storage. A description of each element follows: • A protective concrete bulkhead will tie into the existing ,(�C�t bulkhead located on the property to the north and will be installed following the approximate shape of the -tU%1t shoreline. The bulkhead footprint, including area of (bb yv 1 cCG'�hrv� excavation, will be located above OHW. Approximately 100 CY of material will be excavated. The wall will bed _ approximately 110 LF. The wall will be set on approx. 34 CY of base course material with approx.20 CY of new fill DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 3 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY material placed behind the wall to level it out to meet the existing backyard. Approx. 7 CY of 4" minus rock will be placed in front of the waterward face of the bulkhead to provide scour protection. There is no existing bulkhead at the south end to tie into, so the end of the bulkhead will be armored by a small scour protection area (approximately 5'x5') using approximately 2 CY of quarry spalls. This, too, will be located entirely above OHW. • The gatehouse foundation will also be located entirely above OHW. The foundation is a 141x14' concrete slab on base course (12 CY of excavation and equal amount of fill). The gatehouse will serve to secure the dock entry point. • The pier access walkway will connect to the gatehouse. The concrete gatehouse foundation will serve to support the landward end of the walkway. It will extend over the bulkhead and will be 110 feet long and 6 feet wide. The deck elevation is approx. +17.5 feet (MLLW). The walkway will be of metal construction and will be grated to allow for light penetration. Approximately midway out to the pier it will be supported by two (2) 12" dia. steel piles. • The boat hoist pier is approximately 280 SF constructed of wood deck material with steel pile caps. It is supported by seven (7) 12 -inch dia. steel piles. Top of deck elevation is approximately +17.5 feet (MLLW). Two of these piles and two (2) additional piles (also 12 -inch dia. steel) outside of the deck area will support a boat hoist on the south side. These hoist frames are each 18'x2' wide. This will be used for storage of the owner's recreational vessel during lower tides or storm events. One of the pier piles on the north side and one additional pile (12 -inch dia. steel) will support a second independent hoist. This hoist frame is 2'x8' and mostly overlaps the grated gangway. This will be used to lift the gangway serving the boarding float (described below) out of harm's way during storm events and for launching other small craft such as jet skis. The bottoms of the hoist frames are located quite high above the water at approximately +25.5 feet elev. (MLLW), therefore not significantly contributing to overwater shading. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 4 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. I FOR STAFF USE ONLY • A boarding float (10'00') will be accessed via gangway from the north side of the pier. The gangway will be 50 feet long, 4 feet wide and made of grated metal to allow for light penetration. The float will be of wood construction with poly tub floatation below. Approximately 50% of the float deck will be grated. The gangway and float will be anchored by two (2) 12 -inch dia. steel piles. Brackets will be installed on these piles to support the float and prevent it from grounding out during low water. Two (2) additional "stub" piles will be installed to support the south side of the float during low water. These piles will extend approximately 1.0 to 1.5 feet above existing mudline. SUMMARY Total new overwater area below OHW = 11416 SF Approximately 910 SF (64 %) will be grated. Total new 12 -inch diameter steel piles = 17 See attached drawings for further detail. 12. Location of proposal. Give sufficient information for a person to understand the precise location of your proposed project, including a street address, if any, and section, township, and range, if known. If a proposal would occur over a range of area, provide the range or boundaries of the site(s). Provide a legal description, site plan, vicinity map, and topographic map, if reasonably available. While you should submit any plans required by the agency, you are not required to duplicate maps or detailed plans submitted with any permit applications related to this checklist. Address: 579 Stetson Place SW, Bainbridge Island, WA Lat. 47.62091 N / Long. 122.526097 W Sect. 34, Twp. 25N, Rng. 2E B. Environmental Elements 1. Earth a. General description of the site (circle one): f� fla , rolling, hilly, steep slopes, mountainous J Other: Aquatic DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 5 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. ' FOR STAFF USE ONLY b. What is the steepest slope on the site (approximate I percentage of slope)? Negligible. c. What general types of soils are found on the site (for example, clay, sand, gravel, peat, muck)? If you know the classification of agricultural soils, specify them and note any prime farmland. Substrate at the proposed pier location consists of silt and mud with a gravelly beach. The upland yard area where the bulkhead and gatehouse will be installed consists of gravelly loam. d. Are there surface indications or history of unstable soils in I n the immediate vicinity? If so, describe. J7 No. e. Describe the purpose, type, and approximate quantities of any filling or grading proposed. Indicate source of fill. All excavation and fill will occur above OHW. Excavation will be required to place the bulkhead. Excavated material will amount to approx. 100 CY of material. It will be placed behind the bulkhead in the upland yard. The bulkhead will be made of approximately 28 CY of concrete. Approx. 34 CY of bedding course will be placed beneath the concrete bulkhead and 7 CY of 4 -inch minus will be placed at the base of the waterward face of the bulkhead to provide scour protection. A small revetment apron at the south end of the bulkhead will tie the bulkhead into the existing grade and provide scour protection to the end of the bulkhead. This revetment will use approx. 2CY of quarry spalls Approximately 12 CY of material will be excavated for the foundation for the gatehouse. Approximately 7 CY of concrete will be used and approx. 12 CY of gravel base course. Sources of material will be identified by the contractor f. Could erosion occur as a result of clearing, construction, or A 64L DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 6 OF 22 CITY OF BAINnRIDCE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO DE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY use? If so, generally describe. Not likely, but possible during construction. Temporary erosion control measures such as silt fence will be nn implemented during construction to prevent runoff of /1 material Into the harbor during excavation activity. g. About what percent of the site will be covered with impervious surfaces after project construction (for example, asphalt or buildings)? The top edge of the concrete bulkhead will create kC . Gl Qittit o�� approximately 110 SF of impervious area. Runoff will penetrate adjacent soils. The new gatehouse will create approximately 196 SF over impervious surface. The total lot area is 0.48 acres (20,909 SF). Proposed new I ,-A impervious area is approximately 306 SF or 0.01% of the lot. h. Proposed measures to reduce or control erosion, or impacts to the earth, if any: Erosion control during construction may include such measures as silt fencing or straw wattles. Runoff from the gatehouse structure will be collected by gutters and directed to infiltrate into the lawn. 2. Air a. What type of emissions to the air would result from the proposal (i.e., dust, odors, industrial wood smoke) during construction and when the project is completed? If any, generally describe and give approximate quantities if known. Emissions from construction equipment (diesel and gas engines) will occur. No permanent sources of emissions will be created by the project. b. Are there any off -site sources of emissions or odor that may affect your proposal? If so, generally describe. No. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control emissions or other impacts to air, if any: i ze ly\.LN& V)�D vtimv bock 4 t-t -C-Jt � DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 7 OF 22 LeyY�tSst CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY Construction equipment will not be allowed to unnecessarily idle and will be kept in good repair to meet state vehicle emissions requirements as appropriate. 3. Water a. Surface: 1) Is there any surface water body on or in the immediate vicinity of the site (including year -round and seasonal streams, saltwater, lakes, ponds, wetlands)? If yes, describe type and provide names. If appropriate, state what stream or river it flows into. The site is on Eagle Harbor which is part of Puget Sound. 2) Will the project require any work over, in, or adjacent to (within 200 feet) the described waters? If yes, please describe and attach available plans. Yes. The project includes a fixed pier with a boarding float, boat lift and hoist. Please see attached plans for details. 3) Estimate the amount of fill and dredge material that would be placed in or removed from surface water or wetlands and indicate the area of the site that would be affected. Indicate the source of fill material. No dredging is proposed. No fill below Off is proposed. J�n a4a /Q 'iwI `nrvOil ( d.t''V. h)A,"aa rec ma-) 4) Will the proposal require surface water withdrawals or diversions? Give general description, purpose, and p approximate quantities if known. J i No. 5) Does the proposal lie within a 100 -year floodplain? If so, t note location on the site plan. C C(�eeli. No. b.i ,. 4ac_ cl ' cl) d 6) Does the proposal involve any discharges of waste materials to surface waters? If so, describe the types of waste and anticipated volume of discharge. ✓1 No. (1 \e k v .Shy Le cU3Y 'Vyd& L�fLVNQ,IJ UC 1ro DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 8 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO DE C( b. Ground FOR STAFF USE ONLY 1) Will ground water be withdrawn, or will water be discharged to ground water? Give general description, n purpose, and approximate quantities if known. r1 None proposed. 2) Describe waste material that will be discharged into the ground from septic tanks or other sources, if any (for example: domestic sewage; industrial, containing the following chemicals...; agricultural; etc.). Describe the general size of the system, the number of such systems, J� the number of houses to be served (if applicable), or the v number of animals or humans the system(s) are expected to serve. None proposed. c. Water Runoff (including storm water): 1) Describe the source of runoff (including storm water) and method of collection and disposal, if any (include quantities, if known). Where will this water flow? Will n this water flow into other waters? If so, describe. Runoff from the roof of the new gatehouse structure will be collected in gutters and directed to the lawn for infiltration. 2) Could waste materials enter ground or surface waters? If so, generally describe. None anticipated. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control surface, ground, and K2 no mc�t� l runoff water impacts, if any: ui L(tip yt1 �q Q� Gutters will be attached to the roof of the new gatehouse structure. No impacts are anticipated. 4. Plants a. Check or circle types of vegetation found on the site: deciduous tree: alder, maple, aspen, other evergreen tree: fir, cedar, pine, other shrubs grass pasture crop of grain DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 9 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. _ __[_FOR STAFF USE ONLY wet soil plants: cattail, buttercup, bulrush, skunk cabbage water plants; water lily, eelgrass, milfoil, other n X_ other types of vegetation (Dickleweed) �J1 b. What kind and amount of vegetation will be removed or altered? I �� Approximately 966 SF of existing manicured lawn area (ti will be altered to accommodate the new bulkhead and N cTaC gatehouse structures. C(_, c. List threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. None known. d. Proposed landscaping, use of native plants, or other measures to preserve or enhance vegetation on the site, if any: A planting area of native plants will be planted on the upland side of the bulkhead between the north property line and the gatehouse to provide mitigation for 17 SF footprints of the piles. Ornamental landscaping or lawn will be planted on the rest of the landward side of the bulkhead to replace the lawn area that was removed during construction. 5. Animals a. Circle any birds and animals that have been observed on or near the site or are known to be on or near the site: Birds: 1hawk, heron, eagle, songbirds, Other: Mammals: dee , bear, elk, beaver, Other: raccoon Fish: bass, Riiiii trout, herring, shellfish, Other: b. List any threatened or endangered species known to be on or near the site. Bald Eagle (Haliaeetus leucocephalus) — Federal Species of Concern Resident bald eagles are present in the vicinity of the proposed anchorage and moorage area with nesting sites likely within 2 miles, however are not likely to be affected. C,kkhua Iv TZ `'Y�Gt r Ste. A DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 10 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. Marbled Murrelet (Brachyramphus marmoratus marmoratus)- Federally Threatened The occurrence of marbled murrelets in Eagle Harbor is rare and nesting sites have not been seen in the vicinity, They are not expected to nest in the vicinity clue to the lack of old growth forests. The nearest critical habitat is on the Olympic Peninsula approximately 20 miles to the west. They are not likely to be affected. Stellar Sea Limn (Eumetoplas jubatus) — Federally Threatened It is unlikely that Stellar Sea Lion are present in the vicinity of the proposed anchorage and moorage area and there have been no reported observations. Killer whale (Orcinus orca) — Federally Endangered It is unlikely that Killer whales are present in Eagle Harbor, though they would have access from Puget Sound. This project is not likely to affect them. Chinook Salmon (Oneorhynehus tshawyischa) —Federally Threatened No chinook spawning streams are found in the near vicinity of the proposed project area and there are no studies looking at occurrence or abundance in Eagle Harbor. However, migrating juvenile chinook will likely use Eagle Harbor for feeding, resting, and refugia. Chinook are not likely to be affected. Bull Trout (Salvelinus confluentus) — Federally Threatened Bull trout may occur in the proposed project area, however, there are no records or studies that indicate their presence and /or abundance in Eagle Harbor. Given the nature and location of the proposed action there should be no direct or indirect effects upon bull trout. FOR STAFF USE ONLY c. Is the site part of a migration route? If so, explain. The site is within the Pacific Flyway. During higher tides, it may also be a travelway for migrating salmonids. A DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE I 1 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST d. Proposed measures to preserve or enhance wildlife, if any: A planting area of native plants will be planted on the upland side of the bulkhead between the north property line and the gatehouse to provide mitigation for footprints of the piles. Installation work will occur only during agency allowed work windows. Contractor will employ BMPs applicable to the nature of the work and site. 6. Energy and Natural Resources a. What kinds of energy (electric, natural gas, oil, wood stove, solar) will be used to meet the completed project's energy needs? Describe whether it will be used for heating, manufacturing, etc. The exact type of hoist has yet to be identified. Certain models may require electrical service. b. Would your project affect the potential use of solar energy by I adjacent properties? If so, generally describe. No. FOR STAFF USE ONLY VI c. What kinds of energy conservation features are included in the plans of this proposal? List other proposed measures to p reduce or control energy impacts, if any: �J None proposed. 7. Environmental Health a. Are there any environmental health hazards, including exposure to toxic chemicals, risk of fire and explosion, spill, or hazardous waste, that could occur as a result of this proposal? If so, describe. No. c� Ew X 5W, 1) Describe special emergency services that might be required. nn No special emergency service would be required ✓1 beyond those currently providing service. 2) Proposed measures to reduce or control environmental :( 2 _ r\0 irea}7 p i d0( --1(, health hazards, if any: ;,;I CV0, 4r/\ tc�� None proposed. All construction equipment used will be kept in good repair. # ffe jL,J� z- c�CQA r�k L cAiz DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 12 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. b. Noise 1) What types of noise exist in the area which may affect your project (for example: traffic, equipment operation, other)? Noise typical of recreational watercraft is common in Engle Harbor. No additional effects are anticipated. 2) What types and levels of noise would be created by or associated with the project on a short -term or long -term basis (for example: traffic, construction, operation, other)? Indicate what hours noise would come from this site. Some additional noise during construction is anticipated. This will include pile driving using a vibratory hammer. Impact proofing will be required as well. Long term noise impacts are not anticipated. 3) Proposed measures to reduce or control noise impacts, if any: Construction will adhere to City noise ordinance hours. Equipment engine muffler systems will be employed as required by WA state law. Pending approval by other agencies to ground a work barge, pile driving will be performed to the extent possible in the (try to avoid noise impacts to the aquatic environment. If grounding is not permitted driving may occur in the water. Sound attenuation measures will be employed and may include bubble curtain. Specific sound attenuation measures will be identified with WDFW and USACE during their permit reviews. 8. Land and Shoreline Use a. What is the current use of the site and adjacent properties? The project site is a residential property, as are the surrounding parcels to the north and south with single family homes. There are several residences in the vicinity that have private dock facilities (see attached exhibit). The harbor is actively used for recreational and live - aboard vessels. There are several marinas in the vicinity FOR STAFF USE ONLY 0 43- SGC1V�(Q ci✓C�ntzc>,�iu� Lail DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 13 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. ' FOR STAFF USE ONLY as Well. b. Has the site been used for agriculture? If so, describe. I No. c. Describe any structures on the site. There is a single family home, a guest house and a f1 detached garage. None will be affected by this proposed u -1 project. d. Will any structures be demolished? If so, what? I No. e. What is the current zoning classification of the site? Semi -rural / Urban R4.3 I A �M( "6,cs &Y, j E What is the current comprehensive plan designation of the site? Urban. g. If applicable, what is the cluTent shoreline master program I designation of the site ?Q Aquatic, h. Has any part of the site been classified as an I P n "environmentally critical" area? If so, specify. No. i. Approximately how many people would reside or work in I the completed project? A Project does not involve housing. j. Approximately how many people would the completed I project displace? None. k. Proposed measures to avoid or reduce displacement impacts, I if any: }� Not applicable. 1. Proposed measures to ensure the proposal is compatible with DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 14 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. FOR STAFF USE ONLY existing and projected land uses and plans, if any: No change in use. This is an improvement to an existing residential property. 9. Housing a. Approximately how many units would be provided, if any? n Indicate whether high, middle, or low - income housing. J 1 No change. b. Approximately how many units, if any, would be eliminated? Indicate whether high, middle, or low- income housing? No change. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control housing impacts, if I any: There will be no housing impacts. J 10. Aesthetics a. What is the tallest height of any proposed structure(s), not including antennas; what is the principal exterior building material(s) proposed? Two structures are proposed: 1. Gatehouse: The roof peak of the gatehouse would be approximately 12 feet above existing grade. A wood .i structure is proposed though has not been designed yet. 2. Pier: The deck elevation of the pier is +17.5 feet (MLLW). The top of the tallest pile of the boat hoist is + 25.5 feet (MLLW). b. What views in the immediate obstructed? Pier and piles may be seen other nearby existing piers s structure is not anticipated to vicinity would be altered or in nearby vicinity as with ind docks. Presence of new detract from views. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control aesthetic impacts, if any: No solid vertical walls are proposed for the waterward structure. DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 15 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST BY APPLICANT. I FOR STAFF USE ONLY Light and Glare a. What type of light or glare will be the proposal produce? What time of day would it mainly occur? L� None anticipated. b. Could light or glare from the finished project be a safety I hazard or interfere with views? No. c. What existing off -site sources of light or glare may affect your proposal? I None. d. Proposed measures to reduce or control light and glare I impacts, if any: A No impacts are anticipated. 12. Recreation a. What designated and informal recreational opportunities are in the immediate vicinity? Boating, fishing, crabbing, paddling and other such water is activities are available in the area. b. Would the proposed project displace any existing recreational uses? If so, describe. No activities will be displaced; however during certain n tides vessels traveling close to shore may have to navigate 1 around the new structure. c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts on recreation, including recreation opportunities to be provided by the project or applicant, if any: The proposed boarding float will have reflective striping n to aid in improved visibility. The proposed pier and boat J hoist will allow the owner to minimize usage of the public boat launch and will allow for recreational 13. Historic and Cultural Preservation a. Are there any places or objects listed on, or proposed for, national, state, or local preservation registers known to be on DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 16 GE 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT. or next to the site? If so, generally describe. None known. b. Generally describe any landmarks or evidence of historic, archaeological, scientific, or cultural importance known to be on or next to the site. None known. FOR STAFF USE ONLY c. Proposed measures to reduce or control impacts, if any: � �� None proposed. 14. Transportation a. Identify public streets and highways serving the site, and describe the proposed access to the existing street system. Show on site plans, if any. The residence is accessed via Stetson Place SW. No access changes are proposed. This is a private road. �1 b. Is the site currently served by public transit? If not, what is I the approximate distance to the nearest transit stop? Not applicable. c. How many parking spaces would the completed project I have? How many would the project eliminate? n Not applicable. ✓1 d. Will the proposal require any new roads or streets, or improvements to existing roads or streets, not including driveways? If so, generally describe (indicate whether public or private). No. e. Will the project use (or occur in the immediate vicinity of) but 14W bo7 water, rail, or air transportation? If so, generally describe. No. The project is for recreational use only. f. How many vehicular trips per day would be generated by the completed project? If known, indicate when peak volumes would occur? No change from current levels. g. Proposed measures to reduce or control transportation DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 17 OF 22 CITY OF BAINBRIDGE ISLAND ENVIRONMENTAL (SEPA) CHECKLIST LEFT COLUMN TO BE COMPLETED BY APPLICANT, FOR STAFF USE ONLY impacts, if any. None proposed. 15. Public Services a. Would the project result in an increased need for public services (for example: fire protection, police protection, health care, schools, other)? If so, generally describe. No. b. Proposed measures to reduce or control direct impacts on I public services, if any. None proposed. 16. Utilities a. Circle utilities currently available at the site: electricity, natural gas, water, refuse service, telephone, sanitary sewer, septic system, other. Services are available to the residence, but not currently to the proposed project location. b. Describe the utilities that are proposed for the project, the utility providing the service, and the general construction activities on the site or in the immediate vicinity which might be needed. n The exact type of hoist has yet to be identified. Certain 1 models may require electrical service. C. Signature I swear under penalty of perjury that the above answers are true and complete to the best of my knowledge. I understand that the lead agency is relying on them to make its decision. Signature: Date submitted: Any comments or changes made by the department are entered in the body of the checklist and contain the initials of the review. This checklist was reviewed by: DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 18 OF 22 Planner, Department of Planning and Community Development DEPARTMENT OF PLANNING AND COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT Revised July 2010 PAGE 19 OF 22 CYTY OF BAmBjuDGE IsLAND Department Planning Community Development RE: Notice of Administrative Decision and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance APPLICANT: Marcus & Suzanne Gerlach PROJECT NUMBER: SSDP 13500B /:i17: \�/ M 1[I] �1 \C171 Y I y (NVYCI] \`I I certify that I posted the Notice on the Proposed Land Use Action webpage and emailed it to the attached listsery recipients per the requirements of Ordinance No. 2010 -47 on March 2, 2013. Theresa Rice, Administrative Secretary Planning & Community Development Theresa Rice From: Theresa Rice Sent: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:45 AM To: Alison O'Sullivan; BI Library; ChrisWaldbillig; Dale Severson; Debbie Maker; Dennis Anstine; DNR; Doug Johnson; Eileen Safford; Gina Piazza; Gretchen Kaehler; Ivan Miller; Luke Carpenter; PCD; Peg Plummer; Perry Barrett; Richard Oxley; S. Trudel; Sarah Lee; SEPAdesk; Steven Brown; Sylvia Carlton; T. Van Winkle; Tom Brobst; Vince M & C. Schmid Cc: Heather Beckmann Subject: COBI notice for your review Attachments: gerlachNOD.pdf Good morning. Attached is the Notice of Decision and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance for Gerlach SSDP13500B. Theresa Rice (206)780 -3758 (direct) Theresa Rice From: slloyd @soundpublishing.com on behalf of Sound Legals [legals @soundpublishing.com] Sent: Tuesday, March 19, 2013 10:48 AM To: Theresa Rice Subject: Re: Notices for publication on March 22nd Thank you, Both notices will publish in the BIR on 3/22 Sincerely, Sandy Lloyd and /or Dave Murray Kitsap Legals Bainbridge Review, North Kitsap Herald, Central Kitsap Reporter /Bremerton Patriot, kitsap Navy News, Port Orchard Independent, Countywide Sound Publishing, Inc. 19351 8th Ave NE, Suite 205 Poulsbo, WA 98370 Sandy phone: 360 - 394 -8714 / 866- 296 -0511 Dave phone: 360- 394 -8715 fax: 360- 598 -4611 On Mon, Mar 18, 2013 at 5:58 PM, <trice bainbridgewa.g_ov> wrote: Please publish the following notices in the March 22n edition of The Review: Florez Notice of Application SPT18484 Gerlach Notice of Decision and Mitigated Determination of Nonsignificance SSDP13500B Please let me know if you have any questions. Theresa Rice 780 -3758 SENDING EMAIL Do not close this window until the process has completed. Doing so will terminate this process prematurely. Process started on: 3/21/2013 3:34:58 PM Emails being processed: 188 ablair @bainbridgewa.gov - sent acox @co.kitsap.wa.us - sent alice @heydayfarm.com - sent amweiner @u.washington.edu - sent amychouinard @earthlink.net - sent andie @bainbridgechamber.com - sent aosullivan@suquamish.nsn.us - sent arbutusl37 @gmail.com - sent artologie @yahoo.eom - sent asha @bi- landtrust.org - sent auhlig @gglo.com - sent bainbridgeassistants @yahoo.com - sent beatlesl965 @acanac.net - sent beatlesl965 @bell.net - sent bhogg @oconnorarchitects.com - sent bill @chesterarchitecture.com - sent bknobloch @ci.bainbridge- isl.wa.us - sent blair @blair4cobicouncil.com - sent bocamartha @gmail.com - sent bpweiland @comcast.net - sent brfan @danziglawfirm.com - sent brianreddick @live.com - sent Calauxier @aol.com - sent casslisa @hotmail.com - sent eblaw @ix.netcom.com - sent Champagnetraining @yahoo.com - sent charthoman@yahoo.com - sent chosfeldt @msn.com - sent chrisr @pnwtkitsap.com - sent chrissnow @gwestoffice.net - sent christinegl @mac.com - sent connie.waddington @att.net - sent danburrusl @msn.com - sent debbielcraig@msn.com - sent debbievann @gmail.com - sent demirasmussen @gmail.com - sent dennis.vogt @gmail.com - sent dennis @ddrlaw.com - sent denms @kirkpatrickarchitects.com - sent devodivo @gmail.com - sent dlaretz @onebainbrige.org - sent DMCNABB @AUTOSCANINC.COM - sent doinaindesign @earthlink.net - sent doug @whalley.net - sent DReitan@insleebest.com - sent dthunters @msn.com - sent dwillott @mac.com - sent ebinl932@gmail.com - sent editor @bainbridgereview.com - sent editor@kpbj.com - sent ejlofgren @msn.com - sent emtw46 @gmail.com - sent ericalyh @gmail.com - sent fergu09 @hotmail.com - sent fjkochenash @msn.com - sent frogsanddsheep @gmail.com - sent frogsandsheep @gmail.com - sent geneapace @msn.com - sent georgestibitz @yahoo.com - sent gcrald @waterfrontconstruction.com - sent halsnow @comcast.net - sent hanna.sj @hotmail.com - sent hedsmithc @comcast.net - sent hhuber@hccc.wa.gov - sent hmckay @bainbridge.wednet.edu - sent idra @imsinfo.com - sent islandsvcs @aol.com - sent janie @biseniorcenter.org - sent Jason.Cabias @surlatable.com - sent jbickfor @uci.edu - sent jbransoml8@hotmail.com - sent jessiehey @aol.com - sent Jeyrock @yahoo.com - sent jhoch @bainbridgereview.com - sent jjd5432 @msn.com - sent jlipton @cairncross.com - sent jlivdahl @bifd.org - sent jmcourtl @aol.com - sent jmm5939 @psu.edu - sent joanne @wiltermood.com - sent joannewagner @earthlink.net - sent jodyhunsaker @hotmail.com - sent joe.levan@comcast.net - sent john @newhometrends.com - sent johnhunkim @gmail.com - sent joy78 @balboaisland.com - sent joylha @aol.com - sent juliabwilliams @msn.com - sent juiie.ann.mitchell @comcast.net - sent kathiefblack @aol.com - sent kathy.faust @gmail.com - sent kellybreel @hotmail.com - sent kellysamson @earthlink.net - sent ken @housingresourcesboard.org - sent kimberly.mccormick @comcast.net - sent kirkr65 @gmail.com - sent kirkrobinson @earthlink.net - sent kirstenhytopoulos @gmail.com - sent kirstenhytopoulos @yahoo.com - sent kjahraus @ci.bainbridge- isl.wa.us - sent lana @chandlerandchandler.net - sent larrysr @searsandassociates.com - sent laurelpowell @centurytel.net - sent ldemerritt@tmsc.org - sent lin @aquaglen.com - sent Ijax @comcast.net - sent lnordby @mrse.org - sent lrrens @sio.midco.net - sent luannacather @yahoo.com - sent lynda @lyndahmcmaken.com - sent macchio.lisa @epa.gov - sent makerd @wsdot.wa.gov - sent malshab @rhysome.com - sent marcia @crcwa.com - sent maryannsmithl @yahoo.com - sent mchalvorsen @hotmail.com - sent medina @thenonprofrtlawgroup.com - sent melaniekeenan @comcast.net - sent melissa @fgi.com - sent Mercury @bainbridgehomes.com - sent mguliani.crp @gmail.com - sent mikerbb @juno.com - sent mikesuraci @aol.com - sent milesyanick@milesyanick.com - sent mjel123 @hotmail.eom - sent mparkennedlaw @comcast.net - sent MPhommahaxay @insleebest.com - sent mrlavig @yahoo.com - sent myma328 @yahoo.com - sent nai156 @ix.netcom.com - sent nikki.lounsbury @gmail.com - sent norm.bruns @gmail.com - sent oceanusgirl2 @yahoo.com - sent pamela _thorfinson @mcgraw- hill.com - sent pampartin @msn.com - sent paul @pbianchi.com - sent paulgcarr @cox.net - sent paulinejones28 @yahoo.com - sent pcd @bainbridgewa.gov - sent perspectives @bainbridge.net - sent podonnel @fhere.org - sent ptyrrell @bainbridge.wednet.edu - sent Q- ;Lease @msn.com - sent rdaniels213450 @earthlink.net - sent renee @searsandassociates.com - sent rexsub @gmail.com - sent rgdimages @aol.com - sent rice.laurie @gmail.com - sent r6dney0311@yahoo.com - sent roxley @bainbridgereview.com - sent rpritchett @kitsapsun.com - sent mmningdogfann @hotmail.com - sent russ @studiohamlet.com - sent ryan @nexusplanning.com - sent saint.livesey @gmail.com - sent sally.adams @att.net - sent sandiegoyoli@hotmail.com - sent sandra.johnson2 @bp.com - sent sarahleebainbridge @gmail.com - sent scoff @bitv.org - sent selina @bitv.org - sent sguthrie @ix.netcom.com - sent shephardshep @msn.com - sent Sieglinda20IO @gmail.com - sent sjnordgren @gmail.com - sent snmitchell1 @hotmail.com - sent southbainbridgewater @hotmail.com - sent sparta_one@msn.com - sent spellcon @blarg.com - sent Broach @bainbridgereview.com - sent sue @phc- construction.com - sent terry.myers.mhcc @comcast.net - sent thos.mitche118185 @live.com - sent tina @avatar- inc.com - sent tm_henderson @yahoo.com - sent tmf53 @comcast.net - sent tomb @liontradingcompany.com - sent tvanwinkle @bainbridge.wednet.edu -sent tzutzutree @gmail.com - sent vanessa @sherwoodridge.com - sent virginiabrewer @gmail.com - sent wayneblair @cedarhall.us - sent whisperingwillows @msn.com - sent william.a.eastman @boeing.com - sent wtnai39@aol.com - sent wmcairns @msn.com - sent wshopes @gmail.com - sent xtof @xto£org - sent Process completed on: 3/21/2013 3:35:14 PM Emails Sent Successfully: 188 Failed Emails: 0 SENDING COMPLETE - It is now ok to close this window.